WhatsApp 
Olympus A Case Study Solution
Olympus A Case Study Help
Olympus A Case Study Analysis
The following area focuses on the of marketing for Olympus A where the company's consumers, rivals and core competencies have evaluated in order to justify whether the choice to introduce Case Study Help under Olympus A brand would be a practical alternative or not. We have to start with looked at the type of consumers that Olympus A handle while an evaluation of the competitive environment and the company's weak points and strengths follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the justification for not introducing Case Study Help under Olympus A name.
Olympus A customers can be segmented into two groups, industrial customers and final customers. Both the groups use Olympus A high performance adhesives while the company is not only associated with the production of these adhesives however likewise markets them to these customer groups. There are two types of products that are being sold to these prospective markets; immediate adhesives and anaerobic adhesives. We would be concentrating on the consumers of immediate adhesives for this analysis since the marketplace for the latter has a lower capacity for Olympus A compared to that of instantaneous adhesives.
The overall market for instantaneous adhesives is around 890,000 in the United States in 1978 which covers both client groups which have actually been determined earlier.If we look at a breakdown of Olympus A potential market or consumer groups, we can see that the business sells to OEMs (Original Equipment Producers), Do-it-Yourself consumers, repair and upgrading business (MRO) and producers handling products made from leather, plastic, metal and wood. This diversity in consumers suggests that Olympus A can target has different choices in regards to segmenting the marketplace for its new item specifically as each of these groups would be requiring the exact same type of item with respective changes in amount, demand or packaging. However, the client is not price sensitive or brand name mindful so introducing a low priced dispenser under Olympus A name is not an advised option.
Olympus A is not just a producer of adhesives however enjoys market management in the immediate adhesive market. The company has its own knowledgeable and competent sales force which includes worth to sales by training the company's network of 250 suppliers for facilitating the sale of adhesives.
Core competences are not restricted to adhesive production just as Olympus A likewise concentrates on making adhesive dispensing equipment to help with using its items. This double production strategy offers Olympus A an edge over competitors because none of the competitors of dispensing equipment makes instant adhesives. In addition, none of these rivals sells directly to the customer either and utilizes suppliers for reaching out to consumers. While we are looking at the strengths of Olympus A, it is important to highlight the company's weaknesses too.
The business's sales staff is knowledgeable in training suppliers, the fact stays that the sales group is not trained in offering equipment so there is a possibility of relying greatly on suppliers when promoting adhesive equipment. Nevertheless, it must also be noted that the suppliers are showing reluctance when it comes to selling devices that needs maintenance which increases the difficulties of offering devices under a specific trademark name.
If we take a look at Olympus A product line in adhesive devices especially, the company has products focused on the high end of the marketplace. The possibility of sales cannibalization exists if Olympus A offers Case Study Help under the same portfolio. Offered the fact that Case Study Help is priced lower than Olympus A high-end line of product, sales cannibalization would absolutely be impacting Olympus A sales profits if the adhesive equipment is sold under the company's brand.
We can see sales cannibalization affecting Olympus A 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. If Case Study Help is introduced under the business's brand name, there is another possible threat which could reduce Olympus A profits. The truth that $175000 has actually been spent in promoting SuperBonder recommends that it is not a good time for releasing a dispenser which can highlight the fact that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the instant adhesive.
Furthermore, if we look at the marketplace in general, the adhesives market does disappoint brand name orientation or price awareness which provides us two extra factors for not introducing a low priced product under the company's brand name.
The competitive environment of Olympus A would be studied through Porter's 5 forces analysis which would highlight the degree of competition in the market.
Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the buyer in this market is low especially as the purchaser has low understanding about the product. While business like Olympus A have actually handled to train suppliers regarding adhesives, the final customer depends on suppliers. Approximately 72% of sales are made straight by producers and suppliers for instant adhesives so the buyer has a low bargaining power.
Bargaining Power of Supplier: Provided the fact that the adhesive market is controlled by 3 gamers, it could be stated that the supplier delights in a higher bargaining power compared to the buyer. However, the fact stays that the supplier does not have much influence over the purchaser at this moment specifically as the buyer does not show brand name acknowledgment or price level of sensitivity. This shows that the distributor has the higher power when it comes to the adhesive market while the buyer and the maker do not have a significant control over the real sales.
Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand name loyalty and the ease of entry revealed by foreign Japanese rivals in the instant adhesive market suggests that the market permits ease of entry. However, if we take a look at Olympus A in particular, the company has dual abilities in regards to being a maker of adhesive dispensers and instant adhesives. Potential dangers in devices dispensing market are low which shows the possibility of developing brand name awareness in not just immediate adhesives however also in dispensing adhesives as none of the industry gamers has actually handled to position itself in dual capabilities.
Hazard of Substitutes: The risk of alternatives in the immediate adhesive market is low while the dispenser market in particular has replacements like Glumetic suggestion applicators, built-in applicators, pencil applicators and sophisticated consoles. The fact stays that if Olympus A presented Case Study Help, it would be enjoying sales cannibalization for its own items. (see appendix 1 for framework).
Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has offered numerous reasons for not releasing Case Study Help under Olympus A name, we have a suggested marketing mix for Case Study Help provided listed below if Olympus A chooses to go ahead with the launch.
Product & Target Market: The target market picked for Case Study Help is 'Motor vehicle services' for a variety of reasons. There are currently 89257 facilities in this section and a high use of roughly 58900 lbs. is being used by 36.1 % of the marketplace. This market has an additional growth capacity of 10.1% which might be a good enough niche market segment for Case Study Help. Not only would a portable dispenser deal convenience to this particular market, the truth that the Do-it-Yourself market can likewise be targeted if a safe and clean low priced adhesive is being cost use with SuperBonder. The item would be sold without the 'glumetic idea' and 'vari-drop' so that the consumer can choose whether he wishes to select either of the two accessories or not.
Price: The suggested cost of Case Study Help has actually been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is offered through suppliers or through direct selling. A rate listed below $250 would not need approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor vehicle maintenance store requires to buy the product on his own.
Olympus A would just be getting $157 per unit as shown in appendix 2 which offers a breakdown of gross profitability and net profitability for Olympus A for launching Case Study Help.
Place: A distribution model where Olympus A straight sends the product to the local supplier and keeps a 10% drop shipment allowance for the supplier would be utilized by Olympus A. Because the sales group is currently participated in selling immediate adhesives and they do not have know-how in offering dispensers, including them in the selling process would be pricey specifically as each sales call costs approximately $120. The suppliers are currently selling dispensers so selling Case Study Help through them would be a beneficial choice.
Promotion: A low marketing budget ought to have been assigned to Case Study Help however the truth that the dispenser is an innovation and it needs to be marketed well in order to cover the capital costs sustained for production, the suggested advertising plan costing $51816 is suggested for at first introducing the item in the market. The prepared ads in publications would be targeted at mechanics in automobile upkeep stores. (Suggested text for the advertisement is displayed in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summed up in appendix 4).
