WhatsApp

Maple Leaf Hardware Limited Case Study Help Checklist

Maple Leaf Hardware Limited Case Study Help Checklist

Maple Leaf Hardware Limited Case Study Solution
Maple Leaf Hardware Limited Case Study Help
Maple Leaf Hardware Limited Case Study Analysis



Analyses for Evaluating Maple Leaf Hardware Limited decision to launch Case Study Solution


The following area focuses on the of marketing for Maple Leaf Hardware Limited where the company's consumers, competitors and core proficiencies have actually evaluated in order to validate whether the choice to introduce Case Study Help under Maple Leaf Hardware Limited brand would be a possible alternative or not. We have to start with looked at the type of clients that Maple Leaf Hardware Limited handle while an examination of the competitive environment and the business's strengths and weak points follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the reason for not launching Case Study Help under Maple Leaf Hardware Limited name.
Maple Leaf Hardware Limited Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Maple Leaf Hardware Limited clients can be segmented into two groups, commercial customers and final consumers. Both the groups use Maple Leaf Hardware Limited high performance adhesives while the company is not only involved in the production of these adhesives but also markets them to these customer groups. There are two types of items that are being offered to these possible markets; anaerobic adhesives and instant adhesives. We would be concentrating on the customers of instant adhesives for this analysis considering that the market for the latter has a lower capacity for Maple Leaf Hardware Limited compared to that of instantaneous adhesives.

The overall market for instant adhesives is around 890,000 in the United States in 1978 which covers both consumer groups which have actually been recognized earlier.If we take a look at a breakdown of Maple Leaf Hardware Limited prospective market or client groups, we can see that the company sells to OEMs (Initial Devices Manufacturers), Do-it-Yourself customers, repair and upgrading companies (MRO) and producers dealing in items made of leather, plastic, metal and wood. This variety in customers recommends that Maple Leaf Hardware Limited can target has numerous options in regards to segmenting the marketplace for its new item particularly as each of these groups would be needing the same kind of product with particular changes in quantity, product packaging or need. The consumer is not rate sensitive or brand conscious so releasing a low priced dispenser under Maple Leaf Hardware Limited name is not a suggested choice.

Company Analysis

Maple Leaf Hardware Limited is not just a producer of adhesives but enjoys market leadership in the instantaneous adhesive market. The business has its own proficient and certified sales force which includes worth to sales by training the company's network of 250 suppliers for helping with the sale of adhesives.

Core skills are not limited to adhesive production only as Maple Leaf Hardware Limited likewise concentrates on making adhesive giving equipment to facilitate using its products. This dual production method provides Maple Leaf Hardware Limited an edge over rivals because none of the competitors of dispensing equipment makes immediate adhesives. Additionally, none of these rivals offers straight to the consumer either and utilizes suppliers for connecting to clients. While we are taking a look at the strengths of Maple Leaf Hardware Limited, it is necessary to highlight the company's weak points as well.

Although the company's sales personnel is experienced in training suppliers, the fact stays that the sales group is not trained in offering devices so there is a possibility of relying heavily on distributors when promoting adhesive devices. It ought to also be kept in mind that the suppliers are revealing unwillingness when it comes to offering devices that needs servicing which increases the difficulties of offering devices under a particular brand name.

The business has items aimed at the high end of the market if we look at Maple Leaf Hardware Limited item line in adhesive devices particularly. The possibility of sales cannibalization exists if Maple Leaf Hardware Limited offers Case Study Help under the same portfolio. Given the truth that Case Study Help is priced lower than Maple Leaf Hardware Limited high-end product line, sales cannibalization would definitely be impacting Maple Leaf Hardware Limited sales revenue if the adhesive equipment is offered under the business's trademark name.

We can see sales cannibalization impacting Maple Leaf Hardware Limited 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. There is another possible hazard which could lower Maple Leaf Hardware Limited profits if Case Study Help is released under the company's trademark name. The reality that $175000 has been invested in promoting SuperBonder recommends that it is not a great time for releasing a dispenser which can highlight the fact that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the immediate adhesive.

In addition, if we take a look at the market in general, the adhesives market does not show brand name orientation or price consciousness which gives us 2 extra reasons for not introducing a low priced item under the business's brand name.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Maple Leaf Hardware Limited would be studied via Porter's five forces analysis which would highlight the degree of rivalry in the market.


Degree of Rivalry:

Currently we can see that the adhesive market has a high development capacity due to the presence of fragmented sectors with Maple Leaf Hardware Limited enjoying leadership and a combined market share of 75% with two other industry gamers, Eastman and Permabond. While industry competition in between these players could be called 'extreme' as the customer is not brand name mindful and each of these gamers has prominence in regards to market share, the fact still stays that the market is not filled and still has a number of market segments which can be targeted as possible niche markets even when launching an adhesive. However, we can even mention the fact that sales cannibalization might be leading to market competition in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for instant adhesives provides growth potential.


Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the purchaser in this market is low specifically as the buyer has low understanding about the product. While business like Maple Leaf Hardware Limited have managed to train distributors relating to adhesives, the final consumer depends on distributors. Approximately 72% of sales are made straight by makers and suppliers for instant adhesives so the purchaser has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Offered the truth that the adhesive market is controlled by three players, it could be stated that the provider takes pleasure in a higher bargaining power compared to the purchaser. The truth stays that the provider does not have much influence over the purchaser at this point specifically as the purchaser does not show brand name recognition or rate level of sensitivity. When it comes to the adhesive market while the manufacturer and the purchaser do not have a major control over the actual sales, this shows that the distributor has the higher power.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand loyalty and the ease of entry shown by foreign Japanese competitors in the instantaneous adhesive market shows that the marketplace allows ease of entry. Nevertheless, if we look at Maple Leaf Hardware Limited in particular, the company has double capabilities in regards to being a producer of adhesive dispensers and instantaneous adhesives. Potential hazards in equipment giving market are low which shows the possibility of creating brand awareness in not only immediate adhesives but also in giving adhesives as none of the industry gamers has managed to place itself in dual abilities.

Danger of Substitutes: The hazard of replacements in the instantaneous adhesive industry is low while the dispenser market in particular has replacements like Glumetic pointer applicators, built-in applicators, pencil applicators and sophisticated consoles. The truth remains that if Maple Leaf Hardware Limited introduced Case Study Help, it would be delighting in sales cannibalization for its own items. (see appendix 1 for framework).


4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Maple Leaf Hardware Limited Case Study Help


Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has actually provided different factors for not launching Case Study Help under Maple Leaf Hardware Limited name, we have actually a suggested marketing mix for Case Study Help offered below if Maple Leaf Hardware Limited chooses to go on with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target market selected for Case Study Help is 'Automobile services' for a number of reasons. There are presently 89257 facilities in this section and a high use of around 58900 lbs. is being used by 36.1 % of the marketplace. This market has an extra development potential of 10.1% which might be a sufficient niche market section for Case Study Help. Not only would a portable dispenser offer convenience to this specific market, the reality that the Do-it-Yourself market can also be targeted if a safe and clean low priced adhesive is being cost use with SuperBonder. The item would be sold without the 'glumetic tip' and 'vari-drop' so that the customer can choose whether he wants to go with either of the two devices or not.

Price: The recommended rate of Case Study Help has actually been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is sold through distributors or via direct selling. This cost would not consist of the expense of the 'vari pointer' or the 'glumetic idea'. A rate listed below $250 would not require approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor vehicle maintenance store requires to acquire the product on his own. This would increase the possibility of influencing mechanics to buy the product for usage in their day-to-day maintenance tasks.

Maple Leaf Hardware Limited would only be getting $157 per unit as displayed in appendix 2 which offers a breakdown of gross success and net success for Maple Leaf Hardware Limited for introducing Case Study Help.

Place: A circulation model where Maple Leaf Hardware Limited straight sends out the product to the regional supplier and keeps a 10% drop delivery allowance for the distributor would be used by Maple Leaf Hardware Limited. Since the sales group is already engaged in selling instantaneous adhesives and they do not have competence in offering dispensers, including them in the selling procedure would be costly particularly as each sales call expenses approximately $120. The distributors are already selling dispensers so selling Case Study Help through them would be a favorable alternative.

Promotion: Although a low promotional spending plan needs to have been assigned to Case Study Help however the fact that the dispenser is a development and it needs to be marketed well in order to cover the capital costs incurred for production, the suggested advertising plan costing $51816 is suggested for initially introducing the item in the market. The planned advertisements in publications would be targeted at mechanics in automobile upkeep stores. (Recommended text for the advertisement is displayed in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summed up in appendix 4).


Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Maple Leaf Hardware Limited Case Study Analysis

A suggested strategy of action in the kind of a marketing mix has been discussed for Case Study Help, the fact still remains that the item would not complement Maple Leaf Hardware Limited item line. We take a look at appendix 2, we can see how the total gross profitability for the two designs is expected to be approximately $49377 if 250 systems of each model are manufactured each year based on the strategy. The preliminary planned advertising is around $52000 per year which would be putting a strain on the company's resources leaving Maple Leaf Hardware Limited with a negative net earnings if the expenditures are allocated to Case Study Help only.

The reality that Maple Leaf Hardware Limited has already incurred a preliminary investment of $48000 in the form of capital expense and prototype development suggests that the income from Case Study Help is not enough to undertake the risk of sales cannibalization. Aside from that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market showing low flexibility of demand is not a preferable choice specifically of it is impacting the sale of the business's profits generating models.


 

PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE