WhatsApp

Maple Leaf Hardware Limited Case Study Help Checklist

Maple Leaf Hardware Limited Case Study Help Checklist

Maple Leaf Hardware Limited Case Study Solution
Maple Leaf Hardware Limited Case Study Help
Maple Leaf Hardware Limited Case Study Analysis



Analyses for Evaluating Maple Leaf Hardware Limited decision to launch Case Study Solution


The following section concentrates on the of marketing for Maple Leaf Hardware Limited where the business's clients, competitors and core proficiencies have examined in order to validate whether the decision to introduce Case Study Help under Maple Leaf Hardware Limited brand name would be a practical option or not. We have first of all looked at the kind of clients that Maple Leaf Hardware Limited handle while an assessment of the competitive environment and the business's weak points and strengths follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the reason for not launching Case Study Help under Maple Leaf Hardware Limited name.
Maple Leaf Hardware Limited Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Maple Leaf Hardware Limited clients can be segmented into 2 groups, last customers and commercial consumers. Both the groups utilize Maple Leaf Hardware Limited high performance adhesives while the business is not only involved in the production of these adhesives however also markets them to these consumer groups. There are two kinds of items that are being sold to these prospective markets; anaerobic adhesives and instantaneous adhesives. We would be concentrating on the consumers of instantaneous adhesives for this analysis considering that the marketplace for the latter has a lower potential for Maple Leaf Hardware Limited compared to that of instantaneous adhesives.

The total market for instant adhesives is roughly 890,000 in the US in 1978 which covers both consumer groups which have been determined earlier.If we take a look at a breakdown of Maple Leaf Hardware Limited prospective market or client groups, we can see that the business offers to OEMs (Initial Devices Manufacturers), Do-it-Yourself consumers, repair work and upgrading business (MRO) and manufacturers handling products made from leather, plastic, metal and wood. This diversity in customers suggests that Maple Leaf Hardware Limited can target has numerous alternatives in terms of segmenting the marketplace for its brand-new product especially as each of these groups would be requiring the exact same kind of product with particular modifications in quantity, product packaging or need. Nevertheless, the customer is not rate sensitive or brand mindful so introducing a low priced dispenser under Maple Leaf Hardware Limited name is not an advised choice.

Company Analysis

Maple Leaf Hardware Limited is not just a maker of adhesives however enjoys market management in the instantaneous adhesive market. The business has its own skilled and competent sales force which adds worth to sales by training the business's network of 250 distributors for facilitating the sale of adhesives. Maple Leaf Hardware Limited believes in exclusive distribution as suggested by the truth that it has actually chosen to sell through 250 distributors whereas there is t a network of 10000 suppliers that can be explored for broadening reach via suppliers. The company's reach is not limited to The United States and Canada just as it likewise delights in international sales. With 1400 outlets spread all throughout North America, Maple Leaf Hardware Limited has its in-house production plants instead of using out-sourcing as the favored technique.

Core skills are not limited to adhesive production only as Maple Leaf Hardware Limited likewise focuses on making adhesive dispensing devices to facilitate making use of its products. This double production method provides Maple Leaf Hardware Limited an edge over competitors considering that none of the rivals of dispensing equipment makes instantaneous adhesives. In addition, none of these rivals offers straight to the consumer either and uses suppliers for connecting to clients. While we are looking at the strengths of Maple Leaf Hardware Limited, it is important to highlight the business's weak points.

Although the business's sales personnel is skilled in training distributors, the truth stays that the sales group is not trained in selling devices so there is a possibility of relying heavily on distributors when promoting adhesive devices. It should likewise be noted that the suppliers are revealing hesitation when it comes to selling equipment that needs maintenance which increases the difficulties of offering equipment under a particular brand name.

If we take a look at Maple Leaf Hardware Limited line of product in adhesive equipment particularly, the business has actually products targeted at the high end of the market. If Maple Leaf Hardware Limited sells Case Study Help under the same portfolio, the possibility of sales cannibalization exists. Provided the fact that Case Study Help is priced lower than Maple Leaf Hardware Limited high-end line of product, sales cannibalization would certainly be impacting Maple Leaf Hardware Limited sales profits if the adhesive devices is sold under the company's trademark name.

We can see sales cannibalization impacting Maple Leaf Hardware Limited 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. There is another possible threat which might decrease Maple Leaf Hardware Limited earnings if Case Study Help is introduced under the business's trademark name. The truth that $175000 has actually been invested in promoting SuperBonder suggests that it is not a good time for introducing a dispenser which can highlight the truth that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the immediate adhesive.

Furthermore, if we take a look at the marketplace in general, the adhesives market does not show brand orientation or cost consciousness which offers us two extra factors for not launching a low priced product under the company's brand name.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Maple Leaf Hardware Limited would be studied through Porter's five forces analysis which would highlight the degree of competition in the market.


Degree of Rivalry:

Presently we can see that the adhesive market has a high growth potential due to the existence of fragmented segments with Maple Leaf Hardware Limited taking pleasure in leadership and a combined market share of 75% with two other industry gamers, Eastman and Permabond. While market rivalry in between these gamers could be called 'intense' as the consumer is not brand name conscious and each of these players has prominence in regards to market share, the truth still remains that the industry is not saturated and still has numerous market segments which can be targeted as potential specific niche markets even when launching an adhesive. We can even point out the truth that sales cannibalization may be leading to market rivalry in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for instant adhesives provides growth potential.


Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the purchaser in this industry is low especially as the buyer has low understanding about the item. While business like Maple Leaf Hardware Limited have managed to train suppliers relating to adhesives, the final customer is dependent on distributors. Roughly 72% of sales are made directly by makers and suppliers for immediate adhesives so the buyer has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Offered the truth that the adhesive market is controlled by three gamers, it could be stated that the provider enjoys a higher bargaining power compared to the buyer. The fact stays that the provider does not have much impact over the buyer at this point specifically as the purchaser does not reveal brand recognition or rate level of sensitivity. This indicates that the distributor has the higher power when it pertains to the adhesive market while the manufacturer and the buyer do not have a significant control over the real sales.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand loyalty and the ease of entry shown by foreign Japanese rivals in the instant adhesive market shows that the market enables ease of entry. However, if we look at Maple Leaf Hardware Limited in particular, the company has dual abilities in terms of being a producer of instant adhesives and adhesive dispensers. Prospective risks in equipment giving industry are low which reveals the possibility of producing brand awareness in not only immediate adhesives however likewise in giving adhesives as none of the market gamers has handled to position itself in double abilities.

Hazard of Substitutes: The threat of alternatives in the instantaneous adhesive industry is low while the dispenser market in particular has substitutes like Glumetic tip applicators, inbuilt applicators, pencil applicators and sophisticated consoles. The truth remains that if Maple Leaf Hardware Limited introduced Case Study Help, it would be indulging in sales cannibalization for its own items. (see appendix 1 for framework).


4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Maple Leaf Hardware Limited Case Study Help


Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has offered different factors for not launching Case Study Help under Maple Leaf Hardware Limited name, we have a recommended marketing mix for Case Study Help provided below if Maple Leaf Hardware Limited chooses to go ahead with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target market chosen for Case Study Help is 'Motor vehicle services' for a number of factors. There are presently 89257 facilities in this segment and a high use of approximately 58900 lbs. is being used by 36.1 % of the market. This market has an additional growth capacity of 10.1% which may be a good enough niche market section for Case Study Help. Not only would a portable dispenser deal convenience to this particular market, the truth that the Diy market can likewise be targeted if a safe and clean low priced adhesive is being cost usage with SuperBonder. The product would be sold without the 'glumetic suggestion' and 'vari-drop' so that the consumer can decide whether he wishes to select either of the two accessories or not.

Price: The suggested cost of Case Study Help has been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is offered through suppliers or through direct selling. This rate would not consist of the cost of the 'vari suggestion' or the 'glumetic suggestion'. A cost listed below $250 would not need approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at an automobile upkeep shop requires to acquire the product on his own. This would increase the possibility of affecting mechanics to buy the product for use in their daily maintenance tasks.

Maple Leaf Hardware Limited would only be getting $157 per unit as displayed in appendix 2 which provides a breakdown of gross success and net profitability for Maple Leaf Hardware Limited for launching Case Study Help.

Place: A circulation design where Maple Leaf Hardware Limited directly sends the product to the local distributor and keeps a 10% drop delivery allowance for the supplier would be used by Maple Leaf Hardware Limited. Given that the sales team is currently participated in offering instant adhesives and they do not have know-how in selling dispensers, including them in the selling process would be pricey particularly as each sales call expenses around $120. The suppliers are currently offering dispensers so offering Case Study Help through them would be a favorable option.

Promotion: A low promotional budget plan must have been assigned to Case Study Help however the fact that the dispenser is a development and it needs to be marketed well in order to cover the capital expenses sustained for production, the suggested advertising plan costing $51816 is suggested for at first introducing the item in the market. The prepared ads in magazines would be targeted at mechanics in lorry upkeep stores. (Recommended text for the ad is displayed in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summarized in appendix 4).


Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Maple Leaf Hardware Limited Case Study Analysis

A suggested strategy of action in the kind of a marketing mix has actually been gone over for Case Study Help, the truth still stays that the item would not complement Maple Leaf Hardware Limited product line. We take a look at appendix 2, we can see how the overall gross success for the two designs is anticipated to be around $49377 if 250 units of each design are manufactured each year as per the plan. The preliminary planned marketing is approximately $52000 per year which would be putting a stress on the company's resources leaving Maple Leaf Hardware Limited with an unfavorable net income if the costs are designated to Case Study Help only.

The reality that Maple Leaf Hardware Limited has already sustained an initial investment of $48000 in the form of capital expense and prototype development shows that the revenue from Case Study Help is insufficient to carry out the threat of sales cannibalization. Besides that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market showing low flexibility of need is not a more suitable choice specifically of it is impacting the sale of the company's revenue creating designs.



PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE