WhatsApp

Island Ecn Case Study Help Checklist

Island Ecn Case Study Help Checklist

Island Ecn Case Study Solution
Island Ecn Case Study Help
Island Ecn Case Study Analysis



Analyses for Evaluating Island Ecn decision to launch Case Study Solution


The following section concentrates on the of marketing for Island Ecn where the company's consumers, competitors and core proficiencies have evaluated in order to validate whether the decision to introduce Case Study Help under Island Ecn brand name would be a feasible choice or not. We have actually to start with taken a look at the type of customers that Island Ecn handle while an examination of the competitive environment and the business's strengths and weak points follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the justification for not launching Case Study Help under Island Ecn name.
Island Ecn Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Island Ecn customers can be segmented into 2 groups, industrial customers and final customers. Both the groups use Island Ecn high performance adhesives while the company is not only involved in the production of these adhesives however likewise markets them to these consumer groups. There are 2 kinds of items that are being offered to these possible markets; anaerobic adhesives and immediate adhesives. We would be focusing on the customers of immediate adhesives for this analysis because the market for the latter has a lower potential for Island Ecn compared to that of instantaneous adhesives.

The total market for immediate adhesives is roughly 890,000 in the United States in 1978 which covers both consumer groups which have been recognized earlier.If we take a look at a breakdown of Island Ecn potential market or consumer groups, we can see that the company offers to OEMs (Original Equipment Producers), Do-it-Yourself customers, repair work and overhauling business (MRO) and manufacturers dealing in items made from leather, wood, metal and plastic. This variety in consumers suggests that Island Ecn can target has different choices in terms of segmenting the market for its brand-new item specifically as each of these groups would be requiring the same kind of product with respective changes in amount, product packaging or demand. However, the client is not price sensitive or brand mindful so introducing a low priced dispenser under Island Ecn name is not a recommended choice.

Company Analysis

Island Ecn is not just a producer of adhesives however enjoys market management in the instantaneous adhesive market. The business has its own experienced and competent sales force which adds value to sales by training the company's network of 250 suppliers for assisting in the sale of adhesives. Island Ecn believes in exclusive circulation as indicated by the reality that it has chosen to sell through 250 distributors whereas there is t a network of 10000 suppliers that can be explored for expanding reach via suppliers. The company's reach is not limited to The United States and Canada just as it also enjoys international sales. With 1400 outlets spread all across North America, Island Ecn has its in-house production plants rather than using out-sourcing as the favored strategy.

Core skills are not limited to adhesive production just as Island Ecn also focuses on making adhesive giving equipment to facilitate the use of its products. This double production technique offers Island Ecn an edge over rivals considering that none of the rivals of giving equipment makes instantaneous adhesives. In addition, none of these competitors sells directly to the consumer either and makes use of suppliers for reaching out to consumers. While we are looking at the strengths of Island Ecn, it is crucial to highlight the business's weaknesses.

Although the business's sales personnel is skilled in training distributors, the truth remains that the sales team is not trained in selling devices so there is a possibility of relying heavily on suppliers when promoting adhesive devices. It needs to also be kept in mind that the distributors are revealing hesitation when it comes to offering equipment that needs servicing which increases the challenges of offering devices under a specific brand name.

If we take a look at Island Ecn line of product in adhesive equipment especially, the business has products focused on the high-end of the marketplace. If Island Ecn offers Case Study Help under the same portfolio, the possibility of sales cannibalization exists. Given the fact that Case Study Help is priced lower than Island Ecn high-end line of product, sales cannibalization would definitely be affecting Island Ecn sales revenue if the adhesive devices is sold under the business's brand.

We can see sales cannibalization impacting Island Ecn 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. There is another possible danger which could lower Island Ecn earnings if Case Study Help is released under the business's brand name. The fact that $175000 has been spent in promoting SuperBonder recommends that it is not a great time for releasing a dispenser which can highlight the truth that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the instantaneous adhesive.

In addition, if we take a look at the market in general, the adhesives market does disappoint brand orientation or cost consciousness which provides us two additional reasons for not releasing a low priced product under the company's brand.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Island Ecn would be studied by means of Porter's 5 forces analysis which would highlight the degree of rivalry in the market.


Degree of Rivalry:

Currently we can see that the adhesive market has a high growth capacity due to the presence of fragmented sections with Island Ecn enjoying management and a combined market share of 75% with 2 other market gamers, Eastman and Permabond. While industry rivalry between these gamers could be called 'extreme' as the customer is not brand mindful and each of these gamers has prominence in regards to market share, the reality still remains that the market is not filled and still has several market segments which can be targeted as potential niche markets even when introducing an adhesive. We can even point out the fact that sales cannibalization might be leading to industry rivalry in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for instantaneous adhesives provides growth potential.


Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the purchaser in this market is low particularly as the purchaser has low knowledge about the item. While companies like Island Ecn have managed to train distributors regarding adhesives, the last consumer depends on distributors. Approximately 72% of sales are made directly by producers and distributors for instant adhesives so the buyer has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Given the reality that the adhesive market is controlled by 3 gamers, it could be stated that the supplier takes pleasure in a greater bargaining power compared to the buyer. The truth stays that the provider does not have much impact over the buyer at this point especially as the buyer does not show brand name acknowledgment or rate sensitivity. When it comes to the adhesive market while the maker and the purchaser do not have a significant control over the real sales, this indicates that the distributor has the higher power.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand commitment and the ease of entry shown by foreign Japanese competitors in the immediate adhesive market suggests that the market allows ease of entry. However, if we look at Island Ecn in particular, the business has double capabilities in terms of being a maker of adhesive dispensers and instantaneous adhesives. Potential risks in devices dispensing industry are low which shows the possibility of creating brand name awareness in not just instant adhesives but likewise in giving adhesives as none of the market players has managed to place itself in dual abilities.

Threat of Substitutes: The risk of replacements in the instant adhesive industry is low while the dispenser market in particular has alternatives like Glumetic suggestion applicators, in-built applicators, pencil applicators and advanced consoles. The fact stays that if Island Ecn presented Case Study Help, it would be enjoying sales cannibalization for its own items. (see appendix 1 for structure).


4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Island Ecn Case Study Help


Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has offered different reasons for not introducing Case Study Help under Island Ecn name, we have actually a recommended marketing mix for Case Study Help given below if Island Ecn decides to go ahead with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target audience selected for Case Study Help is 'Automobile services' for a number of factors. There are currently 89257 establishments in this section and a high use of around 58900 pounds. is being used by 36.1 % of the market. This market has an additional growth potential of 10.1% which may be a good enough specific niche market section for Case Study Help. Not only would a portable dispenser deal convenience to this particular market, the fact that the Diy market can likewise be targeted if a drinkable low priced adhesive is being sold for usage with SuperBonder. The item would be offered without the 'glumetic suggestion' and 'vari-drop' so that the consumer can decide whether he wants to select either of the two accessories or not.

Price: The suggested cost of Case Study Help has been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is sold through distributors or via direct selling. A rate listed below $250 would not require approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor lorry maintenance store needs to purchase the item on his own.

Island Ecn would only be getting $157 per unit as displayed in appendix 2 which offers a breakdown of gross success and net profitability for Island Ecn for releasing Case Study Help.

Place: A distribution model where Island Ecn directly sends out the product to the local supplier and keeps a 10% drop delivery allowance for the distributor would be utilized by Island Ecn. Because the sales group is already participated in offering instantaneous adhesives and they do not have competence in selling dispensers, involving them in the selling process would be expensive especially as each sales call expenses approximately $120. The distributors are currently offering dispensers so offering Case Study Help through them would be a beneficial choice.

Promotion: Although a low marketing spending plan must have been assigned to Case Study Help but the fact that the dispenser is a development and it needs to be marketed well in order to cover the capital costs incurred for production, the suggested advertising plan costing $51816 is suggested for at first presenting the product in the market. The prepared ads in publications would be targeted at mechanics in vehicle upkeep shops. (Recommended text for the ad is displayed in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summarized in appendix 4).


Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Island Ecn Case Study Analysis

A suggested plan of action in the form of a marketing mix has actually been gone over for Case Study Help, the truth still stays that the item would not complement Island Ecn item line. We have a look at appendix 2, we can see how the total gross profitability for the two designs is expected to be approximately $49377 if 250 systems of each design are made each year as per the plan. The initial prepared advertising is around $52000 per year which would be putting a pressure on the company's resources leaving Island Ecn with a negative net income if the costs are allocated to Case Study Help only.

The fact that Island Ecn has actually currently incurred an initial financial investment of $48000 in the form of capital cost and model development indicates that the income from Case Study Help is insufficient to carry out the risk of sales cannibalization. Besides that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market showing low elasticity of demand is not a more effective alternative particularly of it is impacting the sale of the company's profits creating designs.


 

PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE