Cox Communications Inc 1999 Case Study Help Checklist

Cox Communications Inc 1999 Case Study Help Checklist

Cox Communications Inc 1999 Case Study Solution
Cox Communications Inc 1999 Case Study Help
Cox Communications Inc 1999 Case Study Analysis

Analyses for Evaluating Cox Communications Inc 1999 decision to launch Case Study Solution

The following section concentrates on the of marketing for Cox Communications Inc 1999 where the company's clients, rivals and core proficiencies have assessed in order to validate whether the choice to release Case Study Help under Cox Communications Inc 1999 brand name would be a practical choice or not. We have firstly looked at the type of clients that Cox Communications Inc 1999 deals in while an assessment of the competitive environment and the business's weak points and strengths follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the validation for not releasing Case Study Help under Cox Communications Inc 1999 name.
Cox Communications Inc 1999 Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Both the groups use Cox Communications Inc 1999 high efficiency adhesives while the business is not just included in the production of these adhesives but also markets them to these client groups. We would be focusing on the consumers of immediate adhesives for this analysis considering that the market for the latter has a lower potential for Cox Communications Inc 1999 compared to that of instant adhesives.

The overall market for instant adhesives is approximately 890,000 in the US in 1978 which covers both consumer groups which have been recognized earlier.If we take a look at a breakdown of Cox Communications Inc 1999 potential market or consumer groups, we can see that the business sells to OEMs (Original Equipment Producers), Do-it-Yourself clients, repair work and overhauling business (MRO) and makers handling products made of leather, wood, plastic and metal. This variety in consumers recommends that Cox Communications Inc 1999 can target has various alternatives in regards to segmenting the market for its new item particularly as each of these groups would be needing the same type of item with particular changes in need, amount or packaging. The client is not rate delicate or brand conscious so introducing a low priced dispenser under Cox Communications Inc 1999 name is not a suggested choice.

Company Analysis

Cox Communications Inc 1999 is not just a maker of adhesives however delights in market management in the instant adhesive market. The business has its own knowledgeable and qualified sales force which adds worth to sales by training the company's network of 250 suppliers for facilitating the sale of adhesives.

Core proficiencies are not limited to adhesive production just as Cox Communications Inc 1999 likewise specializes in making adhesive giving equipment to help with the use of its items. This double production strategy offers Cox Communications Inc 1999 an edge over competitors given that none of the competitors of giving devices makes instant adhesives. Additionally, none of these rivals sells straight to the customer either and makes use of distributors for connecting to customers. While we are looking at the strengths of Cox Communications Inc 1999, it is very important to highlight the company's weaknesses as well.

The business's sales personnel is competent in training distributors, the truth remains that the sales group is not trained in selling equipment so there is a possibility of relying greatly on suppliers when promoting adhesive equipment. However, it ought to likewise be kept in mind that the suppliers are revealing unwillingness when it pertains to offering devices that requires servicing which increases the challenges of offering devices under a particular brand name.

If we look at Cox Communications Inc 1999 line of product in adhesive devices especially, the company has actually items targeted at the high-end of the market. If Cox Communications Inc 1999 sells Case Study Help under the same portfolio, the possibility of sales cannibalization exists. Given the fact that Case Study Help is priced lower than Cox Communications Inc 1999 high-end product line, sales cannibalization would certainly be impacting Cox Communications Inc 1999 sales earnings if the adhesive devices is offered under the company's trademark name.

We can see sales cannibalization affecting Cox Communications Inc 1999 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. If Case Study Help is launched under the company's brand name, there is another possible risk which might reduce Cox Communications Inc 1999 profits. The reality that $175000 has actually been spent in promoting SuperBonder suggests that it is not a good time for introducing a dispenser which can highlight the fact that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the immediate adhesive.

Additionally, if we look at the market in general, the adhesives market does disappoint brand orientation or price consciousness which offers us two extra factors for not releasing a low priced product under the business's brand.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Cox Communications Inc 1999 would be studied by means of Porter's 5 forces analysis which would highlight the degree of competition in the market.

Degree of Rivalry:

Currently we can see that the adhesive market has a high development capacity due to the existence of fragmented segments with Cox Communications Inc 1999 enjoying leadership and a combined market share of 75% with 2 other industry players, Eastman and Permabond. While market competition in between these players could be called 'intense' as the consumer is not brand conscious and each of these players has prominence in terms of market share, the truth still stays that the industry is not saturated and still has numerous market sectors which can be targeted as potential specific niche markets even when introducing an adhesive. We can even point out the fact that sales cannibalization may be leading to market competition in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for instant adhesives offers development capacity.

Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the purchaser in this market is low specifically as the purchaser has low understanding about the item. While business like Cox Communications Inc 1999 have handled to train distributors concerning adhesives, the final consumer depends on distributors. Approximately 72% of sales are made straight by makers and distributors for immediate adhesives so the buyer has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Provided the truth that the adhesive market is dominated by three gamers, it could be stated that the supplier enjoys a higher bargaining power compared to the purchaser. The truth remains that the supplier does not have much impact over the purchaser at this point especially as the buyer does not show brand name acknowledgment or rate sensitivity. When it comes to the adhesive market while the buyer and the maker do not have a significant control over the actual sales, this suggests that the supplier has the higher power.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand name loyalty and the ease of entry shown by foreign Japanese rivals in the immediate adhesive market suggests that the marketplace enables ease of entry. Nevertheless, if we look at Cox Communications Inc 1999 in particular, the business has dual abilities in regards to being a producer of adhesive dispensers and instant adhesives. Potential hazards in equipment dispensing market are low which shows the possibility of creating brand name awareness in not only immediate adhesives but also in dispensing adhesives as none of the market gamers has handled to place itself in dual abilities.

Risk of Substitutes: The risk of substitutes in the immediate adhesive market is low while the dispenser market in particular has substitutes like Glumetic suggestion applicators, in-built applicators, pencil applicators and advanced consoles. The reality remains that if Cox Communications Inc 1999 introduced Case Study Help, it would be indulging in sales cannibalization for its own items. (see appendix 1 for framework).

4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Cox Communications Inc 1999 Case Study Help

Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has actually provided numerous reasons for not introducing Case Study Help under Cox Communications Inc 1999 name, we have a suggested marketing mix for Case Study Help offered below if Cox Communications Inc 1999 decides to proceed with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target market picked for Case Study Help is 'Motor lorry services' for a number of factors. This market has an additional development potential of 10.1% which may be a good adequate niche market segment for Case Study Help. Not only would a portable dispenser offer benefit to this particular market, the reality that the Do-it-Yourself market can likewise be targeted if a drinkable low priced adhesive is being sold for usage with SuperBonder.

Price: The recommended rate of Case Study Help has been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is sold through suppliers or via direct selling. A price listed below $250 would not require approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor car upkeep store requires to purchase the item on his own.

Cox Communications Inc 1999 would only be getting $157 per unit as displayed in appendix 2 which gives a breakdown of gross profitability and net profitability for Cox Communications Inc 1999 for launching Case Study Help.

Place: A distribution model where Cox Communications Inc 1999 straight sends the item to the local supplier and keeps a 10% drop shipment allowance for the supplier would be utilized by Cox Communications Inc 1999. Since the sales team is already participated in selling instantaneous adhesives and they do not have expertise in selling dispensers, including them in the selling procedure would be pricey particularly as each sales call expenses approximately $120. The suppliers are currently offering dispensers so offering Case Study Help through them would be a favorable option.

Promotion: A low promotional spending plan needs to have been designated to Case Study Help but the reality that the dispenser is a development and it requires to be marketed well in order to cover the capital costs sustained for production, the suggested advertising strategy costing $51816 is recommended for at first presenting the item in the market. The prepared advertisements in magazines would be targeted at mechanics in lorry maintenance stores. (Suggested text for the advertisement is shown in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summed up in appendix 4).

Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Cox Communications Inc 1999 Case Study Analysis

A suggested plan of action in the type of a marketing mix has been talked about for Case Study Help, the truth still remains that the item would not match Cox Communications Inc 1999 item line. We have a look at appendix 2, we can see how the total gross success for the two models is anticipated to be around $49377 if 250 units of each design are manufactured each year according to the strategy. However, the preliminary planned advertising is around $52000 annually which would be putting a strain on the company's resources leaving Cox Communications Inc 1999 with an unfavorable net income if the costs are assigned to Case Study Help only.

The reality that Cox Communications Inc 1999 has actually currently incurred a preliminary investment of $48000 in the form of capital cost and prototype development indicates that the income from Case Study Help is inadequate to undertake the threat of sales cannibalization. Besides that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market showing low elasticity of demand is not a preferable choice specifically of it is affecting the sale of the company's revenue generating models.