Lyondell Chemical Company Case Study Help Checklist

Lyondell Chemical Company Case Study Help Checklist

Lyondell Chemical Company Case Study Solution
Lyondell Chemical Company Case Study Help
Lyondell Chemical Company Case Study Analysis

Analyses for Evaluating Lyondell Chemical Company decision to launch Case Study Solution

The following area focuses on the of marketing for Lyondell Chemical Company where the business's consumers, rivals and core competencies have examined in order to validate whether the choice to launch Case Study Help under Lyondell Chemical Company brand name would be a feasible alternative or not. We have first of all taken a look at the kind of consumers that Lyondell Chemical Company deals in while an assessment of the competitive environment and the company's weaknesses and strengths follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the validation for not releasing Case Study Help under Lyondell Chemical Company name.
Lyondell Chemical Company Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Both the groups use Lyondell Chemical Company high efficiency adhesives while the business is not only included in the production of these adhesives but also markets them to these customer groups. We would be focusing on the consumers of instant adhesives for this analysis because the market for the latter has a lower capacity for Lyondell Chemical Company compared to that of instant adhesives.

The total market for instantaneous adhesives is around 890,000 in the US in 1978 which covers both customer groups which have actually been identified earlier.If we take a look at a breakdown of Lyondell Chemical Company potential market or consumer groups, we can see that the business sells to OEMs (Initial Equipment Makers), Do-it-Yourself customers, repair and overhauling business (MRO) and manufacturers handling products made of leather, metal, wood and plastic. This variety in consumers suggests that Lyondell Chemical Company can target has numerous choices in terms of segmenting the market for its brand-new item especially as each of these groups would be requiring the same kind of product with particular modifications in quantity, demand or product packaging. The client is not cost sensitive or brand name conscious so launching a low priced dispenser under Lyondell Chemical Company name is not a suggested choice.

Company Analysis

Lyondell Chemical Company is not just a maker of adhesives but enjoys market management in the instant adhesive market. The company has its own experienced and certified sales force which adds value to sales by training the company's network of 250 suppliers for facilitating the sale of adhesives. Lyondell Chemical Company believes in unique distribution as indicated by the reality that it has actually picked to sell through 250 suppliers whereas there is t a network of 10000 distributors that can be explored for broadening reach via distributors. The business's reach is not limited to The United States and Canada just as it also delights in international sales. With 1400 outlets spread out all throughout North America, Lyondell Chemical Company has its internal production plants rather than using out-sourcing as the preferred technique.

Core proficiencies are not restricted to adhesive manufacturing only as Lyondell Chemical Company likewise focuses on making adhesive giving equipment to help with using its items. This dual production method gives Lyondell Chemical Company an edge over rivals since none of the rivals of dispensing devices makes instantaneous adhesives. Additionally, none of these rivals offers directly to the consumer either and makes use of suppliers for reaching out to clients. While we are taking a look at the strengths of Lyondell Chemical Company, it is essential to highlight the company's weak points as well.

Although the business's sales staff is experienced in training suppliers, the reality remains that the sales team is not trained in selling devices so there is a possibility of relying greatly on suppliers when promoting adhesive equipment. Nevertheless, it ought to likewise be kept in mind that the suppliers are showing unwillingness when it comes to offering devices that needs maintenance which increases the obstacles of offering devices under a specific brand name.

The company has actually products intended at the high end of the market if we look at Lyondell Chemical Company item line in adhesive devices especially. The possibility of sales cannibalization exists if Lyondell Chemical Company offers Case Study Help under the same portfolio. Given the reality that Case Study Help is priced lower than Lyondell Chemical Company high-end product line, sales cannibalization would absolutely be affecting Lyondell Chemical Company sales earnings if the adhesive devices is sold under the business's trademark name.

We can see sales cannibalization impacting Lyondell Chemical Company 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. If Case Study Help is introduced under the business's brand name, there is another possible hazard which could lower Lyondell Chemical Company profits. The truth that $175000 has been spent in promoting SuperBonder suggests that it is not a good time for launching a dispenser which can highlight the truth that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the immediate adhesive.

Additionally, if we take a look at the market in general, the adhesives market does not show brand name orientation or cost consciousness which gives us two extra factors for not introducing a low priced item under the business's brand name.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Lyondell Chemical Company would be studied via Porter's 5 forces analysis which would highlight the degree of competition in the market.

Degree of Rivalry:

Presently we can see that the adhesive market has a high growth capacity due to the existence of fragmented sections with Lyondell Chemical Company enjoying leadership and a combined market share of 75% with 2 other industry players, Eastman and Permabond. While industry competition in between these players could be called 'intense' as the consumer is not brand name mindful and each of these players has prominence in terms of market share, the reality still stays that the industry is not saturated and still has numerous market sectors which can be targeted as prospective niche markets even when launching an adhesive. Nevertheless, we can even mention the fact that sales cannibalization might be causing market rivalry in the adhesive dispenser market while the marketplace for immediate adhesives offers development capacity.

Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the purchaser in this market is low particularly as the purchaser has low knowledge about the item. While business like Lyondell Chemical Company have actually handled to train distributors concerning adhesives, the final consumer depends on suppliers. Around 72% of sales are made straight by makers and suppliers for immediate adhesives so the buyer has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Offered the reality that the adhesive market is dominated by 3 gamers, it could be said that the supplier enjoys a higher bargaining power compared to the buyer. However, the reality remains that the supplier does not have much impact over the purchaser at this moment particularly as the buyer does disappoint brand name acknowledgment or cost sensitivity. This indicates that the distributor has the greater power when it concerns the adhesive market while the buyer and the manufacturer do not have a major control over the actual sales.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand name commitment and the ease of entry shown by foreign Japanese competitors in the instant adhesive market suggests that the market allows ease of entry. Nevertheless, if we take a look at Lyondell Chemical Company in particular, the company has dual capabilities in regards to being a manufacturer of adhesive dispensers and instant adhesives. Prospective risks in equipment giving industry are low which shows the possibility of developing brand name awareness in not just instant adhesives however also in giving adhesives as none of the industry players has managed to place itself in dual abilities.

Threat of Substitutes: The danger of replacements in the instant adhesive market is low while the dispenser market in particular has replacements like Glumetic pointer applicators, inbuilt applicators, pencil applicators and advanced consoles. The truth stays that if Lyondell Chemical Company presented Case Study Help, it would be enjoying sales cannibalization for its own items. (see appendix 1 for framework).

4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Lyondell Chemical Company Case Study Help

Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has actually offered numerous factors for not introducing Case Study Help under Lyondell Chemical Company name, we have a suggested marketing mix for Case Study Help given below if Lyondell Chemical Company decides to go ahead with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target market picked for Case Study Help is 'Motor car services' for a number of factors. This market has an extra development capacity of 10.1% which may be a great sufficient niche market sector for Case Study Help. Not just would a portable dispenser offer benefit to this specific market, the fact that the Do-it-Yourself market can also be targeted if a safe and clean low priced adhesive is being offered for usage with SuperBonder.

Price: The recommended cost of Case Study Help has actually been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is offered through distributors or by means of direct selling. This cost would not consist of the cost of the 'vari tip' or the 'glumetic idea'. A cost below $250 would not need approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor vehicle upkeep shop requires to acquire the item on his own. This would increase the possibility of affecting mechanics to buy the product for usage in their everyday upkeep jobs.

Lyondell Chemical Company would just be getting $157 per unit as shown in appendix 2 which gives a breakdown of gross profitability and net profitability for Lyondell Chemical Company for introducing Case Study Help.

Place: A circulation design where Lyondell Chemical Company directly sends the item to the local distributor and keeps a 10% drop shipment allowance for the supplier would be utilized by Lyondell Chemical Company. Given that the sales group is already taken part in offering instantaneous adhesives and they do not have knowledge in selling dispensers, including them in the selling procedure would be expensive especially as each sales call costs roughly $120. The suppliers are currently selling dispensers so selling Case Study Help through them would be a beneficial choice.

Promotion: Although a low promotional budget plan should have been designated to Case Study Help however the truth that the dispenser is a development and it needs to be marketed well in order to cover the capital costs sustained for production, the suggested advertising strategy costing $51816 is advised for at first introducing the item in the market. The prepared ads in publications would be targeted at mechanics in vehicle upkeep stores. (Suggested text for the ad is displayed in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summed up in appendix 4).

Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Lyondell Chemical Company Case Study Analysis

A suggested strategy of action in the form of a marketing mix has actually been gone over for Case Study Help, the reality still remains that the item would not match Lyondell Chemical Company item line. We take a look at appendix 2, we can see how the overall gross success for the two designs is anticipated to be roughly $49377 if 250 systems of each model are manufactured annually according to the plan. The initial prepared advertising is approximately $52000 per year which would be putting a pressure on the company's resources leaving Lyondell Chemical Company with a negative net income if the expenditures are allocated to Case Study Help just.

The truth that Lyondell Chemical Company has actually currently sustained a preliminary investment of $48000 in the form of capital cost and model development indicates that the earnings from Case Study Help is not enough to undertake the threat of sales cannibalization. Other than that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market revealing low flexibility of need is not a preferable alternative particularly of it is impacting the sale of the company's earnings creating models.