WhatsApp

Goodyear Tire And Rubber Co 1986 Case Study Help Checklist

Goodyear Tire And Rubber Co 1986 Case Study Help Checklist

Goodyear Tire And Rubber Co 1986 Case Study Solution
Goodyear Tire And Rubber Co 1986 Case Study Help
Goodyear Tire And Rubber Co 1986 Case Study Analysis



Analyses for Evaluating Goodyear Tire And Rubber Co 1986 decision to launch Case Study Solution


The following section focuses on the of marketing for Goodyear Tire And Rubber Co 1986 where the company's customers, rivals and core competencies have actually assessed in order to validate whether the decision to release Case Study Help under Goodyear Tire And Rubber Co 1986 brand would be a practical alternative or not. We have first of all looked at the type of consumers that Goodyear Tire And Rubber Co 1986 deals in while an assessment of the competitive environment and the company's weaknesses and strengths follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the validation for not launching Case Study Help under Goodyear Tire And Rubber Co 1986 name.
Goodyear Tire And Rubber Co 1986 Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Goodyear Tire And Rubber Co 1986 clients can be segmented into two groups, last consumers and industrial clients. Both the groups use Goodyear Tire And Rubber Co 1986 high performance adhesives while the business is not only associated with the production of these adhesives however also markets them to these client groups. There are two kinds of items that are being offered to these prospective markets; anaerobic adhesives and instant adhesives. We would be focusing on the customers of immediate adhesives for this analysis considering that the marketplace for the latter has a lower potential for Goodyear Tire And Rubber Co 1986 compared to that of instant adhesives.

The overall market for immediate adhesives is around 890,000 in the US in 1978 which covers both client groups which have been identified earlier.If we look at a breakdown of Goodyear Tire And Rubber Co 1986 prospective market or consumer groups, we can see that the company sells to OEMs (Initial Equipment Makers), Do-it-Yourself consumers, repair and overhauling business (MRO) and manufacturers handling items made from leather, plastic, metal and wood. This diversity in clients suggests that Goodyear Tire And Rubber Co 1986 can target has numerous alternatives in terms of segmenting the market for its new product particularly as each of these groups would be requiring the same type of item with particular modifications in quantity, demand or packaging. The client is not rate delicate or brand name conscious so launching a low priced dispenser under Goodyear Tire And Rubber Co 1986 name is not a recommended option.

Company Analysis

Goodyear Tire And Rubber Co 1986 is not just a manufacturer of adhesives however takes pleasure in market leadership in the instantaneous adhesive industry. The company has its own knowledgeable and certified sales force which adds value to sales by training the business's network of 250 distributors for helping with the sale of adhesives.

Core proficiencies are not restricted to adhesive production just as Goodyear Tire And Rubber Co 1986 likewise concentrates on making adhesive dispensing equipment to facilitate making use of its products. This dual production strategy gives Goodyear Tire And Rubber Co 1986 an edge over rivals since none of the rivals of giving equipment makes instantaneous adhesives. Furthermore, none of these rivals sells directly to the customer either and utilizes distributors for connecting to clients. While we are looking at the strengths of Goodyear Tire And Rubber Co 1986, it is very important to highlight the business's weaknesses also.

The company's sales staff is proficient in training distributors, the reality stays that the sales team is not trained in selling devices so there is a possibility of relying heavily on distributors when promoting adhesive devices. It should likewise be noted that the distributors are revealing reluctance when it comes to selling equipment that needs maintenance which increases the obstacles of offering devices under a particular brand name.

If we take a look at Goodyear Tire And Rubber Co 1986 product line in adhesive equipment especially, the business has actually items targeted at the high end of the market. The possibility of sales cannibalization exists if Goodyear Tire And Rubber Co 1986 sells Case Study Help under the exact same portfolio. Given the truth that Case Study Help is priced lower than Goodyear Tire And Rubber Co 1986 high-end product line, sales cannibalization would certainly be affecting Goodyear Tire And Rubber Co 1986 sales earnings if the adhesive equipment is sold under the company's brand name.

We can see sales cannibalization affecting Goodyear Tire And Rubber Co 1986 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. There is another possible threat which could lower Goodyear Tire And Rubber Co 1986 income if Case Study Help is launched under the company's brand name. The reality that $175000 has been spent in promoting SuperBonder suggests that it is not a good time for releasing a dispenser which can highlight the reality that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the instantaneous adhesive.

In addition, if we take a look at the marketplace in general, the adhesives market does not show brand name orientation or rate awareness which offers us two extra reasons for not releasing a low priced product under the company's brand.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Goodyear Tire And Rubber Co 1986 would be studied through Porter's 5 forces analysis which would highlight the degree of rivalry in the market.


Degree of Rivalry:

Presently we can see that the adhesive market has a high development capacity due to the presence of fragmented segments with Goodyear Tire And Rubber Co 1986 delighting in leadership and a combined market share of 75% with two other market gamers, Eastman and Permabond. While industry competition between these gamers could be called 'extreme' as the consumer is not brand mindful and each of these players has prominence in regards to market share, the reality still remains that the industry is not saturated and still has a number of market sections which can be targeted as possible specific niche markets even when introducing an adhesive. We can even point out the truth that sales cannibalization might be leading to industry competition in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for immediate adhesives provides development capacity.


Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the purchaser in this industry is low especially as the buyer has low knowledge about the product. While companies like Goodyear Tire And Rubber Co 1986 have managed to train distributors concerning adhesives, the last customer is dependent on suppliers. Around 72% of sales are made straight by manufacturers and suppliers for instantaneous adhesives so the buyer has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Given the reality that the adhesive market is dominated by 3 players, it could be stated that the supplier delights in a higher bargaining power compared to the buyer. However, the reality stays that the supplier does not have much influence over the purchaser at this moment especially as the buyer does disappoint brand acknowledgment or price sensitivity. When it comes to the adhesive market while the purchaser and the manufacturer do not have a major control over the actual sales, this indicates that the supplier has the greater power.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand commitment and the ease of entry revealed by foreign Japanese competitors in the immediate adhesive market indicates that the marketplace allows ease of entry. If we look at Goodyear Tire And Rubber Co 1986 in particular, the business has dual capabilities in terms of being a manufacturer of adhesive dispensers and instantaneous adhesives. Prospective dangers in devices dispensing market are low which reveals the possibility of creating brand name awareness in not only immediate adhesives but also in giving adhesives as none of the industry players has handled to place itself in double capabilities.

Risk of Substitutes: The risk of replacements in the instant adhesive industry is low while the dispenser market in particular has substitutes like Glumetic idea applicators, inbuilt applicators, pencil applicators and advanced consoles. The reality stays that if Goodyear Tire And Rubber Co 1986 introduced Case Study Help, it would be enjoying sales cannibalization for its own items. (see appendix 1 for framework).


4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Goodyear Tire And Rubber Co 1986 Case Study Help


Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has given different factors for not launching Case Study Help under Goodyear Tire And Rubber Co 1986 name, we have actually a suggested marketing mix for Case Study Help offered listed below if Goodyear Tire And Rubber Co 1986 decides to go on with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target market chosen for Case Study Help is 'Motor vehicle services' for a variety of reasons. There are currently 89257 facilities in this section and a high use of approximately 58900 lbs. is being used by 36.1 % of the marketplace. This market has an extra development potential of 10.1% which might be a good enough specific niche market section for Case Study Help. Not just would a portable dispenser offer convenience to this particular market, the reality that the Do-it-Yourself market can also be targeted if a drinkable low priced adhesive is being sold for usage with SuperBonder. The product would be offered without the 'glumetic idea' and 'vari-drop' so that the consumer can choose whether he wants to go with either of the two devices or not.

Price: The suggested cost of Case Study Help has been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is sold through suppliers or through direct selling. This rate would not include the expense of the 'vari pointer' or the 'glumetic pointer'. A price listed below $250 would not need approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor vehicle maintenance shop requires to purchase the item on his own. This would increase the possibility of affecting mechanics to buy the product for usage in their day-to-day upkeep jobs.

Goodyear Tire And Rubber Co 1986 would only be getting $157 per unit as shown in appendix 2 which gives a breakdown of gross success and net success for Goodyear Tire And Rubber Co 1986 for launching Case Study Help.

Place: A circulation model where Goodyear Tire And Rubber Co 1986 directly sends the product to the regional supplier and keeps a 10% drop delivery allowance for the distributor would be utilized by Goodyear Tire And Rubber Co 1986. Since the sales group is already engaged in offering immediate adhesives and they do not have proficiency in selling dispensers, including them in the selling procedure would be costly specifically as each sales call expenses around $120. The distributors are currently offering dispensers so offering Case Study Help through them would be a favorable choice.

Promotion: Although a low marketing budget needs to have been designated to Case Study Help but the truth that the dispenser is an innovation and it needs to be marketed well in order to cover the capital costs incurred for production, the suggested advertising strategy costing $51816 is advised for at first introducing the item in the market. The planned advertisements in publications would be targeted at mechanics in automobile upkeep shops. (Suggested text for the advertisement is shown in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summed up in appendix 4).


Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Goodyear Tire And Rubber Co 1986 Case Study Analysis

Although a suggested plan of action in the form of a marketing mix has been discussed for Case Study Help, the truth still remains that the product would not complement Goodyear Tire And Rubber Co 1986 product line. We take a look at appendix 2, we can see how the overall gross profitability for the two designs is anticipated to be approximately $49377 if 250 units of each model are manufactured per year as per the plan. Nevertheless, the initial prepared advertising is roughly $52000 per year which would be putting a strain on the company's resources leaving Goodyear Tire And Rubber Co 1986 with a negative net income if the expenses are designated to Case Study Help only.

The reality that Goodyear Tire And Rubber Co 1986 has currently incurred an initial financial investment of $48000 in the form of capital cost and model development suggests that the revenue from Case Study Help is not enough to carry out the threat of sales cannibalization. Besides that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market showing low elasticity of need is not a more effective choice especially of it is affecting the sale of the business's income creating models.


 

PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE