Korea Stock Exchange 1998 Case Study Help Checklist

Korea Stock Exchange 1998 Case Study Help Checklist

Korea Stock Exchange 1998 Case Study Solution
Korea Stock Exchange 1998 Case Study Help
Korea Stock Exchange 1998 Case Study Analysis

Analyses for Evaluating Korea Stock Exchange 1998 decision to launch Case Study Solution

The following section focuses on the of marketing for Korea Stock Exchange 1998 where the company's consumers, competitors and core competencies have actually assessed in order to justify whether the choice to introduce Case Study Help under Korea Stock Exchange 1998 brand would be a feasible option or not. We have actually firstly looked at the type of clients that Korea Stock Exchange 1998 deals in while an examination of the competitive environment and the business's strengths and weaknesses follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the reason for not launching Case Study Help under Korea Stock Exchange 1998 name.
Korea Stock Exchange 1998 Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Korea Stock Exchange 1998 customers can be segmented into two groups, commercial customers and last customers. Both the groups use Korea Stock Exchange 1998 high performance adhesives while the business is not only associated with the production of these adhesives but likewise markets them to these consumer groups. There are two kinds of products that are being sold to these potential markets; immediate adhesives and anaerobic adhesives. We would be focusing on the customers of instant adhesives for this analysis given that the market for the latter has a lower capacity for Korea Stock Exchange 1998 compared to that of instantaneous adhesives.

The overall market for instant adhesives is around 890,000 in the US in 1978 which covers both client groups which have been determined earlier.If we take a look at a breakdown of Korea Stock Exchange 1998 prospective market or consumer groups, we can see that the business offers to OEMs (Initial Equipment Manufacturers), Do-it-Yourself clients, repair work and revamping business (MRO) and producers handling products made from leather, plastic, wood and metal. This diversity in customers suggests that Korea Stock Exchange 1998 can target has different options in terms of segmenting the market for its brand-new product particularly as each of these groups would be needing the very same kind of product with respective changes in need, packaging or quantity. The customer is not cost delicate or brand mindful so releasing a low priced dispenser under Korea Stock Exchange 1998 name is not a recommended choice.

Company Analysis

Korea Stock Exchange 1998 is not just a manufacturer of adhesives but takes pleasure in market management in the immediate adhesive market. The business has its own skilled and qualified sales force which includes worth to sales by training the business's network of 250 distributors for helping with the sale of adhesives. Korea Stock Exchange 1998 believes in exclusive distribution as shown by the reality that it has picked to sell through 250 suppliers whereas there is t a network of 10000 suppliers that can be explored for expanding reach via suppliers. The company's reach is not limited to North America only as it likewise enjoys worldwide sales. With 1400 outlets spread out all throughout The United States and Canada, Korea Stock Exchange 1998 has its internal production plants rather than using out-sourcing as the favored technique.

Core proficiencies are not restricted to adhesive manufacturing only as Korea Stock Exchange 1998 likewise specializes in making adhesive giving devices to assist in using its items. This double production strategy gives Korea Stock Exchange 1998 an edge over competitors because none of the rivals of dispensing devices makes instant adhesives. Furthermore, none of these rivals sells straight to the customer either and makes use of distributors for reaching out to customers. While we are taking a look at the strengths of Korea Stock Exchange 1998, it is essential to highlight the business's weaknesses also.

Although the company's sales staff is competent in training suppliers, the fact stays that the sales group is not trained in offering equipment so there is a possibility of relying heavily on distributors when promoting adhesive devices. However, it ought to likewise be kept in mind that the suppliers are revealing hesitation when it comes to selling devices that requires maintenance which increases the difficulties of offering devices under a particular trademark name.

The company has items aimed at the high end of the market if we look at Korea Stock Exchange 1998 product line in adhesive equipment especially. If Korea Stock Exchange 1998 offers Case Study Help under the same portfolio, the possibility of sales cannibalization exists. Given the truth that Case Study Help is priced lower than Korea Stock Exchange 1998 high-end product line, sales cannibalization would definitely be impacting Korea Stock Exchange 1998 sales earnings if the adhesive devices is offered under the company's brand name.

We can see sales cannibalization affecting Korea Stock Exchange 1998 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. There is another possible risk which could decrease Korea Stock Exchange 1998 earnings if Case Study Help is introduced under the business's trademark name. The fact that $175000 has been invested in promoting SuperBonder suggests that it is not a good time for introducing a dispenser which can highlight the truth that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the instantaneous adhesive.

Furthermore, if we take a look at the marketplace in general, the adhesives market does disappoint brand orientation or cost consciousness which provides us 2 extra factors for not launching a low priced item under the company's brand.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Korea Stock Exchange 1998 would be studied via Porter's 5 forces analysis which would highlight the degree of rivalry in the market.

Degree of Rivalry:

Currently we can see that the adhesive market has a high growth potential due to the presence of fragmented segments with Korea Stock Exchange 1998 enjoying leadership and a combined market share of 75% with 2 other market players, Eastman and Permabond. While market competition between these gamers could be called 'extreme' as the consumer is not brand name conscious and each of these players has prominence in terms of market share, the fact still stays that the industry is not filled and still has several market segments which can be targeted as potential specific niche markets even when launching an adhesive. We can even point out the reality that sales cannibalization may be leading to industry competition in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for instantaneous adhesives uses development potential.

Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the buyer in this industry is low particularly as the buyer has low knowledge about the product. While business like Korea Stock Exchange 1998 have handled to train distributors regarding adhesives, the last consumer is dependent on suppliers. Around 72% of sales are made directly by makers and suppliers for instant adhesives so the buyer has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Provided the reality that the adhesive market is controlled by three players, it could be said that the provider delights in a higher bargaining power compared to the purchaser. The reality stays that the supplier does not have much impact over the buyer at this point specifically as the purchaser does not show brand name acknowledgment or price sensitivity. This suggests that the distributor has the greater power when it comes to the adhesive market while the purchaser and the maker do not have a major control over the actual sales.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand loyalty and the ease of entry revealed by foreign Japanese competitors in the immediate adhesive market indicates that the marketplace allows ease of entry. If we look at Korea Stock Exchange 1998 in particular, the company has double capabilities in terms of being a maker of instantaneous adhesives and adhesive dispensers. Prospective hazards in equipment dispensing industry are low which reveals the possibility of creating brand awareness in not only immediate adhesives but also in giving adhesives as none of the industry players has actually handled to position itself in dual abilities.

Threat of Substitutes: The hazard of substitutes in the immediate adhesive market is low while the dispenser market in particular has alternatives like Glumetic pointer applicators, in-built applicators, pencil applicators and advanced consoles. The fact stays that if Korea Stock Exchange 1998 presented Case Study Help, it would be enjoying sales cannibalization for its own products. (see appendix 1 for structure).

4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Korea Stock Exchange 1998 Case Study Help

Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has actually provided various reasons for not releasing Case Study Help under Korea Stock Exchange 1998 name, we have actually a suggested marketing mix for Case Study Help offered listed below if Korea Stock Exchange 1998 decides to go ahead with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target market selected for Case Study Help is 'Automobile services' for a number of factors. There are currently 89257 facilities in this sector and a high use of roughly 58900 lbs. is being used by 36.1 % of the marketplace. This market has an extra development potential of 10.1% which might be a good enough specific niche market sector for Case Study Help. Not just would a portable dispenser offer convenience to this specific market, the fact that the Do-it-Yourself market can also be targeted if a safe and clean low priced adhesive is being cost use with SuperBonder. The item would be sold without the 'glumetic suggestion' and 'vari-drop' so that the customer can decide whether he wants to go with either of the two accessories or not.

Price: The recommended cost of Case Study Help has been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is sold through distributors or by means of direct selling. A price below $250 would not require approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor car upkeep shop requires to acquire the item on his own.

Korea Stock Exchange 1998 would only be getting $157 per unit as displayed in appendix 2 which offers a breakdown of gross profitability and net profitability for Korea Stock Exchange 1998 for launching Case Study Help.

Place: A distribution model where Korea Stock Exchange 1998 straight sends the item to the local distributor and keeps a 10% drop shipment allowance for the supplier would be used by Korea Stock Exchange 1998. Because the sales group is currently engaged in offering immediate adhesives and they do not have know-how in selling dispensers, including them in the selling process would be expensive especially as each sales call expenses roughly $120. The suppliers are already offering dispensers so selling Case Study Help through them would be a beneficial option.

Promotion: A low advertising spending plan needs to have been assigned to Case Study Help however the fact that the dispenser is an innovation and it needs to be marketed well in order to cover the capital expenses sustained for production, the suggested marketing strategy costing $51816 is suggested for at first presenting the product in the market. The prepared advertisements in publications would be targeted at mechanics in vehicle maintenance shops. (Recommended text for the ad is displayed in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summarized in appendix 4).

Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Korea Stock Exchange 1998 Case Study Analysis

Although a suggested strategy in the form of a marketing mix has been gone over for Case Study Help, the fact still remains that the product would not match Korea Stock Exchange 1998 line of product. We take a look at appendix 2, we can see how the total gross success for the two designs is anticipated to be around $49377 if 250 units of each model are produced per year according to the plan. Nevertheless, the preliminary planned marketing is around $52000 annually which would be putting a pressure on the company's resources leaving Korea Stock Exchange 1998 with an unfavorable earnings if the expenses are assigned to Case Study Help only.

The truth that Korea Stock Exchange 1998 has actually already sustained a preliminary investment of $48000 in the form of capital expense and prototype development suggests that the income from Case Study Help is not enough to undertake the threat of sales cannibalization. Aside from that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market showing low flexibility of need is not a more effective option especially of it is affecting the sale of the company's income producing models.