WhatsApp

Medfield Pharmaceuticals Case Study Help Checklist

Medfield Pharmaceuticals Case Study Help Checklist

Medfield Pharmaceuticals Case Study Solution
Medfield Pharmaceuticals Case Study Help
Medfield Pharmaceuticals Case Study Analysis



Analyses for Evaluating Medfield Pharmaceuticals decision to launch Case Study Solution


The following section concentrates on the of marketing for Medfield Pharmaceuticals where the business's consumers, competitors and core competencies have actually evaluated in order to validate whether the choice to introduce Case Study Help under Medfield Pharmaceuticals trademark name would be a feasible option or not. We have actually to start with looked at the kind of clients that Medfield Pharmaceuticals deals in while an evaluation of the competitive environment and the business's weaknesses and strengths follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the reason for not releasing Case Study Help under Medfield Pharmaceuticals name.
Medfield Pharmaceuticals Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Both the groups utilize Medfield Pharmaceuticals high performance adhesives while the business is not only involved in the production of these adhesives however also markets them to these consumer groups. We would be focusing on the customers of instantaneous adhesives for this analysis because the market for the latter has a lower potential for Medfield Pharmaceuticals compared to that of instant adhesives.

The total market for instant adhesives is roughly 890,000 in the US in 1978 which covers both client groups which have been recognized earlier.If we take a look at a breakdown of Medfield Pharmaceuticals potential market or client groups, we can see that the company offers to OEMs (Initial Devices Makers), Do-it-Yourself customers, repair work and revamping companies (MRO) and producers handling items made from leather, wood, metal and plastic. This variety in consumers suggests that Medfield Pharmaceuticals can target has numerous alternatives in terms of segmenting the marketplace for its new product especially as each of these groups would be needing the very same kind of product with particular modifications in product packaging, quantity or need. Nevertheless, the consumer is not cost sensitive or brand mindful so releasing a low priced dispenser under Medfield Pharmaceuticals name is not a recommended option.

Company Analysis

Medfield Pharmaceuticals is not simply a manufacturer of adhesives however enjoys market leadership in the instantaneous adhesive market. The business has its own knowledgeable and qualified sales force which includes worth to sales by training the business's network of 250 suppliers for assisting in the sale of adhesives. Medfield Pharmaceuticals believes in exclusive distribution as shown by the fact that it has actually picked to offer through 250 distributors whereas there is t a network of 10000 suppliers that can be checked out for broadening reach via suppliers. The business's reach is not limited to The United States and Canada just as it also takes pleasure in international sales. With 1400 outlets spread all across North America, Medfield Pharmaceuticals has its in-house production plants instead of using out-sourcing as the preferred technique.

Core proficiencies are not restricted to adhesive production just as Medfield Pharmaceuticals also specializes in making adhesive dispensing devices to facilitate the use of its products. This double production technique offers Medfield Pharmaceuticals an edge over rivals given that none of the rivals of dispensing equipment makes instant adhesives. In addition, none of these competitors sells straight to the customer either and utilizes suppliers for reaching out to consumers. While we are looking at the strengths of Medfield Pharmaceuticals, it is essential to highlight the business's weak points.

The business's sales personnel is proficient in training suppliers, the truth stays that the sales team is not trained in offering devices so there is a possibility of relying greatly on distributors when promoting adhesive equipment. Nevertheless, it needs to also be noted that the suppliers are revealing reluctance when it pertains to selling equipment that needs maintenance which increases the challenges of selling devices under a particular trademark name.

If we look at Medfield Pharmaceuticals line of product in adhesive equipment particularly, the business has items aimed at the luxury of the marketplace. If Medfield Pharmaceuticals sells Case Study Help under the very same portfolio, the possibility of sales cannibalization exists. Provided the reality that Case Study Help is priced lower than Medfield Pharmaceuticals high-end line of product, sales cannibalization would certainly be impacting Medfield Pharmaceuticals sales revenue if the adhesive devices is sold under the business's brand name.

We can see sales cannibalization impacting Medfield Pharmaceuticals 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. If Case Study Help is launched under the company's brand name, there is another possible hazard which could lower Medfield Pharmaceuticals profits. The reality that $175000 has been spent in promoting SuperBonder suggests that it is not a good time for launching a dispenser which can highlight the reality that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the immediate adhesive.

Furthermore, if we take a look at the marketplace in general, the adhesives market does disappoint brand name orientation or cost consciousness which gives us 2 additional reasons for not introducing a low priced item under the company's brand.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Medfield Pharmaceuticals would be studied by means of Porter's five forces analysis which would highlight the degree of competition in the market.


Degree of Rivalry:

Currently we can see that the adhesive market has a high development potential due to the existence of fragmented segments with Medfield Pharmaceuticals delighting in management and a combined market share of 75% with two other industry players, Eastman and Permabond. While industry rivalry in between these gamers could be called 'extreme' as the customer is not brand conscious and each of these players has prominence in regards to market share, the fact still stays that the market is not filled and still has several market segments which can be targeted as possible specific niche markets even when introducing an adhesive. Nevertheless, we can even explain the reality that sales cannibalization might be leading to industry competition in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for instant adhesives uses growth potential.


Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the purchaser in this market is low specifically as the purchaser has low understanding about the item. While business like Medfield Pharmaceuticals have handled to train suppliers concerning adhesives, the final consumer is dependent on distributors. Around 72% of sales are made directly by makers and distributors for instantaneous adhesives so the buyer has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Given the truth that the adhesive market is dominated by three players, it could be said that the supplier takes pleasure in a higher bargaining power compared to the buyer. Nevertheless, the reality stays that the provider does not have much impact over the buyer at this moment specifically as the purchaser does not show brand acknowledgment or rate sensitivity. This indicates that the supplier has the greater power when it comes to the adhesive market while the producer and the buyer do not have a major control over the real sales.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand loyalty and the ease of entry shown by foreign Japanese competitors in the instantaneous adhesive market suggests that the marketplace allows ease of entry. If we look at Medfield Pharmaceuticals in particular, the business has dual abilities in terms of being a producer of instant adhesives and adhesive dispensers. Prospective risks in devices dispensing market are low which shows the possibility of creating brand awareness in not only instant adhesives however likewise in giving adhesives as none of the industry gamers has managed to place itself in double abilities.

Threat of Substitutes: The danger of replacements in the instant adhesive industry is low while the dispenser market in particular has substitutes like Glumetic tip applicators, in-built applicators, pencil applicators and sophisticated consoles. The truth remains that if Medfield Pharmaceuticals presented Case Study Help, it would be indulging in sales cannibalization for its own items. (see appendix 1 for structure).


4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Medfield Pharmaceuticals Case Study Help


Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has actually offered various reasons for not launching Case Study Help under Medfield Pharmaceuticals name, we have a recommended marketing mix for Case Study Help provided listed below if Medfield Pharmaceuticals chooses to go ahead with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target audience selected for Case Study Help is 'Motor vehicle services' for a number of reasons. There are presently 89257 establishments in this section and a high use of around 58900 pounds. is being utilized by 36.1 % of the marketplace. This market has an additional development capacity of 10.1% which may be a sufficient specific niche market sector for Case Study Help. Not only would a portable dispenser deal convenience to this particular market, the fact that the Diy market can also be targeted if a potable low priced adhesive is being cost usage with SuperBonder. The product would be sold without the 'glumetic suggestion' and 'vari-drop' so that the customer can choose whether he wishes to select either of the two devices or not.

Price: The suggested price of Case Study Help has been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is sold through distributors or via direct selling. A price below $250 would not need approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor automobile upkeep store requires to acquire the item on his own.

Medfield Pharmaceuticals would just be getting $157 per unit as shown in appendix 2 which offers a breakdown of gross profitability and net profitability for Medfield Pharmaceuticals for introducing Case Study Help.

Place: A circulation design where Medfield Pharmaceuticals directly sends out the item to the regional distributor and keeps a 10% drop shipment allowance for the supplier would be utilized by Medfield Pharmaceuticals. Given that the sales team is already engaged in selling immediate adhesives and they do not have know-how in selling dispensers, including them in the selling process would be pricey particularly as each sales call expenses around $120. The suppliers are already offering dispensers so selling Case Study Help through them would be a beneficial alternative.

Promotion: Although a low advertising budget ought to have been appointed to Case Study Help but the truth that the dispenser is a development and it needs to be marketed well in order to cover the capital costs sustained for production, the recommended advertising strategy costing $51816 is suggested for at first presenting the product in the market. The planned ads in magazines would be targeted at mechanics in car upkeep shops. (Suggested text for the ad is shown in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summed up in appendix 4).


Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Medfield Pharmaceuticals Case Study Analysis

A recommended strategy of action in the form of a marketing mix has actually been talked about for Case Study Help, the reality still stays that the item would not complement Medfield Pharmaceuticals product line. We have a look at appendix 2, we can see how the overall gross profitability for the two models is expected to be roughly $49377 if 250 units of each design are produced each year based on the plan. The initial planned marketing is around $52000 per year which would be putting a stress on the company's resources leaving Medfield Pharmaceuticals with a negative net earnings if the costs are allocated to Case Study Help just.

The truth that Medfield Pharmaceuticals has already sustained a preliminary financial investment of $48000 in the form of capital expense and prototype development suggests that the earnings from Case Study Help is insufficient to undertake the danger of sales cannibalization. Other than that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market revealing low elasticity of demand is not a more effective alternative specifically of it is impacting the sale of the business's revenue creating models.


 

PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE