WhatsApp

Apex Investment Partners A April 1995 Case Study Help Checklist

Apex Investment Partners A April 1995 Case Study Help Checklist

Apex Investment Partners A April 1995 Case Study Solution
Apex Investment Partners A April 1995 Case Study Help
Apex Investment Partners A April 1995 Case Study Analysis



Analyses for Evaluating Apex Investment Partners A April 1995 decision to launch Case Study Solution


The following area focuses on the of marketing for Apex Investment Partners A April 1995 where the company's customers, rivals and core competencies have examined in order to justify whether the decision to release Case Study Help under Apex Investment Partners A April 1995 trademark name would be a practical alternative or not. We have first of all taken a look at the type of customers that Apex Investment Partners A April 1995 handle while an evaluation of the competitive environment and the company's strengths and weak points follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the validation for not releasing Case Study Help under Apex Investment Partners A April 1995 name.
Apex Investment Partners A April 1995 Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Both the groups use Apex Investment Partners A April 1995 high efficiency adhesives while the business is not only included in the production of these adhesives but also markets them to these consumer groups. We would be focusing on the customers of instant adhesives for this analysis considering that the market for the latter has a lower potential for Apex Investment Partners A April 1995 compared to that of instant adhesives.

The total market for immediate adhesives is approximately 890,000 in the United States in 1978 which covers both client groups which have actually been determined earlier.If we look at a breakdown of Apex Investment Partners A April 1995 prospective market or client groups, we can see that the business offers to OEMs (Initial Devices Makers), Do-it-Yourself customers, repair and upgrading business (MRO) and manufacturers dealing in products made of leather, wood, plastic and metal. This variety in clients recommends that Apex Investment Partners A April 1995 can target has different choices in terms of segmenting the market for its new item specifically as each of these groups would be needing the exact same kind of product with particular modifications in quantity, demand or product packaging. The client is not price delicate or brand name conscious so releasing a low priced dispenser under Apex Investment Partners A April 1995 name is not a suggested option.

Company Analysis

Apex Investment Partners A April 1995 is not just a producer of adhesives but enjoys market leadership in the immediate adhesive industry. The company has its own competent and certified sales force which includes worth to sales by training the company's network of 250 distributors for helping with the sale of adhesives. Apex Investment Partners A April 1995 believes in special distribution as shown by the reality that it has selected to offer through 250 distributors whereas there is t a network of 10000 suppliers that can be explored for expanding reach via suppliers. The business's reach is not restricted to The United States and Canada just as it also takes pleasure in global sales. With 1400 outlets spread out all throughout The United States and Canada, Apex Investment Partners A April 1995 has its in-house production plants rather than using out-sourcing as the preferred method.

Core skills are not limited to adhesive production only as Apex Investment Partners A April 1995 also focuses on making adhesive giving equipment to facilitate using its items. This dual production technique gives Apex Investment Partners A April 1995 an edge over rivals because none of the competitors of giving devices makes immediate adhesives. Furthermore, none of these rivals sells directly to the customer either and makes use of distributors for reaching out to consumers. While we are looking at the strengths of Apex Investment Partners A April 1995, it is necessary to highlight the company's weaknesses too.

Although the company's sales staff is competent in training suppliers, the truth remains that the sales group is not trained in selling devices so there is a possibility of relying heavily on distributors when promoting adhesive devices. Nevertheless, it needs to likewise be noted that the suppliers are showing reluctance when it comes to offering equipment that requires maintenance which increases the difficulties of selling equipment under a specific trademark name.

If we take a look at Apex Investment Partners A April 1995 product line in adhesive devices particularly, the company has items targeted at the luxury of the marketplace. The possibility of sales cannibalization exists if Apex Investment Partners A April 1995 offers Case Study Help under the exact same portfolio. Provided the reality that Case Study Help is priced lower than Apex Investment Partners A April 1995 high-end line of product, sales cannibalization would absolutely be impacting Apex Investment Partners A April 1995 sales earnings if the adhesive devices is offered under the business's brand.

We can see sales cannibalization affecting Apex Investment Partners A April 1995 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. If Case Study Help is introduced under the company's brand name, there is another possible risk which might decrease Apex Investment Partners A April 1995 profits. The reality that $175000 has actually been spent in promoting SuperBonder recommends that it is not a good time for releasing a dispenser which can highlight the fact that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the instantaneous adhesive.

In addition, if we take a look at the marketplace in general, the adhesives market does disappoint brand orientation or rate awareness which offers us 2 additional reasons for not introducing a low priced item under the company's trademark name.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Apex Investment Partners A April 1995 would be studied through Porter's 5 forces analysis which would highlight the degree of rivalry in the market.


Degree of Rivalry:

Presently we can see that the adhesive market has a high growth capacity due to the existence of fragmented sections with Apex Investment Partners A April 1995 enjoying leadership and a combined market share of 75% with 2 other market players, Eastman and Permabond. While market competition between these gamers could be called 'extreme' as the consumer is not brand conscious and each of these players has prominence in regards to market share, the fact still stays that the market is not saturated and still has numerous market sectors which can be targeted as prospective specific niche markets even when introducing an adhesive. We can even point out the truth that sales cannibalization might be leading to market competition in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for instantaneous adhesives offers growth potential.


Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the purchaser in this market is low especially as the purchaser has low understanding about the product. While companies like Apex Investment Partners A April 1995 have handled to train suppliers regarding adhesives, the last customer is dependent on distributors. Approximately 72% of sales are made directly by makers and suppliers for immediate adhesives so the purchaser has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Given the fact that the adhesive market is dominated by 3 players, it could be said that the supplier delights in a greater bargaining power compared to the buyer. The truth remains that the provider does not have much influence over the purchaser at this point particularly as the buyer does not reveal brand acknowledgment or cost sensitivity. When it comes to the adhesive market while the purchaser and the maker do not have a major control over the real sales, this shows that the supplier has the greater power.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand commitment and the ease of entry revealed by foreign Japanese rivals in the immediate adhesive market indicates that the marketplace enables ease of entry. Nevertheless, if we look at Apex Investment Partners A April 1995 in particular, the company has dual capabilities in regards to being a producer of adhesive dispensers and instantaneous adhesives. Possible hazards in equipment giving industry are low which reveals the possibility of creating brand name awareness in not only immediate adhesives but likewise in dispensing adhesives as none of the market players has actually handled to position itself in dual abilities.

Hazard of Substitutes: The threat of alternatives in the immediate adhesive industry is low while the dispenser market in particular has alternatives like Glumetic idea applicators, inbuilt applicators, pencil applicators and sophisticated consoles. The truth stays that if Apex Investment Partners A April 1995 introduced Case Study Help, it would be enjoying sales cannibalization for its own items. (see appendix 1 for framework).


4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Apex Investment Partners A April 1995 Case Study Help


Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has actually provided different reasons for not launching Case Study Help under Apex Investment Partners A April 1995 name, we have a suggested marketing mix for Case Study Help provided listed below if Apex Investment Partners A April 1995 chooses to go ahead with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target audience selected for Case Study Help is 'Motor vehicle services' for a number of factors. There are presently 89257 establishments in this sector and a high usage of roughly 58900 pounds. is being utilized by 36.1 % of the market. This market has an additional development capacity of 10.1% which may be a good enough specific niche market section for Case Study Help. Not just would a portable dispenser offer benefit to this specific market, the reality that the Diy market can likewise be targeted if a safe and clean low priced adhesive is being cost usage with SuperBonder. The product would be sold without the 'glumetic pointer' and 'vari-drop' so that the customer can decide whether he wishes to opt for either of the two devices or not.

Price: The recommended cost of Case Study Help has actually been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is offered through distributors or through direct selling. This price would not include the expense of the 'vari pointer' or the 'glumetic pointer'. A cost listed below $250 would not require approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at an automobile maintenance store needs to acquire the item on his own. This would increase the possibility of affecting mechanics to buy the product for usage in their daily maintenance jobs.

Apex Investment Partners A April 1995 would just be getting $157 per unit as shown in appendix 2 which provides a breakdown of gross profitability and net profitability for Apex Investment Partners A April 1995 for releasing Case Study Help.

Place: A circulation model where Apex Investment Partners A April 1995 straight sends out the product to the local supplier and keeps a 10% drop shipment allowance for the supplier would be utilized by Apex Investment Partners A April 1995. Given that the sales group is already taken part in selling instantaneous adhesives and they do not have expertise in selling dispensers, including them in the selling process would be costly specifically as each sales call costs roughly $120. The suppliers are already offering dispensers so offering Case Study Help through them would be a favorable option.

Promotion: A low promotional spending plan needs to have been designated to Case Study Help but the reality that the dispenser is an innovation and it requires to be marketed well in order to cover the capital costs incurred for production, the suggested advertising plan costing $51816 is advised for at first introducing the item in the market. The planned advertisements in magazines would be targeted at mechanics in car maintenance shops. (Suggested text for the advertisement is shown in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summarized in appendix 4).


Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Apex Investment Partners A April 1995 Case Study Analysis

Although a recommended strategy in the form of a marketing mix has been gone over for Case Study Help, the reality still stays that the item would not match Apex Investment Partners A April 1995 line of product. We have a look at appendix 2, we can see how the total gross success for the two designs is anticipated to be around $49377 if 250 units of each design are manufactured per year based on the strategy. The preliminary prepared advertising is approximately $52000 per year which would be putting a strain on the company's resources leaving Apex Investment Partners A April 1995 with an unfavorable net earnings if the expenditures are assigned to Case Study Help only.

The fact that Apex Investment Partners A April 1995 has currently incurred an initial financial investment of $48000 in the form of capital expense and model development shows that the income from Case Study Help is insufficient to undertake the danger of sales cannibalization. Aside from that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market revealing low flexibility of demand is not a more effective option especially of it is impacting the sale of the business's earnings creating models.



PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE