WhatsApp

Aqrs Momentum Funds B Case Study Help Checklist

Aqrs Momentum Funds B Case Study Help Checklist

Aqrs Momentum Funds B Case Study Solution
Aqrs Momentum Funds B Case Study Help
Aqrs Momentum Funds B Case Study Analysis



Analyses for Evaluating Aqrs Momentum Funds B decision to launch Case Study Solution


The following section focuses on the of marketing for Aqrs Momentum Funds B where the business's clients, competitors and core proficiencies have assessed in order to validate whether the decision to release Case Study Help under Aqrs Momentum Funds B trademark name would be a practical option or not. We have actually firstly taken a look at the type of consumers that Aqrs Momentum Funds B handle while an examination of the competitive environment and the business's weak points and strengths follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the reason for not introducing Case Study Help under Aqrs Momentum Funds B name.
Aqrs Momentum Funds B Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Aqrs Momentum Funds B consumers can be segmented into 2 groups, final customers and industrial consumers. Both the groups use Aqrs Momentum Funds B high performance adhesives while the business is not just associated with the production of these adhesives but likewise markets them to these consumer groups. There are two kinds of products that are being offered to these possible markets; instant adhesives and anaerobic adhesives. We would be concentrating on the consumers of instant adhesives for this analysis because the marketplace for the latter has a lower potential for Aqrs Momentum Funds B compared to that of instantaneous adhesives.

The overall market for immediate adhesives is roughly 890,000 in the United States in 1978 which covers both client groups which have been identified earlier.If we take a look at a breakdown of Aqrs Momentum Funds B potential market or client groups, we can see that the company sells to OEMs (Original Devices Producers), Do-it-Yourself consumers, repair work and upgrading companies (MRO) and manufacturers handling items made of leather, wood, plastic and metal. This variety in clients suggests that Aqrs Momentum Funds B can target has various alternatives in regards to segmenting the marketplace for its new product especially as each of these groups would be requiring the exact same type of product with respective modifications in product packaging, demand or amount. The consumer is not cost delicate or brand name conscious so introducing a low priced dispenser under Aqrs Momentum Funds B name is not an advised option.

Company Analysis

Aqrs Momentum Funds B is not simply a maker of adhesives but takes pleasure in market leadership in the instant adhesive market. The business has its own proficient and certified sales force which adds worth to sales by training the business's network of 250 suppliers for helping with the sale of adhesives.

Core competences are not limited to adhesive production only as Aqrs Momentum Funds B likewise specializes in making adhesive dispensing equipment to facilitate the use of its products. This dual production technique provides Aqrs Momentum Funds B an edge over competitors since none of the rivals of giving equipment makes instantaneous adhesives. Furthermore, none of these competitors sells straight to the consumer either and uses distributors for reaching out to customers. While we are looking at the strengths of Aqrs Momentum Funds B, it is essential to highlight the business's weak points.

The company's sales staff is experienced in training distributors, the reality stays that the sales group is not trained in selling equipment so there is a possibility of relying greatly on distributors when promoting adhesive devices. It should also be kept in mind that the suppliers are showing hesitation when it comes to selling equipment that requires maintenance which increases the challenges of offering equipment under a particular brand name.

If we look at Aqrs Momentum Funds B line of product in adhesive devices especially, the business has items aimed at the high-end of the marketplace. The possibility of sales cannibalization exists if Aqrs Momentum Funds B sells Case Study Help under the same portfolio. Provided the truth that Case Study Help is priced lower than Aqrs Momentum Funds B high-end product line, sales cannibalization would definitely be affecting Aqrs Momentum Funds B sales income if the adhesive equipment is sold under the business's brand name.

We can see sales cannibalization impacting Aqrs Momentum Funds B 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. There is another possible threat which might decrease Aqrs Momentum Funds B revenue if Case Study Help is introduced under the business's trademark name. The fact that $175000 has been invested in promoting SuperBonder suggests that it is not a good time for releasing a dispenser which can highlight the reality that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the instantaneous adhesive.

Furthermore, if we take a look at the marketplace in general, the adhesives market does not show brand name orientation or cost consciousness which gives us 2 additional factors for not launching a low priced product under the company's trademark name.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Aqrs Momentum Funds B would be studied by means of Porter's five forces analysis which would highlight the degree of competition in the market.


Degree of Rivalry:

Currently we can see that the adhesive market has a high growth capacity due to the existence of fragmented sectors with Aqrs Momentum Funds B enjoying management and a combined market share of 75% with 2 other market players, Eastman and Permabond. While market competition between these players could be called 'extreme' as the customer is not brand conscious and each of these players has prominence in regards to market share, the reality still stays that the industry is not saturated and still has several market sectors which can be targeted as potential niche markets even when releasing an adhesive. We can even point out the reality that sales cannibalization may be leading to market rivalry in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for instant adhesives uses development capacity.


Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the buyer in this industry is low especially as the purchaser has low knowledge about the product. While business like Aqrs Momentum Funds B have actually handled to train distributors relating to adhesives, the final consumer is dependent on suppliers. Roughly 72% of sales are made directly by manufacturers and distributors for immediate adhesives so the buyer has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Offered the reality that the adhesive market is controlled by three players, it could be stated that the supplier delights in a higher bargaining power compared to the purchaser. The truth remains that the provider does not have much impact over the buyer at this point particularly as the purchaser does not show brand name recognition or price sensitivity. This suggests that the distributor has the greater power when it concerns the adhesive market while the maker and the purchaser do not have a major control over the actual sales.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand name loyalty and the ease of entry revealed by foreign Japanese competitors in the immediate adhesive market suggests that the marketplace permits ease of entry. If we look at Aqrs Momentum Funds B in specific, the company has dual abilities in terms of being a maker of immediate adhesives and adhesive dispensers. Possible dangers in devices giving market are low which shows the possibility of creating brand awareness in not only instantaneous adhesives but likewise in dispensing adhesives as none of the industry players has handled to place itself in dual capabilities.

Risk of Substitutes: The hazard of alternatives in the instant adhesive market is low while the dispenser market in particular has alternatives like Glumetic suggestion applicators, in-built applicators, pencil applicators and sophisticated consoles. The truth stays that if Aqrs Momentum Funds B presented Case Study Help, it would be delighting in sales cannibalization for its own products. (see appendix 1 for framework).


4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Aqrs Momentum Funds B Case Study Help


Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has given numerous reasons for not launching Case Study Help under Aqrs Momentum Funds B name, we have a suggested marketing mix for Case Study Help given listed below if Aqrs Momentum Funds B decides to go ahead with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target market chosen for Case Study Help is 'Motor vehicle services' for a number of factors. This market has an additional development potential of 10.1% which may be an excellent sufficient niche market segment for Case Study Help. Not only would a portable dispenser offer convenience to this particular market, the truth that the Do-it-Yourself market can also be targeted if a safe and clean low priced adhesive is being sold for usage with SuperBonder.

Price: The recommended rate of Case Study Help has actually been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is sold through suppliers or by means of direct selling. A rate listed below $250 would not need approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor lorry maintenance shop requires to buy the item on his own.

Aqrs Momentum Funds B would only be getting $157 per unit as displayed in appendix 2 which provides a breakdown of gross success and net success for Aqrs Momentum Funds B for launching Case Study Help.

Place: A circulation model where Aqrs Momentum Funds B straight sends the product to the local supplier and keeps a 10% drop delivery allowance for the supplier would be utilized by Aqrs Momentum Funds B. Considering that the sales team is already engaged in selling immediate adhesives and they do not have competence in selling dispensers, involving them in the selling process would be costly particularly as each sales call expenses roughly $120. The suppliers are already offering dispensers so offering Case Study Help through them would be a favorable option.

Promotion: A low promotional budget plan ought to have been designated to Case Study Help however the fact that the dispenser is a development and it needs to be marketed well in order to cover the capital costs sustained for production, the recommended marketing strategy costing $51816 is advised for at first presenting the product in the market. The prepared ads in publications would be targeted at mechanics in automobile maintenance stores. (Suggested text for the advertisement is displayed in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summarized in appendix 4).


Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Aqrs Momentum Funds B Case Study Analysis

Although a suggested strategy in the form of a marketing mix has actually been talked about for Case Study Help, the truth still remains that the product would not complement Aqrs Momentum Funds B line of product. We have a look at appendix 2, we can see how the total gross success for the two models is anticipated to be around $49377 if 250 units of each design are manufactured each year based on the plan. Nevertheless, the preliminary prepared marketing is around $52000 annually which would be putting a strain on the company's resources leaving Aqrs Momentum Funds B with a negative net income if the costs are designated to Case Study Help only.

The reality that Aqrs Momentum Funds B has actually currently incurred an initial investment of $48000 in the form of capital cost and model development shows that the income from Case Study Help is insufficient to carry out the risk of sales cannibalization. Aside from that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market showing low elasticity of demand is not a preferable choice specifically of it is affecting the sale of the company's earnings producing designs.


 

PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE