WhatsApp

Gaz De France Case Study Help Checklist

Gaz De France Case Study Help Checklist

Gaz De France Case Study Solution
Gaz De France Case Study Help
Gaz De France Case Study Analysis



Analyses for Evaluating Gaz De France decision to launch Case Study Solution


The following section focuses on the of marketing for Gaz De France where the business's consumers, competitors and core competencies have assessed in order to validate whether the decision to introduce Case Study Help under Gaz De France trademark name would be a practical option or not. We have first of all looked at the type of customers that Gaz De France deals in while an assessment of the competitive environment and the business's weak points and strengths follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the reason for not launching Case Study Help under Gaz De France name.
Gaz De France Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Both the groups use Gaz De France high efficiency adhesives while the business is not just involved in the production of these adhesives however also markets them to these customer groups. We would be focusing on the consumers of immediate adhesives for this analysis given that the market for the latter has a lower potential for Gaz De France compared to that of instantaneous adhesives.

The total market for instantaneous adhesives is roughly 890,000 in the United States in 1978 which covers both customer groups which have been recognized earlier.If we take a look at a breakdown of Gaz De France possible market or consumer groups, we can see that the company sells to OEMs (Initial Equipment Manufacturers), Do-it-Yourself clients, repair work and revamping business (MRO) and makers handling items made of leather, plastic, metal and wood. This variety in consumers suggests that Gaz De France can target has numerous alternatives in terms of segmenting the marketplace for its new product specifically as each of these groups would be requiring the very same type of item with particular changes in demand, product packaging or quantity. The client is not price sensitive or brand conscious so introducing a low priced dispenser under Gaz De France name is not an advised choice.

Company Analysis

Gaz De France is not just a manufacturer of adhesives however enjoys market leadership in the instant adhesive industry. The company has its own proficient and qualified sales force which includes value to sales by training the business's network of 250 distributors for facilitating the sale of adhesives. Gaz De France believes in unique distribution as indicated by the reality that it has chosen to offer through 250 distributors whereas there is t a network of 10000 distributors that can be checked out for broadening reach by means of suppliers. The business's reach is not restricted to The United States and Canada only as it likewise delights in global sales. With 1400 outlets spread out all across The United States and Canada, Gaz De France has its internal production plants rather than utilizing out-sourcing as the preferred technique.

Core proficiencies are not limited to adhesive manufacturing only as Gaz De France likewise focuses on making adhesive giving devices to facilitate making use of its items. This double production technique gives Gaz De France an edge over competitors given that none of the rivals of giving equipment makes instantaneous adhesives. In addition, none of these competitors sells directly to the customer either and uses suppliers for connecting to clients. While we are taking a look at the strengths of Gaz De France, it is important to highlight the company's weaknesses as well.

The business's sales staff is experienced in training suppliers, the reality stays that the sales team is not trained in offering devices so there is a possibility of relying heavily on suppliers when promoting adhesive devices. Nevertheless, it should likewise be noted that the suppliers are revealing hesitation when it comes to selling devices that needs servicing which increases the challenges of selling devices under a particular brand name.

If we take a look at Gaz De France line of product in adhesive devices especially, the business has products targeted at the luxury of the market. The possibility of sales cannibalization exists if Gaz De France offers Case Study Help under the same portfolio. Provided the reality that Case Study Help is priced lower than Gaz De France high-end product line, sales cannibalization would definitely be affecting Gaz De France sales profits if the adhesive devices is offered under the company's brand name.

We can see sales cannibalization affecting Gaz De France 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. If Case Study Help is launched under the business's brand name, there is another possible hazard which might lower Gaz De France earnings. The truth that $175000 has actually been invested in promoting SuperBonder suggests that it is not a great time for launching a dispenser which can highlight the truth that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the instantaneous adhesive.

Additionally, if we look at the marketplace in general, the adhesives market does not show brand orientation or rate awareness which offers us two extra reasons for not launching a low priced item under the business's brand name.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Gaz De France would be studied via Porter's five forces analysis which would highlight the degree of competition in the market.


Degree of Rivalry:

Presently we can see that the adhesive market has a high growth potential due to the existence of fragmented sections with Gaz De France delighting in management and a combined market share of 75% with 2 other industry players, Eastman and Permabond. While market rivalry in between these players could be called 'intense' as the customer is not brand name conscious and each of these players has prominence in terms of market share, the reality still remains that the market is not saturated and still has several market sections which can be targeted as prospective niche markets even when releasing an adhesive. We can even point out the fact that sales cannibalization may be leading to market rivalry in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for instantaneous adhesives uses development potential.


Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the purchaser in this market is low especially as the buyer has low knowledge about the product. While business like Gaz De France have managed to train suppliers relating to adhesives, the final consumer is dependent on suppliers. Around 72% of sales are made straight by manufacturers and suppliers for immediate adhesives so the buyer has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Offered the truth that the adhesive market is dominated by three players, it could be said that the supplier enjoys a higher bargaining power compared to the buyer. The reality remains that the supplier does not have much influence over the purchaser at this point particularly as the purchaser does not show brand name acknowledgment or rate level of sensitivity. This suggests that the supplier has the greater power when it comes to the adhesive market while the producer and the buyer do not have a significant control over the real sales.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand commitment and the ease of entry revealed by foreign Japanese competitors in the instant adhesive market suggests that the market permits ease of entry. However, if we take a look at Gaz De France in particular, the company has double capabilities in terms of being a maker of adhesive dispensers and instantaneous adhesives. Potential dangers in equipment dispensing industry are low which shows the possibility of producing brand awareness in not just instant adhesives but also in dispensing adhesives as none of the market players has managed to place itself in dual capabilities.

Danger of Substitutes: The risk of alternatives in the immediate adhesive market is low while the dispenser market in particular has substitutes like Glumetic pointer applicators, built-in applicators, pencil applicators and sophisticated consoles. The truth remains that if Gaz De France introduced Case Study Help, it would be delighting in sales cannibalization for its own products. (see appendix 1 for framework).


4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Gaz De France Case Study Help


Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has provided various reasons for not launching Case Study Help under Gaz De France name, we have a recommended marketing mix for Case Study Help given listed below if Gaz De France decides to proceed with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target audience picked for Case Study Help is 'Automobile services' for a number of reasons. There are presently 89257 establishments in this segment and a high use of approximately 58900 lbs. is being used by 36.1 % of the market. This market has an additional growth potential of 10.1% which might be a sufficient niche market segment for Case Study Help. Not only would a portable dispenser deal benefit to this particular market, the reality that the Diy market can also be targeted if a drinkable low priced adhesive is being sold for usage with SuperBonder. The item would be offered without the 'glumetic pointer' and 'vari-drop' so that the consumer can decide whether he wishes to go with either of the two accessories or not.

Price: The suggested rate of Case Study Help has been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is sold through suppliers or through direct selling. A cost listed below $250 would not require approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor car upkeep store needs to purchase the product on his own.

Gaz De France would just be getting $157 per unit as displayed in appendix 2 which provides a breakdown of gross profitability and net profitability for Gaz De France for releasing Case Study Help.

Place: A distribution design where Gaz De France directly sends out the product to the local supplier and keeps a 10% drop shipment allowance for the supplier would be used by Gaz De France. Considering that the sales group is currently taken part in offering immediate adhesives and they do not have knowledge in offering dispensers, involving them in the selling process would be pricey especially as each sales call costs roughly $120. The distributors are currently offering dispensers so offering Case Study Help through them would be a favorable alternative.

Promotion: A low marketing budget should have been assigned to Case Study Help but the fact that the dispenser is a development and it needs to be marketed well in order to cover the capital costs incurred for production, the recommended marketing plan costing $51816 is suggested for initially introducing the product in the market. The prepared ads in magazines would be targeted at mechanics in lorry upkeep stores. (Recommended text for the advertisement is displayed in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summed up in appendix 4).


Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Gaz De France Case Study Analysis

A recommended strategy of action in the kind of a marketing mix has been gone over for Case Study Help, the truth still stays that the product would not complement Gaz De France product line. We have a look at appendix 2, we can see how the total gross profitability for the two designs is expected to be around $49377 if 250 units of each model are made per year according to the plan. The initial planned marketing is roughly $52000 per year which would be putting a pressure on the business's resources leaving Gaz De France with a negative net earnings if the expenditures are assigned to Case Study Help only.

The truth that Gaz De France has currently incurred an initial financial investment of $48000 in the form of capital expense and prototype development suggests that the income from Case Study Help is not enough to carry out the danger of sales cannibalization. Aside from that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market showing low elasticity of need is not a more effective option especially of it is impacting the sale of the business's income creating models.


 

PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE