WhatsApp

Hollywood Rules Case Study Help Checklist

Hollywood Rules Case Study Help Checklist

Hollywood Rules Case Study Solution
Hollywood Rules Case Study Help
Hollywood Rules Case Study Analysis



Analyses for Evaluating Hollywood Rules decision to launch Case Study Solution


The following section concentrates on the of marketing for Hollywood Rules where the business's consumers, competitors and core proficiencies have examined in order to validate whether the decision to introduce Case Study Help under Hollywood Rules trademark name would be a feasible option or not. We have firstly taken a look at the kind of customers that Hollywood Rules deals in while an examination of the competitive environment and the business's strengths and weaknesses follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the reason for not introducing Case Study Help under Hollywood Rules name.
Hollywood Rules Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Hollywood Rules clients can be segmented into two groups, last consumers and industrial clients. Both the groups utilize Hollywood Rules high performance adhesives while the business is not only involved in the production of these adhesives but likewise markets them to these client groups. There are 2 types of products that are being offered to these possible markets; immediate adhesives and anaerobic adhesives. We would be focusing on the consumers of immediate adhesives for this analysis because the marketplace for the latter has a lower potential for Hollywood Rules compared to that of instantaneous adhesives.

The overall market for immediate adhesives is around 890,000 in the US in 1978 which covers both consumer groups which have actually been identified earlier.If we take a look at a breakdown of Hollywood Rules potential market or customer groups, we can see that the company sells to OEMs (Original Equipment Makers), Do-it-Yourself customers, repair and upgrading companies (MRO) and producers dealing in items made of leather, plastic, metal and wood. This diversity in clients suggests that Hollywood Rules can target has various alternatives in regards to segmenting the marketplace for its brand-new product especially as each of these groups would be requiring the very same kind of item with respective changes in quantity, demand or product packaging. The client is not cost sensitive or brand conscious so launching a low priced dispenser under Hollywood Rules name is not an advised alternative.

Company Analysis

Hollywood Rules is not simply a maker of adhesives but enjoys market leadership in the instantaneous adhesive industry. The business has its own proficient and qualified sales force which adds worth to sales by training the business's network of 250 distributors for helping with the sale of adhesives.

Core skills are not limited to adhesive production only as Hollywood Rules also concentrates on making adhesive giving equipment to assist in making use of its products. This dual production strategy gives Hollywood Rules an edge over rivals because none of the rivals of giving equipment makes instantaneous adhesives. Additionally, none of these competitors sells straight to the consumer either and uses suppliers for connecting to clients. While we are taking a look at the strengths of Hollywood Rules, it is essential to highlight the business's weak points too.

The company's sales personnel is proficient in training distributors, the fact remains that the sales group is not trained in offering equipment so there is a possibility of relying greatly on suppliers when promoting adhesive equipment. It must likewise be kept in mind that the distributors are showing unwillingness when it comes to offering equipment that needs servicing which increases the difficulties of selling equipment under a particular brand name.

If we look at Hollywood Rules product line in adhesive devices particularly, the company has items aimed at the luxury of the marketplace. If Hollywood Rules offers Case Study Help under the same portfolio, the possibility of sales cannibalization exists. Offered the fact that Case Study Help is priced lower than Hollywood Rules high-end product line, sales cannibalization would definitely be affecting Hollywood Rules sales profits if the adhesive equipment is sold under the company's brand.

We can see sales cannibalization impacting Hollywood Rules 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. If Case Study Help is released under the business's brand name, there is another possible risk which could decrease Hollywood Rules income. The reality that $175000 has actually been spent in promoting SuperBonder recommends that it is not a great time for introducing a dispenser which can highlight the fact that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the instant adhesive.

In addition, if we look at the market in general, the adhesives market does disappoint brand orientation or price awareness which offers us two additional factors for not releasing a low priced product under the business's trademark name.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Hollywood Rules would be studied by means of Porter's five forces analysis which would highlight the degree of rivalry in the market.


Degree of Rivalry:

Presently we can see that the adhesive market has a high development capacity due to the presence of fragmented sectors with Hollywood Rules enjoying leadership and a combined market share of 75% with 2 other market gamers, Eastman and Permabond. While market rivalry in between these players could be called 'extreme' as the consumer is not brand mindful and each of these gamers has prominence in terms of market share, the reality still remains that the industry is not filled and still has a number of market sections which can be targeted as possible niche markets even when releasing an adhesive. We can even point out the fact that sales cannibalization may be leading to market rivalry in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for instantaneous adhesives provides growth capacity.


Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the buyer in this market is low particularly as the purchaser has low understanding about the item. While companies like Hollywood Rules have actually managed to train suppliers relating to adhesives, the final customer depends on distributors. Approximately 72% of sales are made straight by makers and suppliers for instant adhesives so the purchaser has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Provided the reality that the adhesive market is controlled by three players, it could be stated that the provider enjoys a greater bargaining power compared to the purchaser. The truth stays that the supplier does not have much impact over the purchaser at this point particularly as the purchaser does not reveal brand recognition or price level of sensitivity. When it comes to the adhesive market while the buyer and the manufacturer do not have a major control over the actual sales, this suggests that the supplier has the greater power.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand name loyalty and the ease of entry revealed by foreign Japanese rivals in the immediate adhesive market indicates that the marketplace allows ease of entry. If we look at Hollywood Rules in particular, the business has dual capabilities in terms of being a maker of instantaneous adhesives and adhesive dispensers. Possible hazards in equipment giving industry are low which shows the possibility of producing brand name awareness in not only immediate adhesives however also in dispensing adhesives as none of the industry players has managed to place itself in dual capabilities.

Threat of Substitutes: The danger of replacements in the immediate adhesive market is low while the dispenser market in particular has substitutes like Glumetic idea applicators, built-in applicators, pencil applicators and advanced consoles. The fact stays that if Hollywood Rules introduced Case Study Help, it would be enjoying sales cannibalization for its own items. (see appendix 1 for framework).


4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Hollywood Rules Case Study Help


Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has provided numerous factors for not launching Case Study Help under Hollywood Rules name, we have a suggested marketing mix for Case Study Help given below if Hollywood Rules decides to go on with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target market chosen for Case Study Help is 'Motor automobile services' for a number of factors. This market has an additional growth potential of 10.1% which might be an excellent sufficient niche market section for Case Study Help. Not just would a portable dispenser deal benefit to this specific market, the fact that the Do-it-Yourself market can also be targeted if a safe and clean low priced adhesive is being offered for usage with SuperBonder.

Price: The suggested price of Case Study Help has actually been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is offered through distributors or via direct selling. This price would not consist of the expense of the 'vari idea' or the 'glumetic pointer'. A rate listed below $250 would not require approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor vehicle maintenance shop needs to purchase the product on his own. This would increase the possibility of influencing mechanics to purchase the item for usage in their everyday upkeep tasks.

Hollywood Rules would just be getting $157 per unit as shown in appendix 2 which gives a breakdown of gross profitability and net profitability for Hollywood Rules for introducing Case Study Help.

Place: A distribution design where Hollywood Rules straight sends the product to the local distributor and keeps a 10% drop delivery allowance for the supplier would be utilized by Hollywood Rules. Given that the sales team is already participated in selling instantaneous adhesives and they do not have competence in selling dispensers, involving them in the selling process would be costly particularly as each sales call expenses roughly $120. The distributors are currently selling dispensers so offering Case Study Help through them would be a beneficial choice.

Promotion: A low marketing budget should have been appointed to Case Study Help but the fact that the dispenser is an innovation and it requires to be marketed well in order to cover the capital expenses incurred for production, the recommended marketing plan costing $51816 is advised for at first presenting the product in the market. The planned ads in publications would be targeted at mechanics in lorry maintenance shops. (Suggested text for the advertisement is shown in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summed up in appendix 4).


Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Hollywood Rules Case Study Analysis

Although a recommended plan of action in the form of a marketing mix has actually been talked about for Case Study Help, the truth still remains that the item would not match Hollywood Rules line of product. We take a look at appendix 2, we can see how the overall gross profitability for the two designs is expected to be approximately $49377 if 250 units of each model are made each year based on the strategy. The initial planned advertising is roughly $52000 per year which would be putting a pressure on the business's resources leaving Hollywood Rules with a negative net income if the expenditures are designated to Case Study Help only.

The reality that Hollywood Rules has actually currently incurred a preliminary investment of $48000 in the form of capital cost and model development indicates that the revenue from Case Study Help is inadequate to undertake the risk of sales cannibalization. Other than that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market revealing low elasticity of need is not a more suitable choice specifically of it is affecting the sale of the company's profits generating designs.


 

PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE