First Capital Holdings Corp Case Study Help Checklist

First Capital Holdings Corp Case Study Help Checklist

First Capital Holdings Corp Case Study Solution
First Capital Holdings Corp Case Study Help
First Capital Holdings Corp Case Study Analysis

Analyses for Evaluating First Capital Holdings Corp decision to launch Case Study Solution

The following section concentrates on the of marketing for First Capital Holdings Corp where the business's clients, rivals and core competencies have assessed in order to validate whether the choice to release Case Study Help under First Capital Holdings Corp trademark name would be a feasible choice or not. We have to start with looked at the type of clients that First Capital Holdings Corp deals in while an evaluation of the competitive environment and the business's strengths and weak points follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the reason for not introducing Case Study Help under First Capital Holdings Corp name.
First Capital Holdings Corp Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

First Capital Holdings Corp clients can be segmented into 2 groups, last consumers and commercial consumers. Both the groups use First Capital Holdings Corp high performance adhesives while the company is not just involved in the production of these adhesives but likewise markets them to these consumer groups. There are 2 kinds of items that are being offered to these prospective markets; instantaneous adhesives and anaerobic adhesives. We would be focusing on the customers of instantaneous adhesives for this analysis given that the market for the latter has a lower capacity for First Capital Holdings Corp compared to that of instantaneous adhesives.

The total market for instant adhesives is roughly 890,000 in the US in 1978 which covers both customer groups which have actually been recognized earlier.If we look at a breakdown of First Capital Holdings Corp potential market or customer groups, we can see that the business offers to OEMs (Initial Equipment Manufacturers), Do-it-Yourself customers, repair and overhauling companies (MRO) and makers dealing in products made from leather, wood, metal and plastic. This diversity in clients recommends that First Capital Holdings Corp can target has different alternatives in terms of segmenting the market for its new product particularly as each of these groups would be needing the exact same type of product with particular changes in product packaging, demand or amount. Nevertheless, the consumer is not cost sensitive or brand mindful so introducing a low priced dispenser under First Capital Holdings Corp name is not a suggested option.

Company Analysis

First Capital Holdings Corp is not simply a manufacturer of adhesives but takes pleasure in market leadership in the immediate adhesive industry. The business has its own experienced and competent sales force which includes value to sales by training the business's network of 250 suppliers for assisting in the sale of adhesives.

Core competences are not limited to adhesive production just as First Capital Holdings Corp likewise concentrates on making adhesive giving devices to help with making use of its products. This dual production method offers First Capital Holdings Corp an edge over competitors given that none of the rivals of dispensing equipment makes immediate adhesives. Furthermore, none of these competitors sells straight to the consumer either and utilizes suppliers for reaching out to customers. While we are looking at the strengths of First Capital Holdings Corp, it is important to highlight the company's weaknesses.

Although the business's sales personnel is skilled in training distributors, the fact remains that the sales group is not trained in offering devices so there is a possibility of relying heavily on distributors when promoting adhesive devices. Nevertheless, it must also be noted that the distributors are revealing unwillingness when it pertains to offering equipment that requires servicing which increases the difficulties of offering equipment under a specific trademark name.

If we look at First Capital Holdings Corp line of product in adhesive equipment particularly, the business has actually items aimed at the high-end of the marketplace. If First Capital Holdings Corp offers Case Study Help under the exact same portfolio, the possibility of sales cannibalization exists. Offered the truth that Case Study Help is priced lower than First Capital Holdings Corp high-end product line, sales cannibalization would certainly be affecting First Capital Holdings Corp sales profits if the adhesive equipment is offered under the business's brand name.

We can see sales cannibalization affecting First Capital Holdings Corp 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. There is another possible hazard which could reduce First Capital Holdings Corp revenue if Case Study Help is released under the business's brand. The fact that $175000 has been spent in promoting SuperBonder suggests that it is not a good time for launching a dispenser which can highlight the fact that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the instantaneous adhesive.

In addition, if we look at the marketplace in general, the adhesives market does not show brand orientation or cost consciousness which gives us 2 extra factors for not releasing a low priced product under the business's trademark name.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of First Capital Holdings Corp would be studied by means of Porter's 5 forces analysis which would highlight the degree of competition in the market.

Degree of Rivalry:

Presently we can see that the adhesive market has a high development capacity due to the presence of fragmented segments with First Capital Holdings Corp delighting in leadership and a combined market share of 75% with 2 other market gamers, Eastman and Permabond. While market competition between these players could be called 'extreme' as the consumer is not brand mindful and each of these gamers has prominence in regards to market share, the truth still stays that the market is not filled and still has several market segments which can be targeted as possible specific niche markets even when introducing an adhesive. We can even point out the reality that sales cannibalization may be leading to industry competition in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for immediate adhesives provides development potential.

Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the purchaser in this industry is low especially as the buyer has low understanding about the item. While business like First Capital Holdings Corp have handled to train distributors relating to adhesives, the final customer is dependent on suppliers. Roughly 72% of sales are made directly by makers and distributors for instantaneous adhesives so the purchaser has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Provided the reality that the adhesive market is controlled by three gamers, it could be said that the provider takes pleasure in a greater bargaining power compared to the buyer. Nevertheless, the reality remains that the supplier does not have much impact over the purchaser at this point especially as the purchaser does disappoint brand acknowledgment or rate level of sensitivity. This suggests that the distributor has the greater power when it concerns the adhesive market while the buyer and the producer do not have a significant control over the actual sales.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand loyalty and the ease of entry revealed by foreign Japanese rivals in the instantaneous adhesive market shows that the marketplace permits ease of entry. Nevertheless, if we take a look at First Capital Holdings Corp in particular, the business has dual abilities in regards to being a maker of instantaneous adhesives and adhesive dispensers. Possible threats in devices giving industry are low which reveals the possibility of creating brand name awareness in not only instantaneous adhesives but also in giving adhesives as none of the industry gamers has actually managed to position itself in double capabilities.

Hazard of Substitutes: The danger of substitutes in the immediate adhesive industry is low while the dispenser market in particular has alternatives like Glumetic suggestion applicators, inbuilt applicators, pencil applicators and sophisticated consoles. The reality remains that if First Capital Holdings Corp introduced Case Study Help, it would be indulging in sales cannibalization for its own products. (see appendix 1 for structure).

4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

First Capital Holdings Corp Case Study Help

Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has actually given various factors for not introducing Case Study Help under First Capital Holdings Corp name, we have a recommended marketing mix for Case Study Help provided below if First Capital Holdings Corp chooses to go ahead with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target market selected for Case Study Help is 'Motor automobile services' for a number of reasons. This market has an additional development capacity of 10.1% which might be an excellent adequate niche market segment for Case Study Help. Not only would a portable dispenser offer convenience to this specific market, the fact that the Diy market can also be targeted if a drinkable low priced adhesive is being offered for use with SuperBonder.

Price: The recommended cost of Case Study Help has actually been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is sold through distributors or by means of direct selling. This cost would not include the cost of the 'vari tip' or the 'glumetic tip'. A rate below $250 would not need approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at an automobile maintenance shop requires to buy the product on his own. This would increase the possibility of influencing mechanics to buy the product for use in their daily maintenance tasks.

First Capital Holdings Corp would only be getting $157 per unit as shown in appendix 2 which gives a breakdown of gross profitability and net profitability for First Capital Holdings Corp for releasing Case Study Help.

Place: A circulation model where First Capital Holdings Corp directly sends the product to the local distributor and keeps a 10% drop delivery allowance for the distributor would be utilized by First Capital Holdings Corp. Given that the sales team is already engaged in offering instant adhesives and they do not have know-how in selling dispensers, including them in the selling procedure would be costly particularly as each sales call costs roughly $120. The distributors are already offering dispensers so selling Case Study Help through them would be a beneficial choice.

Promotion: Although a low marketing budget must have been assigned to Case Study Help however the fact that the dispenser is a development and it requires to be marketed well in order to cover the capital costs sustained for production, the recommended advertising strategy costing $51816 is recommended for initially introducing the product in the market. The prepared advertisements in publications would be targeted at mechanics in lorry upkeep shops. (Suggested text for the advertisement is displayed in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summed up in appendix 4).

Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
First Capital Holdings Corp Case Study Analysis

A recommended strategy of action in the kind of a marketing mix has been discussed for Case Study Help, the reality still stays that the item would not complement First Capital Holdings Corp item line. We take a look at appendix 2, we can see how the total gross profitability for the two designs is expected to be roughly $49377 if 250 systems of each design are manufactured per year according to the strategy. Nevertheless, the initial planned advertising is around $52000 each year which would be putting a pressure on the company's resources leaving First Capital Holdings Corp with a negative net income if the costs are designated to Case Study Help only.

The reality that First Capital Holdings Corp has actually currently incurred a preliminary investment of $48000 in the form of capital cost and model development indicates that the earnings from Case Study Help is not enough to carry out the risk of sales cannibalization. Besides that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market revealing low flexibility of need is not a more suitable alternative specifically of it is affecting the sale of the business's revenue creating designs.