WhatsApp

British Columbia Hydro Case Study Help Checklist

British Columbia Hydro Case Study Help Checklist

British Columbia Hydro Case Study Solution
British Columbia Hydro Case Study Help
British Columbia Hydro Case Study Analysis



Analyses for Evaluating British Columbia Hydro decision to launch Case Study Solution


The following area concentrates on the of marketing for British Columbia Hydro where the business's clients, competitors and core proficiencies have actually assessed in order to validate whether the choice to launch Case Study Help under British Columbia Hydro brand would be a practical choice or not. We have actually to start with taken a look at the kind of customers that British Columbia Hydro handle while an assessment of the competitive environment and the business's strengths and weaknesses follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the justification for not launching Case Study Help under British Columbia Hydro name.
British Columbia Hydro Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

British Columbia Hydro customers can be segmented into two groups, final customers and commercial consumers. Both the groups use British Columbia Hydro high performance adhesives while the company is not just associated with the production of these adhesives however also markets them to these client groups. There are two types of items that are being offered to these potential markets; immediate adhesives and anaerobic adhesives. We would be concentrating on the customers of instantaneous adhesives for this analysis since the market for the latter has a lower capacity for British Columbia Hydro compared to that of instantaneous adhesives.

The total market for instantaneous adhesives is approximately 890,000 in the US in 1978 which covers both consumer groups which have actually been identified earlier.If we look at a breakdown of British Columbia Hydro potential market or consumer groups, we can see that the company sells to OEMs (Original Equipment Makers), Do-it-Yourself customers, repair and revamping companies (MRO) and producers dealing in items made from leather, metal, plastic and wood. This diversity in consumers suggests that British Columbia Hydro can target has various alternatives in terms of segmenting the marketplace for its brand-new item specifically as each of these groups would be needing the very same type of product with respective changes in demand, quantity or packaging. The consumer is not price sensitive or brand name mindful so launching a low priced dispenser under British Columbia Hydro name is not a recommended option.

Company Analysis

British Columbia Hydro is not simply a manufacturer of adhesives however takes pleasure in market management in the immediate adhesive market. The business has its own competent and qualified sales force which adds worth to sales by training the company's network of 250 distributors for assisting in the sale of adhesives.

Core proficiencies are not restricted to adhesive production only as British Columbia Hydro likewise concentrates on making adhesive giving equipment to help with the use of its items. This dual production strategy gives British Columbia Hydro an edge over competitors because none of the competitors of giving devices makes instant adhesives. In addition, none of these competitors sells straight to the consumer either and makes use of suppliers for reaching out to consumers. While we are taking a look at the strengths of British Columbia Hydro, it is important to highlight the company's weak points too.

Although the company's sales staff is knowledgeable in training suppliers, the truth stays that the sales group is not trained in offering equipment so there is a possibility of relying heavily on distributors when promoting adhesive devices. It needs to also be kept in mind that the suppliers are showing hesitation when it comes to selling devices that needs maintenance which increases the obstacles of offering devices under a particular brand name.

The company has actually products intended at the high end of the market if we look at British Columbia Hydro product line in adhesive equipment particularly. If British Columbia Hydro sells Case Study Help under the exact same portfolio, the possibility of sales cannibalization exists. Offered the truth that Case Study Help is priced lower than British Columbia Hydro high-end line of product, sales cannibalization would certainly be impacting British Columbia Hydro sales revenue if the adhesive devices is sold under the company's brand.

We can see sales cannibalization affecting British Columbia Hydro 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. There is another possible danger which could lower British Columbia Hydro income if Case Study Help is launched under the business's trademark name. The reality that $175000 has been spent in promoting SuperBonder recommends that it is not a good time for launching a dispenser which can highlight the reality that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the instant adhesive.

Additionally, if we take a look at the market in general, the adhesives market does disappoint brand orientation or cost awareness which gives us two additional reasons for not introducing a low priced item under the business's trademark name.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of British Columbia Hydro would be studied through Porter's 5 forces analysis which would highlight the degree of competition in the market.


Degree of Rivalry:

Presently we can see that the adhesive market has a high development potential due to the presence of fragmented segments with British Columbia Hydro delighting in leadership and a combined market share of 75% with two other market players, Eastman and Permabond. While market competition between these players could be called 'extreme' as the customer is not brand name conscious and each of these players has prominence in regards to market share, the fact still remains that the market is not filled and still has numerous market segments which can be targeted as potential specific niche markets even when launching an adhesive. We can even point out the truth that sales cannibalization may be leading to industry competition in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for immediate adhesives offers development potential.


Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the purchaser in this market is low specifically as the buyer has low understanding about the product. While companies like British Columbia Hydro have actually managed to train suppliers regarding adhesives, the final customer depends on suppliers. Roughly 72% of sales are made directly by producers and suppliers for instant adhesives so the purchaser has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Provided the reality that the adhesive market is controlled by 3 players, it could be stated that the provider enjoys a higher bargaining power compared to the buyer. The truth remains that the provider does not have much impact over the buyer at this point especially as the buyer does not reveal brand acknowledgment or rate level of sensitivity. When it comes to the adhesive market while the purchaser and the manufacturer do not have a significant control over the actual sales, this indicates that the supplier has the greater power.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand commitment and the ease of entry shown by foreign Japanese rivals in the instantaneous adhesive market shows that the market allows ease of entry. However, if we take a look at British Columbia Hydro in particular, the business has double abilities in regards to being a manufacturer of adhesive dispensers and instantaneous adhesives. Possible threats in devices dispensing market are low which shows the possibility of creating brand awareness in not just immediate adhesives but also in dispensing adhesives as none of the market players has actually managed to position itself in dual capabilities.

Hazard of Substitutes: The danger of replacements in the immediate adhesive industry is low while the dispenser market in particular has alternatives like Glumetic tip applicators, inbuilt applicators, pencil applicators and advanced consoles. The reality remains that if British Columbia Hydro presented Case Study Help, it would be indulging in sales cannibalization for its own products. (see appendix 1 for framework).


4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

British Columbia Hydro Case Study Help


Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has actually provided various reasons for not launching Case Study Help under British Columbia Hydro name, we have actually a suggested marketing mix for Case Study Help offered below if British Columbia Hydro decides to go on with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target market chosen for Case Study Help is 'Motor lorry services' for a number of reasons. This market has an extra development potential of 10.1% which might be an excellent enough niche market sector for Case Study Help. Not only would a portable dispenser offer benefit to this particular market, the truth that the Diy market can also be targeted if a drinkable low priced adhesive is being sold for use with SuperBonder.

Price: The recommended price of Case Study Help has actually been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is sold through suppliers or through direct selling. This price would not include the cost of the 'vari suggestion' or the 'glumetic idea'. A price listed below $250 would not require approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at an automobile maintenance shop requires to buy the item on his own. This would increase the possibility of influencing mechanics to acquire the product for usage in their daily upkeep jobs.

British Columbia Hydro would only be getting $157 per unit as displayed in appendix 2 which gives a breakdown of gross profitability and net profitability for British Columbia Hydro for introducing Case Study Help.

Place: A circulation model where British Columbia Hydro straight sends the item to the regional distributor and keeps a 10% drop delivery allowance for the supplier would be used by British Columbia Hydro. Given that the sales group is already taken part in offering immediate adhesives and they do not have know-how in offering dispensers, including them in the selling procedure would be pricey especially as each sales call expenses around $120. The suppliers are already offering dispensers so offering Case Study Help through them would be a beneficial choice.

Promotion: A low promotional budget plan should have been appointed to Case Study Help but the truth that the dispenser is an innovation and it needs to be marketed well in order to cover the capital expenses incurred for production, the suggested marketing strategy costing $51816 is advised for at first introducing the item in the market. The prepared advertisements in magazines would be targeted at mechanics in automobile upkeep shops. (Suggested text for the ad is shown in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summarized in appendix 4).


Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
British Columbia Hydro Case Study Analysis

Although a suggested plan of action in the form of a marketing mix has been gone over for Case Study Help, the fact still stays that the item would not complement British Columbia Hydro product line. We take a look at appendix 2, we can see how the overall gross profitability for the two models is expected to be roughly $49377 if 250 units of each design are made annually according to the strategy. Nevertheless, the initial planned marketing is around $52000 per year which would be putting a stress on the company's resources leaving British Columbia Hydro with an unfavorable net income if the costs are assigned to Case Study Help just.

The reality that British Columbia Hydro has currently incurred an initial financial investment of $48000 in the form of capital cost and prototype development indicates that the earnings from Case Study Help is not enough to carry out the threat of sales cannibalization. Other than that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market showing low flexibility of need is not a preferable choice especially of it is impacting the sale of the business's profits producing models.


 

PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE