Amtelecom Group Inc Case Study Help Checklist

Amtelecom Group Inc Case Study Help Checklist

Amtelecom Group Inc Case Study Solution
Amtelecom Group Inc Case Study Help
Amtelecom Group Inc Case Study Analysis

Analyses for Evaluating Amtelecom Group Inc decision to launch Case Study Solution

The following area focuses on the of marketing for Amtelecom Group Inc where the company's consumers, rivals and core proficiencies have actually examined in order to justify whether the choice to release Case Study Help under Amtelecom Group Inc brand would be a feasible option or not. We have to start with taken a look at the type of clients that Amtelecom Group Inc handle while an examination of the competitive environment and the company's weaknesses and strengths follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the reason for not releasing Case Study Help under Amtelecom Group Inc name.
Amtelecom Group Inc Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Both the groups utilize Amtelecom Group Inc high efficiency adhesives while the company is not just involved in the production of these adhesives but likewise markets them to these customer groups. We would be focusing on the customers of instant adhesives for this analysis considering that the market for the latter has a lower capacity for Amtelecom Group Inc compared to that of immediate adhesives.

The overall market for instantaneous adhesives is approximately 890,000 in the US in 1978 which covers both customer groups which have actually been recognized earlier.If we look at a breakdown of Amtelecom Group Inc possible market or customer groups, we can see that the business offers to OEMs (Initial Devices Makers), Do-it-Yourself consumers, repair work and revamping companies (MRO) and manufacturers handling products made from leather, wood, metal and plastic. This diversity in customers recommends that Amtelecom Group Inc can target has different options in regards to segmenting the market for its new item especially as each of these groups would be needing the same type of product with particular changes in quantity, need or packaging. The customer is not price delicate or brand name conscious so releasing a low priced dispenser under Amtelecom Group Inc name is not a recommended option.

Company Analysis

Amtelecom Group Inc is not simply a manufacturer of adhesives however enjoys market management in the instant adhesive market. The business has its own competent and competent sales force which adds value to sales by training the company's network of 250 suppliers for facilitating the sale of adhesives. Amtelecom Group Inc believes in special circulation as suggested by the truth that it has picked to sell through 250 suppliers whereas there is t a network of 10000 distributors that can be checked out for expanding reach by means of suppliers. The business's reach is not restricted to North America only as it likewise delights in international sales. With 1400 outlets spread out all throughout The United States and Canada, Amtelecom Group Inc has its in-house production plants rather than utilizing out-sourcing as the preferred strategy.

Core skills are not limited to adhesive production only as Amtelecom Group Inc also specializes in making adhesive dispensing devices to help with making use of its products. This double production method offers Amtelecom Group Inc an edge over rivals given that none of the competitors of dispensing equipment makes instant adhesives. Additionally, none of these rivals sells directly to the consumer either and makes use of suppliers for connecting to customers. While we are taking a look at the strengths of Amtelecom Group Inc, it is important to highlight the company's weak points too.

Although the business's sales staff is experienced in training suppliers, the reality stays that the sales group is not trained in offering equipment so there is a possibility of relying heavily on suppliers when promoting adhesive devices. Nevertheless, it should also be noted that the distributors are showing unwillingness when it comes to offering devices that needs servicing which increases the difficulties of selling devices under a specific brand name.

If we take a look at Amtelecom Group Inc product line in adhesive devices especially, the company has items targeted at the high end of the marketplace. The possibility of sales cannibalization exists if Amtelecom Group Inc offers Case Study Help under the very same portfolio. Given the truth that Case Study Help is priced lower than Amtelecom Group Inc high-end line of product, sales cannibalization would certainly be affecting Amtelecom Group Inc sales revenue if the adhesive devices is offered under the business's brand name.

We can see sales cannibalization impacting Amtelecom Group Inc 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. If Case Study Help is released under the business's brand name, there is another possible hazard which could reduce Amtelecom Group Inc revenue. The fact that $175000 has been spent in promoting SuperBonder recommends that it is not a good time for launching a dispenser which can highlight the truth that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the instantaneous adhesive.

Additionally, if we look at the market in general, the adhesives market does disappoint brand name orientation or price consciousness which offers us 2 extra reasons for not releasing a low priced product under the business's trademark name.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Amtelecom Group Inc would be studied by means of Porter's five forces analysis which would highlight the degree of rivalry in the market.

Degree of Rivalry:

Presently we can see that the adhesive market has a high development potential due to the presence of fragmented segments with Amtelecom Group Inc enjoying leadership and a combined market share of 75% with two other industry players, Eastman and Permabond. While market competition in between these gamers could be called 'intense' as the customer is not brand conscious and each of these players has prominence in terms of market share, the reality still remains that the industry is not saturated and still has a number of market sectors which can be targeted as prospective specific niche markets even when releasing an adhesive. We can even point out the fact that sales cannibalization may be leading to industry rivalry in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for instantaneous adhesives provides development potential.

Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the buyer in this industry is low specifically as the purchaser has low knowledge about the item. While business like Amtelecom Group Inc have handled to train suppliers relating to adhesives, the final consumer depends on distributors. Approximately 72% of sales are made directly by makers and distributors for immediate adhesives so the purchaser has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Provided the fact that the adhesive market is dominated by three players, it could be stated that the supplier enjoys a greater bargaining power compared to the purchaser. The fact stays that the supplier does not have much influence over the purchaser at this point especially as the buyer does not reveal brand acknowledgment or rate level of sensitivity. When it comes to the adhesive market while the purchaser and the producer do not have a major control over the actual sales, this indicates that the supplier has the greater power.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand loyalty and the ease of entry revealed by foreign Japanese rivals in the instantaneous adhesive market indicates that the marketplace enables ease of entry. Nevertheless, if we look at Amtelecom Group Inc in particular, the company has double abilities in terms of being a producer of adhesive dispensers and immediate adhesives. Prospective dangers in equipment giving industry are low which reveals the possibility of producing brand awareness in not only immediate adhesives but likewise in giving adhesives as none of the market gamers has handled to place itself in dual capabilities.

Risk of Substitutes: The risk of substitutes in the immediate adhesive market is low while the dispenser market in particular has replacements like Glumetic idea applicators, in-built applicators, pencil applicators and advanced consoles. The fact remains that if Amtelecom Group Inc introduced Case Study Help, it would be delighting in sales cannibalization for its own items. (see appendix 1 for structure).

4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Amtelecom Group Inc Case Study Help

Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has given various reasons for not introducing Case Study Help under Amtelecom Group Inc name, we have actually a recommended marketing mix for Case Study Help provided listed below if Amtelecom Group Inc chooses to go ahead with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target market selected for Case Study Help is 'Motor car services' for a number of reasons. This market has an extra development potential of 10.1% which might be an excellent sufficient specific niche market section for Case Study Help. Not only would a portable dispenser offer benefit to this specific market, the fact that the Diy market can also be targeted if a drinkable low priced adhesive is being sold for usage with SuperBonder.

Price: The recommended cost of Case Study Help has actually been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is sold through suppliers or via direct selling. This cost would not include the expense of the 'vari suggestion' or the 'glumetic tip'. A cost below $250 would not require approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor vehicle upkeep shop requires to purchase the item on his own. This would increase the possibility of affecting mechanics to acquire the item for usage in their everyday upkeep tasks.

Amtelecom Group Inc would only be getting $157 per unit as shown in appendix 2 which offers a breakdown of gross success and net profitability for Amtelecom Group Inc for introducing Case Study Help.

Place: A distribution design where Amtelecom Group Inc straight sends the item to the local distributor and keeps a 10% drop delivery allowance for the distributor would be used by Amtelecom Group Inc. Since the sales team is already engaged in selling immediate adhesives and they do not have competence in selling dispensers, involving them in the selling procedure would be pricey specifically as each sales call expenses approximately $120. The distributors are currently selling dispensers so selling Case Study Help through them would be a favorable option.

Promotion: A low promotional budget plan must have been designated to Case Study Help however the truth that the dispenser is a development and it requires to be marketed well in order to cover the capital costs incurred for production, the recommended advertising strategy costing $51816 is suggested for initially presenting the product in the market. The prepared ads in publications would be targeted at mechanics in lorry upkeep stores. (Suggested text for the advertisement is shown in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summarized in appendix 4).

Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Amtelecom Group Inc Case Study Analysis

Although a suggested strategy in the form of a marketing mix has been gone over for Case Study Help, the fact still remains that the product would not match Amtelecom Group Inc product line. We take a look at appendix 2, we can see how the total gross profitability for the two designs is expected to be approximately $49377 if 250 units of each design are manufactured per year based on the plan. The preliminary prepared advertising is approximately $52000 per year which would be putting a pressure on the company's resources leaving Amtelecom Group Inc with an unfavorable net earnings if the costs are allocated to Case Study Help just.

The fact that Amtelecom Group Inc has actually already incurred a preliminary financial investment of $48000 in the form of capital expense and model development shows that the profits from Case Study Help is inadequate to undertake the danger of sales cannibalization. Besides that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market showing low elasticity of need is not a preferable alternative particularly of it is affecting the sale of the company's income generating models.