Affinity Plus A Case Study Help Checklist

Affinity Plus A Case Study Help Checklist

Affinity Plus A Case Study Solution
Affinity Plus A Case Study Help
Affinity Plus A Case Study Analysis

Analyses for Evaluating Affinity Plus A decision to launch Case Study Solution

The following section concentrates on the of marketing for Affinity Plus A where the business's customers, competitors and core competencies have evaluated in order to justify whether the decision to introduce Case Study Help under Affinity Plus A brand would be a possible option or not. We have actually to start with looked at the kind of clients that Affinity Plus A handle while an evaluation of the competitive environment and the business's strengths and weaknesses follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the reason for not releasing Case Study Help under Affinity Plus A name.
Affinity Plus A Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Affinity Plus A clients can be segmented into 2 groups, industrial clients and final customers. Both the groups utilize Affinity Plus A high performance adhesives while the business is not just involved in the production of these adhesives however also markets them to these consumer groups. There are two kinds of products that are being sold to these potential markets; anaerobic adhesives and instant adhesives. We would be concentrating on the customers of instantaneous adhesives for this analysis given that the market for the latter has a lower capacity for Affinity Plus A compared to that of instantaneous adhesives.

The total market for instantaneous adhesives is around 890,000 in the United States in 1978 which covers both customer groups which have actually been recognized earlier.If we take a look at a breakdown of Affinity Plus A prospective market or consumer groups, we can see that the business offers to OEMs (Initial Devices Makers), Do-it-Yourself consumers, repair and upgrading business (MRO) and manufacturers handling items made of leather, plastic, metal and wood. This variety in clients recommends that Affinity Plus A can target has various choices in regards to segmenting the marketplace for its new product especially as each of these groups would be needing the exact same type of product with respective changes in amount, product packaging or demand. However, the client is not price sensitive or brand name mindful so releasing a low priced dispenser under Affinity Plus A name is not an advised alternative.

Company Analysis

Affinity Plus A is not just a manufacturer of adhesives however takes pleasure in market management in the instant adhesive market. The company has its own proficient and qualified sales force which includes worth to sales by training the business's network of 250 distributors for assisting in the sale of adhesives. Affinity Plus A believes in special circulation as suggested by the reality that it has actually selected to sell through 250 distributors whereas there is t a network of 10000 suppliers that can be checked out for broadening reach via suppliers. The company's reach is not restricted to The United States and Canada only as it likewise enjoys global sales. With 1400 outlets spread all across North America, Affinity Plus A has its internal production plants instead of utilizing out-sourcing as the preferred method.

Core skills are not limited to adhesive manufacturing only as Affinity Plus A also specializes in making adhesive giving equipment to facilitate using its products. This dual production method gives Affinity Plus A an edge over rivals considering that none of the rivals of giving equipment makes instantaneous adhesives. Additionally, none of these rivals offers directly to the consumer either and uses suppliers for connecting to consumers. While we are taking a look at the strengths of Affinity Plus A, it is necessary to highlight the company's weak points too.

Although the business's sales staff is competent in training distributors, the fact stays that the sales team is not trained in offering equipment so there is a possibility of relying heavily on suppliers when promoting adhesive devices. It should also be kept in mind that the distributors are showing unwillingness when it comes to selling devices that needs servicing which increases the challenges of selling equipment under a particular brand name.

If we take a look at Affinity Plus A product line in adhesive devices particularly, the business has products targeted at the high end of the marketplace. The possibility of sales cannibalization exists if Affinity Plus A sells Case Study Help under the very same portfolio. Given the fact that Case Study Help is priced lower than Affinity Plus A high-end line of product, sales cannibalization would definitely be impacting Affinity Plus A sales revenue if the adhesive devices is offered under the company's brand.

We can see sales cannibalization affecting Affinity Plus A 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. If Case Study Help is introduced under the company's brand name, there is another possible danger which could lower Affinity Plus A profits. The truth that $175000 has actually been invested in promoting SuperBonder recommends that it is not a great time for launching a dispenser which can highlight the reality that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the instantaneous adhesive.

In addition, if we look at the market in general, the adhesives market does not show brand orientation or rate awareness which offers us 2 extra reasons for not introducing a low priced product under the company's brand.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Affinity Plus A would be studied via Porter's five forces analysis which would highlight the degree of rivalry in the market.

Degree of Rivalry:

Presently we can see that the adhesive market has a high growth potential due to the presence of fragmented sections with Affinity Plus A enjoying leadership and a combined market share of 75% with 2 other market players, Eastman and Permabond. While industry rivalry between these players could be called 'extreme' as the consumer is not brand name conscious and each of these gamers has prominence in terms of market share, the reality still remains that the industry is not saturated and still has several market sections which can be targeted as potential specific niche markets even when introducing an adhesive. We can even point out the fact that sales cannibalization might be leading to market competition in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for immediate adhesives provides development potential.

Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the purchaser in this market is low especially as the buyer has low understanding about the product. While companies like Affinity Plus A have managed to train suppliers relating to adhesives, the last customer is dependent on distributors. Around 72% of sales are made straight by producers and distributors for instantaneous adhesives so the purchaser has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Given the truth that the adhesive market is dominated by three players, it could be stated that the provider delights in a greater bargaining power compared to the buyer. The fact stays that the provider does not have much impact over the buyer at this point particularly as the purchaser does not show brand name acknowledgment or price level of sensitivity. When it comes to the adhesive market while the buyer and the producer do not have a significant control over the real sales, this suggests that the supplier has the greater power.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand loyalty and the ease of entry revealed by foreign Japanese competitors in the instant adhesive market suggests that the marketplace enables ease of entry. However, if we take a look at Affinity Plus A in particular, the company has dual capabilities in terms of being a producer of adhesive dispensers and instantaneous adhesives. Possible dangers in devices giving market are low which reveals the possibility of developing brand awareness in not just immediate adhesives but likewise in giving adhesives as none of the market gamers has actually managed to place itself in double abilities.

Danger of Substitutes: The hazard of replacements in the immediate adhesive market is low while the dispenser market in particular has replacements like Glumetic tip applicators, built-in applicators, pencil applicators and advanced consoles. The truth remains that if Affinity Plus A introduced Case Study Help, it would be indulging in sales cannibalization for its own items. (see appendix 1 for structure).

4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Affinity Plus A Case Study Help

Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has given numerous factors for not releasing Case Study Help under Affinity Plus A name, we have actually a suggested marketing mix for Case Study Help provided listed below if Affinity Plus A chooses to proceed with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target market selected for Case Study Help is 'Motor vehicle services' for a number of factors. This market has an additional growth capacity of 10.1% which might be a good enough specific niche market sector for Case Study Help. Not just would a portable dispenser deal benefit to this specific market, the fact that the Diy market can also be targeted if a safe and clean low priced adhesive is being sold for use with SuperBonder.

Price: The recommended cost of Case Study Help has been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is sold through suppliers or via direct selling. A rate below $250 would not need approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor lorry maintenance store requires to buy the product on his own.

Affinity Plus A would only be getting $157 per unit as displayed in appendix 2 which gives a breakdown of gross profitability and net profitability for Affinity Plus A for introducing Case Study Help.

Place: A circulation design where Affinity Plus A directly sends out the product to the regional supplier and keeps a 10% drop shipment allowance for the supplier would be utilized by Affinity Plus A. Considering that the sales group is currently engaged in selling instant adhesives and they do not have competence in selling dispensers, involving them in the selling process would be pricey especially as each sales call expenses roughly $120. The distributors are currently offering dispensers so offering Case Study Help through them would be a beneficial alternative.

Promotion: A low advertising budget must have been appointed to Case Study Help however the fact that the dispenser is a development and it needs to be marketed well in order to cover the capital expenses sustained for production, the recommended advertising plan costing $51816 is advised for at first introducing the item in the market. The planned advertisements in magazines would be targeted at mechanics in car upkeep stores. (Suggested text for the advertisement is displayed in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summarized in appendix 4).

Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Affinity Plus A Case Study Analysis

A suggested plan of action in the form of a marketing mix has actually been gone over for Case Study Help, the reality still stays that the product would not match Affinity Plus A item line. We take a look at appendix 2, we can see how the overall gross profitability for the two models is expected to be approximately $49377 if 250 units of each model are manufactured annually according to the strategy. The preliminary prepared marketing is approximately $52000 per year which would be putting a stress on the company's resources leaving Affinity Plus A with an unfavorable net earnings if the expenses are allocated to Case Study Help only.

The truth that Affinity Plus A has actually currently incurred a preliminary investment of $48000 in the form of capital cost and model development indicates that the earnings from Case Study Help is inadequate to undertake the danger of sales cannibalization. Other than that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market showing low flexibility of need is not a more suitable option particularly of it is impacting the sale of the company's revenue producing designs.