WhatsApp

Affinity Plus A Case Study Help Checklist

Affinity Plus A Case Study Help Checklist

Affinity Plus A Case Study Solution
Affinity Plus A Case Study Help
Affinity Plus A Case Study Analysis



Analyses for Evaluating Affinity Plus A decision to launch Case Study Solution


The following area focuses on the of marketing for Affinity Plus A where the business's consumers, competitors and core proficiencies have actually assessed in order to validate whether the decision to release Case Study Help under Affinity Plus A brand name would be a practical choice or not. We have actually to start with looked at the type of customers that Affinity Plus A handle while an assessment of the competitive environment and the company's weak points and strengths follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the justification for not releasing Case Study Help under Affinity Plus A name.
Affinity Plus A Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Affinity Plus A clients can be segmented into two groups, commercial consumers and last consumers. Both the groups utilize Affinity Plus A high performance adhesives while the business is not only associated with the production of these adhesives but also markets them to these consumer groups. There are two kinds of products that are being sold to these prospective markets; anaerobic adhesives and instantaneous adhesives. We would be concentrating on the consumers of instantaneous adhesives for this analysis given that the market for the latter has a lower potential for Affinity Plus A compared to that of instantaneous adhesives.

The total market for immediate adhesives is approximately 890,000 in the US in 1978 which covers both client groups which have actually been identified earlier.If we take a look at a breakdown of Affinity Plus A possible market or consumer groups, we can see that the business offers to OEMs (Original Equipment Producers), Do-it-Yourself customers, repair work and overhauling companies (MRO) and producers dealing in products made from leather, plastic, wood and metal. This variety in customers suggests that Affinity Plus A can target has different options in terms of segmenting the market for its new item specifically as each of these groups would be needing the same type of item with respective modifications in amount, product packaging or need. However, the customer is not rate sensitive or brand conscious so introducing a low priced dispenser under Affinity Plus A name is not an advised alternative.

Company Analysis

Affinity Plus A is not simply a manufacturer of adhesives however takes pleasure in market leadership in the instantaneous adhesive industry. The company has its own experienced and qualified sales force which includes value to sales by training the business's network of 250 distributors for helping with the sale of adhesives. Affinity Plus A believes in exclusive distribution as shown by the truth that it has chosen to offer through 250 suppliers whereas there is t a network of 10000 distributors that can be explored for broadening reach via suppliers. The company's reach is not restricted to The United States and Canada just as it likewise takes pleasure in global sales. With 1400 outlets spread all throughout The United States and Canada, Affinity Plus A has its internal production plants instead of utilizing out-sourcing as the preferred technique.

Core skills are not limited to adhesive manufacturing only as Affinity Plus A also focuses on making adhesive dispensing equipment to help with the use of its products. This dual production technique gives Affinity Plus A an edge over competitors considering that none of the rivals of giving devices makes instant adhesives. Additionally, none of these rivals offers directly to the customer either and uses distributors for connecting to customers. While we are looking at the strengths of Affinity Plus A, it is important to highlight the business's weaknesses.

The business's sales personnel is skilled in training suppliers, the truth remains that the sales team is not trained in selling devices so there is a possibility of relying heavily on suppliers when promoting adhesive devices. However, it must also be noted that the distributors are showing reluctance when it concerns selling equipment that needs maintenance which increases the difficulties of offering devices under a particular trademark name.

The business has products intended at the high end of the market if we look at Affinity Plus A product line in adhesive devices especially. The possibility of sales cannibalization exists if Affinity Plus A sells Case Study Help under the same portfolio. Offered the truth that Case Study Help is priced lower than Affinity Plus A high-end line of product, sales cannibalization would definitely be affecting Affinity Plus A sales income if the adhesive devices is sold under the company's brand name.

We can see sales cannibalization affecting Affinity Plus A 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. There is another possible danger which could lower Affinity Plus A income if Case Study Help is launched under the business's trademark name. The reality that $175000 has been invested in promoting SuperBonder recommends that it is not a good time for introducing a dispenser which can highlight the fact that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the immediate adhesive.

In addition, if we take a look at the market in general, the adhesives market does not show brand name orientation or rate awareness which gives us two additional factors for not launching a low priced product under the company's brand name.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Affinity Plus A would be studied through Porter's five forces analysis which would highlight the degree of rivalry in the market.


Degree of Rivalry:

Presently we can see that the adhesive market has a high growth potential due to the presence of fragmented sections with Affinity Plus A enjoying management and a combined market share of 75% with two other market gamers, Eastman and Permabond. While industry rivalry in between these players could be called 'extreme' as the customer is not brand name conscious and each of these gamers has prominence in regards to market share, the fact still stays that the market is not filled and still has a number of market sectors which can be targeted as potential specific niche markets even when releasing an adhesive. However, we can even point out the reality that sales cannibalization might be causing industry competition in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for immediate adhesives offers growth capacity.


Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the purchaser in this industry is low specifically as the buyer has low understanding about the item. While companies like Affinity Plus A have actually handled to train suppliers relating to adhesives, the last consumer is dependent on suppliers. Around 72% of sales are made straight by makers and suppliers for instant adhesives so the buyer has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Provided the truth that the adhesive market is controlled by 3 players, it could be said that the supplier delights in a higher bargaining power compared to the buyer. The fact remains that the provider does not have much influence over the purchaser at this point particularly as the buyer does not show brand recognition or rate sensitivity. This suggests that the distributor has the greater power when it comes to the adhesive market while the buyer and the producer do not have a major control over the real sales.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand commitment and the ease of entry shown by foreign Japanese rivals in the instant adhesive market shows that the market allows ease of entry. If we look at Affinity Plus A in specific, the company has dual abilities in terms of being a producer of instant adhesives and adhesive dispensers. Potential threats in equipment dispensing market are low which reveals the possibility of developing brand name awareness in not only instant adhesives but likewise in dispensing adhesives as none of the industry gamers has handled to position itself in dual capabilities.

Threat of Substitutes: The risk of alternatives in the instant adhesive market is low while the dispenser market in particular has replacements like Glumetic pointer applicators, built-in applicators, pencil applicators and sophisticated consoles. The truth remains that if Affinity Plus A introduced Case Study Help, it would be enjoying sales cannibalization for its own items. (see appendix 1 for framework).


4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Affinity Plus A Case Study Help


Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has offered numerous factors for not introducing Case Study Help under Affinity Plus A name, we have actually a recommended marketing mix for Case Study Help offered below if Affinity Plus A decides to go ahead with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target audience chosen for Case Study Help is 'Motor vehicle services' for a variety of factors. There are presently 89257 establishments in this section and a high use of approximately 58900 pounds. is being utilized by 36.1 % of the market. This market has an additional development potential of 10.1% which may be a good enough niche market sector for Case Study Help. Not just would a portable dispenser deal benefit to this particular market, the fact that the Diy market can likewise be targeted if a potable low priced adhesive is being cost usage with SuperBonder. The item would be offered without the 'glumetic tip' and 'vari-drop' so that the consumer can decide whether he wishes to go with either of the two devices or not.

Price: The recommended price of Case Study Help has been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is offered through suppliers or by means of direct selling. This rate would not include the cost of the 'vari tip' or the 'glumetic idea'. A price listed below $250 would not require approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor vehicle upkeep store needs to buy the product on his own. This would increase the possibility of influencing mechanics to acquire the product for use in their everyday upkeep jobs.

Affinity Plus A would just be getting $157 per unit as displayed in appendix 2 which provides a breakdown of gross profitability and net success for Affinity Plus A for releasing Case Study Help.

Place: A distribution design where Affinity Plus A straight sends the item to the regional supplier and keeps a 10% drop shipment allowance for the distributor would be used by Affinity Plus A. Considering that the sales team is already engaged in selling immediate adhesives and they do not have competence in selling dispensers, involving them in the selling process would be expensive particularly as each sales call expenses roughly $120. The distributors are already offering dispensers so selling Case Study Help through them would be a favorable alternative.

Promotion: A low advertising budget must have been assigned to Case Study Help but the fact that the dispenser is a development and it requires to be marketed well in order to cover the capital costs incurred for production, the recommended marketing strategy costing $51816 is advised for at first presenting the item in the market. The prepared ads in magazines would be targeted at mechanics in automobile maintenance stores. (Recommended text for the ad is shown in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summarized in appendix 4).


Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Affinity Plus A Case Study Analysis

A suggested plan of action in the type of a marketing mix has been discussed for Case Study Help, the reality still remains that the product would not complement Affinity Plus A item line. We have a look at appendix 2, we can see how the overall gross success for the two models is expected to be roughly $49377 if 250 units of each design are made each year as per the plan. Nevertheless, the initial planned advertising is around $52000 each year which would be putting a pressure on the company's resources leaving Affinity Plus A with a negative earnings if the expenditures are assigned to Case Study Help just.

The reality that Affinity Plus A has actually currently incurred an initial financial investment of $48000 in the form of capital cost and model development indicates that the revenue from Case Study Help is not enough to carry out the threat of sales cannibalization. Aside from that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market revealing low flexibility of demand is not a more effective alternative particularly of it is affecting the sale of the business's revenue generating models.


 

PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE