WhatsApp

Cash Technology Limited A Chinese Ipo In Singapore Case Study Help Checklist

Cash Technology Limited A Chinese Ipo In Singapore Case Study Help Checklist

Cash Technology Limited A Chinese Ipo In Singapore Case Study Solution
Cash Technology Limited A Chinese Ipo In Singapore Case Study Help
Cash Technology Limited A Chinese Ipo In Singapore Case Study Analysis



Analyses for Evaluating Cash Technology Limited A Chinese Ipo In Singapore decision to launch Case Study Solution


The following area concentrates on the of marketing for Cash Technology Limited A Chinese Ipo In Singapore where the company's consumers, rivals and core proficiencies have evaluated in order to justify whether the choice to introduce Case Study Help under Cash Technology Limited A Chinese Ipo In Singapore brand name would be a practical alternative or not. We have first of all looked at the type of clients that Cash Technology Limited A Chinese Ipo In Singapore handle while an examination of the competitive environment and the business's strengths and weak points follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the reason for not introducing Case Study Help under Cash Technology Limited A Chinese Ipo In Singapore name.
Cash Technology Limited A Chinese Ipo In Singapore Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Both the groups use Cash Technology Limited A Chinese Ipo In Singapore high performance adhesives while the company is not only included in the production of these adhesives but also markets them to these consumer groups. We would be focusing on the consumers of immediate adhesives for this analysis considering that the market for the latter has a lower potential for Cash Technology Limited A Chinese Ipo In Singapore compared to that of instant adhesives.

The overall market for instantaneous adhesives is roughly 890,000 in the United States in 1978 which covers both client groups which have actually been recognized earlier.If we take a look at a breakdown of Cash Technology Limited A Chinese Ipo In Singapore possible market or consumer groups, we can see that the company sells to OEMs (Initial Equipment Producers), Do-it-Yourself clients, repair and revamping companies (MRO) and manufacturers dealing in products made from leather, plastic, metal and wood. This variety in clients suggests that Cash Technology Limited A Chinese Ipo In Singapore can target has numerous alternatives in terms of segmenting the marketplace for its new item especially as each of these groups would be requiring the very same kind of product with particular modifications in demand, packaging or amount. However, the client is not cost delicate or brand name mindful so introducing a low priced dispenser under Cash Technology Limited A Chinese Ipo In Singapore name is not a recommended option.

Company Analysis

Cash Technology Limited A Chinese Ipo In Singapore is not simply a manufacturer of adhesives however takes pleasure in market leadership in the instant adhesive industry. The business has its own skilled and competent sales force which includes worth to sales by training the business's network of 250 distributors for facilitating the sale of adhesives.

Core skills are not limited to adhesive manufacturing just as Cash Technology Limited A Chinese Ipo In Singapore also specializes in making adhesive giving devices to help with using its items. This dual production technique provides Cash Technology Limited A Chinese Ipo In Singapore an edge over rivals considering that none of the rivals of dispensing equipment makes immediate adhesives. Furthermore, none of these competitors sells directly to the consumer either and uses distributors for reaching out to customers. While we are looking at the strengths of Cash Technology Limited A Chinese Ipo In Singapore, it is essential to highlight the business's weaknesses.

The business's sales personnel is competent in training distributors, the reality remains that the sales team is not trained in selling devices so there is a possibility of relying heavily on distributors when promoting adhesive equipment. However, it ought to likewise be kept in mind that the suppliers are revealing unwillingness when it concerns selling equipment that needs servicing which increases the challenges of offering devices under a particular trademark name.

If we look at Cash Technology Limited A Chinese Ipo In Singapore line of product in adhesive equipment particularly, the business has actually products focused on the high end of the market. If Cash Technology Limited A Chinese Ipo In Singapore offers Case Study Help under the very same portfolio, the possibility of sales cannibalization exists. Given the fact that Case Study Help is priced lower than Cash Technology Limited A Chinese Ipo In Singapore high-end product line, sales cannibalization would definitely be affecting Cash Technology Limited A Chinese Ipo In Singapore sales revenue if the adhesive devices is sold under the business's brand.

We can see sales cannibalization impacting Cash Technology Limited A Chinese Ipo In Singapore 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. If Case Study Help is introduced under the business's brand name, there is another possible danger which might reduce Cash Technology Limited A Chinese Ipo In Singapore profits. The truth that $175000 has actually been spent in promoting SuperBonder recommends that it is not a good time for releasing a dispenser which can highlight the reality that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the instant adhesive.

Furthermore, if we take a look at the marketplace in general, the adhesives market does disappoint brand name orientation or price awareness which gives us 2 additional factors for not launching a low priced item under the company's trademark name.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Cash Technology Limited A Chinese Ipo In Singapore would be studied by means of Porter's five forces analysis which would highlight the degree of rivalry in the market.


Degree of Rivalry:

Currently we can see that the adhesive market has a high development potential due to the presence of fragmented sections with Cash Technology Limited A Chinese Ipo In Singapore enjoying leadership and a combined market share of 75% with two other market players, Eastman and Permabond. While industry rivalry between these gamers could be called 'extreme' as the consumer is not brand conscious and each of these players has prominence in terms of market share, the fact still remains that the industry is not filled and still has numerous market segments which can be targeted as potential specific niche markets even when launching an adhesive. We can even point out the fact that sales cannibalization may be leading to industry rivalry in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for immediate adhesives offers growth potential.


Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the buyer in this market is low particularly as the buyer has low understanding about the product. While companies like Cash Technology Limited A Chinese Ipo In Singapore have managed to train distributors regarding adhesives, the last consumer is dependent on suppliers. Approximately 72% of sales are made directly by producers and distributors for instant adhesives so the buyer has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Offered the truth that the adhesive market is dominated by three gamers, it could be said that the supplier enjoys a greater bargaining power compared to the buyer. However, the truth remains that the provider does not have much influence over the purchaser at this point particularly as the purchaser does not show brand name recognition or cost level of sensitivity. This suggests that the distributor has the greater power when it comes to the adhesive market while the buyer and the maker do not have a significant control over the actual sales.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand name commitment and the ease of entry shown by foreign Japanese competitors in the immediate adhesive market shows that the market enables ease of entry. Nevertheless, if we take a look at Cash Technology Limited A Chinese Ipo In Singapore in particular, the company has double abilities in regards to being a producer of instantaneous adhesives and adhesive dispensers. Potential threats in equipment giving industry are low which reveals the possibility of creating brand name awareness in not only immediate adhesives however also in dispensing adhesives as none of the market players has managed to place itself in dual capabilities.

Hazard of Substitutes: The risk of replacements in the immediate adhesive market is low while the dispenser market in particular has substitutes like Glumetic idea applicators, inbuilt applicators, pencil applicators and advanced consoles. The reality stays that if Cash Technology Limited A Chinese Ipo In Singapore introduced Case Study Help, it would be delighting in sales cannibalization for its own products. (see appendix 1 for framework).


4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Cash Technology Limited A Chinese Ipo In Singapore Case Study Help


Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has actually given numerous factors for not launching Case Study Help under Cash Technology Limited A Chinese Ipo In Singapore name, we have actually a recommended marketing mix for Case Study Help offered listed below if Cash Technology Limited A Chinese Ipo In Singapore chooses to go ahead with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target audience picked for Case Study Help is 'Automobile services' for a variety of factors. There are currently 89257 facilities in this sector and a high usage of around 58900 lbs. is being utilized by 36.1 % of the market. This market has an additional growth capacity of 10.1% which may be a sufficient niche market section for Case Study Help. Not just would a portable dispenser offer benefit to this specific market, the truth that the Do-it-Yourself market can likewise be targeted if a safe and clean low priced adhesive is being cost use with SuperBonder. The item would be offered without the 'glumetic tip' and 'vari-drop' so that the consumer can decide whether he wishes to go with either of the two devices or not.

Price: The recommended rate of Case Study Help has been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is sold through suppliers or by means of direct selling. This rate would not include the expense of the 'vari idea' or the 'glumetic tip'. A rate listed below $250 would not require approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor vehicle maintenance shop requires to buy the item on his own. This would increase the possibility of influencing mechanics to purchase the item for usage in their daily maintenance jobs.

Cash Technology Limited A Chinese Ipo In Singapore would only be getting $157 per unit as displayed in appendix 2 which offers a breakdown of gross success and net profitability for Cash Technology Limited A Chinese Ipo In Singapore for introducing Case Study Help.

Place: A circulation model where Cash Technology Limited A Chinese Ipo In Singapore directly sends the product to the regional distributor and keeps a 10% drop delivery allowance for the distributor would be utilized by Cash Technology Limited A Chinese Ipo In Singapore. Considering that the sales team is currently engaged in selling immediate adhesives and they do not have proficiency in selling dispensers, including them in the selling procedure would be costly specifically as each sales call costs roughly $120. The suppliers are already offering dispensers so selling Case Study Help through them would be a beneficial choice.

Promotion: A low marketing spending plan needs to have been designated to Case Study Help but the reality that the dispenser is an innovation and it needs to be marketed well in order to cover the capital costs incurred for production, the suggested advertising plan costing $51816 is advised for initially introducing the product in the market. The prepared advertisements in magazines would be targeted at mechanics in automobile upkeep shops. (Suggested text for the advertisement is displayed in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summed up in appendix 4).


Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Cash Technology Limited A Chinese Ipo In Singapore Case Study Analysis

Although a recommended strategy in the form of a marketing mix has actually been talked about for Case Study Help, the fact still stays that the product would not match Cash Technology Limited A Chinese Ipo In Singapore product line. We have a look at appendix 2, we can see how the total gross profitability for the two models is expected to be around $49377 if 250 systems of each model are manufactured annually based on the plan. Nevertheless, the initial prepared advertising is around $52000 annually which would be putting a pressure on the company's resources leaving Cash Technology Limited A Chinese Ipo In Singapore with a negative earnings if the expenses are assigned to Case Study Help just.

The truth that Cash Technology Limited A Chinese Ipo In Singapore has actually currently incurred a preliminary financial investment of $48000 in the form of capital expense and model development indicates that the revenue from Case Study Help is insufficient to undertake the danger of sales cannibalization. Aside from that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market showing low elasticity of need is not a preferable alternative specifically of it is impacting the sale of the company's earnings generating models.



PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE