WhatsApp

Yale University Investments Office June 2003 Generic Strategy Case Study Help


Yale University Investments Office June 2003 Generic Strategy Generic Strategy Case Study HelpIn this section we would be evaluating the generic techniques that have been utilized by Yale University Investments Office June 2003 Generic Strategy to highlight locations which can be targeted for highlighting an one-upmanship that can result in a sustainable development strategy for Yale University Investments Office June 2003 Generic Strategy.

Focus Strategy: Niche Marketing

We have actually gone over three possible options for Yale University Investments Office June 2003 Generic Strategy which can be pursued in terms of specific niche marketing. Before we look at these alternatives, a discussion regarding why Yale University Investments Office June 2003 Generic Strategy requires an alternative income development design is shared below.

We have actually already discussed how Yale University Investments Office June 2003 Generic Strategy has three revenue sources including its theatre operations, film circulation and system leasing. As we take a look at the earnings declarations for 2004 to 2007, we can observe disparity in regards to success and development in earnings. A fall in net income particularly in 2006 and 2007 recommends that the business requires to concentrate on locations of development which can promise consistency in income development and success.

As we check out each of the profits sources for Yale University Investments Office June 2003 Generic Strategy, we can see how the system-leasing company of Yale University Investments Office June 2003 Generic Strategy has dependence on the growth of theatres and even then there is a limitation in terms of the number of theatres that can be opened.

As far as the theatre operations are worried, earnings from this source depend on the number of theatres that Yale University Investments Office June 2003 Generic Strategy runs. Along with that, expanding the number of theatres might lead to high capital expenses for Yale University Investments Office June 2003 Generic Strategy where the possibility of further overheads in the form of interest payments on loans for capital expense may lead to lower net profitability.

Franchises or Alliances:

If we look at Yale University Investments Office June 2003 Generic Strategy balance sheet, we can see how the business has a long term financial obligation of $ 160,000,000. We have currently gone over the financial obligation to assets, liquidity and success of the business in the ratio analysis done earlier to examine the internal financial position of Yale University Investments Office June 2003 Generic Strategy which would offer further clarity concerning the fact that increasing the long term liability is not a possible option for growth. This brings us to the conclusion that Yale University Investments Office June 2003 Generic Strategy is presently in a position where it requires to minimize its reliability on revenue from theatre operations and needs to broaden through alternative choices which require lower capital investment and promise greater net profitability. One possible choice that can be assessed further is to give franchises of Yale University Investments Office June 2003 Generic Strategy or to have alliances with other business which can promote growth with very little capital investment. The possibility of losing a total hold over the quality of services being offered may avoid further orientation in this instructions.

Documentaries:

If we check out Yale University Investments Office June 2003 Generic Strategy position in its movie distribution company, we can see how there is a higher orientation towards producing documentary films. Focusing on documentaries in terms of expanding the film distribution organisation implies limiting the number of releases to a couple of documentaries that might not be drawing in more than the present audience.