WhatsApp

Bake Me A Cake Case Study Help Checklist

Bake Me A Cake Case Study Help Checklist

Bake Me A Cake Case Study Solution
Bake Me A Cake Case Study Help
Bake Me A Cake Case Study Analysis



Analyses for Evaluating Bake Me A Cake decision to launch Case Study Solution


The following area concentrates on the of marketing for Bake Me A Cake where the business's clients, rivals and core proficiencies have evaluated in order to validate whether the choice to introduce Case Study Help under Bake Me A Cake brand would be a feasible alternative or not. We have firstly looked at the type of customers that Bake Me A Cake deals in while an examination of the competitive environment and the business's weak points and strengths follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the validation for not introducing Case Study Help under Bake Me A Cake name.
Bake Me A Cake Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Bake Me A Cake clients can be segmented into two groups, industrial clients and last consumers. Both the groups utilize Bake Me A Cake high performance adhesives while the company is not just associated with the production of these adhesives but also markets them to these client groups. There are 2 kinds of products that are being sold to these potential markets; anaerobic adhesives and instant adhesives. We would be focusing on the customers of instantaneous adhesives for this analysis since the market for the latter has a lower capacity for Bake Me A Cake compared to that of instant adhesives.

The total market for instant adhesives is approximately 890,000 in the US in 1978 which covers both consumer groups which have been determined earlier.If we take a look at a breakdown of Bake Me A Cake possible market or consumer groups, we can see that the business sells to OEMs (Initial Equipment Producers), Do-it-Yourself consumers, repair and overhauling companies (MRO) and producers dealing in products made of leather, plastic, wood and metal. This variety in customers recommends that Bake Me A Cake can target has numerous alternatives in terms of segmenting the market for its new product especially as each of these groups would be requiring the same kind of item with particular changes in quantity, need or packaging. The customer is not cost delicate or brand name conscious so introducing a low priced dispenser under Bake Me A Cake name is not an advised alternative.

Company Analysis

Bake Me A Cake is not simply a producer of adhesives however takes pleasure in market management in the instantaneous adhesive industry. The business has its own proficient and competent sales force which adds value to sales by training the business's network of 250 suppliers for helping with the sale of adhesives. Bake Me A Cake believes in unique circulation as suggested by the fact that it has actually picked to sell through 250 suppliers whereas there is t a network of 10000 suppliers that can be checked out for expanding reach via suppliers. The company's reach is not restricted to The United States and Canada only as it also delights in worldwide sales. With 1400 outlets spread out all across The United States and Canada, Bake Me A Cake has its internal production plants rather than using out-sourcing as the favored method.

Core skills are not restricted to adhesive production just as Bake Me A Cake likewise concentrates on making adhesive giving devices to help with the use of its products. This dual production method gives Bake Me A Cake an edge over rivals since none of the competitors of giving equipment makes immediate adhesives. In addition, none of these rivals offers straight to the consumer either and uses distributors for reaching out to customers. While we are looking at the strengths of Bake Me A Cake, it is very important to highlight the company's weaknesses as well.

The business's sales staff is experienced in training suppliers, the reality stays that the sales group is not trained in selling devices so there is a possibility of relying heavily on suppliers when promoting adhesive devices. Nevertheless, it should also be kept in mind that the suppliers are revealing hesitation when it pertains to offering equipment that needs maintenance which increases the obstacles of selling equipment under a specific trademark name.

The business has actually products aimed at the high end of the market if we look at Bake Me A Cake product line in adhesive devices especially. The possibility of sales cannibalization exists if Bake Me A Cake sells Case Study Help under the very same portfolio. Provided the fact that Case Study Help is priced lower than Bake Me A Cake high-end line of product, sales cannibalization would absolutely be impacting Bake Me A Cake sales revenue if the adhesive equipment is sold under the company's brand name.

We can see sales cannibalization affecting Bake Me A Cake 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. If Case Study Help is introduced under the company's brand name, there is another possible danger which could reduce Bake Me A Cake profits. The truth that $175000 has been invested in promoting SuperBonder recommends that it is not a great time for launching a dispenser which can highlight the fact that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the instant adhesive.

In addition, if we look at the marketplace in general, the adhesives market does not show brand orientation or rate consciousness which offers us two extra factors for not releasing a low priced item under the company's brand.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Bake Me A Cake would be studied via Porter's 5 forces analysis which would highlight the degree of competition in the market.


Degree of Rivalry:

Presently we can see that the adhesive market has a high development potential due to the existence of fragmented sections with Bake Me A Cake taking pleasure in leadership and a combined market share of 75% with two other market players, Eastman and Permabond. While market competition in between these gamers could be called 'extreme' as the consumer is not brand mindful and each of these players has prominence in terms of market share, the truth still remains that the market is not saturated and still has numerous market sections which can be targeted as potential specific niche markets even when launching an adhesive. We can even point out the reality that sales cannibalization might be leading to market rivalry in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for instantaneous adhesives uses growth potential.


Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the purchaser in this market is low specifically as the buyer has low understanding about the product. While companies like Bake Me A Cake have actually handled to train distributors relating to adhesives, the final customer is dependent on distributors. Approximately 72% of sales are made straight by manufacturers and distributors for immediate adhesives so the buyer has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Given the fact that the adhesive market is dominated by 3 gamers, it could be said that the provider enjoys a greater bargaining power compared to the buyer. The fact stays that the supplier does not have much influence over the buyer at this point particularly as the purchaser does not show brand name recognition or cost sensitivity. This indicates that the distributor has the higher power when it pertains to the adhesive market while the buyer and the producer do not have a significant control over the actual sales.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand loyalty and the ease of entry revealed by foreign Japanese competitors in the immediate adhesive market indicates that the market permits ease of entry. However, if we look at Bake Me A Cake in particular, the company has double capabilities in regards to being a manufacturer of immediate adhesives and adhesive dispensers. Potential hazards in equipment dispensing industry are low which shows the possibility of producing brand name awareness in not just immediate adhesives but likewise in giving adhesives as none of the market gamers has actually handled to place itself in dual abilities.

Hazard of Substitutes: The risk of alternatives in the instantaneous adhesive market is low while the dispenser market in particular has alternatives like Glumetic pointer applicators, inbuilt applicators, pencil applicators and sophisticated consoles. The fact remains that if Bake Me A Cake introduced Case Study Help, it would be enjoying sales cannibalization for its own products. (see appendix 1 for framework).


4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Bake Me A Cake Case Study Help


Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has actually given numerous factors for not launching Case Study Help under Bake Me A Cake name, we have a suggested marketing mix for Case Study Help given listed below if Bake Me A Cake chooses to proceed with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target market selected for Case Study Help is 'Motor automobile services' for a number of factors. This market has an additional growth capacity of 10.1% which may be a good sufficient niche market segment for Case Study Help. Not just would a portable dispenser offer benefit to this particular market, the truth that the Diy market can also be targeted if a safe and clean low priced adhesive is being sold for use with SuperBonder.

Price: The recommended price of Case Study Help has actually been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is offered through distributors or through direct selling. This rate would not include the expense of the 'vari suggestion' or the 'glumetic tip'. A rate listed below $250 would not require approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor vehicle upkeep store needs to acquire the item on his own. This would increase the possibility of influencing mechanics to acquire the product for use in their everyday maintenance jobs.

Bake Me A Cake would just be getting $157 per unit as shown in appendix 2 which provides a breakdown of gross success and net success for Bake Me A Cake for launching Case Study Help.

Place: A circulation model where Bake Me A Cake straight sends the item to the regional supplier and keeps a 10% drop delivery allowance for the supplier would be used by Bake Me A Cake. Because the sales group is currently participated in selling instant adhesives and they do not have proficiency in offering dispensers, involving them in the selling process would be expensive specifically as each sales call costs roughly $120. The suppliers are already offering dispensers so selling Case Study Help through them would be a beneficial choice.

Promotion: A low advertising spending plan needs to have been designated to Case Study Help however the reality that the dispenser is a development and it needs to be marketed well in order to cover the capital costs incurred for production, the recommended marketing plan costing $51816 is recommended for at first introducing the product in the market. The prepared ads in publications would be targeted at mechanics in lorry maintenance stores. (Suggested text for the ad is displayed in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summed up in appendix 4).


Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Bake Me A Cake Case Study Analysis

Although a suggested strategy in the form of a marketing mix has been discussed for Case Study Help, the reality still remains that the product would not match Bake Me A Cake line of product. We have a look at appendix 2, we can see how the total gross profitability for the two designs is anticipated to be approximately $49377 if 250 units of each design are made annually according to the strategy. Nevertheless, the initial prepared marketing is approximately $52000 per year which would be putting a strain on the business's resources leaving Bake Me A Cake with an unfavorable net income if the expenses are designated to Case Study Help just.

The fact that Bake Me A Cake has already sustained an initial financial investment of $48000 in the form of capital cost and model development shows that the income from Case Study Help is not enough to undertake the risk of sales cannibalization. Besides that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market revealing low flexibility of demand is not a preferable alternative especially of it is affecting the sale of the business's profits generating models.


 

PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE