WhatsApp

Brierley Investments Ltd Case Study Help Checklist

Brierley Investments Ltd Case Study Help Checklist

Brierley Investments Ltd Case Study Solution
Brierley Investments Ltd Case Study Help
Brierley Investments Ltd Case Study Analysis



Analyses for Evaluating Brierley Investments Ltd decision to launch Case Study Solution


The following area focuses on the of marketing for Brierley Investments Ltd where the company's consumers, competitors and core proficiencies have assessed in order to validate whether the decision to release Case Study Help under Brierley Investments Ltd brand name would be a practical alternative or not. We have actually to start with looked at the type of clients that Brierley Investments Ltd handle while an evaluation of the competitive environment and the business's weaknesses and strengths follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the reason for not introducing Case Study Help under Brierley Investments Ltd name.
Brierley Investments Ltd Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Brierley Investments Ltd clients can be segmented into 2 groups, final consumers and commercial customers. Both the groups use Brierley Investments Ltd high performance adhesives while the business is not only involved in the production of these adhesives but likewise markets them to these customer groups. There are two types of items that are being sold to these prospective markets; anaerobic adhesives and immediate adhesives. We would be focusing on the consumers of immediate adhesives for this analysis since the marketplace for the latter has a lower capacity for Brierley Investments Ltd compared to that of immediate adhesives.

The total market for instant adhesives is approximately 890,000 in the US in 1978 which covers both customer groups which have actually been identified earlier.If we look at a breakdown of Brierley Investments Ltd possible market or consumer groups, we can see that the business sells to OEMs (Initial Equipment Makers), Do-it-Yourself consumers, repair work and revamping companies (MRO) and producers dealing in items made of leather, metal, wood and plastic. This variety in consumers suggests that Brierley Investments Ltd can target has various alternatives in terms of segmenting the marketplace for its brand-new item specifically as each of these groups would be requiring the exact same type of item with respective modifications in packaging, amount or demand. The customer is not rate delicate or brand conscious so releasing a low priced dispenser under Brierley Investments Ltd name is not an advised alternative.

Company Analysis

Brierley Investments Ltd is not simply a manufacturer of adhesives but takes pleasure in market management in the instant adhesive industry. The business has its own experienced and certified sales force which adds value to sales by training the business's network of 250 suppliers for assisting in the sale of adhesives. Brierley Investments Ltd believes in unique distribution as indicated by the fact that it has selected to offer through 250 distributors whereas there is t a network of 10000 distributors that can be checked out for expanding reach by means of distributors. The business's reach is not limited to North America only as it also takes pleasure in worldwide sales. With 1400 outlets spread all across North America, Brierley Investments Ltd has its internal production plants instead of using out-sourcing as the preferred strategy.

Core competences are not limited to adhesive production only as Brierley Investments Ltd also specializes in making adhesive giving devices to facilitate making use of its items. This dual production strategy gives Brierley Investments Ltd an edge over competitors considering that none of the competitors of giving equipment makes immediate adhesives. Furthermore, none of these rivals offers directly to the consumer either and uses suppliers for connecting to consumers. While we are looking at the strengths of Brierley Investments Ltd, it is essential to highlight the company's weak points.

The company's sales personnel is knowledgeable in training distributors, the truth remains that the sales group is not trained in selling equipment so there is a possibility of relying heavily on suppliers when promoting adhesive devices. It needs to likewise be noted that the suppliers are showing unwillingness when it comes to offering devices that needs maintenance which increases the obstacles of offering equipment under a specific brand name.

If we look at Brierley Investments Ltd product line in adhesive equipment especially, the company has actually items focused on the high-end of the market. The possibility of sales cannibalization exists if Brierley Investments Ltd sells Case Study Help under the very same portfolio. Given the reality that Case Study Help is priced lower than Brierley Investments Ltd high-end product line, sales cannibalization would certainly be impacting Brierley Investments Ltd sales profits if the adhesive devices is sold under the business's brand name.

We can see sales cannibalization impacting Brierley Investments Ltd 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. If Case Study Help is released under the company's brand name, there is another possible threat which might lower Brierley Investments Ltd income. The fact that $175000 has actually been spent in promoting SuperBonder suggests that it is not a great time for launching a dispenser which can highlight the truth that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the immediate adhesive.

Furthermore, if we look at the marketplace in general, the adhesives market does disappoint brand name orientation or rate awareness which gives us two additional factors for not introducing a low priced product under the company's trademark name.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Brierley Investments Ltd would be studied through Porter's five forces analysis which would highlight the degree of competition in the market.


Degree of Rivalry:

Currently we can see that the adhesive market has a high growth capacity due to the existence of fragmented sectors with Brierley Investments Ltd enjoying leadership and a combined market share of 75% with two other market players, Eastman and Permabond. While market competition in between these gamers could be called 'intense' as the customer is not brand conscious and each of these players has prominence in terms of market share, the fact still stays that the market is not saturated and still has several market sectors which can be targeted as prospective specific niche markets even when releasing an adhesive. We can even point out the truth that sales cannibalization may be leading to market competition in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for instantaneous adhesives uses growth capacity.


Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the buyer in this market is low particularly as the buyer has low knowledge about the item. While companies like Brierley Investments Ltd have managed to train distributors relating to adhesives, the final consumer is dependent on suppliers. Around 72% of sales are made straight by producers and suppliers for immediate adhesives so the buyer has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Given the truth that the adhesive market is controlled by 3 players, it could be stated that the supplier takes pleasure in a higher bargaining power compared to the buyer. Nevertheless, the truth stays that the supplier does not have much impact over the purchaser at this point especially as the buyer does disappoint brand name acknowledgment or rate level of sensitivity. When it comes to the adhesive market while the buyer and the producer do not have a major control over the real sales, this suggests that the supplier has the higher power.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand loyalty and the ease of entry shown by foreign Japanese competitors in the instantaneous adhesive market suggests that the marketplace permits ease of entry. Nevertheless, if we look at Brierley Investments Ltd in particular, the company has dual abilities in regards to being a producer of adhesive dispensers and immediate adhesives. Prospective risks in equipment giving market are low which shows the possibility of producing brand awareness in not only instant adhesives however also in dispensing adhesives as none of the industry gamers has actually managed to place itself in dual capabilities.

Hazard of Substitutes: The hazard of alternatives in the immediate adhesive market is low while the dispenser market in particular has alternatives like Glumetic tip applicators, built-in applicators, pencil applicators and sophisticated consoles. The truth remains that if Brierley Investments Ltd presented Case Study Help, it would be enjoying sales cannibalization for its own products. (see appendix 1 for structure).


4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Brierley Investments Ltd Case Study Help


Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has given different factors for not launching Case Study Help under Brierley Investments Ltd name, we have actually a recommended marketing mix for Case Study Help provided listed below if Brierley Investments Ltd chooses to go on with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target market selected for Case Study Help is 'Motor vehicle services' for a number of factors. This market has an extra development potential of 10.1% which may be a great adequate specific niche market sector for Case Study Help. Not just would a portable dispenser offer benefit to this specific market, the truth that the Diy market can likewise be targeted if a drinkable low priced adhesive is being offered for usage with SuperBonder.

Price: The suggested price of Case Study Help has actually been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is offered through suppliers or by means of direct selling. This cost would not include the expense of the 'vari pointer' or the 'glumetic pointer'. A rate listed below $250 would not require approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor vehicle maintenance store requires to acquire the item on his own. This would increase the possibility of influencing mechanics to purchase the item for use in their daily upkeep jobs.

Brierley Investments Ltd would only be getting $157 per unit as displayed in appendix 2 which offers a breakdown of gross success and net success for Brierley Investments Ltd for releasing Case Study Help.

Place: A circulation model where Brierley Investments Ltd straight sends the product to the regional distributor and keeps a 10% drop delivery allowance for the distributor would be used by Brierley Investments Ltd. Considering that the sales team is currently taken part in selling immediate adhesives and they do not have knowledge in selling dispensers, involving them in the selling procedure would be pricey especially as each sales call costs around $120. The distributors are currently selling dispensers so offering Case Study Help through them would be a beneficial choice.

Promotion: A low marketing budget plan must have been assigned to Case Study Help but the fact that the dispenser is a development and it requires to be marketed well in order to cover the capital expenses sustained for production, the recommended marketing plan costing $51816 is recommended for at first introducing the item in the market. The prepared advertisements in magazines would be targeted at mechanics in automobile upkeep shops. (Suggested text for the advertisement is shown in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summed up in appendix 4).


Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Brierley Investments Ltd Case Study Analysis

Although a suggested strategy in the form of a marketing mix has actually been gone over for Case Study Help, the truth still stays that the product would not match Brierley Investments Ltd product line. We take a look at appendix 2, we can see how the total gross success for the two models is expected to be approximately $49377 if 250 units of each design are produced each year based on the strategy. However, the initial prepared marketing is roughly $52000 each year which would be putting a stress on the company's resources leaving Brierley Investments Ltd with a negative earnings if the expenses are allocated to Case Study Help only.

The fact that Brierley Investments Ltd has actually already incurred a preliminary investment of $48000 in the form of capital expense and model development shows that the income from Case Study Help is not enough to carry out the risk of sales cannibalization. Aside from that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market revealing low elasticity of need is not a more suitable choice particularly of it is impacting the sale of the company's earnings creating models.


 

PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE