WhatsApp

Blue Turtle Clothing Company Case Study Help Checklist

Blue Turtle Clothing Company Case Study Help Checklist

Blue Turtle Clothing Company Case Study Solution
Blue Turtle Clothing Company Case Study Help
Blue Turtle Clothing Company Case Study Analysis



Analyses for Evaluating Blue Turtle Clothing Company decision to launch Case Study Solution


The following section focuses on the of marketing for Blue Turtle Clothing Company where the company's clients, competitors and core competencies have actually examined in order to validate whether the choice to release Case Study Help under Blue Turtle Clothing Company trademark name would be a possible option or not. We have first of all looked at the kind of consumers that Blue Turtle Clothing Company handle while an evaluation of the competitive environment and the company's weaknesses and strengths follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the justification for not releasing Case Study Help under Blue Turtle Clothing Company name.
Blue Turtle Clothing Company Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Blue Turtle Clothing Company consumers can be segmented into two groups, last consumers and commercial consumers. Both the groups use Blue Turtle Clothing Company high performance adhesives while the business is not just associated with the production of these adhesives but likewise markets them to these client groups. There are two kinds of products that are being sold to these potential markets; anaerobic adhesives and instantaneous adhesives. We would be focusing on the consumers of instant adhesives for this analysis considering that the market for the latter has a lower potential for Blue Turtle Clothing Company compared to that of instant adhesives.

The overall market for instant adhesives is roughly 890,000 in the US in 1978 which covers both customer groups which have actually been identified earlier.If we look at a breakdown of Blue Turtle Clothing Company potential market or client groups, we can see that the company sells to OEMs (Initial Devices Makers), Do-it-Yourself consumers, repair work and upgrading business (MRO) and manufacturers dealing in products made of leather, metal, plastic and wood. This variety in customers recommends that Blue Turtle Clothing Company can target has different alternatives in regards to segmenting the marketplace for its brand-new item specifically as each of these groups would be requiring the very same type of product with respective modifications in quantity, product packaging or demand. However, the customer is not rate delicate or brand name conscious so launching a low priced dispenser under Blue Turtle Clothing Company name is not an advised alternative.

Company Analysis

Blue Turtle Clothing Company is not simply a maker of adhesives but takes pleasure in market leadership in the immediate adhesive industry. The company has its own experienced and qualified sales force which adds worth to sales by training the business's network of 250 suppliers for facilitating the sale of adhesives. Blue Turtle Clothing Company believes in special distribution as shown by the fact that it has chosen to sell through 250 distributors whereas there is t a network of 10000 distributors that can be checked out for expanding reach via distributors. The business's reach is not restricted to The United States and Canada just as it also delights in international sales. With 1400 outlets spread all across North America, Blue Turtle Clothing Company has its internal production plants instead of utilizing out-sourcing as the favored method.

Core competences are not restricted to adhesive production only as Blue Turtle Clothing Company likewise specializes in making adhesive giving devices to facilitate using its items. This dual production strategy provides Blue Turtle Clothing Company an edge over rivals considering that none of the competitors of dispensing devices makes instant adhesives. In addition, none of these rivals sells directly to the customer either and uses suppliers for reaching out to customers. While we are looking at the strengths of Blue Turtle Clothing Company, it is essential to highlight the business's weaknesses too.

The business's sales personnel is knowledgeable in training suppliers, the fact remains that the sales team is not trained in selling devices so there is a possibility of relying greatly on suppliers when promoting adhesive equipment. Nevertheless, it needs to likewise be noted that the suppliers are showing hesitation when it concerns selling devices that requires servicing which increases the challenges of offering equipment under a specific brand name.

If we take a look at Blue Turtle Clothing Company product line in adhesive equipment particularly, the company has products aimed at the high-end of the market. The possibility of sales cannibalization exists if Blue Turtle Clothing Company sells Case Study Help under the exact same portfolio. Offered the truth that Case Study Help is priced lower than Blue Turtle Clothing Company high-end product line, sales cannibalization would absolutely be impacting Blue Turtle Clothing Company sales earnings if the adhesive devices is offered under the company's trademark name.

We can see sales cannibalization impacting Blue Turtle Clothing Company 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. If Case Study Help is launched under the business's brand name, there is another possible threat which could reduce Blue Turtle Clothing Company profits. The reality that $175000 has actually been spent in promoting SuperBonder recommends that it is not a good time for launching a dispenser which can highlight the reality that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the immediate adhesive.

Furthermore, if we look at the market in general, the adhesives market does not show brand name orientation or rate awareness which gives us 2 additional reasons for not launching a low priced product under the business's trademark name.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Blue Turtle Clothing Company would be studied through Porter's five forces analysis which would highlight the degree of rivalry in the market.


Degree of Rivalry:

Currently we can see that the adhesive market has a high growth capacity due to the presence of fragmented sectors with Blue Turtle Clothing Company delighting in management and a combined market share of 75% with two other market players, Eastman and Permabond. While industry rivalry between these gamers could be called 'intense' as the consumer is not brand name conscious and each of these gamers has prominence in terms of market share, the fact still stays that the industry is not saturated and still has a number of market sections which can be targeted as possible niche markets even when launching an adhesive. We can even point out the truth that sales cannibalization may be leading to market competition in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for immediate adhesives provides growth capacity.


Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the buyer in this market is low particularly as the buyer has low understanding about the product. While business like Blue Turtle Clothing Company have actually handled to train suppliers concerning adhesives, the last consumer is dependent on suppliers. Approximately 72% of sales are made directly by manufacturers and suppliers for instant adhesives so the purchaser has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Offered the truth that the adhesive market is controlled by 3 players, it could be said that the provider delights in a greater bargaining power compared to the buyer. However, the fact stays that the supplier does not have much impact over the buyer at this moment especially as the purchaser does disappoint brand name acknowledgment or cost level of sensitivity. This shows that the supplier has the higher power when it comes to the adhesive market while the purchaser and the manufacturer do not have a significant control over the actual sales.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand loyalty and the ease of entry shown by foreign Japanese rivals in the immediate adhesive market suggests that the marketplace allows ease of entry. Nevertheless, if we take a look at Blue Turtle Clothing Company in particular, the company has double capabilities in terms of being a maker of immediate adhesives and adhesive dispensers. Prospective hazards in devices giving industry are low which shows the possibility of creating brand name awareness in not just instant adhesives however likewise in giving adhesives as none of the industry players has actually managed to place itself in double abilities.

Danger of Substitutes: The risk of substitutes in the instant adhesive industry is low while the dispenser market in particular has replacements like Glumetic idea applicators, in-built applicators, pencil applicators and advanced consoles. The fact stays that if Blue Turtle Clothing Company presented Case Study Help, it would be indulging in sales cannibalization for its own items. (see appendix 1 for structure).


4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Blue Turtle Clothing Company Case Study Help


Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has offered numerous reasons for not releasing Case Study Help under Blue Turtle Clothing Company name, we have a suggested marketing mix for Case Study Help provided below if Blue Turtle Clothing Company chooses to proceed with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target market chosen for Case Study Help is 'Motor vehicle services' for a variety of factors. There are currently 89257 facilities in this sector and a high usage of roughly 58900 lbs. is being utilized by 36.1 % of the market. This market has an additional development capacity of 10.1% which might be a sufficient specific niche market sector for Case Study Help. Not just would a portable dispenser offer convenience to this specific market, the reality that the Do-it-Yourself market can likewise be targeted if a drinkable low priced adhesive is being sold for usage with SuperBonder. The item would be sold without the 'glumetic idea' and 'vari-drop' so that the consumer can decide whether he wishes to select either of the two accessories or not.

Price: The recommended rate of Case Study Help has actually been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is sold through distributors or via direct selling. This rate would not consist of the cost of the 'vari tip' or the 'glumetic suggestion'. A cost below $250 would not require approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor vehicle maintenance shop requires to buy the item on his own. This would increase the possibility of influencing mechanics to purchase the item for use in their day-to-day maintenance jobs.

Blue Turtle Clothing Company would just be getting $157 per unit as displayed in appendix 2 which gives a breakdown of gross success and net profitability for Blue Turtle Clothing Company for launching Case Study Help.

Place: A circulation design where Blue Turtle Clothing Company straight sends the item to the local supplier and keeps a 10% drop shipment allowance for the distributor would be used by Blue Turtle Clothing Company. Since the sales group is currently participated in selling immediate adhesives and they do not have know-how in offering dispensers, involving them in the selling process would be expensive particularly as each sales call expenses around $120. The distributors are currently offering dispensers so selling Case Study Help through them would be a favorable option.

Promotion: A low marketing budget plan ought to have been appointed to Case Study Help but the reality that the dispenser is an innovation and it requires to be marketed well in order to cover the capital costs sustained for production, the recommended marketing plan costing $51816 is advised for at first presenting the item in the market. The planned advertisements in publications would be targeted at mechanics in lorry upkeep stores. (Suggested text for the advertisement is displayed in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summarized in appendix 4).


Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Blue Turtle Clothing Company Case Study Analysis

A suggested plan of action in the form of a marketing mix has actually been discussed for Case Study Help, the fact still stays that the item would not complement Blue Turtle Clothing Company item line. We take a look at appendix 2, we can see how the total gross success for the two designs is expected to be approximately $49377 if 250 systems of each model are manufactured each year as per the strategy. The initial planned marketing is approximately $52000 per year which would be putting a pressure on the business's resources leaving Blue Turtle Clothing Company with a negative net income if the expenditures are designated to Case Study Help just.

The reality that Blue Turtle Clothing Company has currently sustained an initial investment of $48000 in the form of capital cost and prototype development shows that the profits from Case Study Help is not enough to undertake the risk of sales cannibalization. Aside from that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market revealing low elasticity of need is not a more suitable choice especially of it is impacting the sale of the company's income creating designs.



PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE