WhatsApp

Dividend Policy At Linear Technology Case Study Help Checklist

Dividend Policy At Linear Technology Case Study Help Checklist

Dividend Policy At Linear Technology Case Study Solution
Dividend Policy At Linear Technology Case Study Help
Dividend Policy At Linear Technology Case Study Analysis



Analyses for Evaluating Dividend Policy At Linear Technology decision to launch Case Study Solution


The following section concentrates on the of marketing for Dividend Policy At Linear Technology where the company's consumers, competitors and core competencies have examined in order to justify whether the choice to introduce Case Study Help under Dividend Policy At Linear Technology brand name would be a feasible option or not. We have firstly taken a look at the type of customers that Dividend Policy At Linear Technology handle while an evaluation of the competitive environment and the business's weaknesses and strengths follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the reason for not introducing Case Study Help under Dividend Policy At Linear Technology name.
Dividend Policy At Linear Technology Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Both the groups utilize Dividend Policy At Linear Technology high performance adhesives while the company is not just involved in the production of these adhesives but likewise markets them to these consumer groups. We would be focusing on the customers of immediate adhesives for this analysis because the market for the latter has a lower potential for Dividend Policy At Linear Technology compared to that of instant adhesives.

The overall market for instant adhesives is approximately 890,000 in the US in 1978 which covers both consumer groups which have been determined earlier.If we take a look at a breakdown of Dividend Policy At Linear Technology potential market or customer groups, we can see that the company offers to OEMs (Initial Devices Producers), Do-it-Yourself customers, repair work and upgrading companies (MRO) and manufacturers handling items made of leather, plastic, metal and wood. This diversity in customers recommends that Dividend Policy At Linear Technology can target has various alternatives in regards to segmenting the marketplace for its brand-new item particularly as each of these groups would be needing the very same kind of product with respective changes in amount, demand or packaging. The client is not price sensitive or brand mindful so introducing a low priced dispenser under Dividend Policy At Linear Technology name is not a recommended option.

Company Analysis

Dividend Policy At Linear Technology is not just a maker of adhesives but enjoys market leadership in the immediate adhesive industry. The business has its own knowledgeable and certified sales force which includes worth to sales by training the company's network of 250 suppliers for facilitating the sale of adhesives. Dividend Policy At Linear Technology believes in exclusive circulation as shown by the truth that it has picked to offer through 250 suppliers whereas there is t a network of 10000 suppliers that can be checked out for broadening reach through distributors. The company's reach is not limited to North America only as it likewise takes pleasure in global sales. With 1400 outlets spread out all across The United States and Canada, Dividend Policy At Linear Technology has its internal production plants rather than using out-sourcing as the preferred strategy.

Core proficiencies are not limited to adhesive production only as Dividend Policy At Linear Technology also concentrates on making adhesive giving devices to assist in making use of its products. This double production technique provides Dividend Policy At Linear Technology an edge over competitors given that none of the competitors of dispensing devices makes immediate adhesives. Furthermore, none of these competitors sells directly to the customer either and utilizes suppliers for connecting to consumers. While we are looking at the strengths of Dividend Policy At Linear Technology, it is important to highlight the company's weak points.

Although the company's sales staff is knowledgeable in training suppliers, the reality remains that the sales team is not trained in offering devices so there is a possibility of relying greatly on distributors when promoting adhesive equipment. It should likewise be noted that the distributors are showing unwillingness when it comes to selling devices that needs maintenance which increases the difficulties of offering equipment under a particular brand name.

If we look at Dividend Policy At Linear Technology product line in adhesive devices especially, the business has products targeted at the high end of the marketplace. If Dividend Policy At Linear Technology offers Case Study Help under the very same portfolio, the possibility of sales cannibalization exists. Given the reality that Case Study Help is priced lower than Dividend Policy At Linear Technology high-end line of product, sales cannibalization would definitely be affecting Dividend Policy At Linear Technology sales profits if the adhesive equipment is sold under the company's brand name.

We can see sales cannibalization impacting Dividend Policy At Linear Technology 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. There is another possible hazard which might reduce Dividend Policy At Linear Technology income if Case Study Help is introduced under the company's brand. The fact that $175000 has actually been spent in promoting SuperBonder recommends that it is not a great time for launching a dispenser which can highlight the truth that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the immediate adhesive.

In addition, if we take a look at the marketplace in general, the adhesives market does disappoint brand name orientation or cost awareness which gives us two additional factors for not launching a low priced item under the business's brand.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Dividend Policy At Linear Technology would be studied through Porter's 5 forces analysis which would highlight the degree of competition in the market.


Degree of Rivalry:

Currently we can see that the adhesive market has a high development potential due to the existence of fragmented sections with Dividend Policy At Linear Technology taking pleasure in management and a combined market share of 75% with two other industry gamers, Eastman and Permabond. While industry rivalry between these players could be called 'extreme' as the consumer is not brand conscious and each of these gamers has prominence in terms of market share, the reality still remains that the industry is not filled and still has several market sections which can be targeted as potential specific niche markets even when launching an adhesive. We can even point out the truth that sales cannibalization might be leading to industry competition in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for instant adhesives provides growth potential.


Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the purchaser in this industry is low specifically as the purchaser has low knowledge about the product. While business like Dividend Policy At Linear Technology have managed to train suppliers relating to adhesives, the final customer is dependent on suppliers. Around 72% of sales are made directly by makers and suppliers for instantaneous adhesives so the purchaser has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Given the truth that the adhesive market is dominated by 3 players, it could be stated that the supplier takes pleasure in a higher bargaining power compared to the purchaser. The fact remains that the supplier does not have much impact over the purchaser at this point especially as the buyer does not show brand acknowledgment or rate sensitivity. When it comes to the adhesive market while the maker and the purchaser do not have a major control over the real sales, this suggests that the supplier has the greater power.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand name loyalty and the ease of entry revealed by foreign Japanese rivals in the instant adhesive market shows that the marketplace enables ease of entry. Nevertheless, if we look at Dividend Policy At Linear Technology in particular, the company has double capabilities in regards to being a manufacturer of adhesive dispensers and immediate adhesives. Possible threats in devices giving market are low which shows the possibility of developing brand name awareness in not just instantaneous adhesives however likewise in dispensing adhesives as none of the market gamers has actually managed to place itself in double capabilities.

Danger of Substitutes: The hazard of replacements in the immediate adhesive market is low while the dispenser market in particular has alternatives like Glumetic suggestion applicators, built-in applicators, pencil applicators and advanced consoles. The fact remains that if Dividend Policy At Linear Technology presented Case Study Help, it would be enjoying sales cannibalization for its own items. (see appendix 1 for structure).


4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Dividend Policy At Linear Technology Case Study Help


Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has actually provided various factors for not releasing Case Study Help under Dividend Policy At Linear Technology name, we have actually a suggested marketing mix for Case Study Help offered listed below if Dividend Policy At Linear Technology chooses to go ahead with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target market picked for Case Study Help is 'Motor vehicle services' for a number of factors. This market has an additional growth potential of 10.1% which might be an excellent sufficient niche market segment for Case Study Help. Not only would a portable dispenser offer convenience to this particular market, the truth that the Diy market can likewise be targeted if a potable low priced adhesive is being sold for usage with SuperBonder.

Price: The suggested rate of Case Study Help has been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is offered through suppliers or via direct selling. This price would not include the cost of the 'vari pointer' or the 'glumetic tip'. A rate below $250 would not require approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at an automobile upkeep shop requires to buy the product on his own. This would increase the possibility of affecting mechanics to acquire the product for usage in their everyday maintenance jobs.

Dividend Policy At Linear Technology would only be getting $157 per unit as displayed in appendix 2 which gives a breakdown of gross success and net success for Dividend Policy At Linear Technology for launching Case Study Help.

Place: A circulation design where Dividend Policy At Linear Technology directly sends out the item to the local supplier and keeps a 10% drop shipment allowance for the distributor would be used by Dividend Policy At Linear Technology. Given that the sales group is currently participated in offering immediate adhesives and they do not have know-how in selling dispensers, including them in the selling process would be costly specifically as each sales call expenses around $120. The suppliers are already offering dispensers so selling Case Study Help through them would be a favorable alternative.

Promotion: Although a low marketing budget plan needs to have been assigned to Case Study Help however the reality that the dispenser is an innovation and it needs to be marketed well in order to cover the capital expenses incurred for production, the recommended advertising strategy costing $51816 is suggested for at first introducing the item in the market. The prepared ads in publications would be targeted at mechanics in car maintenance stores. (Suggested text for the advertisement is displayed in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summed up in appendix 4).


Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Dividend Policy At Linear Technology Case Study Analysis

Although a suggested strategy in the form of a marketing mix has been gone over for Case Study Help, the truth still stays that the product would not match Dividend Policy At Linear Technology product line. We take a look at appendix 2, we can see how the total gross success for the two designs is expected to be around $49377 if 250 units of each design are made per year based on the strategy. However, the preliminary prepared marketing is around $52000 each year which would be putting a pressure on the company's resources leaving Dividend Policy At Linear Technology with a negative net income if the costs are allocated to Case Study Help only.

The reality that Dividend Policy At Linear Technology has already incurred a preliminary investment of $48000 in the form of capital expense and model development suggests that the earnings from Case Study Help is not enough to carry out the threat of sales cannibalization. Aside from that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market showing low elasticity of demand is not a more effective option particularly of it is impacting the sale of the business's profits producing designs.



PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE