WhatsApp

Enron Corp May 6 2001 Sell Recommendation Case Study Help Checklist

Enron Corp May 6 2001 Sell Recommendation Case Study Help Checklist

Enron Corp May 6 2001 Sell Recommendation Case Study Solution
Enron Corp May 6 2001 Sell Recommendation Case Study Help
Enron Corp May 6 2001 Sell Recommendation Case Study Analysis



Analyses for Evaluating Enron Corp May 6 2001 Sell Recommendation decision to launch Case Study Solution


The following area focuses on the of marketing for Enron Corp May 6 2001 Sell Recommendation where the company's clients, rivals and core competencies have evaluated in order to justify whether the decision to release Case Study Help under Enron Corp May 6 2001 Sell Recommendation brand name would be a feasible alternative or not. We have to start with taken a look at the type of consumers that Enron Corp May 6 2001 Sell Recommendation deals in while an assessment of the competitive environment and the business's strengths and weaknesses follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the justification for not introducing Case Study Help under Enron Corp May 6 2001 Sell Recommendation name.
Enron Corp May 6 2001 Sell Recommendation Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Enron Corp May 6 2001 Sell Recommendation consumers can be segmented into 2 groups, last consumers and industrial clients. Both the groups use Enron Corp May 6 2001 Sell Recommendation high performance adhesives while the business is not only associated with the production of these adhesives but likewise markets them to these client groups. There are two types of items that are being offered to these possible markets; anaerobic adhesives and instantaneous adhesives. We would be concentrating on the customers of immediate adhesives for this analysis given that the market for the latter has a lower potential for Enron Corp May 6 2001 Sell Recommendation compared to that of instant adhesives.

The overall market for instant adhesives is around 890,000 in the US in 1978 which covers both consumer groups which have been identified earlier.If we take a look at a breakdown of Enron Corp May 6 2001 Sell Recommendation possible market or client groups, we can see that the business offers to OEMs (Original Devices Manufacturers), Do-it-Yourself customers, repair work and upgrading business (MRO) and makers dealing in items made from leather, plastic, wood and metal. This diversity in consumers suggests that Enron Corp May 6 2001 Sell Recommendation can target has different options in regards to segmenting the market for its new item particularly as each of these groups would be requiring the very same type of item with respective changes in packaging, amount or demand. However, the customer is not cost delicate or brand conscious so launching a low priced dispenser under Enron Corp May 6 2001 Sell Recommendation name is not a recommended choice.

Company Analysis

Enron Corp May 6 2001 Sell Recommendation is not just a maker of adhesives but takes pleasure in market leadership in the instant adhesive industry. The company has its own skilled and certified sales force which includes value to sales by training the company's network of 250 distributors for helping with the sale of adhesives.

Core skills are not limited to adhesive manufacturing only as Enron Corp May 6 2001 Sell Recommendation likewise concentrates on making adhesive dispensing equipment to facilitate making use of its products. This dual production technique provides Enron Corp May 6 2001 Sell Recommendation an edge over rivals considering that none of the competitors of dispensing equipment makes instant adhesives. Furthermore, none of these competitors offers directly to the customer either and uses suppliers for reaching out to clients. While we are looking at the strengths of Enron Corp May 6 2001 Sell Recommendation, it is crucial to highlight the business's weaknesses.

The company's sales staff is competent in training distributors, the fact remains that the sales group is not trained in offering equipment so there is a possibility of relying greatly on suppliers when promoting adhesive devices. However, it needs to also be noted that the suppliers are revealing hesitation when it pertains to offering devices that requires servicing which increases the challenges of selling equipment under a particular brand name.

If we take a look at Enron Corp May 6 2001 Sell Recommendation line of product in adhesive equipment particularly, the business has actually items targeted at the luxury of the marketplace. The possibility of sales cannibalization exists if Enron Corp May 6 2001 Sell Recommendation offers Case Study Help under the very same portfolio. Offered the truth that Case Study Help is priced lower than Enron Corp May 6 2001 Sell Recommendation high-end line of product, sales cannibalization would certainly be impacting Enron Corp May 6 2001 Sell Recommendation sales income if the adhesive equipment is sold under the business's brand name.

We can see sales cannibalization impacting Enron Corp May 6 2001 Sell Recommendation 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. If Case Study Help is released under the business's brand name, there is another possible danger which might reduce Enron Corp May 6 2001 Sell Recommendation earnings. The truth that $175000 has been invested in promoting SuperBonder suggests that it is not a good time for introducing a dispenser which can highlight the truth that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the immediate adhesive.

Furthermore, if we look at the market in general, the adhesives market does disappoint brand name orientation or cost awareness which offers us 2 additional reasons for not introducing a low priced product under the business's brand name.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Enron Corp May 6 2001 Sell Recommendation would be studied through Porter's five forces analysis which would highlight the degree of rivalry in the market.


Degree of Rivalry:

Currently we can see that the adhesive market has a high development potential due to the presence of fragmented sectors with Enron Corp May 6 2001 Sell Recommendation delighting in management and a combined market share of 75% with 2 other industry gamers, Eastman and Permabond. While market competition in between these gamers could be called 'intense' as the consumer is not brand name conscious and each of these players has prominence in terms of market share, the reality still remains that the industry is not saturated and still has several market sectors which can be targeted as potential specific niche markets even when launching an adhesive. We can even point out the reality that sales cannibalization might be leading to market rivalry in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for instantaneous adhesives offers growth capacity.


Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the purchaser in this market is low particularly as the purchaser has low understanding about the product. While companies like Enron Corp May 6 2001 Sell Recommendation have handled to train suppliers concerning adhesives, the final customer is dependent on suppliers. Approximately 72% of sales are made straight by makers and suppliers for instant adhesives so the purchaser has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Offered the truth that the adhesive market is controlled by 3 gamers, it could be said that the supplier enjoys a higher bargaining power compared to the purchaser. Nevertheless, the fact remains that the supplier does not have much impact over the buyer at this point especially as the purchaser does disappoint brand name acknowledgment or price sensitivity. This suggests that the supplier has the higher power when it pertains to the adhesive market while the buyer and the maker do not have a significant control over the actual sales.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand loyalty and the ease of entry shown by foreign Japanese competitors in the instantaneous adhesive market shows that the marketplace enables ease of entry. If we look at Enron Corp May 6 2001 Sell Recommendation in specific, the company has dual capabilities in terms of being a manufacturer of adhesive dispensers and instant adhesives. Prospective dangers in devices giving industry are low which reveals the possibility of producing brand awareness in not only immediate adhesives however likewise in dispensing adhesives as none of the market players has managed to position itself in double abilities.

Risk of Substitutes: The danger of alternatives in the instantaneous adhesive market is low while the dispenser market in particular has alternatives like Glumetic suggestion applicators, inbuilt applicators, pencil applicators and advanced consoles. The fact remains that if Enron Corp May 6 2001 Sell Recommendation introduced Case Study Help, it would be delighting in sales cannibalization for its own products. (see appendix 1 for structure).


4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Enron Corp May 6 2001 Sell Recommendation Case Study Help


Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has provided numerous factors for not launching Case Study Help under Enron Corp May 6 2001 Sell Recommendation name, we have actually a suggested marketing mix for Case Study Help offered listed below if Enron Corp May 6 2001 Sell Recommendation chooses to go on with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target audience chosen for Case Study Help is 'Automobile services' for a number of reasons. There are currently 89257 facilities in this section and a high usage of around 58900 pounds. is being used by 36.1 % of the marketplace. This market has an extra growth capacity of 10.1% which may be a good enough niche market segment for Case Study Help. Not only would a portable dispenser offer convenience to this specific market, the fact that the Do-it-Yourself market can likewise be targeted if a potable low priced adhesive is being sold for usage with SuperBonder. The product would be offered without the 'glumetic idea' and 'vari-drop' so that the consumer can choose whether he wants to choose either of the two accessories or not.

Price: The suggested rate of Case Study Help has actually been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is offered through suppliers or via direct selling. This cost would not include the expense of the 'vari suggestion' or the 'glumetic pointer'. A price below $250 would not need approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor vehicle maintenance store needs to purchase the product on his own. This would increase the possibility of influencing mechanics to purchase the product for use in their daily maintenance tasks.

Enron Corp May 6 2001 Sell Recommendation would just be getting $157 per unit as displayed in appendix 2 which provides a breakdown of gross profitability and net profitability for Enron Corp May 6 2001 Sell Recommendation for releasing Case Study Help.

Place: A distribution design where Enron Corp May 6 2001 Sell Recommendation straight sends the item to the local supplier and keeps a 10% drop delivery allowance for the supplier would be used by Enron Corp May 6 2001 Sell Recommendation. Because the sales team is already participated in offering instantaneous adhesives and they do not have proficiency in selling dispensers, involving them in the selling process would be pricey specifically as each sales call costs approximately $120. The suppliers are currently selling dispensers so offering Case Study Help through them would be a favorable choice.

Promotion: A low advertising budget needs to have been assigned to Case Study Help however the fact that the dispenser is a development and it needs to be marketed well in order to cover the capital costs sustained for production, the recommended advertising strategy costing $51816 is advised for at first presenting the item in the market. The planned ads in publications would be targeted at mechanics in automobile maintenance stores. (Recommended text for the advertisement is displayed in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summarized in appendix 4).


Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Enron Corp May 6 2001 Sell Recommendation Case Study Analysis

Although a recommended plan of action in the form of a marketing mix has been talked about for Case Study Help, the reality still remains that the item would not complement Enron Corp May 6 2001 Sell Recommendation product line. We have a look at appendix 2, we can see how the total gross success for the two designs is anticipated to be around $49377 if 250 systems of each design are made annually as per the plan. The preliminary prepared advertising is around $52000 per year which would be putting a pressure on the business's resources leaving Enron Corp May 6 2001 Sell Recommendation with a negative net income if the expenditures are designated to Case Study Help only.

The reality that Enron Corp May 6 2001 Sell Recommendation has actually currently incurred an initial financial investment of $48000 in the form of capital expense and prototype development shows that the income from Case Study Help is insufficient to carry out the risk of sales cannibalization. Besides that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market showing low flexibility of need is not a more suitable alternative especially of it is affecting the sale of the business's earnings generating designs.



PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE