Bio Tech Inc Case Study Help Checklist

Bio Tech Inc Case Study Help Checklist

Bio Tech Inc Case Study Solution
Bio Tech Inc Case Study Help
Bio Tech Inc Case Study Analysis

Analyses for Evaluating Bio Tech Inc decision to launch Case Study Solution

The following area focuses on the of marketing for Bio Tech Inc where the company's customers, rivals and core proficiencies have evaluated in order to justify whether the choice to launch Case Study Help under Bio Tech Inc brand would be a practical choice or not. We have firstly taken a look at the type of clients that Bio Tech Inc deals in while an evaluation of the competitive environment and the business's weaknesses and strengths follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the validation for not introducing Case Study Help under Bio Tech Inc name.
Bio Tech Inc Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Both the groups use Bio Tech Inc high efficiency adhesives while the company is not only included in the production of these adhesives however likewise markets them to these client groups. We would be focusing on the consumers of immediate adhesives for this analysis given that the market for the latter has a lower potential for Bio Tech Inc compared to that of instant adhesives.

The total market for immediate adhesives is around 890,000 in the US in 1978 which covers both consumer groups which have been recognized earlier.If we look at a breakdown of Bio Tech Inc possible market or customer groups, we can see that the business offers to OEMs (Initial Equipment Manufacturers), Do-it-Yourself consumers, repair work and revamping business (MRO) and producers dealing in items made from leather, metal, plastic and wood. This variety in customers suggests that Bio Tech Inc can target has different alternatives in regards to segmenting the market for its brand-new item especially as each of these groups would be needing the exact same kind of item with respective changes in product packaging, quantity or need. However, the consumer is not cost sensitive or brand name mindful so releasing a low priced dispenser under Bio Tech Inc name is not a recommended alternative.

Company Analysis

Bio Tech Inc is not simply a maker of adhesives however takes pleasure in market management in the immediate adhesive industry. The business has its own knowledgeable and qualified sales force which adds worth to sales by training the business's network of 250 suppliers for facilitating the sale of adhesives. Bio Tech Inc believes in special distribution as shown by the reality that it has picked to sell through 250 distributors whereas there is t a network of 10000 distributors that can be explored for expanding reach by means of distributors. The business's reach is not restricted to North America just as it likewise enjoys worldwide sales. With 1400 outlets spread out all across The United States and Canada, Bio Tech Inc has its internal production plants rather than using out-sourcing as the favored method.

Core skills are not restricted to adhesive production only as Bio Tech Inc also focuses on making adhesive giving equipment to facilitate using its items. This dual production technique offers Bio Tech Inc an edge over competitors given that none of the rivals of giving equipment makes immediate adhesives. In addition, none of these rivals sells straight to the customer either and makes use of suppliers for connecting to customers. While we are looking at the strengths of Bio Tech Inc, it is essential to highlight the company's weaknesses.

The business's sales personnel is experienced in training suppliers, the truth stays that the sales team is not trained in offering devices so there is a possibility of relying heavily on suppliers when promoting adhesive devices. It must likewise be kept in mind that the distributors are showing reluctance when it comes to offering devices that needs maintenance which increases the obstacles of offering equipment under a specific brand name.

The company has actually products intended at the high end of the market if we look at Bio Tech Inc product line in adhesive devices particularly. The possibility of sales cannibalization exists if Bio Tech Inc offers Case Study Help under the very same portfolio. Given the truth that Case Study Help is priced lower than Bio Tech Inc high-end product line, sales cannibalization would absolutely be affecting Bio Tech Inc sales income if the adhesive equipment is sold under the company's brand name.

We can see sales cannibalization impacting Bio Tech Inc 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. There is another possible hazard which might reduce Bio Tech Inc income if Case Study Help is introduced under the business's trademark name. The truth that $175000 has actually been invested in promoting SuperBonder suggests that it is not a great time for releasing a dispenser which can highlight the fact that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the instantaneous adhesive.

Additionally, if we take a look at the marketplace in general, the adhesives market does not show brand name orientation or price consciousness which provides us 2 additional factors for not introducing a low priced item under the business's brand name.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Bio Tech Inc would be studied via Porter's 5 forces analysis which would highlight the degree of competition in the market.

Degree of Rivalry:

Currently we can see that the adhesive market has a high development potential due to the existence of fragmented sectors with Bio Tech Inc delighting in leadership and a combined market share of 75% with 2 other industry players, Eastman and Permabond. While industry rivalry between these gamers could be called 'extreme' as the consumer is not brand name conscious and each of these players has prominence in regards to market share, the fact still stays that the industry is not saturated and still has numerous market sections which can be targeted as prospective niche markets even when releasing an adhesive. We can even point out the fact that sales cannibalization might be leading to industry competition in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for instant adhesives uses growth capacity.

Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the purchaser in this market is low particularly as the purchaser has low knowledge about the product. While companies like Bio Tech Inc have handled to train suppliers regarding adhesives, the final customer depends on distributors. Approximately 72% of sales are made directly by producers and suppliers for instant adhesives so the buyer has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Offered the fact that the adhesive market is dominated by three gamers, it could be stated that the supplier takes pleasure in a higher bargaining power compared to the buyer. The fact stays that the provider does not have much impact over the buyer at this point specifically as the buyer does not reveal brand name recognition or rate sensitivity. When it comes to the adhesive market while the buyer and the producer do not have a major control over the actual sales, this shows that the supplier has the greater power.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand commitment and the ease of entry shown by foreign Japanese competitors in the immediate adhesive market indicates that the market allows ease of entry. Nevertheless, if we take a look at Bio Tech Inc in particular, the company has dual abilities in terms of being a manufacturer of adhesive dispensers and immediate adhesives. Prospective hazards in equipment giving market are low which reveals the possibility of developing brand awareness in not just immediate adhesives however also in dispensing adhesives as none of the market players has actually handled to place itself in double capabilities.

Threat of Substitutes: The hazard of alternatives in the instantaneous adhesive market is low while the dispenser market in particular has substitutes like Glumetic suggestion applicators, inbuilt applicators, pencil applicators and sophisticated consoles. The truth remains that if Bio Tech Inc presented Case Study Help, it would be delighting in sales cannibalization for its own items. (see appendix 1 for framework).

4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Bio Tech Inc Case Study Help

Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has provided numerous reasons for not releasing Case Study Help under Bio Tech Inc name, we have a recommended marketing mix for Case Study Help offered below if Bio Tech Inc chooses to go on with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target market selected for Case Study Help is 'Motor vehicle services' for a variety of factors. There are presently 89257 establishments in this section and a high use of roughly 58900 pounds. is being utilized by 36.1 % of the market. This market has an additional growth capacity of 10.1% which may be a good enough specific niche market section for Case Study Help. Not just would a portable dispenser offer benefit to this particular market, the fact that the Diy market can also be targeted if a potable low priced adhesive is being sold for use with SuperBonder. The product would be offered without the 'glumetic idea' and 'vari-drop' so that the customer can decide whether he wants to opt for either of the two accessories or not.

Price: The recommended rate of Case Study Help has been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is sold through suppliers or via direct selling. This cost would not consist of the cost of the 'vari suggestion' or the 'glumetic tip'. A cost listed below $250 would not need approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor vehicle maintenance store needs to buy the product on his own. This would increase the possibility of affecting mechanics to buy the item for use in their day-to-day maintenance jobs.

Bio Tech Inc would only be getting $157 per unit as shown in appendix 2 which offers a breakdown of gross success and net success for Bio Tech Inc for launching Case Study Help.

Place: A distribution model where Bio Tech Inc directly sends out the product to the local distributor and keeps a 10% drop delivery allowance for the supplier would be utilized by Bio Tech Inc. Given that the sales group is already taken part in offering immediate adhesives and they do not have proficiency in offering dispensers, involving them in the selling process would be expensive especially as each sales call expenses roughly $120. The distributors are already offering dispensers so selling Case Study Help through them would be a favorable alternative.

Promotion: A low promotional budget needs to have been assigned to Case Study Help but the truth that the dispenser is a development and it requires to be marketed well in order to cover the capital expenses incurred for production, the suggested advertising strategy costing $51816 is recommended for at first presenting the item in the market. The prepared advertisements in magazines would be targeted at mechanics in automobile maintenance stores. (Recommended text for the advertisement is displayed in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summed up in appendix 4).

Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Bio Tech Inc Case Study Analysis

Although a recommended plan of action in the form of a marketing mix has been discussed for Case Study Help, the fact still stays that the product would not complement Bio Tech Inc line of product. We take a look at appendix 2, we can see how the overall gross profitability for the two designs is anticipated to be roughly $49377 if 250 units of each model are made each year according to the strategy. The initial planned advertising is roughly $52000 per year which would be putting a strain on the company's resources leaving Bio Tech Inc with a negative net income if the expenditures are assigned to Case Study Help just.

The reality that Bio Tech Inc has actually already incurred an initial financial investment of $48000 in the form of capital expense and prototype development indicates that the revenue from Case Study Help is not enough to carry out the threat of sales cannibalization. Aside from that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market revealing low flexibility of need is not a more effective option especially of it is affecting the sale of the business's profits creating models.