Clarkson Lumber Co Case Study Help Checklist

Clarkson Lumber Co Case Study Help Checklist

Clarkson Lumber Co Case Study Solution
Clarkson Lumber Co Case Study Help
Clarkson Lumber Co Case Study Analysis

3 C Analyses for Evaluating Clarkson Lumber Co decision to launch Case Study Solution

The following section concentrates on the 3Cs of marketing for Clarkson Lumber Co where the company's clients, rivals and core proficiencies have actually evaluated in order to validate whether the choice to release Case Study Help under Clarkson Lumber Co brand would be a practical option or not. We have firstly looked at the kind of clients that Clarkson Lumber Co deals in while an assessment of the competitive environment and the business's strengths and weaknesses follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the validation for not introducing Case Study Help under Clarkson Lumber Co name.
Clarkson Lumber Co Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Clarkson Lumber Co clients can be segmented into 2 groups, industrial consumers and final customers. Both the groups utilize Clarkson Lumber Co high performance adhesives while the business is not only involved in the production of these adhesives but also markets them to these customer groups. There are two kinds of items that are being sold to these possible markets; instantaneous adhesives and anaerobic adhesives. We would be focusing on the customers of instantaneous adhesives for this analysis since the marketplace for the latter has a lower potential for Clarkson Lumber Co compared to that of instant adhesives.

The total market for immediate adhesives is around 890,000 in the US in 1978 which covers both customer groups which have actually been identified earlier.If we take a look at a breakdown of Clarkson Lumber Co prospective market or customer groups, we can see that the company offers to OEMs (Original Devices Manufacturers), Do-it-Yourself consumers, repair and overhauling business (MRO) and makers dealing in products made of leather, plastic, wood and metal. This diversity in customers recommends that Clarkson Lumber Co can target has different choices in regards to segmenting the market for its brand-new item especially as each of these groups would be requiring the very same type of product with particular modifications in demand, amount or packaging. The client is not cost delicate or brand conscious so releasing a low priced dispenser under Clarkson Lumber Co name is not a recommended choice.

Company Analysis

Clarkson Lumber Co is not just a producer of adhesives however takes pleasure in market management in the instant adhesive industry. The business has its own experienced and certified sales force which adds worth to sales by training the company's network of 250 suppliers for helping with the sale of adhesives. Clarkson Lumber Co believes in special circulation as shown by the fact that it has selected to offer through 250 suppliers whereas there is t a network of 10000 suppliers that can be explored for broadening reach by means of suppliers. The company's reach is not limited to The United States and Canada only as it likewise delights in global sales. With 1400 outlets spread all across The United States and Canada, Clarkson Lumber Co has its internal production plants instead of utilizing out-sourcing as the favored strategy.

Core competences are not limited to adhesive production just as Clarkson Lumber Co likewise concentrates on making adhesive dispensing equipment to help with making use of its items. This dual production method provides Clarkson Lumber Co an edge over competitors because none of the rivals of giving devices makes instant adhesives. In addition, none of these rivals offers directly to the consumer either and uses distributors for reaching out to clients. While we are looking at the strengths of Clarkson Lumber Co, it is important to highlight the business's weaknesses also.

Although the business's sales staff is knowledgeable in training distributors, the reality stays that the sales group is not trained in offering equipment so there is a possibility of relying heavily on suppliers when promoting adhesive equipment. It must likewise be noted that the distributors are showing unwillingness when it comes to selling equipment that requires servicing which increases the obstacles of offering equipment under a specific brand name.

The business has actually products intended at the high end of the market if we look at Clarkson Lumber Co item line in adhesive devices especially. The possibility of sales cannibalization exists if Clarkson Lumber Co sells Case Study Help under the same portfolio. Provided the reality that Case Study Help is priced lower than Clarkson Lumber Co high-end line of product, sales cannibalization would definitely be impacting Clarkson Lumber Co sales earnings if the adhesive devices is offered under the company's trademark name.

We can see sales cannibalization impacting Clarkson Lumber Co 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. If Case Study Help is released under the company's brand name, there is another possible threat which might lower Clarkson Lumber Co revenue. The reality that $175000 has actually been invested in promoting SuperBonder suggests that it is not a good time for releasing a dispenser which can highlight the truth that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the instantaneous adhesive.

In addition, if we take a look at the marketplace in general, the adhesives market does not show brand orientation or rate awareness which offers us 2 additional reasons for not releasing a low priced item under the company's brand.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Clarkson Lumber Co would be studied via Porter's five forces analysis which would highlight the degree of rivalry in the market.

Degree of Rivalry:

Currently we can see that the adhesive market has a high development capacity due to the presence of fragmented sectors with Clarkson Lumber Co enjoying leadership and a combined market share of 75% with 2 other market players, Eastman and Permabond. While industry rivalry between these gamers could be called 'intense' as the consumer is not brand name conscious and each of these players has prominence in terms of market share, the reality still stays that the market is not saturated and still has several market sectors which can be targeted as potential specific niche markets even when launching an adhesive. However, we can even mention the truth that sales cannibalization may be leading to industry competition in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for immediate adhesives provides growth potential.

Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the purchaser in this market is low particularly as the buyer has low understanding about the product. While business like Clarkson Lumber Co have handled to train distributors regarding adhesives, the last customer depends on suppliers. Approximately 72% of sales are made directly by manufacturers and distributors for instantaneous adhesives so the buyer has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Given the fact that the adhesive market is dominated by three gamers, it could be said that the provider delights in a higher bargaining power compared to the purchaser. The truth remains that the provider does not have much impact over the buyer at this point especially as the buyer does not reveal brand acknowledgment or price level of sensitivity. When it comes to the adhesive market while the producer and the buyer do not have a major control over the real sales, this shows that the supplier has the higher power.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand name loyalty and the ease of entry revealed by foreign Japanese rivals in the immediate adhesive market shows that the market enables ease of entry. If we look at Clarkson Lumber Co in specific, the company has double abilities in terms of being a manufacturer of adhesive dispensers and immediate adhesives. Potential dangers in equipment giving industry are low which shows the possibility of producing brand name awareness in not just immediate adhesives however also in giving adhesives as none of the market players has managed to position itself in dual abilities.

Hazard of Substitutes: The hazard of replacements in the instantaneous adhesive industry is low while the dispenser market in particular has replacements like Glumetic suggestion applicators, built-in applicators, pencil applicators and sophisticated consoles. The reality remains that if Clarkson Lumber Co introduced Case Study Help, it would be enjoying sales cannibalization for its own items. (see appendix 1 for framework).

4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Clarkson Lumber Co Case Study Help

Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has offered different reasons for not launching Case Study Help under Clarkson Lumber Co name, we have a recommended marketing mix for Case Study Help provided below if Clarkson Lumber Co chooses to go on with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target market selected for Case Study Help is 'Automobile services' for a number of reasons. There are currently 89257 facilities in this sector and a high usage of roughly 58900 pounds. is being utilized by 36.1 % of the marketplace. This market has an extra development capacity of 10.1% which may be a sufficient niche market segment for Case Study Help. Not only would a portable dispenser offer convenience to this specific market, the truth that the Diy market can likewise be targeted if a potable low priced adhesive is being cost use with SuperBonder. The product would be offered without the 'glumetic pointer' and 'vari-drop' so that the customer can decide whether he wishes to opt for either of the two devices or not.

Price: The recommended rate of Case Study Help has been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is offered through suppliers or by means of direct selling. A cost below $250 would not need approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor car upkeep store requires to buy the item on his own.

Clarkson Lumber Co would only be getting $157 per unit as shown in appendix 2 which provides a breakdown of gross success and net success for Clarkson Lumber Co for introducing Case Study Help.

Place: A circulation model where Clarkson Lumber Co straight sends the product to the regional supplier and keeps a 10% drop delivery allowance for the distributor would be used by Clarkson Lumber Co. Since the sales group is currently engaged in selling instantaneous adhesives and they do not have expertise in selling dispensers, involving them in the selling process would be pricey especially as each sales call costs around $120. The distributors are already selling dispensers so selling Case Study Help through them would be a favorable alternative.

Promotion: Although a low promotional budget plan should have been appointed to Case Study Help however the reality that the dispenser is a development and it needs to be marketed well in order to cover the capital costs incurred for production, the suggested advertising plan costing $51816 is recommended for at first presenting the item in the market. The planned ads in magazines would be targeted at mechanics in automobile maintenance shops. (Recommended text for the ad is shown in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summarized in appendix 4).

Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Clarkson Lumber Co Case Study Analysis

A suggested plan of action in the form of a marketing mix has actually been discussed for Case Study Help, the truth still stays that the product would not match Clarkson Lumber Co item line. We take a look at appendix 2, we can see how the total gross success for the two designs is anticipated to be roughly $49377 if 250 units of each design are manufactured each year as per the plan. The initial planned marketing is approximately $52000 per year which would be putting a strain on the company's resources leaving Clarkson Lumber Co with a negative net income if the expenditures are assigned to Case Study Help only.

The reality that Clarkson Lumber Co has already incurred a preliminary investment of $48000 in the form of capital cost and model development indicates that the profits from Case Study Help is inadequate to undertake the threat of sales cannibalization. Other than that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market showing low elasticity of need is not a more suitable alternative specifically of it is impacting the sale of the business's earnings generating designs.

Executive Summary Porters Five Forces Analysis Pestel Analysis Financial Analysis
Generic Strategy Vrine Analysis