WhatsApp

Marion Boats Inc Case Study Help Checklist

Marion Boats Inc Case Study Help Checklist

Marion Boats Inc Case Study Solution
Marion Boats Inc Case Study Help
Marion Boats Inc Case Study Analysis



Analyses for Evaluating Marion Boats Inc decision to launch Case Study Solution


The following section concentrates on the of marketing for Marion Boats Inc where the business's consumers, rivals and core proficiencies have actually examined in order to validate whether the choice to release Case Study Help under Marion Boats Inc trademark name would be a possible choice or not. We have to start with looked at the kind of consumers that Marion Boats Inc handle while an evaluation of the competitive environment and the business's weak points and strengths follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the reason for not introducing Case Study Help under Marion Boats Inc name.
Marion Boats Inc Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Marion Boats Inc customers can be segmented into 2 groups, industrial clients and final customers. Both the groups utilize Marion Boats Inc high performance adhesives while the company is not just associated with the production of these adhesives but also markets them to these customer groups. There are two kinds of products that are being offered to these potential markets; anaerobic adhesives and instant adhesives. We would be focusing on the customers of instant adhesives for this analysis since the market for the latter has a lower potential for Marion Boats Inc compared to that of immediate adhesives.

The overall market for instantaneous adhesives is approximately 890,000 in the US in 1978 which covers both consumer groups which have been recognized earlier.If we look at a breakdown of Marion Boats Inc prospective market or consumer groups, we can see that the business offers to OEMs (Original Devices Producers), Do-it-Yourself customers, repair and overhauling companies (MRO) and manufacturers dealing in products made from leather, metal, wood and plastic. This diversity in customers suggests that Marion Boats Inc can target has various alternatives in regards to segmenting the market for its new item particularly as each of these groups would be requiring the same type of item with particular changes in need, quantity or packaging. Nevertheless, the customer is not rate sensitive or brand conscious so launching a low priced dispenser under Marion Boats Inc name is not a suggested option.

Company Analysis

Marion Boats Inc is not simply a maker of adhesives however enjoys market leadership in the instant adhesive industry. The company has its own experienced and certified sales force which includes worth to sales by training the business's network of 250 suppliers for helping with the sale of adhesives. Marion Boats Inc believes in exclusive circulation as suggested by the truth that it has chosen to offer through 250 distributors whereas there is t a network of 10000 suppliers that can be checked out for broadening reach through distributors. The company's reach is not restricted to North America just as it also enjoys international sales. With 1400 outlets spread out all across North America, Marion Boats Inc has its internal production plants instead of utilizing out-sourcing as the favored strategy.

Core proficiencies are not restricted to adhesive manufacturing just as Marion Boats Inc likewise concentrates on making adhesive dispensing devices to help with using its items. This double production strategy gives Marion Boats Inc an edge over competitors given that none of the rivals of giving equipment makes immediate adhesives. Additionally, none of these rivals sells directly to the consumer either and makes use of distributors for reaching out to consumers. While we are looking at the strengths of Marion Boats Inc, it is very important to highlight the company's weak points also.

Although the company's sales personnel is competent in training suppliers, the truth stays that the sales group is not trained in offering equipment so there is a possibility of relying greatly on suppliers when promoting adhesive equipment. It needs to likewise be noted that the distributors are showing reluctance when it comes to selling devices that requires servicing which increases the obstacles of selling devices under a specific brand name.

If we look at Marion Boats Inc product line in adhesive equipment especially, the business has products focused on the high-end of the market. If Marion Boats Inc sells Case Study Help under the same portfolio, the possibility of sales cannibalization exists. Given the truth that Case Study Help is priced lower than Marion Boats Inc high-end product line, sales cannibalization would definitely be impacting Marion Boats Inc sales revenue if the adhesive devices is sold under the company's brand name.

We can see sales cannibalization affecting Marion Boats Inc 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. If Case Study Help is launched under the company's brand name, there is another possible danger which could lower Marion Boats Inc profits. The reality that $175000 has actually been spent in promoting SuperBonder suggests that it is not a good time for releasing a dispenser which can highlight the reality that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the instant adhesive.

Additionally, if we take a look at the market in general, the adhesives market does disappoint brand name orientation or rate awareness which gives us two extra factors for not introducing a low priced product under the company's brand.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Marion Boats Inc would be studied through Porter's 5 forces analysis which would highlight the degree of rivalry in the market.


Degree of Rivalry:

Presently we can see that the adhesive market has a high development capacity due to the existence of fragmented segments with Marion Boats Inc taking pleasure in management and a combined market share of 75% with two other market gamers, Eastman and Permabond. While market competition in between these players could be called 'intense' as the consumer is not brand name mindful and each of these players has prominence in regards to market share, the truth still remains that the market is not filled and still has a number of market sectors which can be targeted as possible specific niche markets even when releasing an adhesive. Nevertheless, we can even explain the fact that sales cannibalization might be causing industry rivalry in the adhesive dispenser market while the marketplace for instantaneous adhesives uses development capacity.


Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the buyer in this market is low particularly as the buyer has low knowledge about the product. While companies like Marion Boats Inc have actually handled to train suppliers regarding adhesives, the final consumer depends on suppliers. Around 72% of sales are made directly by manufacturers and distributors for immediate adhesives so the buyer has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Given the truth that the adhesive market is dominated by three players, it could be stated that the supplier enjoys a greater bargaining power compared to the purchaser. However, the fact stays that the supplier does not have much influence over the buyer at this moment specifically as the buyer does disappoint brand name acknowledgment or rate sensitivity. When it comes to the adhesive market while the producer and the purchaser do not have a major control over the actual sales, this shows that the supplier has the greater power.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand name commitment and the ease of entry revealed by foreign Japanese rivals in the instantaneous adhesive market shows that the marketplace permits ease of entry. Nevertheless, if we look at Marion Boats Inc in particular, the business has dual abilities in terms of being a producer of adhesive dispensers and instantaneous adhesives. Potential risks in equipment dispensing market are low which shows the possibility of creating brand awareness in not just immediate adhesives but likewise in giving adhesives as none of the industry players has managed to position itself in dual capabilities.

Hazard of Substitutes: The threat of substitutes in the instant adhesive market is low while the dispenser market in particular has alternatives like Glumetic tip applicators, built-in applicators, pencil applicators and advanced consoles. The reality remains that if Marion Boats Inc presented Case Study Help, it would be enjoying sales cannibalization for its own products. (see appendix 1 for structure).


4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Marion Boats Inc Case Study Help


Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has offered numerous reasons for not launching Case Study Help under Marion Boats Inc name, we have a recommended marketing mix for Case Study Help provided listed below if Marion Boats Inc chooses to go on with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target market chosen for Case Study Help is 'Motor vehicle services' for a number of reasons. There are presently 89257 facilities in this segment and a high usage of approximately 58900 lbs. is being used by 36.1 % of the market. This market has an extra development potential of 10.1% which might be a good enough specific niche market section for Case Study Help. Not only would a portable dispenser deal benefit to this specific market, the truth that the Diy market can also be targeted if a safe and clean low priced adhesive is being cost use with SuperBonder. The item would be sold without the 'glumetic suggestion' and 'vari-drop' so that the consumer can decide whether he wishes to go with either of the two accessories or not.

Price: The recommended rate of Case Study Help has actually been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is sold through distributors or via direct selling. A rate listed below $250 would not need approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor vehicle maintenance shop needs to acquire the item on his own.

Marion Boats Inc would only be getting $157 per unit as shown in appendix 2 which gives a breakdown of gross profitability and net profitability for Marion Boats Inc for launching Case Study Help.

Place: A circulation model where Marion Boats Inc directly sends out the product to the regional supplier and keeps a 10% drop delivery allowance for the supplier would be utilized by Marion Boats Inc. Considering that the sales team is currently participated in offering immediate adhesives and they do not have know-how in selling dispensers, including them in the selling process would be expensive particularly as each sales call costs around $120. The suppliers are currently offering dispensers so selling Case Study Help through them would be a beneficial alternative.

Promotion: A low marketing spending plan needs to have been designated to Case Study Help however the fact that the dispenser is a development and it needs to be marketed well in order to cover the capital expenses incurred for production, the suggested advertising plan costing $51816 is suggested for initially presenting the product in the market. The prepared ads in publications would be targeted at mechanics in vehicle upkeep stores. (Suggested text for the advertisement is displayed in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summarized in appendix 4).


Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Marion Boats Inc Case Study Analysis

A recommended plan of action in the type of a marketing mix has actually been discussed for Case Study Help, the reality still remains that the item would not match Marion Boats Inc item line. We take a look at appendix 2, we can see how the overall gross profitability for the two models is expected to be approximately $49377 if 250 units of each design are produced each year based on the plan. However, the preliminary prepared advertising is around $52000 each year which would be putting a pressure on the company's resources leaving Marion Boats Inc with an unfavorable net income if the costs are allocated to Case Study Help only.

The reality that Marion Boats Inc has currently sustained an initial financial investment of $48000 in the form of capital expense and prototype development shows that the income from Case Study Help is inadequate to undertake the risk of sales cannibalization. Aside from that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market showing low flexibility of demand is not a more effective choice specifically of it is affecting the sale of the company's profits producing designs.



PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE