Brierley Investments Ltd Case Study Help Checklist

Brierley Investments Ltd Case Study Help Checklist

Brierley Investments Ltd Case Study Solution
Brierley Investments Ltd Case Study Help
Brierley Investments Ltd Case Study Analysis

Analyses for Evaluating Brierley Investments Ltd decision to launch Case Study Solution

The following area focuses on the of marketing for Brierley Investments Ltd where the business's clients, rivals and core proficiencies have actually examined in order to justify whether the decision to introduce Case Study Help under Brierley Investments Ltd trademark name would be a practical choice or not. We have actually to start with taken a look at the type of clients that Brierley Investments Ltd deals in while an assessment of the competitive environment and the company's strengths and weaknesses follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the reason for not launching Case Study Help under Brierley Investments Ltd name.
Brierley Investments Ltd Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Brierley Investments Ltd clients can be segmented into two groups, final customers and industrial customers. Both the groups use Brierley Investments Ltd high performance adhesives while the company is not just involved in the production of these adhesives however likewise markets them to these consumer groups. There are 2 types of items that are being sold to these potential markets; anaerobic adhesives and immediate adhesives. We would be concentrating on the customers of immediate adhesives for this analysis since the market for the latter has a lower potential for Brierley Investments Ltd compared to that of instant adhesives.

The overall market for instant adhesives is roughly 890,000 in the United States in 1978 which covers both customer groups which have actually been determined earlier.If we take a look at a breakdown of Brierley Investments Ltd potential market or client groups, we can see that the business offers to OEMs (Original Equipment Manufacturers), Do-it-Yourself clients, repair and overhauling companies (MRO) and producers handling items made from leather, wood, metal and plastic. This diversity in clients recommends that Brierley Investments Ltd can target has various alternatives in regards to segmenting the market for its new product specifically as each of these groups would be requiring the same kind of item with respective changes in amount, product packaging or demand. The consumer is not price sensitive or brand conscious so launching a low priced dispenser under Brierley Investments Ltd name is not an advised choice.

Company Analysis

Brierley Investments Ltd is not just a manufacturer of adhesives however delights in market management in the instantaneous adhesive market. The business has its own proficient and qualified sales force which includes value to sales by training the company's network of 250 suppliers for assisting in the sale of adhesives.

Core skills are not restricted to adhesive production just as Brierley Investments Ltd likewise focuses on making adhesive dispensing equipment to help with using its items. This double production technique provides Brierley Investments Ltd an edge over rivals given that none of the competitors of giving devices makes instant adhesives. In addition, none of these rivals sells directly to the customer either and makes use of distributors for reaching out to customers. While we are taking a look at the strengths of Brierley Investments Ltd, it is necessary to highlight the company's weak points as well.

The company's sales staff is competent in training distributors, the truth remains that the sales group is not trained in offering equipment so there is a possibility of relying heavily on suppliers when promoting adhesive equipment. It needs to likewise be noted that the suppliers are showing reluctance when it comes to offering equipment that requires servicing which increases the difficulties of selling devices under a particular brand name.

If we look at Brierley Investments Ltd line of product in adhesive devices especially, the business has actually products focused on the high end of the market. If Brierley Investments Ltd sells Case Study Help under the exact same portfolio, the possibility of sales cannibalization exists. Offered the reality that Case Study Help is priced lower than Brierley Investments Ltd high-end product line, sales cannibalization would absolutely be impacting Brierley Investments Ltd sales income if the adhesive devices is sold under the company's brand name.

We can see sales cannibalization impacting Brierley Investments Ltd 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. If Case Study Help is launched under the business's brand name, there is another possible danger which could decrease Brierley Investments Ltd profits. The truth that $175000 has actually been spent in promoting SuperBonder recommends that it is not a good time for launching a dispenser which can highlight the fact that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the instantaneous adhesive.

In addition, if we look at the marketplace in general, the adhesives market does disappoint brand orientation or rate awareness which offers us two extra reasons for not releasing a low priced item under the business's brand.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Brierley Investments Ltd would be studied by means of Porter's five forces analysis which would highlight the degree of rivalry in the market.

Degree of Rivalry:

Presently we can see that the adhesive market has a high development potential due to the presence of fragmented segments with Brierley Investments Ltd delighting in leadership and a combined market share of 75% with 2 other industry gamers, Eastman and Permabond. While industry rivalry in between these players could be called 'intense' as the customer is not brand conscious and each of these players has prominence in terms of market share, the fact still remains that the industry is not filled and still has numerous market sectors which can be targeted as potential specific niche markets even when introducing an adhesive. However, we can even explain the truth that sales cannibalization may be causing industry competition in the adhesive dispenser market while the marketplace for immediate adhesives uses development potential.

Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the purchaser in this market is low specifically as the buyer has low knowledge about the item. While companies like Brierley Investments Ltd have handled to train distributors relating to adhesives, the final consumer is dependent on suppliers. Around 72% of sales are made directly by producers and distributors for instantaneous adhesives so the buyer has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Offered the reality that the adhesive market is dominated by three gamers, it could be stated that the provider delights in a higher bargaining power compared to the purchaser. The fact stays that the provider does not have much impact over the buyer at this point specifically as the buyer does not show brand name recognition or rate level of sensitivity. This shows that the distributor has the higher power when it comes to the adhesive market while the manufacturer and the buyer do not have a significant control over the actual sales.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand name loyalty and the ease of entry shown by foreign Japanese rivals in the immediate adhesive market indicates that the marketplace enables ease of entry. Nevertheless, if we take a look at Brierley Investments Ltd in particular, the business has double capabilities in terms of being a maker of adhesive dispensers and instant adhesives. Potential hazards in equipment dispensing market are low which shows the possibility of creating brand awareness in not just immediate adhesives however also in giving adhesives as none of the industry players has managed to place itself in dual capabilities.

Danger of Substitutes: The hazard of alternatives in the instantaneous adhesive market is low while the dispenser market in particular has replacements like Glumetic pointer applicators, inbuilt applicators, pencil applicators and advanced consoles. The fact stays that if Brierley Investments Ltd presented Case Study Help, it would be indulging in sales cannibalization for its own products. (see appendix 1 for structure).

4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Brierley Investments Ltd Case Study Help

Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has provided different reasons for not releasing Case Study Help under Brierley Investments Ltd name, we have actually a suggested marketing mix for Case Study Help offered listed below if Brierley Investments Ltd decides to go on with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target market picked for Case Study Help is 'Automobile services' for a variety of factors. There are presently 89257 facilities in this sector and a high usage of around 58900 pounds. is being utilized by 36.1 % of the market. This market has an additional development capacity of 10.1% which may be a good enough niche market segment for Case Study Help. Not just would a portable dispenser deal benefit to this specific market, the truth that the Diy market can likewise be targeted if a drinkable low priced adhesive is being sold for usage with SuperBonder. The item would be offered without the 'glumetic suggestion' and 'vari-drop' so that the consumer can decide whether he wishes to choose either of the two accessories or not.

Price: The recommended price of Case Study Help has been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is sold through distributors or through direct selling. A rate below $250 would not require approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor car maintenance store needs to buy the product on his own.

Brierley Investments Ltd would only be getting $157 per unit as displayed in appendix 2 which provides a breakdown of gross success and net success for Brierley Investments Ltd for launching Case Study Help.

Place: A distribution model where Brierley Investments Ltd directly sends the item to the local distributor and keeps a 10% drop delivery allowance for the distributor would be utilized by Brierley Investments Ltd. Because the sales group is already engaged in selling instant adhesives and they do not have know-how in selling dispensers, including them in the selling procedure would be expensive specifically as each sales call expenses around $120. The distributors are currently selling dispensers so selling Case Study Help through them would be a beneficial alternative.

Promotion: A low marketing budget plan must have been appointed to Case Study Help but the reality that the dispenser is a development and it requires to be marketed well in order to cover the capital costs incurred for production, the recommended marketing strategy costing $51816 is advised for initially presenting the product in the market. The planned advertisements in magazines would be targeted at mechanics in car upkeep shops. (Suggested text for the advertisement is shown in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summed up in appendix 4).

Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Brierley Investments Ltd Case Study Analysis

A recommended plan of action in the form of a marketing mix has actually been talked about for Case Study Help, the fact still remains that the item would not match Brierley Investments Ltd product line. We have a look at appendix 2, we can see how the overall gross profitability for the two designs is anticipated to be roughly $49377 if 250 units of each design are made each year based on the strategy. The initial planned marketing is approximately $52000 per year which would be putting a pressure on the business's resources leaving Brierley Investments Ltd with an unfavorable net earnings if the expenditures are designated to Case Study Help just.

The reality that Brierley Investments Ltd has actually currently incurred a preliminary investment of $48000 in the form of capital expense and model development suggests that the earnings from Case Study Help is inadequate to undertake the danger of sales cannibalization. Other than that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market revealing low flexibility of demand is not a more effective alternative particularly of it is impacting the sale of the business's profits creating models.