WhatsApp

Acme Investment Trust Case Study Help Checklist

Acme Investment Trust Case Study Help Checklist

Acme Investment Trust Case Study Solution
Acme Investment Trust Case Study Help
Acme Investment Trust Case Study Analysis



Analyses for Evaluating Acme Investment Trust decision to launch Case Study Solution


The following area concentrates on the of marketing for Acme Investment Trust where the company's customers, rivals and core proficiencies have actually assessed in order to justify whether the decision to release Case Study Help under Acme Investment Trust brand would be a practical option or not. We have actually firstly taken a look at the kind of customers that Acme Investment Trust deals in while an examination of the competitive environment and the company's weak points and strengths follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the reason for not introducing Case Study Help under Acme Investment Trust name.
Acme Investment Trust Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Acme Investment Trust customers can be segmented into two groups, industrial clients and last consumers. Both the groups use Acme Investment Trust high performance adhesives while the business is not just associated with the production of these adhesives however also markets them to these client groups. There are two types of products that are being offered to these possible markets; anaerobic adhesives and instant adhesives. We would be concentrating on the customers of instantaneous adhesives for this analysis because the marketplace for the latter has a lower capacity for Acme Investment Trust compared to that of instantaneous adhesives.

The total market for instantaneous adhesives is approximately 890,000 in the United States in 1978 which covers both customer groups which have actually been recognized earlier.If we take a look at a breakdown of Acme Investment Trust prospective market or consumer groups, we can see that the business sells to OEMs (Original Devices Manufacturers), Do-it-Yourself clients, repair work and revamping companies (MRO) and producers dealing in items made of leather, metal, wood and plastic. This variety in customers suggests that Acme Investment Trust can target has various alternatives in regards to segmenting the marketplace for its brand-new item specifically as each of these groups would be needing the very same type of item with respective changes in quantity, product packaging or need. However, the customer is not rate sensitive or brand conscious so releasing a low priced dispenser under Acme Investment Trust name is not a recommended choice.

Company Analysis

Acme Investment Trust is not just a producer of adhesives but enjoys market leadership in the instant adhesive industry. The business has its own proficient and certified sales force which adds value to sales by training the company's network of 250 distributors for facilitating the sale of adhesives.

Core skills are not limited to adhesive production only as Acme Investment Trust likewise concentrates on making adhesive dispensing equipment to facilitate using its items. This double production technique gives Acme Investment Trust an edge over rivals considering that none of the rivals of dispensing equipment makes instantaneous adhesives. In addition, none of these competitors offers straight to the customer either and makes use of suppliers for reaching out to consumers. While we are looking at the strengths of Acme Investment Trust, it is necessary to highlight the business's weak points also.

The company's sales personnel is skilled in training suppliers, the reality stays that the sales group is not trained in selling equipment so there is a possibility of relying heavily on distributors when promoting adhesive devices. Nevertheless, it ought to likewise be kept in mind that the distributors are revealing unwillingness when it comes to selling devices that needs servicing which increases the obstacles of selling equipment under a particular brand.

The company has actually items intended at the high end of the market if we look at Acme Investment Trust product line in adhesive devices especially. The possibility of sales cannibalization exists if Acme Investment Trust sells Case Study Help under the very same portfolio. Offered the reality that Case Study Help is priced lower than Acme Investment Trust high-end line of product, sales cannibalization would definitely be impacting Acme Investment Trust sales income if the adhesive devices is sold under the company's trademark name.

We can see sales cannibalization affecting Acme Investment Trust 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. There is another possible danger which might reduce Acme Investment Trust profits if Case Study Help is introduced under the company's brand. The reality that $175000 has actually been spent in promoting SuperBonder suggests that it is not a good time for releasing a dispenser which can highlight the fact that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the instantaneous adhesive.

Furthermore, if we look at the market in general, the adhesives market does not show brand name orientation or rate consciousness which gives us 2 extra reasons for not launching a low priced product under the company's trademark name.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Acme Investment Trust would be studied via Porter's five forces analysis which would highlight the degree of competition in the market.


Degree of Rivalry:

Presently we can see that the adhesive market has a high development capacity due to the presence of fragmented sectors with Acme Investment Trust enjoying management and a combined market share of 75% with two other industry gamers, Eastman and Permabond. While industry competition between these gamers could be called 'extreme' as the customer is not brand conscious and each of these players has prominence in terms of market share, the truth still remains that the industry is not saturated and still has several market sections which can be targeted as potential specific niche markets even when releasing an adhesive. However, we can even mention the fact that sales cannibalization might be causing industry competition in the adhesive dispenser market while the marketplace for instant adhesives uses development potential.


Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the buyer in this industry is low specifically as the buyer has low understanding about the item. While companies like Acme Investment Trust have actually handled to train suppliers regarding adhesives, the final customer depends on suppliers. Approximately 72% of sales are made straight by manufacturers and suppliers for instantaneous adhesives so the buyer has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Given the reality that the adhesive market is controlled by three gamers, it could be said that the provider enjoys a greater bargaining power compared to the purchaser. Nevertheless, the reality stays that the provider does not have much impact over the purchaser at this point particularly as the buyer does not show brand recognition or price level of sensitivity. When it comes to the adhesive market while the producer and the purchaser do not have a major control over the real sales, this shows that the supplier has the greater power.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand name commitment and the ease of entry shown by foreign Japanese rivals in the immediate adhesive market indicates that the marketplace allows ease of entry. However, if we look at Acme Investment Trust in particular, the company has double capabilities in regards to being a producer of adhesive dispensers and instantaneous adhesives. Potential dangers in devices giving industry are low which reveals the possibility of creating brand awareness in not just immediate adhesives but likewise in dispensing adhesives as none of the industry players has actually managed to position itself in double capabilities.

Danger of Substitutes: The risk of alternatives in the instant adhesive industry is low while the dispenser market in particular has alternatives like Glumetic suggestion applicators, in-built applicators, pencil applicators and sophisticated consoles. The reality remains that if Acme Investment Trust introduced Case Study Help, it would be delighting in sales cannibalization for its own items. (see appendix 1 for framework).


4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Acme Investment Trust Case Study Help


Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has provided different reasons for not introducing Case Study Help under Acme Investment Trust name, we have actually a suggested marketing mix for Case Study Help offered below if Acme Investment Trust chooses to proceed with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target market chosen for Case Study Help is 'Motor automobile services' for a number of factors. This market has an additional growth potential of 10.1% which may be an excellent sufficient specific niche market sector for Case Study Help. Not only would a portable dispenser deal benefit to this specific market, the reality that the Do-it-Yourself market can also be targeted if a safe and clean low priced adhesive is being offered for use with SuperBonder.

Price: The suggested rate of Case Study Help has been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is offered through suppliers or by means of direct selling. This price would not consist of the expense of the 'vari tip' or the 'glumetic suggestion'. A cost below $250 would not require approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor vehicle maintenance store requires to purchase the item on his own. This would increase the possibility of influencing mechanics to purchase the product for usage in their everyday upkeep tasks.

Acme Investment Trust would just be getting $157 per unit as shown in appendix 2 which gives a breakdown of gross profitability and net profitability for Acme Investment Trust for launching Case Study Help.

Place: A circulation design where Acme Investment Trust straight sends the product to the local supplier and keeps a 10% drop shipment allowance for the supplier would be used by Acme Investment Trust. Because the sales group is already participated in selling instantaneous adhesives and they do not have competence in selling dispensers, including them in the selling process would be pricey especially as each sales call expenses approximately $120. The distributors are currently offering dispensers so selling Case Study Help through them would be a beneficial alternative.

Promotion: A low marketing budget should have been appointed to Case Study Help but the truth that the dispenser is an innovation and it needs to be marketed well in order to cover the capital costs incurred for production, the recommended advertising strategy costing $51816 is suggested for at first presenting the product in the market. The prepared advertisements in magazines would be targeted at mechanics in car upkeep shops. (Recommended text for the ad is shown in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summed up in appendix 4).


Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Acme Investment Trust Case Study Analysis

A recommended strategy of action in the form of a marketing mix has actually been talked about for Case Study Help, the truth still stays that the product would not match Acme Investment Trust item line. We take a look at appendix 2, we can see how the overall gross success for the two models is expected to be around $49377 if 250 units of each model are produced each year according to the plan. The initial prepared marketing is approximately $52000 per year which would be putting a strain on the business's resources leaving Acme Investment Trust with a negative net income if the expenses are designated to Case Study Help just.

The fact that Acme Investment Trust has actually already incurred an initial investment of $48000 in the form of capital cost and model development indicates that the earnings from Case Study Help is insufficient to carry out the danger of sales cannibalization. Besides that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market showing low elasticity of need is not a more suitable option specifically of it is affecting the sale of the company's income producing designs.


 

PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE