Jupiter Management Co Case Study Help Checklist

Jupiter Management Co Case Study Help Checklist

Jupiter Management Co Case Study Solution
Jupiter Management Co Case Study Help
Jupiter Management Co Case Study Analysis

Analyses for Evaluating Jupiter Management Co decision to launch Case Study Solution

The following area concentrates on the of marketing for Jupiter Management Co where the business's consumers, rivals and core proficiencies have actually evaluated in order to validate whether the decision to release Case Study Help under Jupiter Management Co brand would be a practical choice or not. We have actually firstly looked at the kind of clients that Jupiter Management Co handle while an examination of the competitive environment and the business's strengths and weaknesses follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the justification for not introducing Case Study Help under Jupiter Management Co name.
Jupiter Management Co Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Jupiter Management Co clients can be segmented into two groups, industrial customers and final consumers. Both the groups use Jupiter Management Co high performance adhesives while the business is not just involved in the production of these adhesives however likewise markets them to these consumer groups. There are 2 kinds of products that are being offered to these possible markets; anaerobic adhesives and instant adhesives. We would be concentrating on the consumers of instant adhesives for this analysis considering that the market for the latter has a lower potential for Jupiter Management Co compared to that of instant adhesives.

The overall market for immediate adhesives is around 890,000 in the US in 1978 which covers both customer groups which have actually been determined earlier.If we look at a breakdown of Jupiter Management Co possible market or client groups, we can see that the company offers to OEMs (Original Equipment Manufacturers), Do-it-Yourself customers, repair work and revamping business (MRO) and producers handling products made of leather, plastic, wood and metal. This variety in customers recommends that Jupiter Management Co can target has different alternatives in terms of segmenting the marketplace for its new product especially as each of these groups would be needing the very same type of item with particular modifications in need, quantity or packaging. However, the client is not cost sensitive or brand conscious so launching a low priced dispenser under Jupiter Management Co name is not an advised option.

Company Analysis

Jupiter Management Co is not just a maker of adhesives but takes pleasure in market leadership in the immediate adhesive industry. The company has its own knowledgeable and certified sales force which includes value to sales by training the business's network of 250 distributors for assisting in the sale of adhesives. Jupiter Management Co believes in exclusive distribution as suggested by the fact that it has actually chosen to offer through 250 suppliers whereas there is t a network of 10000 suppliers that can be explored for expanding reach by means of distributors. The business's reach is not limited to North America only as it also delights in global sales. With 1400 outlets spread all throughout North America, Jupiter Management Co has its internal production plants instead of utilizing out-sourcing as the favored strategy.

Core skills are not restricted to adhesive manufacturing just as Jupiter Management Co also specializes in making adhesive dispensing devices to help with making use of its items. This dual production method gives Jupiter Management Co an edge over rivals because none of the competitors of dispensing equipment makes immediate adhesives. In addition, none of these competitors offers directly to the consumer either and uses distributors for reaching out to clients. While we are taking a look at the strengths of Jupiter Management Co, it is essential to highlight the company's weaknesses too.

Although the company's sales staff is competent in training suppliers, the reality stays that the sales team is not trained in offering devices so there is a possibility of relying heavily on distributors when promoting adhesive devices. Nevertheless, it must also be kept in mind that the distributors are revealing reluctance when it concerns selling equipment that requires servicing which increases the challenges of offering devices under a specific brand.

If we take a look at Jupiter Management Co line of product in adhesive equipment particularly, the business has actually items focused on the luxury of the marketplace. The possibility of sales cannibalization exists if Jupiter Management Co sells Case Study Help under the same portfolio. Offered the fact that Case Study Help is priced lower than Jupiter Management Co high-end product line, sales cannibalization would definitely be affecting Jupiter Management Co sales earnings if the adhesive devices is offered under the company's brand.

We can see sales cannibalization impacting Jupiter Management Co 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. There is another possible risk which might lower Jupiter Management Co revenue if Case Study Help is introduced under the company's trademark name. The reality that $175000 has been invested in promoting SuperBonder recommends that it is not a great time for releasing a dispenser which can highlight the reality that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the instant adhesive.

Additionally, if we take a look at the marketplace in general, the adhesives market does disappoint brand name orientation or cost awareness which offers us 2 additional factors for not releasing a low priced product under the business's trademark name.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Jupiter Management Co would be studied through Porter's 5 forces analysis which would highlight the degree of rivalry in the market.

Degree of Rivalry:

Currently we can see that the adhesive market has a high growth potential due to the existence of fragmented segments with Jupiter Management Co enjoying leadership and a combined market share of 75% with two other industry gamers, Eastman and Permabond. While market rivalry in between these gamers could be called 'intense' as the consumer is not brand mindful and each of these gamers has prominence in regards to market share, the fact still remains that the market is not saturated and still has several market segments which can be targeted as potential specific niche markets even when introducing an adhesive. However, we can even explain the truth that sales cannibalization might be resulting in industry competition in the adhesive dispenser market while the marketplace for immediate adhesives offers growth capacity.

Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the buyer in this market is low particularly as the purchaser has low knowledge about the product. While companies like Jupiter Management Co have actually handled to train distributors regarding adhesives, the final consumer is dependent on distributors. Around 72% of sales are made directly by manufacturers and distributors for immediate adhesives so the buyer has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Offered the fact that the adhesive market is controlled by three players, it could be said that the provider takes pleasure in a higher bargaining power compared to the purchaser. Nevertheless, the fact remains that the provider does not have much impact over the buyer at this point especially as the buyer does not show brand recognition or rate level of sensitivity. When it comes to the adhesive market while the producer and the purchaser do not have a major control over the real sales, this indicates that the distributor has the greater power.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand loyalty and the ease of entry revealed by foreign Japanese competitors in the instant adhesive market shows that the marketplace permits ease of entry. If we look at Jupiter Management Co in specific, the company has double capabilities in terms of being a maker of immediate adhesives and adhesive dispensers. Possible threats in equipment dispensing industry are low which shows the possibility of developing brand name awareness in not only immediate adhesives but also in giving adhesives as none of the market gamers has managed to position itself in double capabilities.

Threat of Substitutes: The risk of substitutes in the immediate adhesive industry is low while the dispenser market in particular has replacements like Glumetic suggestion applicators, in-built applicators, pencil applicators and sophisticated consoles. The truth stays that if Jupiter Management Co introduced Case Study Help, it would be indulging in sales cannibalization for its own items. (see appendix 1 for structure).

4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Jupiter Management Co Case Study Help

Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has actually given various factors for not releasing Case Study Help under Jupiter Management Co name, we have a suggested marketing mix for Case Study Help offered below if Jupiter Management Co decides to go on with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target market chosen for Case Study Help is 'Motor automobile services' for a number of reasons. This market has an additional development capacity of 10.1% which may be a great adequate specific niche market sector for Case Study Help. Not just would a portable dispenser offer benefit to this particular market, the fact that the Do-it-Yourself market can also be targeted if a safe and clean low priced adhesive is being sold for use with SuperBonder.

Price: The suggested price of Case Study Help has been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is offered through distributors or via direct selling. A rate listed below $250 would not require approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor automobile upkeep shop needs to purchase the product on his own.

Jupiter Management Co would just be getting $157 per unit as displayed in appendix 2 which provides a breakdown of gross success and net profitability for Jupiter Management Co for launching Case Study Help.

Place: A distribution design where Jupiter Management Co directly sends out the product to the regional supplier and keeps a 10% drop delivery allowance for the supplier would be used by Jupiter Management Co. Because the sales team is currently taken part in offering instant adhesives and they do not have knowledge in offering dispensers, involving them in the selling procedure would be pricey especially as each sales call costs around $120. The distributors are already offering dispensers so offering Case Study Help through them would be a beneficial alternative.

Promotion: Although a low promotional budget plan should have been appointed to Case Study Help however the reality that the dispenser is a development and it needs to be marketed well in order to cover the capital expenses incurred for production, the recommended advertising strategy costing $51816 is recommended for at first introducing the item in the market. The prepared ads in magazines would be targeted at mechanics in automobile upkeep stores. (Recommended text for the advertisement is displayed in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summarized in appendix 4).

Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Jupiter Management Co Case Study Analysis

Although a suggested plan of action in the form of a marketing mix has been talked about for Case Study Help, the truth still remains that the product would not complement Jupiter Management Co line of product. We have a look at appendix 2, we can see how the overall gross profitability for the two designs is anticipated to be roughly $49377 if 250 units of each design are produced per year according to the plan. However, the preliminary planned advertising is roughly $52000 each year which would be putting a strain on the business's resources leaving Jupiter Management Co with an unfavorable earnings if the costs are designated to Case Study Help only.

The reality that Jupiter Management Co has actually currently incurred an initial investment of $48000 in the form of capital expense and model development indicates that the income from Case Study Help is insufficient to carry out the danger of sales cannibalization. Besides that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market revealing low flexibility of need is not a more suitable alternative especially of it is impacting the sale of the business's revenue producing models.