WhatsApp

Kaiser Steel Corp 1950 Case Study Help Checklist

Kaiser Steel Corp 1950 Case Study Help Checklist

Kaiser Steel Corp 1950 Case Study Solution
Kaiser Steel Corp 1950 Case Study Help
Kaiser Steel Corp 1950 Case Study Analysis



Analyses for Evaluating Kaiser Steel Corp 1950 decision to launch Case Study Solution


The following section concentrates on the of marketing for Kaiser Steel Corp 1950 where the business's clients, competitors and core competencies have examined in order to justify whether the choice to launch Case Study Help under Kaiser Steel Corp 1950 brand name would be a feasible choice or not. We have to start with looked at the kind of consumers that Kaiser Steel Corp 1950 deals in while an assessment of the competitive environment and the business's weaknesses and strengths follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the reason for not launching Case Study Help under Kaiser Steel Corp 1950 name.
Kaiser Steel Corp 1950 Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Kaiser Steel Corp 1950 customers can be segmented into 2 groups, industrial clients and final consumers. Both the groups utilize Kaiser Steel Corp 1950 high performance adhesives while the company is not only involved in the production of these adhesives but also markets them to these client groups. There are 2 kinds of products that are being sold to these possible markets; anaerobic adhesives and instant adhesives. We would be concentrating on the consumers of instant adhesives for this analysis given that the market for the latter has a lower potential for Kaiser Steel Corp 1950 compared to that of instant adhesives.

The total market for instant adhesives is roughly 890,000 in the US in 1978 which covers both client groups which have actually been determined earlier.If we take a look at a breakdown of Kaiser Steel Corp 1950 potential market or consumer groups, we can see that the business offers to OEMs (Initial Devices Manufacturers), Do-it-Yourself consumers, repair and overhauling business (MRO) and manufacturers handling items made from leather, plastic, metal and wood. This variety in consumers recommends that Kaiser Steel Corp 1950 can target has various alternatives in terms of segmenting the market for its new product particularly as each of these groups would be requiring the very same kind of product with respective changes in quantity, demand or packaging. However, the consumer is not cost sensitive or brand mindful so launching a low priced dispenser under Kaiser Steel Corp 1950 name is not an advised choice.

Company Analysis

Kaiser Steel Corp 1950 is not simply a manufacturer of adhesives however delights in market management in the instant adhesive industry. The business has its own skilled and competent sales force which adds worth to sales by training the business's network of 250 distributors for assisting in the sale of adhesives.

Core skills are not restricted to adhesive manufacturing just as Kaiser Steel Corp 1950 also specializes in making adhesive dispensing equipment to assist in making use of its items. This double production strategy provides Kaiser Steel Corp 1950 an edge over rivals since none of the rivals of dispensing equipment makes immediate adhesives. Additionally, none of these rivals offers straight to the consumer either and uses distributors for connecting to clients. While we are looking at the strengths of Kaiser Steel Corp 1950, it is necessary to highlight the business's weak points too.

The company's sales staff is competent in training distributors, the truth stays that the sales team is not trained in offering devices so there is a possibility of relying greatly on suppliers when promoting adhesive devices. It must also be noted that the distributors are showing unwillingness when it comes to selling devices that needs maintenance which increases the obstacles of selling equipment under a specific brand name.

The business has actually products aimed at the high end of the market if we look at Kaiser Steel Corp 1950 item line in adhesive devices especially. The possibility of sales cannibalization exists if Kaiser Steel Corp 1950 sells Case Study Help under the exact same portfolio. Provided the truth that Case Study Help is priced lower than Kaiser Steel Corp 1950 high-end product line, sales cannibalization would absolutely be impacting Kaiser Steel Corp 1950 sales income if the adhesive equipment is sold under the business's brand name.

We can see sales cannibalization impacting Kaiser Steel Corp 1950 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. There is another possible danger which might reduce Kaiser Steel Corp 1950 earnings if Case Study Help is launched under the business's trademark name. The reality that $175000 has actually been spent in promoting SuperBonder suggests that it is not a great time for launching a dispenser which can highlight the fact that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the immediate adhesive.

Furthermore, if we take a look at the marketplace in general, the adhesives market does disappoint brand orientation or rate awareness which provides us two extra reasons for not launching a low priced product under the company's brand.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Kaiser Steel Corp 1950 would be studied through Porter's five forces analysis which would highlight the degree of rivalry in the market.


Degree of Rivalry:

Currently we can see that the adhesive market has a high growth potential due to the presence of fragmented sectors with Kaiser Steel Corp 1950 enjoying management and a combined market share of 75% with two other industry players, Eastman and Permabond. While market competition between these players could be called 'extreme' as the consumer is not brand mindful and each of these players has prominence in regards to market share, the truth still stays that the market is not saturated and still has several market sectors which can be targeted as possible specific niche markets even when introducing an adhesive. However, we can even point out the fact that sales cannibalization might be causing industry rivalry in the adhesive dispenser market while the marketplace for immediate adhesives offers development capacity.


Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the buyer in this market is low specifically as the purchaser has low understanding about the item. While business like Kaiser Steel Corp 1950 have actually handled to train distributors concerning adhesives, the last consumer is dependent on suppliers. Around 72% of sales are made directly by makers and distributors for instantaneous adhesives so the purchaser has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Provided the reality that the adhesive market is controlled by 3 gamers, it could be stated that the provider delights in a greater bargaining power compared to the buyer. However, the fact remains that the supplier does not have much influence over the buyer at this point specifically as the buyer does not show brand recognition or cost sensitivity. This indicates that the supplier has the higher power when it comes to the adhesive market while the buyer and the manufacturer do not have a major control over the actual sales.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand name commitment and the ease of entry shown by foreign Japanese competitors in the instantaneous adhesive market indicates that the marketplace allows ease of entry. If we look at Kaiser Steel Corp 1950 in specific, the company has dual capabilities in terms of being a manufacturer of instant adhesives and adhesive dispensers. Potential dangers in devices dispensing industry are low which reveals the possibility of creating brand awareness in not just instantaneous adhesives however also in giving adhesives as none of the industry players has actually handled to position itself in dual capabilities.

Risk of Substitutes: The hazard of replacements in the instantaneous adhesive industry is low while the dispenser market in particular has alternatives like Glumetic tip applicators, built-in applicators, pencil applicators and sophisticated consoles. The truth stays that if Kaiser Steel Corp 1950 presented Case Study Help, it would be indulging in sales cannibalization for its own products. (see appendix 1 for framework).


4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Kaiser Steel Corp 1950 Case Study Help


Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has actually offered various factors for not releasing Case Study Help under Kaiser Steel Corp 1950 name, we have actually a recommended marketing mix for Case Study Help offered below if Kaiser Steel Corp 1950 decides to proceed with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target market picked for Case Study Help is 'Motor vehicle services' for a number of factors. This market has an additional development potential of 10.1% which might be a great sufficient niche market sector for Case Study Help. Not only would a portable dispenser deal benefit to this specific market, the truth that the Do-it-Yourself market can likewise be targeted if a potable low priced adhesive is being offered for use with SuperBonder.

Price: The recommended price of Case Study Help has actually been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is offered through suppliers or by means of direct selling. A price listed below $250 would not need approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor vehicle maintenance store needs to purchase the item on his own.

Kaiser Steel Corp 1950 would only be getting $157 per unit as shown in appendix 2 which gives a breakdown of gross success and net profitability for Kaiser Steel Corp 1950 for launching Case Study Help.

Place: A distribution model where Kaiser Steel Corp 1950 directly sends out the item to the regional supplier and keeps a 10% drop delivery allowance for the supplier would be utilized by Kaiser Steel Corp 1950. Considering that the sales team is currently taken part in selling instantaneous adhesives and they do not have know-how in selling dispensers, involving them in the selling process would be costly specifically as each sales call expenses around $120. The distributors are already selling dispensers so offering Case Study Help through them would be a beneficial alternative.

Promotion: A low promotional budget should have been designated to Case Study Help but the reality that the dispenser is a development and it requires to be marketed well in order to cover the capital expenses incurred for production, the recommended marketing plan costing $51816 is advised for at first introducing the product in the market. The planned advertisements in publications would be targeted at mechanics in car upkeep stores. (Recommended text for the ad is displayed in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summarized in appendix 4).


Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Kaiser Steel Corp 1950 Case Study Analysis

A suggested plan of action in the form of a marketing mix has actually been talked about for Case Study Help, the truth still stays that the product would not match Kaiser Steel Corp 1950 item line. We take a look at appendix 2, we can see how the total gross success for the two designs is expected to be approximately $49377 if 250 units of each design are produced annually as per the strategy. However, the initial planned advertising is around $52000 per year which would be putting a strain on the company's resources leaving Kaiser Steel Corp 1950 with a negative net income if the costs are assigned to Case Study Help just.

The reality that Kaiser Steel Corp 1950 has currently incurred a preliminary financial investment of $48000 in the form of capital expense and model development shows that the profits from Case Study Help is inadequate to carry out the danger of sales cannibalization. Besides that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market showing low flexibility of demand is not a preferable alternative particularly of it is affecting the sale of the company's earnings generating models.


 

PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE