WhatsApp

Apex Investment Partners B May 1995 Case Study Help Checklist

Apex Investment Partners B May 1995 Case Study Help Checklist

Apex Investment Partners B May 1995 Case Study Solution
Apex Investment Partners B May 1995 Case Study Help
Apex Investment Partners B May 1995 Case Study Analysis



Analyses for Evaluating Apex Investment Partners B May 1995 decision to launch Case Study Solution


The following area focuses on the of marketing for Apex Investment Partners B May 1995 where the company's clients, rivals and core proficiencies have actually examined in order to justify whether the choice to launch Case Study Help under Apex Investment Partners B May 1995 trademark name would be a feasible option or not. We have firstly taken a look at the kind of consumers that Apex Investment Partners B May 1995 deals in while an evaluation of the competitive environment and the company's strengths and weaknesses follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the justification for not launching Case Study Help under Apex Investment Partners B May 1995 name.
Apex Investment Partners B May 1995 Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Both the groups use Apex Investment Partners B May 1995 high efficiency adhesives while the business is not only included in the production of these adhesives however also markets them to these consumer groups. We would be focusing on the customers of instantaneous adhesives for this analysis because the market for the latter has a lower potential for Apex Investment Partners B May 1995 compared to that of instantaneous adhesives.

The total market for instant adhesives is roughly 890,000 in the United States in 1978 which covers both consumer groups which have been determined earlier.If we look at a breakdown of Apex Investment Partners B May 1995 possible market or consumer groups, we can see that the company offers to OEMs (Original Devices Makers), Do-it-Yourself clients, repair work and upgrading business (MRO) and manufacturers handling items made of leather, wood, metal and plastic. This diversity in consumers recommends that Apex Investment Partners B May 1995 can target has different options in terms of segmenting the marketplace for its new product particularly as each of these groups would be needing the same type of item with particular modifications in product packaging, demand or amount. The consumer is not cost delicate or brand conscious so releasing a low priced dispenser under Apex Investment Partners B May 1995 name is not a suggested choice.

Company Analysis

Apex Investment Partners B May 1995 is not simply a producer of adhesives but enjoys market leadership in the immediate adhesive industry. The business has its own knowledgeable and competent sales force which adds value to sales by training the company's network of 250 distributors for facilitating the sale of adhesives. Apex Investment Partners B May 1995 believes in special distribution as indicated by the reality that it has actually selected to offer through 250 distributors whereas there is t a network of 10000 distributors that can be explored for broadening reach by means of suppliers. The company's reach is not limited to North America only as it likewise enjoys international sales. With 1400 outlets spread out all across North America, Apex Investment Partners B May 1995 has its in-house production plants instead of utilizing out-sourcing as the favored method.

Core skills are not limited to adhesive manufacturing just as Apex Investment Partners B May 1995 also focuses on making adhesive giving devices to facilitate using its products. This double production method gives Apex Investment Partners B May 1995 an edge over competitors because none of the competitors of dispensing devices makes immediate adhesives. In addition, none of these rivals sells straight to the consumer either and makes use of suppliers for reaching out to consumers. While we are looking at the strengths of Apex Investment Partners B May 1995, it is essential to highlight the company's weaknesses.

Although the company's sales staff is knowledgeable in training suppliers, the truth remains that the sales group is not trained in offering equipment so there is a possibility of relying heavily on distributors when promoting adhesive devices. It should likewise be kept in mind that the distributors are showing hesitation when it comes to selling devices that needs servicing which increases the challenges of selling equipment under a particular brand name.

If we look at Apex Investment Partners B May 1995 product line in adhesive devices especially, the business has actually products aimed at the high-end of the market. If Apex Investment Partners B May 1995 sells Case Study Help under the exact same portfolio, the possibility of sales cannibalization exists. Provided the reality that Case Study Help is priced lower than Apex Investment Partners B May 1995 high-end product line, sales cannibalization would certainly be affecting Apex Investment Partners B May 1995 sales income if the adhesive devices is sold under the business's trademark name.

We can see sales cannibalization impacting Apex Investment Partners B May 1995 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. There is another possible threat which could lower Apex Investment Partners B May 1995 income if Case Study Help is released under the business's trademark name. The fact that $175000 has been invested in promoting SuperBonder recommends that it is not a good time for releasing a dispenser which can highlight the reality that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the instantaneous adhesive.

In addition, if we take a look at the marketplace in general, the adhesives market does not show brand name orientation or cost awareness which provides us 2 additional reasons for not releasing a low priced product under the business's brand.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Apex Investment Partners B May 1995 would be studied via Porter's five forces analysis which would highlight the degree of rivalry in the market.


Degree of Rivalry:

Presently we can see that the adhesive market has a high development potential due to the presence of fragmented sections with Apex Investment Partners B May 1995 delighting in management and a combined market share of 75% with two other industry gamers, Eastman and Permabond. While industry rivalry between these gamers could be called 'extreme' as the customer is not brand name mindful and each of these players has prominence in terms of market share, the reality still remains that the market is not saturated and still has a number of market sectors which can be targeted as possible specific niche markets even when introducing an adhesive. We can even point out the reality that sales cannibalization might be leading to market rivalry in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for instantaneous adhesives provides development capacity.


Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the buyer in this market is low specifically as the purchaser has low knowledge about the item. While companies like Apex Investment Partners B May 1995 have managed to train suppliers regarding adhesives, the final consumer is dependent on suppliers. Around 72% of sales are made directly by producers and suppliers for instant adhesives so the buyer has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Given the truth that the adhesive market is dominated by three gamers, it could be stated that the provider takes pleasure in a higher bargaining power compared to the buyer. The truth remains that the supplier does not have much influence over the buyer at this point especially as the purchaser does not show brand recognition or price level of sensitivity. This indicates that the distributor has the greater power when it pertains to the adhesive market while the maker and the purchaser do not have a significant control over the real sales.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand loyalty and the ease of entry revealed by foreign Japanese rivals in the instantaneous adhesive market shows that the marketplace permits ease of entry. Nevertheless, if we take a look at Apex Investment Partners B May 1995 in particular, the company has dual abilities in terms of being a maker of adhesive dispensers and instantaneous adhesives. Prospective dangers in equipment giving market are low which reveals the possibility of creating brand awareness in not only instant adhesives however likewise in dispensing adhesives as none of the industry gamers has managed to place itself in double capabilities.

Threat of Substitutes: The danger of substitutes in the instantaneous adhesive industry is low while the dispenser market in particular has alternatives like Glumetic tip applicators, in-built applicators, pencil applicators and advanced consoles. The fact remains that if Apex Investment Partners B May 1995 presented Case Study Help, it would be enjoying sales cannibalization for its own products. (see appendix 1 for framework).


4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Apex Investment Partners B May 1995 Case Study Help


Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has given different factors for not launching Case Study Help under Apex Investment Partners B May 1995 name, we have a recommended marketing mix for Case Study Help provided listed below if Apex Investment Partners B May 1995 chooses to go on with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target market selected for Case Study Help is 'Motor vehicle services' for a variety of factors. There are presently 89257 establishments in this sector and a high usage of approximately 58900 pounds. is being used by 36.1 % of the market. This market has an extra growth potential of 10.1% which might be a sufficient specific niche market section for Case Study Help. Not only would a portable dispenser deal convenience to this particular market, the reality that the Diy market can likewise be targeted if a potable low priced adhesive is being sold for usage with SuperBonder. The product would be sold without the 'glumetic pointer' and 'vari-drop' so that the consumer can choose whether he wants to opt for either of the two accessories or not.

Price: The suggested rate of Case Study Help has actually been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is sold through distributors or through direct selling. A rate below $250 would not need approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor vehicle upkeep store needs to buy the product on his own.

Apex Investment Partners B May 1995 would just be getting $157 per unit as shown in appendix 2 which provides a breakdown of gross profitability and net profitability for Apex Investment Partners B May 1995 for launching Case Study Help.

Place: A circulation design where Apex Investment Partners B May 1995 straight sends the item to the local supplier and keeps a 10% drop shipment allowance for the distributor would be used by Apex Investment Partners B May 1995. Given that the sales group is already engaged in offering instant adhesives and they do not have expertise in offering dispensers, involving them in the selling process would be expensive especially as each sales call expenses roughly $120. The distributors are currently selling dispensers so selling Case Study Help through them would be a beneficial choice.

Promotion: Although a low marketing budget ought to have been designated to Case Study Help however the truth that the dispenser is a development and it requires to be marketed well in order to cover the capital expenses incurred for production, the recommended advertising strategy costing $51816 is advised for initially introducing the product in the market. The prepared ads in publications would be targeted at mechanics in lorry upkeep shops. (Suggested text for the ad is shown in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summed up in appendix 4).


Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Apex Investment Partners B May 1995 Case Study Analysis

Although a recommended strategy in the form of a marketing mix has actually been gone over for Case Study Help, the fact still stays that the item would not match Apex Investment Partners B May 1995 product line. We have a look at appendix 2, we can see how the overall gross profitability for the two models is expected to be roughly $49377 if 250 systems of each model are made per year based on the strategy. The preliminary planned marketing is approximately $52000 per year which would be putting a pressure on the company's resources leaving Apex Investment Partners B May 1995 with a negative net income if the expenses are allocated to Case Study Help only.

The reality that Apex Investment Partners B May 1995 has already incurred a preliminary investment of $48000 in the form of capital expense and model development shows that the revenue from Case Study Help is insufficient to undertake the danger of sales cannibalization. Other than that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market revealing low elasticity of need is not a more suitable option specifically of it is affecting the sale of the company's profits creating designs.


 

PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE