WhatsApp

Consolidated Equipment Co Case Study Help Checklist

Consolidated Equipment Co Case Study Help Checklist

Consolidated Equipment Co Case Study Solution
Consolidated Equipment Co Case Study Help
Consolidated Equipment Co Case Study Analysis



Analyses for Evaluating Consolidated Equipment Co decision to launch Case Study Solution


The following area concentrates on the of marketing for Consolidated Equipment Co where the company's customers, rivals and core proficiencies have assessed in order to validate whether the choice to launch Case Study Help under Consolidated Equipment Co brand name would be a possible choice or not. We have actually firstly looked at the type of clients that Consolidated Equipment Co handle while an evaluation of the competitive environment and the business's strengths and weak points follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the validation for not launching Case Study Help under Consolidated Equipment Co name.
Consolidated Equipment Co Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Consolidated Equipment Co consumers can be segmented into two groups, industrial customers and final customers. Both the groups utilize Consolidated Equipment Co high performance adhesives while the company is not only associated with the production of these adhesives but also markets them to these consumer groups. There are two kinds of products that are being offered to these possible markets; immediate adhesives and anaerobic adhesives. We would be concentrating on the customers of instantaneous adhesives for this analysis considering that the market for the latter has a lower capacity for Consolidated Equipment Co compared to that of immediate adhesives.

The overall market for instant adhesives is approximately 890,000 in the United States in 1978 which covers both consumer groups which have actually been determined earlier.If we look at a breakdown of Consolidated Equipment Co prospective market or consumer groups, we can see that the business offers to OEMs (Initial Equipment Makers), Do-it-Yourself clients, repair work and revamping companies (MRO) and producers handling products made from leather, wood, metal and plastic. This variety in clients suggests that Consolidated Equipment Co can target has numerous options in terms of segmenting the marketplace for its new item particularly as each of these groups would be needing the exact same kind of item with respective changes in need, quantity or packaging. Nevertheless, the client is not price delicate or brand conscious so launching a low priced dispenser under Consolidated Equipment Co name is not a suggested alternative.

Company Analysis

Consolidated Equipment Co is not just a manufacturer of adhesives but takes pleasure in market leadership in the immediate adhesive industry. The company has its own skilled and certified sales force which adds value to sales by training the company's network of 250 suppliers for helping with the sale of adhesives.

Core competences are not limited to adhesive production only as Consolidated Equipment Co also focuses on making adhesive dispensing equipment to facilitate the use of its products. This dual production technique provides Consolidated Equipment Co an edge over rivals because none of the rivals of dispensing equipment makes instant adhesives. Furthermore, none of these rivals offers directly to the consumer either and makes use of distributors for connecting to consumers. While we are taking a look at the strengths of Consolidated Equipment Co, it is essential to highlight the company's weaknesses as well.

The company's sales staff is experienced in training suppliers, the fact stays that the sales team is not trained in selling equipment so there is a possibility of relying heavily on suppliers when promoting adhesive equipment. It needs to also be kept in mind that the distributors are showing unwillingness when it comes to selling devices that needs servicing which increases the difficulties of selling devices under a particular brand name.

If we take a look at Consolidated Equipment Co line of product in adhesive devices particularly, the business has items focused on the high-end of the marketplace. The possibility of sales cannibalization exists if Consolidated Equipment Co offers Case Study Help under the very same portfolio. Given the reality that Case Study Help is priced lower than Consolidated Equipment Co high-end line of product, sales cannibalization would certainly be affecting Consolidated Equipment Co sales income if the adhesive equipment is offered under the company's trademark name.

We can see sales cannibalization impacting Consolidated Equipment Co 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. There is another possible threat which might decrease Consolidated Equipment Co revenue if Case Study Help is released under the company's brand name. The reality that $175000 has been spent in promoting SuperBonder recommends that it is not a great time for introducing a dispenser which can highlight the reality that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the immediate adhesive.

Furthermore, if we look at the marketplace in general, the adhesives market does disappoint brand orientation or cost consciousness which gives us 2 additional reasons for not releasing a low priced product under the company's trademark name.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Consolidated Equipment Co would be studied via Porter's 5 forces analysis which would highlight the degree of rivalry in the market.


Degree of Rivalry:

Currently we can see that the adhesive market has a high development capacity due to the existence of fragmented sectors with Consolidated Equipment Co enjoying leadership and a combined market share of 75% with 2 other market players, Eastman and Permabond. While industry rivalry in between these gamers could be called 'extreme' as the customer is not brand name conscious and each of these players has prominence in terms of market share, the truth still remains that the market is not saturated and still has a number of market segments which can be targeted as potential niche markets even when introducing an adhesive. We can even point out the reality that sales cannibalization might be leading to industry rivalry in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for instant adhesives provides development capacity.


Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the buyer in this industry is low particularly as the purchaser has low knowledge about the item. While business like Consolidated Equipment Co have managed to train distributors concerning adhesives, the last consumer depends on distributors. Roughly 72% of sales are made directly by producers and suppliers for instantaneous adhesives so the purchaser has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Given the fact that the adhesive market is controlled by three gamers, it could be stated that the supplier delights in a greater bargaining power compared to the purchaser. The reality stays that the provider does not have much influence over the purchaser at this point particularly as the purchaser does not show brand acknowledgment or rate sensitivity. When it comes to the adhesive market while the buyer and the producer do not have a major control over the real sales, this indicates that the supplier has the greater power.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand name loyalty and the ease of entry shown by foreign Japanese rivals in the instant adhesive market suggests that the marketplace allows ease of entry. Nevertheless, if we look at Consolidated Equipment Co in particular, the business has double capabilities in regards to being a maker of adhesive dispensers and instant adhesives. Potential risks in devices giving market are low which shows the possibility of producing brand awareness in not just instant adhesives but likewise in giving adhesives as none of the market players has handled to position itself in dual capabilities.

Hazard of Substitutes: The threat of replacements in the immediate adhesive market is low while the dispenser market in particular has alternatives like Glumetic idea applicators, inbuilt applicators, pencil applicators and sophisticated consoles. The reality stays that if Consolidated Equipment Co introduced Case Study Help, it would be delighting in sales cannibalization for its own items. (see appendix 1 for structure).


4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Consolidated Equipment Co Case Study Help


Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has offered numerous reasons for not releasing Case Study Help under Consolidated Equipment Co name, we have actually a suggested marketing mix for Case Study Help offered below if Consolidated Equipment Co chooses to go ahead with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target market chosen for Case Study Help is 'Automobile services' for a variety of reasons. There are currently 89257 establishments in this segment and a high usage of around 58900 pounds. is being used by 36.1 % of the market. This market has an additional development capacity of 10.1% which might be a good enough specific niche market sector for Case Study Help. Not just would a portable dispenser deal convenience to this particular market, the reality that the Do-it-Yourself market can likewise be targeted if a potable low priced adhesive is being sold for usage with SuperBonder. The product would be sold without the 'glumetic tip' and 'vari-drop' so that the customer can decide whether he wants to select either of the two accessories or not.

Price: The suggested price of Case Study Help has been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is offered through suppliers or through direct selling. A price below $250 would not require approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor car upkeep shop requires to purchase the item on his own.

Consolidated Equipment Co would just be getting $157 per unit as shown in appendix 2 which gives a breakdown of gross success and net success for Consolidated Equipment Co for releasing Case Study Help.

Place: A circulation model where Consolidated Equipment Co straight sends the item to the local supplier and keeps a 10% drop delivery allowance for the supplier would be utilized by Consolidated Equipment Co. Considering that the sales team is currently participated in offering immediate adhesives and they do not have knowledge in offering dispensers, involving them in the selling process would be costly specifically as each sales call costs around $120. The suppliers are currently selling dispensers so selling Case Study Help through them would be a favorable choice.

Promotion: A low promotional spending plan must have been designated to Case Study Help but the reality that the dispenser is a development and it needs to be marketed well in order to cover the capital expenses incurred for production, the suggested marketing plan costing $51816 is recommended for at first presenting the product in the market. The prepared ads in publications would be targeted at mechanics in lorry upkeep shops. (Suggested text for the advertisement is shown in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summed up in appendix 4).


Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Consolidated Equipment Co Case Study Analysis

Although a suggested strategy in the form of a marketing mix has been talked about for Case Study Help, the reality still stays that the product would not match Consolidated Equipment Co product line. We take a look at appendix 2, we can see how the overall gross profitability for the two designs is anticipated to be approximately $49377 if 250 systems of each design are made annually as per the plan. Nevertheless, the initial prepared marketing is roughly $52000 each year which would be putting a stress on the business's resources leaving Consolidated Equipment Co with an unfavorable net income if the expenses are allocated to Case Study Help just.

The truth that Consolidated Equipment Co has already incurred a preliminary financial investment of $48000 in the form of capital cost and model development indicates that the revenue from Case Study Help is not enough to carry out the danger of sales cannibalization. Aside from that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market showing low flexibility of need is not a preferable alternative specifically of it is impacting the sale of the company's earnings producing models.


 

PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE