WhatsApp

Cumberland Worldwide Corp B Case Study Help Checklist

Cumberland Worldwide Corp B Case Study Help Checklist

Cumberland Worldwide Corp B Case Study Solution
Cumberland Worldwide Corp B Case Study Help
Cumberland Worldwide Corp B Case Study Analysis



Analyses for Evaluating Cumberland Worldwide Corp B decision to launch Case Study Solution


The following section focuses on the of marketing for Cumberland Worldwide Corp B where the company's customers, competitors and core competencies have evaluated in order to justify whether the choice to introduce Case Study Help under Cumberland Worldwide Corp B brand would be a practical choice or not. We have actually first of all looked at the kind of customers that Cumberland Worldwide Corp B handle while an evaluation of the competitive environment and the company's weak points and strengths follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the reason for not releasing Case Study Help under Cumberland Worldwide Corp B name.
Cumberland Worldwide Corp B Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Cumberland Worldwide Corp B clients can be segmented into 2 groups, final consumers and commercial clients. Both the groups use Cumberland Worldwide Corp B high performance adhesives while the company is not only involved in the production of these adhesives however likewise markets them to these customer groups. There are 2 kinds of items that are being offered to these possible markets; anaerobic adhesives and instantaneous adhesives. We would be concentrating on the consumers of immediate adhesives for this analysis given that the marketplace for the latter has a lower capacity for Cumberland Worldwide Corp B compared to that of immediate adhesives.

The overall market for instant adhesives is around 890,000 in the US in 1978 which covers both customer groups which have been recognized earlier.If we take a look at a breakdown of Cumberland Worldwide Corp B prospective market or client groups, we can see that the company sells to OEMs (Original Devices Manufacturers), Do-it-Yourself customers, repair and revamping business (MRO) and producers handling products made of leather, wood, metal and plastic. This variety in consumers suggests that Cumberland Worldwide Corp B can target has different options in terms of segmenting the market for its new product specifically as each of these groups would be requiring the exact same type of product with respective modifications in product packaging, amount or need. The consumer is not cost delicate or brand mindful so releasing a low priced dispenser under Cumberland Worldwide Corp B name is not a suggested alternative.

Company Analysis

Cumberland Worldwide Corp B is not simply a maker of adhesives but takes pleasure in market management in the instantaneous adhesive market. The business has its own knowledgeable and certified sales force which adds value to sales by training the business's network of 250 distributors for helping with the sale of adhesives. Cumberland Worldwide Corp B believes in unique circulation as suggested by the reality that it has actually picked to sell through 250 suppliers whereas there is t a network of 10000 suppliers that can be checked out for expanding reach by means of distributors. The company's reach is not limited to The United States and Canada only as it likewise enjoys global sales. With 1400 outlets spread out all throughout The United States and Canada, Cumberland Worldwide Corp B has its in-house production plants rather than using out-sourcing as the favored technique.

Core skills are not restricted to adhesive production only as Cumberland Worldwide Corp B likewise specializes in making adhesive dispensing equipment to help with the use of its products. This double production method gives Cumberland Worldwide Corp B an edge over competitors given that none of the competitors of dispensing equipment makes instant adhesives. Furthermore, none of these competitors offers directly to the consumer either and uses distributors for connecting to clients. While we are looking at the strengths of Cumberland Worldwide Corp B, it is important to highlight the business's weak points.

Although the business's sales staff is proficient in training suppliers, the fact remains that the sales group is not trained in selling devices so there is a possibility of relying greatly on suppliers when promoting adhesive equipment. It needs to likewise be noted that the suppliers are showing reluctance when it comes to selling devices that requires servicing which increases the difficulties of selling devices under a specific brand name.

The company has products intended at the high end of the market if we look at Cumberland Worldwide Corp B product line in adhesive devices especially. The possibility of sales cannibalization exists if Cumberland Worldwide Corp B sells Case Study Help under the exact same portfolio. Given the fact that Case Study Help is priced lower than Cumberland Worldwide Corp B high-end line of product, sales cannibalization would definitely be impacting Cumberland Worldwide Corp B sales revenue if the adhesive equipment is offered under the company's trademark name.

We can see sales cannibalization impacting Cumberland Worldwide Corp B 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. There is another possible threat which might reduce Cumberland Worldwide Corp B earnings if Case Study Help is introduced under the business's brand. The fact that $175000 has actually been spent in promoting SuperBonder recommends that it is not a great time for releasing a dispenser which can highlight the fact that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the instantaneous adhesive.

In addition, if we look at the market in general, the adhesives market does disappoint brand name orientation or cost consciousness which provides us 2 additional factors for not launching a low priced item under the business's brand name.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Cumberland Worldwide Corp B would be studied through Porter's 5 forces analysis which would highlight the degree of rivalry in the market.


Degree of Rivalry:

Presently we can see that the adhesive market has a high development potential due to the presence of fragmented sectors with Cumberland Worldwide Corp B enjoying management and a combined market share of 75% with 2 other industry gamers, Eastman and Permabond. While market competition between these players could be called 'intense' as the customer is not brand mindful and each of these gamers has prominence in regards to market share, the fact still remains that the industry is not filled and still has a number of market sectors which can be targeted as prospective specific niche markets even when releasing an adhesive. We can even point out the reality that sales cannibalization may be leading to industry competition in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for immediate adhesives provides growth potential.


Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the buyer in this industry is low especially as the buyer has low understanding about the product. While business like Cumberland Worldwide Corp B have managed to train suppliers relating to adhesives, the final consumer is dependent on distributors. Approximately 72% of sales are made straight by makers and distributors for immediate adhesives so the purchaser has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Offered the reality that the adhesive market is controlled by 3 players, it could be said that the provider takes pleasure in a greater bargaining power compared to the buyer. However, the fact stays that the provider does not have much impact over the purchaser at this moment particularly as the buyer does disappoint brand recognition or price level of sensitivity. This shows that the supplier has the higher power when it comes to the adhesive market while the buyer and the producer do not have a significant control over the real sales.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand commitment and the ease of entry shown by foreign Japanese rivals in the instantaneous adhesive market suggests that the market permits ease of entry. If we look at Cumberland Worldwide Corp B in particular, the company has double capabilities in terms of being a maker of instantaneous adhesives and adhesive dispensers. Potential dangers in devices giving market are low which reveals the possibility of producing brand name awareness in not just instant adhesives however likewise in giving adhesives as none of the market gamers has actually handled to position itself in dual abilities.

Risk of Substitutes: The threat of alternatives in the instantaneous adhesive market is low while the dispenser market in particular has substitutes like Glumetic suggestion applicators, inbuilt applicators, pencil applicators and sophisticated consoles. The reality remains that if Cumberland Worldwide Corp B introduced Case Study Help, it would be delighting in sales cannibalization for its own items. (see appendix 1 for structure).


4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Cumberland Worldwide Corp B Case Study Help


Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has given various reasons for not releasing Case Study Help under Cumberland Worldwide Corp B name, we have a suggested marketing mix for Case Study Help provided listed below if Cumberland Worldwide Corp B chooses to go on with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target market selected for Case Study Help is 'Motor lorry services' for a number of reasons. This market has an additional growth potential of 10.1% which might be a good enough niche market sector for Case Study Help. Not only would a portable dispenser deal benefit to this particular market, the truth that the Diy market can likewise be targeted if a drinkable low priced adhesive is being offered for use with SuperBonder.

Price: The suggested cost of Case Study Help has actually been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is sold through distributors or through direct selling. A price listed below $250 would not require approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor vehicle maintenance store needs to acquire the product on his own.

Cumberland Worldwide Corp B would only be getting $157 per unit as displayed in appendix 2 which offers a breakdown of gross success and net profitability for Cumberland Worldwide Corp B for launching Case Study Help.

Place: A circulation model where Cumberland Worldwide Corp B directly sends out the item to the regional supplier and keeps a 10% drop shipment allowance for the distributor would be used by Cumberland Worldwide Corp B. Considering that the sales team is already participated in selling immediate adhesives and they do not have proficiency in offering dispensers, including them in the selling procedure would be expensive particularly as each sales call costs around $120. The suppliers are already selling dispensers so selling Case Study Help through them would be a beneficial choice.

Promotion: Although a low marketing spending plan must have been assigned to Case Study Help however the reality that the dispenser is an innovation and it requires to be marketed well in order to cover the capital expenses sustained for production, the recommended marketing strategy costing $51816 is suggested for initially presenting the product in the market. The prepared ads in magazines would be targeted at mechanics in car upkeep stores. (Suggested text for the ad is displayed in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summarized in appendix 4).


Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Cumberland Worldwide Corp B Case Study Analysis

Although a recommended strategy in the form of a marketing mix has been gone over for Case Study Help, the truth still stays that the item would not complement Cumberland Worldwide Corp B line of product. We take a look at appendix 2, we can see how the overall gross success for the two designs is expected to be roughly $49377 if 250 systems of each model are produced per year based on the plan. However, the initial planned advertising is approximately $52000 annually which would be putting a pressure on the company's resources leaving Cumberland Worldwide Corp B with an unfavorable earnings if the expenses are allocated to Case Study Help just.

The truth that Cumberland Worldwide Corp B has currently sustained an initial investment of $48000 in the form of capital expense and prototype development indicates that the income from Case Study Help is not enough to carry out the threat of sales cannibalization. Other than that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market showing low flexibility of demand is not a preferable alternative particularly of it is affecting the sale of the business's earnings producing designs.



PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE