WhatsApp

Bio Tech Inc Case Study Help Checklist

Bio Tech Inc Case Study Help Checklist

Bio Tech Inc Case Study Solution
Bio Tech Inc Case Study Help
Bio Tech Inc Case Study Analysis



Analyses for Evaluating Bio Tech Inc decision to launch Case Study Solution


The following section focuses on the of marketing for Bio Tech Inc where the company's consumers, competitors and core proficiencies have actually assessed in order to justify whether the decision to release Case Study Help under Bio Tech Inc brand name would be a practical alternative or not. We have actually to start with looked at the kind of clients that Bio Tech Inc handle while an assessment of the competitive environment and the business's weak points and strengths follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the reason for not releasing Case Study Help under Bio Tech Inc name.
Bio Tech Inc Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Bio Tech Inc customers can be segmented into 2 groups, commercial customers and final customers. Both the groups utilize Bio Tech Inc high performance adhesives while the company is not only involved in the production of these adhesives but likewise markets them to these consumer groups. There are 2 kinds of products that are being sold to these possible markets; anaerobic adhesives and instant adhesives. We would be focusing on the consumers of instantaneous adhesives for this analysis considering that the market for the latter has a lower potential for Bio Tech Inc compared to that of instant adhesives.

The overall market for immediate adhesives is roughly 890,000 in the US in 1978 which covers both client groups which have actually been identified earlier.If we look at a breakdown of Bio Tech Inc prospective market or customer groups, we can see that the business offers to OEMs (Original Equipment Manufacturers), Do-it-Yourself customers, repair work and upgrading business (MRO) and manufacturers dealing in items made of leather, wood, plastic and metal. This diversity in customers suggests that Bio Tech Inc can target has numerous choices in terms of segmenting the market for its brand-new item specifically as each of these groups would be requiring the very same type of item with respective changes in need, packaging or amount. Nevertheless, the client is not rate delicate or brand name conscious so launching a low priced dispenser under Bio Tech Inc name is not an advised option.

Company Analysis

Bio Tech Inc is not just a producer of adhesives however takes pleasure in market leadership in the instantaneous adhesive industry. The business has its own competent and certified sales force which adds worth to sales by training the company's network of 250 suppliers for facilitating the sale of adhesives. Bio Tech Inc believes in exclusive distribution as suggested by the truth that it has actually picked to offer through 250 suppliers whereas there is t a network of 10000 suppliers that can be checked out for expanding reach by means of suppliers. The business's reach is not limited to The United States and Canada just as it also enjoys international sales. With 1400 outlets spread all throughout North America, Bio Tech Inc has its in-house production plants rather than utilizing out-sourcing as the favored strategy.

Core competences are not limited to adhesive manufacturing just as Bio Tech Inc also specializes in making adhesive giving devices to facilitate making use of its products. This dual production technique gives Bio Tech Inc an edge over competitors considering that none of the competitors of dispensing equipment makes immediate adhesives. Furthermore, none of these rivals sells directly to the consumer either and uses distributors for connecting to clients. While we are taking a look at the strengths of Bio Tech Inc, it is very important to highlight the business's weak points as well.

The company's sales staff is competent in training distributors, the fact stays that the sales group is not trained in offering equipment so there is a possibility of relying heavily on distributors when promoting adhesive equipment. However, it needs to also be noted that the distributors are revealing hesitation when it comes to offering equipment that needs servicing which increases the challenges of selling devices under a specific brand name.

The company has actually products aimed at the high end of the market if we look at Bio Tech Inc item line in adhesive equipment especially. The possibility of sales cannibalization exists if Bio Tech Inc offers Case Study Help under the exact same portfolio. Given the truth that Case Study Help is priced lower than Bio Tech Inc high-end product line, sales cannibalization would certainly be impacting Bio Tech Inc sales revenue if the adhesive equipment is offered under the business's brand name.

We can see sales cannibalization affecting Bio Tech Inc 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. There is another possible hazard which could decrease Bio Tech Inc income if Case Study Help is launched under the business's brand. The truth that $175000 has actually been invested in promoting SuperBonder recommends that it is not a good time for launching a dispenser which can highlight the truth that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the immediate adhesive.

Additionally, if we take a look at the market in general, the adhesives market does not show brand orientation or price consciousness which gives us two extra reasons for not releasing a low priced product under the business's brand.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Bio Tech Inc would be studied through Porter's 5 forces analysis which would highlight the degree of competition in the market.


