WhatsApp

Applied Materials Managing Product Costs Case Study Help Checklist

Applied Materials Managing Product Costs Case Study Help Checklist

Applied Materials Managing Product Costs Case Study Solution
Applied Materials Managing Product Costs Case Study Help
Applied Materials Managing Product Costs Case Study Analysis



Analyses for Evaluating Applied Materials Managing Product Costs decision to launch Case Study Solution


The following area focuses on the of marketing for Applied Materials Managing Product Costs where the business's clients, competitors and core proficiencies have actually examined in order to validate whether the choice to release Case Study Help under Applied Materials Managing Product Costs trademark name would be a possible option or not. We have actually firstly taken a look at the type of consumers that Applied Materials Managing Product Costs deals in while an evaluation of the competitive environment and the business's strengths and weak points follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the reason for not introducing Case Study Help under Applied Materials Managing Product Costs name.
Applied Materials Managing Product Costs Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Applied Materials Managing Product Costs customers can be segmented into two groups, industrial customers and last consumers. Both the groups utilize Applied Materials Managing Product Costs high performance adhesives while the business is not only involved in the production of these adhesives but also markets them to these client groups. There are two kinds of products that are being offered to these possible markets; immediate adhesives and anaerobic adhesives. We would be focusing on the consumers of instant adhesives for this analysis because the marketplace for the latter has a lower potential for Applied Materials Managing Product Costs compared to that of instantaneous adhesives.

The overall market for instant adhesives is approximately 890,000 in the United States in 1978 which covers both client groups which have actually been recognized earlier.If we take a look at a breakdown of Applied Materials Managing Product Costs prospective market or client groups, we can see that the company sells to OEMs (Initial Equipment Makers), Do-it-Yourself consumers, repair work and overhauling business (MRO) and producers handling items made of leather, metal, plastic and wood. This variety in clients suggests that Applied Materials Managing Product Costs can target has numerous choices in terms of segmenting the marketplace for its brand-new item particularly as each of these groups would be requiring the very same type of product with particular changes in product packaging, quantity or demand. The client is not cost sensitive or brand name conscious so releasing a low priced dispenser under Applied Materials Managing Product Costs name is not an advised alternative.

Company Analysis

Applied Materials Managing Product Costs is not just a maker of adhesives however takes pleasure in market management in the instantaneous adhesive industry. The company has its own skilled and competent sales force which includes value to sales by training the business's network of 250 distributors for assisting in the sale of adhesives.

Core skills are not restricted to adhesive production just as Applied Materials Managing Product Costs also focuses on making adhesive dispensing equipment to help with using its products. This double production strategy gives Applied Materials Managing Product Costs an edge over competitors considering that none of the rivals of giving devices makes instant adhesives. In addition, none of these competitors sells directly to the consumer either and uses suppliers for reaching out to clients. While we are looking at the strengths of Applied Materials Managing Product Costs, it is essential to highlight the business's weak points as well.

Although the business's sales staff is experienced in training distributors, the fact stays that the sales group is not trained in selling devices so there is a possibility of relying heavily on suppliers when promoting adhesive devices. It should also be noted that the suppliers are revealing reluctance when it comes to selling devices that needs servicing which increases the obstacles of selling equipment under a specific brand name.

The company has items intended at the high end of the market if we look at Applied Materials Managing Product Costs product line in adhesive devices especially. The possibility of sales cannibalization exists if Applied Materials Managing Product Costs sells Case Study Help under the very same portfolio. Offered the reality that Case Study Help is priced lower than Applied Materials Managing Product Costs high-end product line, sales cannibalization would absolutely be impacting Applied Materials Managing Product Costs sales profits if the adhesive devices is offered under the business's trademark name.

We can see sales cannibalization impacting Applied Materials Managing Product Costs 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. There is another possible hazard which might reduce Applied Materials Managing Product Costs revenue if Case Study Help is launched under the business's trademark name. The reality that $175000 has actually been spent in promoting SuperBonder recommends that it is not a great time for launching a dispenser which can highlight the truth that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the immediate adhesive.

Furthermore, if we look at the market in general, the adhesives market does not show brand name orientation or cost awareness which gives us 2 additional factors for not releasing a low priced product under the business's brand name.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Applied Materials Managing Product Costs would be studied by means of Porter's five forces analysis which would highlight the degree of rivalry in the market.


Degree of Rivalry:

Currently we can see that the adhesive market has a high growth potential due to the existence of fragmented sections with Applied Materials Managing Product Costs delighting in management and a combined market share of 75% with two other industry players, Eastman and Permabond. While market rivalry in between these players could be called 'extreme' as the customer is not brand name mindful and each of these gamers has prominence in regards to market share, the truth still remains that the industry is not saturated and still has several market sections which can be targeted as prospective specific niche markets even when releasing an adhesive. Nevertheless, we can even explain the truth that sales cannibalization may be leading to industry competition in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for instant adhesives offers development capacity.


Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the buyer in this industry is low especially as the buyer has low knowledge about the item. While companies like Applied Materials Managing Product Costs have actually handled to train suppliers concerning adhesives, the final consumer depends on distributors. Around 72% of sales are made straight by manufacturers and suppliers for instant adhesives so the buyer has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Offered the truth that the adhesive market is controlled by three gamers, it could be said that the provider takes pleasure in a greater bargaining power compared to the buyer. However, the truth stays that the supplier does not have much impact over the buyer at this point particularly as the buyer does disappoint brand name recognition or price sensitivity. This suggests that the supplier has the higher power when it concerns the adhesive market while the purchaser and the manufacturer do not have a significant control over the real sales.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand loyalty and the ease of entry shown by foreign Japanese rivals in the instantaneous adhesive market suggests that the marketplace enables ease of entry. Nevertheless, if we take a look at Applied Materials Managing Product Costs in particular, the company has double capabilities in regards to being a maker of adhesive dispensers and immediate adhesives. Possible risks in devices dispensing industry are low which reveals the possibility of producing brand awareness in not just instant adhesives but also in giving adhesives as none of the market gamers has actually handled to position itself in dual capabilities.

Threat of Substitutes: The hazard of replacements in the immediate adhesive market is low while the dispenser market in particular has replacements like Glumetic pointer applicators, in-built applicators, pencil applicators and advanced consoles. The truth remains that if Applied Materials Managing Product Costs introduced Case Study Help, it would be enjoying sales cannibalization for its own items. (see appendix 1 for framework).


4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Applied Materials Managing Product Costs Case Study Help


Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has actually offered different factors for not releasing Case Study Help under Applied Materials Managing Product Costs name, we have a suggested marketing mix for Case Study Help given below if Applied Materials Managing Product Costs chooses to go ahead with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target market selected for Case Study Help is 'Motor vehicle services' for a number of factors. There are currently 89257 facilities in this section and a high use of approximately 58900 pounds. is being used by 36.1 % of the marketplace. This market has an extra development potential of 10.1% which might be a sufficient specific niche market segment for Case Study Help. Not only would a portable dispenser deal benefit to this particular market, the reality that the Do-it-Yourself market can also be targeted if a safe and clean low priced adhesive is being sold for usage with SuperBonder. The item would be offered without the 'glumetic tip' and 'vari-drop' so that the customer can choose whether he wants to choose either of the two accessories or not.

Price: The suggested cost of Case Study Help has been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is offered through distributors or via direct selling. This price would not include the expense of the 'vari pointer' or the 'glumetic suggestion'. A cost below $250 would not need approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor vehicle maintenance store needs to acquire the item on his own. This would increase the possibility of affecting mechanics to buy the product for usage in their day-to-day upkeep jobs.

Applied Materials Managing Product Costs would only be getting $157 per unit as displayed in appendix 2 which offers a breakdown of gross profitability and net success for Applied Materials Managing Product Costs for launching Case Study Help.

Place: A distribution design where Applied Materials Managing Product Costs directly sends the product to the regional distributor and keeps a 10% drop delivery allowance for the supplier would be utilized by Applied Materials Managing Product Costs. Since the sales group is already participated in offering instantaneous adhesives and they do not have knowledge in offering dispensers, involving them in the selling process would be costly specifically as each sales call costs roughly $120. The distributors are currently offering dispensers so offering Case Study Help through them would be a beneficial alternative.

Promotion: Although a low advertising spending plan should have been designated to Case Study Help however the fact that the dispenser is a development and it needs to be marketed well in order to cover the capital costs incurred for production, the recommended marketing strategy costing $51816 is advised for initially introducing the item in the market. The planned advertisements in magazines would be targeted at mechanics in car maintenance shops. (Suggested text for the ad is displayed in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summed up in appendix 4).


Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Applied Materials Managing Product Costs Case Study Analysis

Although a suggested plan of action in the form of a marketing mix has been talked about for Case Study Help, the fact still stays that the product would not match Applied Materials Managing Product Costs line of product. We take a look at appendix 2, we can see how the overall gross profitability for the two models is anticipated to be around $49377 if 250 units of each model are produced each year as per the plan. The preliminary prepared marketing is around $52000 per year which would be putting a stress on the company's resources leaving Applied Materials Managing Product Costs with an unfavorable net earnings if the expenses are assigned to Case Study Help just.

The fact that Applied Materials Managing Product Costs has currently incurred a preliminary financial investment of $48000 in the form of capital expense and model development shows that the income from Case Study Help is insufficient to carry out the danger of sales cannibalization. Besides that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market revealing low flexibility of demand is not a more effective choice specifically of it is affecting the sale of the company's profits producing designs.



PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE