WhatsApp

Dividend Policy At Fpl Group Inc B Case Study Help Checklist

Dividend Policy At Fpl Group Inc B Case Study Help Checklist

Dividend Policy At Fpl Group Inc B Case Study Solution
Dividend Policy At Fpl Group Inc B Case Study Help
Dividend Policy At Fpl Group Inc B Case Study Analysis



Analyses for Evaluating Dividend Policy At Fpl Group Inc B decision to launch Case Study Solution


The following section concentrates on the of marketing for Dividend Policy At Fpl Group Inc B where the company's consumers, competitors and core competencies have assessed in order to validate whether the choice to release Case Study Help under Dividend Policy At Fpl Group Inc B brand name would be a feasible option or not. We have first of all looked at the type of customers that Dividend Policy At Fpl Group Inc B deals in while an assessment of the competitive environment and the company's weak points and strengths follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the justification for not releasing Case Study Help under Dividend Policy At Fpl Group Inc B name.
Dividend Policy At Fpl Group Inc B Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Dividend Policy At Fpl Group Inc B customers can be segmented into two groups, final customers and commercial clients. Both the groups use Dividend Policy At Fpl Group Inc B high performance adhesives while the company is not only involved in the production of these adhesives but likewise markets them to these customer groups. There are 2 types of products that are being sold to these possible markets; anaerobic adhesives and instant adhesives. We would be focusing on the customers of immediate adhesives for this analysis considering that the market for the latter has a lower potential for Dividend Policy At Fpl Group Inc B compared to that of instant adhesives.

The total market for instantaneous adhesives is around 890,000 in the US in 1978 which covers both consumer groups which have been identified earlier.If we take a look at a breakdown of Dividend Policy At Fpl Group Inc B potential market or consumer groups, we can see that the company sells to OEMs (Original Devices Producers), Do-it-Yourself clients, repair and revamping companies (MRO) and makers handling products made from leather, metal, plastic and wood. This variety in clients suggests that Dividend Policy At Fpl Group Inc B can target has different choices in regards to segmenting the market for its brand-new product particularly as each of these groups would be needing the exact same type of item with particular changes in quantity, need or packaging. The client is not price delicate or brand name conscious so releasing a low priced dispenser under Dividend Policy At Fpl Group Inc B name is not a suggested choice.

Company Analysis

Dividend Policy At Fpl Group Inc B is not just a producer of adhesives however enjoys market leadership in the instant adhesive industry. The business has its own proficient and certified sales force which adds value to sales by training the business's network of 250 distributors for facilitating the sale of adhesives.

Core proficiencies are not restricted to adhesive production only as Dividend Policy At Fpl Group Inc B likewise concentrates on making adhesive giving equipment to help with the use of its products. This double production strategy provides Dividend Policy At Fpl Group Inc B an edge over competitors considering that none of the rivals of giving devices makes instant adhesives. Furthermore, none of these rivals offers straight to the customer either and makes use of distributors for connecting to customers. While we are looking at the strengths of Dividend Policy At Fpl Group Inc B, it is very important to highlight the company's weak points as well.

The business's sales staff is proficient in training distributors, the reality stays that the sales group is not trained in offering equipment so there is a possibility of relying heavily on suppliers when promoting adhesive devices. It ought to likewise be noted that the distributors are revealing reluctance when it comes to offering devices that needs maintenance which increases the obstacles of selling equipment under a specific brand name.

If we look at Dividend Policy At Fpl Group Inc B product line in adhesive equipment especially, the company has actually items aimed at the high end of the marketplace. The possibility of sales cannibalization exists if Dividend Policy At Fpl Group Inc B sells Case Study Help under the exact same portfolio. Offered the fact that Case Study Help is priced lower than Dividend Policy At Fpl Group Inc B high-end line of product, sales cannibalization would absolutely be impacting Dividend Policy At Fpl Group Inc B sales income if the adhesive devices is sold under the company's brand name.

We can see sales cannibalization impacting Dividend Policy At Fpl Group Inc B 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. There is another possible risk which could reduce Dividend Policy At Fpl Group Inc B profits if Case Study Help is introduced under the company's brand. The truth that $175000 has actually been spent in promoting SuperBonder suggests that it is not a good time for launching a dispenser which can highlight the fact that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the immediate adhesive.

Additionally, if we look at the marketplace in general, the adhesives market does not show brand orientation or price awareness which gives us 2 extra factors for not launching a low priced item under the business's brand.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Dividend Policy At Fpl Group Inc B would be studied through Porter's five forces analysis which would highlight the degree of competition in the market.


Degree of Rivalry:

Currently we can see that the adhesive market has a high growth capacity due to the existence of fragmented sections with Dividend Policy At Fpl Group Inc B delighting in leadership and a combined market share of 75% with two other industry players, Eastman and Permabond. While market competition between these gamers could be called 'extreme' as the customer is not brand conscious and each of these players has prominence in terms of market share, the reality still remains that the industry is not saturated and still has a number of market sectors which can be targeted as prospective specific niche markets even when releasing an adhesive. We can even point out the fact that sales cannibalization might be leading to market competition in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for instant adhesives uses growth capacity.


Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the purchaser in this industry is low specifically as the buyer has low understanding about the product. While business like Dividend Policy At Fpl Group Inc B have actually handled to train suppliers concerning adhesives, the last customer depends on suppliers. Roughly 72% of sales are made directly by manufacturers and distributors for instantaneous adhesives so the buyer has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Given the reality that the adhesive market is controlled by 3 players, it could be stated that the supplier enjoys a greater bargaining power compared to the purchaser. Nevertheless, the fact stays that the provider does not have much influence over the purchaser at this point particularly as the purchaser does not show brand name recognition or rate sensitivity. When it comes to the adhesive market while the maker and the purchaser do not have a significant control over the real sales, this shows that the distributor has the greater power.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand name loyalty and the ease of entry revealed by foreign Japanese competitors in the immediate adhesive market shows that the market enables ease of entry. However, if we take a look at Dividend Policy At Fpl Group Inc B in particular, the business has double abilities in regards to being a manufacturer of instant adhesives and adhesive dispensers. Potential risks in devices giving market are low which shows the possibility of creating brand awareness in not only immediate adhesives but likewise in dispensing adhesives as none of the market players has managed to position itself in double abilities.

Danger of Substitutes: The threat of replacements in the instantaneous adhesive market is low while the dispenser market in particular has replacements like Glumetic idea applicators, inbuilt applicators, pencil applicators and advanced consoles. The truth stays that if Dividend Policy At Fpl Group Inc B introduced Case Study Help, it would be delighting in sales cannibalization for its own items. (see appendix 1 for structure).


4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Dividend Policy At Fpl Group Inc B Case Study Help


Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has offered different factors for not introducing Case Study Help under Dividend Policy At Fpl Group Inc B name, we have a recommended marketing mix for Case Study Help provided below if Dividend Policy At Fpl Group Inc B decides to go on with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target market chosen for Case Study Help is 'Motor vehicle services' for a variety of reasons. There are presently 89257 establishments in this section and a high usage of roughly 58900 pounds. is being used by 36.1 % of the market. This market has an additional growth potential of 10.1% which might be a good enough specific niche market section for Case Study Help. Not just would a portable dispenser offer convenience to this specific market, the truth that the Do-it-Yourself market can also be targeted if a drinkable low priced adhesive is being cost usage with SuperBonder. The item would be offered without the 'glumetic tip' and 'vari-drop' so that the consumer can choose whether he wants to choose either of the two devices or not.

Price: The suggested price of Case Study Help has been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is offered through suppliers or through direct selling. This cost would not consist of the cost of the 'vari pointer' or the 'glumetic suggestion'. A rate listed below $250 would not need approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at an automobile upkeep shop requires to purchase the product on his own. This would increase the possibility of affecting mechanics to acquire the item for use in their day-to-day upkeep jobs.

Dividend Policy At Fpl Group Inc B would only be getting $157 per unit as shown in appendix 2 which provides a breakdown of gross profitability and net success for Dividend Policy At Fpl Group Inc B for releasing Case Study Help.

Place: A circulation design where Dividend Policy At Fpl Group Inc B directly sends out the product to the regional distributor and keeps a 10% drop shipment allowance for the supplier would be utilized by Dividend Policy At Fpl Group Inc B. Given that the sales team is currently participated in selling instantaneous adhesives and they do not have know-how in selling dispensers, involving them in the selling procedure would be expensive especially as each sales call costs approximately $120. The distributors are currently selling dispensers so offering Case Study Help through them would be a beneficial choice.

Promotion: Although a low marketing budget needs to have been assigned to Case Study Help however the reality that the dispenser is an innovation and it needs to be marketed well in order to cover the capital expenses incurred for production, the recommended advertising plan costing $51816 is suggested for at first presenting the product in the market. The prepared advertisements in magazines would be targeted at mechanics in vehicle maintenance shops. (Suggested text for the ad is displayed in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summed up in appendix 4).


Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Dividend Policy At Fpl Group Inc B Case Study Analysis

Although a recommended strategy in the form of a marketing mix has been gone over for Case Study Help, the truth still remains that the product would not match Dividend Policy At Fpl Group Inc B line of product. We have a look at appendix 2, we can see how the overall gross profitability for the two designs is anticipated to be around $49377 if 250 units of each model are manufactured annually based on the strategy. The initial planned advertising is roughly $52000 per year which would be putting a pressure on the company's resources leaving Dividend Policy At Fpl Group Inc B with a negative net income if the expenditures are assigned to Case Study Help just.

The fact that Dividend Policy At Fpl Group Inc B has currently incurred a preliminary investment of $48000 in the form of capital cost and model development suggests that the earnings from Case Study Help is insufficient to undertake the threat of sales cannibalization. Besides that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market revealing low elasticity of demand is not a preferable alternative especially of it is impacting the sale of the business's income producing models.



PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE