WhatsApp

Cachet Technologies Case Study Help Checklist

Cachet Technologies Case Study Help Checklist

Cachet Technologies Case Study Solution
Cachet Technologies Case Study Help
Cachet Technologies Case Study Analysis



Analyses for Evaluating Cachet Technologies decision to launch Case Study Solution


The following section concentrates on the of marketing for Cachet Technologies where the company's clients, competitors and core proficiencies have assessed in order to validate whether the choice to release Case Study Help under Cachet Technologies brand name would be a practical alternative or not. We have actually to start with taken a look at the type of consumers that Cachet Technologies deals in while an evaluation of the competitive environment and the business's strengths and weaknesses follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the reason for not introducing Case Study Help under Cachet Technologies name.
Cachet Technologies Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Cachet Technologies consumers can be segmented into two groups, commercial customers and last consumers. Both the groups utilize Cachet Technologies high performance adhesives while the business is not just involved in the production of these adhesives however also markets them to these customer groups. There are two types of products that are being sold to these prospective markets; anaerobic adhesives and immediate adhesives. We would be focusing on the consumers of instant adhesives for this analysis given that the market for the latter has a lower capacity for Cachet Technologies compared to that of immediate adhesives.

The total market for instant adhesives is roughly 890,000 in the United States in 1978 which covers both customer groups which have been identified earlier.If we look at a breakdown of Cachet Technologies possible market or customer groups, we can see that the business offers to OEMs (Original Devices Producers), Do-it-Yourself clients, repair and overhauling companies (MRO) and producers handling items made of leather, wood, metal and plastic. This diversity in clients suggests that Cachet Technologies can target has numerous options in terms of segmenting the market for its new item particularly as each of these groups would be requiring the very same type of item with respective modifications in quantity, demand or product packaging. The client is not price delicate or brand conscious so launching a low priced dispenser under Cachet Technologies name is not a suggested option.

Company Analysis

Cachet Technologies is not simply a maker of adhesives however delights in market management in the immediate adhesive industry. The company has its own knowledgeable and competent sales force which adds value to sales by training the company's network of 250 distributors for facilitating the sale of adhesives. Cachet Technologies believes in exclusive distribution as shown by the reality that it has actually chosen to offer through 250 suppliers whereas there is t a network of 10000 distributors that can be explored for broadening reach through suppliers. The company's reach is not limited to The United States and Canada just as it also enjoys worldwide sales. With 1400 outlets spread out all across The United States and Canada, Cachet Technologies has its internal production plants instead of utilizing out-sourcing as the favored technique.

Core proficiencies are not limited to adhesive production just as Cachet Technologies likewise concentrates on making adhesive dispensing equipment to help with making use of its products. This double production method offers Cachet Technologies an edge over rivals given that none of the competitors of dispensing devices makes instant adhesives. In addition, none of these competitors offers straight to the customer either and utilizes distributors for connecting to consumers. While we are looking at the strengths of Cachet Technologies, it is essential to highlight the company's weak points.

Although the business's sales staff is experienced in training distributors, the truth stays that the sales group is not trained in offering devices so there is a possibility of relying heavily on distributors when promoting adhesive equipment. It should likewise be kept in mind that the suppliers are showing hesitation when it comes to selling equipment that needs servicing which increases the obstacles of selling equipment under a specific brand name.

If we take a look at Cachet Technologies line of product in adhesive devices especially, the company has actually products focused on the high-end of the market. The possibility of sales cannibalization exists if Cachet Technologies offers Case Study Help under the very same portfolio. Offered the reality that Case Study Help is priced lower than Cachet Technologies high-end line of product, sales cannibalization would absolutely be impacting Cachet Technologies sales revenue if the adhesive equipment is offered under the company's brand name.

We can see sales cannibalization affecting Cachet Technologies 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. If Case Study Help is launched under the business's brand name, there is another possible risk which might lower Cachet Technologies earnings. The reality that $175000 has actually been invested in promoting SuperBonder recommends that it is not a good time for introducing a dispenser which can highlight the truth that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the instant adhesive.

Furthermore, if we take a look at the market in general, the adhesives market does disappoint brand name orientation or rate awareness which gives us 2 extra factors for not introducing a low priced product under the company's trademark name.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Cachet Technologies would be studied via Porter's five forces analysis which would highlight the degree of rivalry in the market.


Degree of Rivalry:

Presently we can see that the adhesive market has a high development capacity due to the existence of fragmented sectors with Cachet Technologies enjoying leadership and a combined market share of 75% with 2 other industry gamers, Eastman and Permabond. While market competition between these gamers could be called 'intense' as the customer is not brand mindful and each of these players has prominence in terms of market share, the fact still remains that the market is not filled and still has a number of market sectors which can be targeted as potential niche markets even when launching an adhesive. However, we can even point out the reality that sales cannibalization may be resulting in industry rivalry in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for instantaneous adhesives provides development potential.


Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the purchaser in this market is low especially as the buyer has low understanding about the product. While companies like Cachet Technologies have actually managed to train distributors concerning adhesives, the final customer is dependent on distributors. Around 72% of sales are made straight by manufacturers and distributors for immediate adhesives so the buyer has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Provided the fact that the adhesive market is dominated by three gamers, it could be stated that the supplier takes pleasure in a greater bargaining power compared to the purchaser. The fact remains that the supplier does not have much impact over the buyer at this point particularly as the purchaser does not reveal brand recognition or price sensitivity. When it comes to the adhesive market while the buyer and the manufacturer do not have a significant control over the real sales, this indicates that the distributor has the higher power.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand name loyalty and the ease of entry shown by foreign Japanese rivals in the instantaneous adhesive market shows that the market permits ease of entry. However, if we look at Cachet Technologies in particular, the company has dual abilities in terms of being a producer of instantaneous adhesives and adhesive dispensers. Possible threats in equipment dispensing industry are low which shows the possibility of developing brand name awareness in not just instantaneous adhesives however likewise in dispensing adhesives as none of the industry gamers has managed to place itself in double capabilities.

Danger of Substitutes: The threat of alternatives in the immediate adhesive industry is low while the dispenser market in particular has substitutes like Glumetic suggestion applicators, in-built applicators, pencil applicators and sophisticated consoles. The fact remains that if Cachet Technologies presented Case Study Help, it would be enjoying sales cannibalization for its own items. (see appendix 1 for framework).


4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Cachet Technologies Case Study Help


Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has actually offered various factors for not introducing Case Study Help under Cachet Technologies name, we have actually a suggested marketing mix for Case Study Help provided below if Cachet Technologies decides to proceed with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target audience selected for Case Study Help is 'Motor vehicle services' for a variety of factors. There are currently 89257 establishments in this section and a high usage of around 58900 pounds. is being used by 36.1 % of the market. This market has an additional growth potential of 10.1% which may be a sufficient specific niche market segment for Case Study Help. Not just would a portable dispenser offer benefit to this specific market, the reality that the Do-it-Yourself market can also be targeted if a potable low priced adhesive is being cost usage with SuperBonder. The product would be offered without the 'glumetic idea' and 'vari-drop' so that the consumer can decide whether he wishes to select either of the two devices or not.

Price: The recommended rate of Case Study Help has actually been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is offered through suppliers or by means of direct selling. A cost below $250 would not need approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor automobile upkeep shop needs to purchase the item on his own.

Cachet Technologies would just be getting $157 per unit as displayed in appendix 2 which provides a breakdown of gross success and net success for Cachet Technologies for launching Case Study Help.

Place: A circulation model where Cachet Technologies straight sends the product to the regional supplier and keeps a 10% drop shipment allowance for the supplier would be utilized by Cachet Technologies. Since the sales team is already taken part in offering instant adhesives and they do not have competence in offering dispensers, involving them in the selling process would be costly specifically as each sales call expenses around $120. The distributors are currently selling dispensers so offering Case Study Help through them would be a favorable option.

Promotion: Although a low promotional spending plan should have been assigned to Case Study Help however the reality that the dispenser is a development and it needs to be marketed well in order to cover the capital costs sustained for production, the recommended marketing strategy costing $51816 is recommended for initially presenting the product in the market. The prepared advertisements in publications would be targeted at mechanics in lorry upkeep shops. (Recommended text for the advertisement is shown in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summed up in appendix 4).


Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Cachet Technologies Case Study Analysis

Although a suggested strategy in the form of a marketing mix has been talked about for Case Study Help, the fact still remains that the product would not match Cachet Technologies product line. We have a look at appendix 2, we can see how the total gross success for the two models is anticipated to be around $49377 if 250 units of each design are made annually based on the plan. The initial planned marketing is roughly $52000 per year which would be putting a strain on the business's resources leaving Cachet Technologies with a negative net earnings if the expenses are designated to Case Study Help just.

The truth that Cachet Technologies has currently incurred a preliminary investment of $48000 in the form of capital cost and prototype development indicates that the revenue from Case Study Help is inadequate to carry out the risk of sales cannibalization. Aside from that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market revealing low elasticity of demand is not a more effective alternative specifically of it is affecting the sale of the company's revenue producing models.


 

PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE