Lulucom Case Study Help Checklist

Lulucom Case Study Help Checklist

Lulucom Case Study Solution
Lulucom Case Study Help
Lulucom Case Study Analysis

3 C Analyses for Evaluating Lulucom decision to launch Case Study Solution

The following section concentrates on the 3Cs of marketing for Lulucom where the company's customers, rivals and core competencies have evaluated in order to validate whether the choice to release Case Study Help under Lulucom brand would be a feasible option or not. We have first of all looked at the kind of customers that Lulucom deals in while an assessment of the competitive environment and the business's weaknesses and strengths follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the validation for not releasing Case Study Help under Lulucom name.
Lulucom Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Lulucom clients can be segmented into two groups, last consumers and commercial customers. Both the groups use Lulucom high performance adhesives while the company is not only involved in the production of these adhesives but also markets them to these customer groups. There are 2 kinds of products that are being offered to these potential markets; anaerobic adhesives and immediate adhesives. We would be concentrating on the customers of instant adhesives for this analysis because the marketplace for the latter has a lower capacity for Lulucom compared to that of immediate adhesives.

The overall market for immediate adhesives is around 890,000 in the US in 1978 which covers both consumer groups which have actually been recognized earlier.If we look at a breakdown of Lulucom potential market or consumer groups, we can see that the company offers to OEMs (Initial Equipment Makers), Do-it-Yourself clients, repair work and overhauling business (MRO) and producers dealing in items made from leather, plastic, wood and metal. This variety in clients suggests that Lulucom can target has different options in regards to segmenting the market for its new item specifically as each of these groups would be needing the very same type of item with respective changes in demand, packaging or quantity. Nevertheless, the client is not price sensitive or brand name conscious so introducing a low priced dispenser under Lulucom name is not an advised alternative.

Company Analysis

Lulucom is not simply a manufacturer of adhesives however takes pleasure in market leadership in the immediate adhesive market. The company has its own proficient and certified sales force which includes worth to sales by training the company's network of 250 suppliers for helping with the sale of adhesives.

Core proficiencies are not limited to adhesive production just as Lulucom also specializes in making adhesive giving devices to assist in using its products. This double production method provides Lulucom an edge over rivals considering that none of the competitors of giving devices makes instant adhesives. Additionally, none of these rivals offers straight to the consumer either and makes use of distributors for connecting to customers. While we are looking at the strengths of Lulucom, it is essential to highlight the company's weaknesses.

Although the business's sales staff is experienced in training suppliers, the fact stays that the sales team is not trained in offering devices so there is a possibility of relying heavily on suppliers when promoting adhesive devices. However, it should also be kept in mind that the suppliers are showing unwillingness when it pertains to selling equipment that requires maintenance which increases the difficulties of offering equipment under a particular brand name.

If we take a look at Lulucom line of product in adhesive equipment particularly, the business has products aimed at the high end of the marketplace. The possibility of sales cannibalization exists if Lulucom sells Case Study Help under the same portfolio. Provided the reality that Case Study Help is priced lower than Lulucom high-end line of product, sales cannibalization would definitely be impacting Lulucom sales earnings if the adhesive equipment is offered under the business's trademark name.

We can see sales cannibalization affecting Lulucom 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. If Case Study Help is introduced under the company's brand name, there is another possible danger which could reduce Lulucom earnings. The reality that $175000 has been spent in promoting SuperBonder recommends that it is not a good time for launching a dispenser which can highlight the truth that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the immediate adhesive.

Furthermore, if we look at the market in general, the adhesives market does disappoint brand name orientation or price awareness which provides us 2 additional reasons for not introducing a low priced product under the company's brand name.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Lulucom would be studied via Porter's 5 forces analysis which would highlight the degree of rivalry in the market.

Degree of Rivalry:

Currently we can see that the adhesive market has a high development capacity due to the existence of fragmented segments with Lulucom taking pleasure in management and a combined market share of 75% with two other industry gamers, Eastman and Permabond. While market competition between these players could be called 'extreme' as the customer is not brand name conscious and each of these gamers has prominence in terms of market share, the reality still remains that the market is not saturated and still has a number of market segments which can be targeted as potential specific niche markets even when introducing an adhesive. However, we can even explain the reality that sales cannibalization may be leading to market competition in the adhesive dispenser market while the marketplace for instantaneous adhesives offers growth capacity.

Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the buyer in this market is low particularly as the purchaser has low knowledge about the item. While business like Lulucom have handled to train distributors relating to adhesives, the last customer is dependent on distributors. Approximately 72% of sales are made directly by producers and suppliers for instant adhesives so the purchaser has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Offered the reality that the adhesive market is dominated by 3 players, it could be said that the supplier takes pleasure in a greater bargaining power compared to the buyer. However, the truth stays that the provider does not have much influence over the purchaser at this point specifically as the buyer does disappoint brand name recognition or rate level of sensitivity. When it comes to the adhesive market while the maker and the purchaser do not have a significant control over the real sales, this indicates that the distributor has the greater power.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand name commitment and the ease of entry shown by foreign Japanese rivals in the instant adhesive market suggests that the marketplace permits ease of entry. Nevertheless, if we take a look at Lulucom in particular, the company has double capabilities in regards to being a producer of adhesive dispensers and immediate adhesives. Potential threats in devices giving market are low which reveals the possibility of creating brand name awareness in not only instantaneous adhesives but also in giving adhesives as none of the industry players has actually handled to position itself in dual capabilities.

Danger of Substitutes: The threat of substitutes in the immediate adhesive market is low while the dispenser market in particular has replacements like Glumetic idea applicators, in-built applicators, pencil applicators and advanced consoles. The truth remains that if Lulucom introduced Case Study Help, it would be delighting in sales cannibalization for its own products. (see appendix 1 for structure).

4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Lulucom Case Study Help

Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has offered numerous factors for not releasing Case Study Help under Lulucom name, we have actually a suggested marketing mix for Case Study Help offered below if Lulucom chooses to go on with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target market picked for Case Study Help is 'Motor lorry services' for a number of factors. This market has an additional growth capacity of 10.1% which may be a great adequate niche market segment for Case Study Help. Not just would a portable dispenser offer convenience to this particular market, the truth that the Do-it-Yourself market can likewise be targeted if a safe and clean low priced adhesive is being sold for usage with SuperBonder.

Price: The suggested cost of Case Study Help has actually been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is sold through distributors or through direct selling. A price listed below $250 would not require approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor vehicle upkeep shop needs to acquire the item on his own.

Lulucom would only be getting $157 per unit as shown in appendix 2 which offers a breakdown of gross success and net success for Lulucom for introducing Case Study Help.

Place: A distribution design where Lulucom straight sends out the item to the regional supplier and keeps a 10% drop shipment allowance for the supplier would be used by Lulucom. Because the sales group is currently taken part in selling immediate adhesives and they do not have proficiency in offering dispensers, including them in the selling procedure would be costly especially as each sales call expenses around $120. The distributors are currently selling dispensers so selling Case Study Help through them would be a beneficial option.

Promotion: A low advertising budget plan ought to have been designated to Case Study Help but the reality that the dispenser is an innovation and it needs to be marketed well in order to cover the capital costs incurred for production, the suggested marketing plan costing $51816 is advised for at first presenting the item in the market. The prepared ads in magazines would be targeted at mechanics in automobile upkeep stores. (Recommended text for the ad is displayed in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summed up in appendix 4).

Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Lulucom Case Study Analysis

Although a recommended strategy in the form of a marketing mix has been talked about for Case Study Help, the reality still remains that the item would not match Lulucom product line. We take a look at appendix 2, we can see how the overall gross success for the two designs is anticipated to be approximately $49377 if 250 systems of each model are made annually according to the strategy. Nevertheless, the preliminary prepared marketing is approximately $52000 each year which would be putting a stress on the company's resources leaving Lulucom with a negative net income if the expenditures are assigned to Case Study Help just.

The reality that Lulucom has already incurred a preliminary investment of $48000 in the form of capital cost and prototype development shows that the profits from Case Study Help is not enough to carry out the danger of sales cannibalization. Other than that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market revealing low flexibility of demand is not a more suitable choice specifically of it is impacting the sale of the business's revenue producing designs.

Executive Summary Porters Five Forces Analysis Pestel Analysis Financial Analysis
Generic Strategy Vrine Analysis