Degree of Rivalry:

Currently we can see that the adhesive market has a high development potential due to the existence of fragmented sectors with Bio Tech Inc enjoying management and a combined market share of 75% with two other industry gamers, Eastman and Permabond. While market competition in between these players could be called 'intense' as the customer is not brand conscious and each of these players has prominence in regards to market share, the truth still stays that the industry is not saturated and still has several market sections which can be targeted as possible specific niche markets even when releasing an adhesive. However, we can even explain the reality that sales cannibalization might be leading to market rivalry in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for instantaneous adhesives offers growth potential.


Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the purchaser in this market is low particularly as the purchaser has low understanding about the product. While business like Bio Tech Inc have actually handled to train suppliers relating to adhesives, the last consumer is dependent on suppliers. Roughly 72% of sales are made directly by makers and distributors for instantaneous adhesives so the buyer has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Provided the fact that the adhesive market is dominated by 3 players, it could be said that the supplier enjoys a higher bargaining power compared to the purchaser. The truth remains that the supplier does not have much influence over the buyer at this point particularly as the buyer does not show brand name acknowledgment or cost level of sensitivity. This suggests that the distributor has the greater power when it pertains to the adhesive market while the manufacturer and the buyer do not have a major control over the real sales.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand name loyalty and the ease of entry revealed by foreign Japanese rivals in the instantaneous adhesive market shows that the market permits ease of entry. If we look at Bio Tech Inc in particular, the company has dual abilities in terms of being a producer of adhesive dispensers and instantaneous adhesives. Prospective threats in devices giving market are low which reveals the possibility of producing brand name awareness in not just instant adhesives however likewise in giving adhesives as none of the industry players has handled to place itself in double abilities.

Threat of Substitutes: The threat of replacements in the instant adhesive industry is low while the dispenser market in particular has substitutes like Glumetic suggestion applicators, built-in applicators, pencil applicators and advanced consoles. The fact stays that if Bio Tech Inc presented Case Study Help, it would be enjoying sales cannibalization for its own products. (see appendix 1 for structure).


4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Bio Tech Inc Case Study Help


Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has actually given different reasons for not introducing Case Study Help under Bio Tech Inc name, we have actually a recommended marketing mix for Case Study Help given below if Bio Tech Inc decides to go ahead with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target market selected for Case Study Help is 'Motor automobile services' for a number of reasons. This market has an additional growth potential of 10.1% which may be a good enough niche market sector for Case Study Help. Not just would a portable dispenser offer benefit to this particular market, the fact that the Do-it-Yourself market can also be targeted if a drinkable low priced adhesive is being offered for use with SuperBonder.

Price: The recommended rate of Case Study Help has actually been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is offered through distributors or via direct selling. This rate would not consist of the expense of the 'vari tip' or the 'glumetic pointer'. A cost below $250 would not require approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor vehicle maintenance store needs to purchase the product on his own. This would increase the possibility of influencing mechanics to acquire the product for usage in their everyday maintenance jobs.

Bio Tech Inc would only be getting $157 per unit as displayed in appendix 2 which offers a breakdown of gross success and net profitability for Bio Tech Inc for releasing Case Study Help.

Place: A distribution design where Bio Tech Inc directly sends the item to the local supplier and keeps a 10% drop delivery allowance for the distributor would be used by Bio Tech Inc. Since the sales team is already participated in offering instantaneous adhesives and they do not have proficiency in selling dispensers, involving them in the selling process would be costly particularly as each sales call costs around $120. The suppliers are currently offering dispensers so offering Case Study Help through them would be a beneficial alternative.

Promotion: Although a low marketing budget plan needs to have been appointed to Case Study Help however the truth that the dispenser is an innovation and it needs to be marketed well in order to cover the capital costs incurred for production, the recommended advertising plan costing $51816 is suggested for initially presenting the product in the market. The prepared advertisements in publications would be targeted at mechanics in car upkeep shops. (Suggested text for the ad is displayed in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summed up in appendix 4).


Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Bio Tech Inc Case Study Analysis

Although a recommended plan of action in the form of a marketing mix has actually been discussed for Case Study Help, the truth still stays that the item would not match Bio Tech Inc product line. We take a look at appendix 2, we can see how the overall gross profitability for the two models is expected to be roughly $49377 if 250 systems of each model are produced annually according to the strategy. The preliminary prepared advertising is around $52000 per year which would be putting a pressure on the business's resources leaving Bio Tech Inc with an unfavorable net income if the expenses are assigned to Case Study Help only.

The reality that Bio Tech Inc has already sustained a preliminary financial investment of $48000 in the form of capital expense and prototype development suggests that the revenue from Case Study Help is insufficient to undertake the danger of sales cannibalization. Other than that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market revealing low flexibility of need is not a preferable option especially of it is affecting the sale of the company's earnings generating models.


 

PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE