WhatsApp

Quaker Oats Co Case Study Help Checklist

Quaker Oats Co Case Study Help Checklist

Quaker Oats Co Case Study Solution
Quaker Oats Co Case Study Help
Quaker Oats Co Case Study Analysis



Analyses for Evaluating Quaker Oats Co decision to launch Case Study Solution


The following section concentrates on the of marketing for Quaker Oats Co where the business's customers, rivals and core proficiencies have assessed in order to justify whether the decision to launch Case Study Help under Quaker Oats Co brand name would be a possible alternative or not. We have actually firstly looked at the type of customers that Quaker Oats Co deals in while an evaluation of the competitive environment and the business's strengths and weaknesses follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the justification for not introducing Case Study Help under Quaker Oats Co name.
Quaker Oats Co Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Quaker Oats Co customers can be segmented into 2 groups, commercial consumers and final customers. Both the groups utilize Quaker Oats Co high performance adhesives while the company is not only associated with the production of these adhesives however also markets them to these customer groups. There are 2 types of items that are being sold to these prospective markets; anaerobic adhesives and immediate adhesives. We would be concentrating on the customers of immediate adhesives for this analysis given that the marketplace for the latter has a lower capacity for Quaker Oats Co compared to that of instant adhesives.

The total market for instantaneous adhesives is approximately 890,000 in the United States in 1978 which covers both consumer groups which have been recognized earlier.If we look at a breakdown of Quaker Oats Co prospective market or customer groups, we can see that the company sells to OEMs (Original Devices Makers), Do-it-Yourself clients, repair work and upgrading companies (MRO) and makers dealing in items made of leather, metal, wood and plastic. This diversity in consumers suggests that Quaker Oats Co can target has numerous choices in regards to segmenting the marketplace for its new product particularly as each of these groups would be needing the same kind of product with particular modifications in quantity, packaging or need. The consumer is not price delicate or brand mindful so releasing a low priced dispenser under Quaker Oats Co name is not a recommended choice.

Company Analysis

Quaker Oats Co is not simply a producer of adhesives however takes pleasure in market management in the instantaneous adhesive market. The company has its own competent and certified sales force which adds worth to sales by training the business's network of 250 distributors for assisting in the sale of adhesives. Quaker Oats Co believes in special distribution as suggested by the reality that it has actually chosen to sell through 250 distributors whereas there is t a network of 10000 suppliers that can be explored for expanding reach through distributors. The business's reach is not limited to North America only as it likewise enjoys worldwide sales. With 1400 outlets spread out all across North America, Quaker Oats Co has its in-house production plants instead of utilizing out-sourcing as the preferred technique.

Core competences are not restricted to adhesive production only as Quaker Oats Co also focuses on making adhesive giving equipment to help with the use of its items. This dual production technique offers Quaker Oats Co an edge over rivals since none of the competitors of dispensing devices makes immediate adhesives. In addition, none of these rivals offers straight to the consumer either and makes use of distributors for connecting to customers. While we are looking at the strengths of Quaker Oats Co, it is important to highlight the business's weaknesses.

The business's sales staff is knowledgeable in training suppliers, the truth remains that the sales team is not trained in selling devices so there is a possibility of relying heavily on suppliers when promoting adhesive equipment. It needs to also be kept in mind that the suppliers are showing unwillingness when it comes to selling devices that requires maintenance which increases the difficulties of selling devices under a particular brand name.

If we look at Quaker Oats Co line of product in adhesive equipment especially, the company has items aimed at the luxury of the market. The possibility of sales cannibalization exists if Quaker Oats Co sells Case Study Help under the same portfolio. Given the reality that Case Study Help is priced lower than Quaker Oats Co high-end product line, sales cannibalization would definitely be impacting Quaker Oats Co sales earnings if the adhesive devices is offered under the company's brand.

We can see sales cannibalization affecting Quaker Oats Co 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. If Case Study Help is launched under the company's brand name, there is another possible threat which could decrease Quaker Oats Co income. The truth that $175000 has been invested in promoting SuperBonder suggests that it is not a good time for releasing a dispenser which can highlight the reality that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the instantaneous adhesive.

Furthermore, if we take a look at the marketplace in general, the adhesives market does not show brand name orientation or rate consciousness which gives us 2 extra reasons for not releasing a low priced item under the business's brand name.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Quaker Oats Co would be studied via Porter's five forces analysis which would highlight the degree of competition in the market.


Degree of Rivalry:

Currently we can see that the adhesive market has a high development capacity due to the existence of fragmented sections with Quaker Oats Co taking pleasure in management and a combined market share of 75% with 2 other industry gamers, Eastman and Permabond. While industry competition in between these players could be called 'extreme' as the customer is not brand conscious and each of these players has prominence in terms of market share, the fact still stays that the industry is not saturated and still has several market sectors which can be targeted as prospective specific niche markets even when releasing an adhesive. We can even point out the truth that sales cannibalization may be leading to industry competition in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for instant adhesives offers development potential.


Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the buyer in this industry is low especially as the buyer has low understanding about the item. While business like Quaker Oats Co have managed to train distributors concerning adhesives, the last customer is dependent on distributors. Approximately 72% of sales are made straight by makers and suppliers for immediate adhesives so the buyer has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Offered the truth that the adhesive market is dominated by 3 gamers, it could be said that the supplier enjoys a higher bargaining power compared to the buyer. Nevertheless, the fact remains that the provider does not have much impact over the buyer at this moment especially as the buyer does disappoint brand name acknowledgment or rate level of sensitivity. This indicates that the distributor has the greater power when it concerns the adhesive market while the maker and the buyer do not have a significant control over the real sales.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand name commitment and the ease of entry revealed by foreign Japanese competitors in the immediate adhesive market shows that the market allows ease of entry. Nevertheless, if we take a look at Quaker Oats Co in particular, the business has dual abilities in regards to being a manufacturer of adhesive dispensers and immediate adhesives. Possible dangers in devices giving industry are low which shows the possibility of developing brand awareness in not only immediate adhesives however also in giving adhesives as none of the industry gamers has actually managed to place itself in dual abilities.

Risk of Substitutes: The danger of substitutes in the immediate adhesive market is low while the dispenser market in particular has replacements like Glumetic suggestion applicators, in-built applicators, pencil applicators and sophisticated consoles. The reality remains that if Quaker Oats Co introduced Case Study Help, it would be indulging in sales cannibalization for its own products. (see appendix 1 for structure).


4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Quaker Oats Co Case Study Help


Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has actually given various factors for not releasing Case Study Help under Quaker Oats Co name, we have a suggested marketing mix for Case Study Help given listed below if Quaker Oats Co decides to proceed with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target market picked for Case Study Help is 'Motor lorry services' for a number of factors. This market has an additional development capacity of 10.1% which may be a good sufficient niche market sector for Case Study Help. Not just would a portable dispenser offer convenience to this specific market, the reality that the Do-it-Yourself market can also be targeted if a safe and clean low priced adhesive is being sold for usage with SuperBonder.

Price: The recommended cost of Case Study Help has actually been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is offered through distributors or through direct selling. A rate below $250 would not need approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor vehicle upkeep store needs to acquire the item on his own.

Quaker Oats Co would only be getting $157 per unit as displayed in appendix 2 which offers a breakdown of gross profitability and net profitability for Quaker Oats Co for introducing Case Study Help.

Place: A distribution design where Quaker Oats Co straight sends out the product to the regional distributor and keeps a 10% drop delivery allowance for the supplier would be utilized by Quaker Oats Co. Because the sales team is currently participated in selling instantaneous adhesives and they do not have proficiency in offering dispensers, including them in the selling procedure would be expensive particularly as each sales call expenses approximately $120. The suppliers are currently offering dispensers so offering Case Study Help through them would be a beneficial choice.

Promotion: Although a low marketing budget must have been appointed to Case Study Help however the fact that the dispenser is a development and it needs to be marketed well in order to cover the capital expenses sustained for production, the suggested advertising strategy costing $51816 is suggested for initially introducing the product in the market. The prepared advertisements in magazines would be targeted at mechanics in lorry upkeep shops. (Suggested text for the advertisement is shown in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summed up in appendix 4).


Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Quaker Oats Co Case Study Analysis

A recommended plan of action in the kind of a marketing mix has actually been gone over for Case Study Help, the reality still stays that the item would not complement Quaker Oats Co item line. We have a look at appendix 2, we can see how the total gross profitability for the two models is anticipated to be roughly $49377 if 250 systems of each design are produced each year based on the plan. However, the preliminary prepared marketing is approximately $52000 annually which would be putting a pressure on the business's resources leaving Quaker Oats Co with a negative net income if the expenses are allocated to Case Study Help just.

The truth that Quaker Oats Co has actually currently sustained a preliminary investment of $48000 in the form of capital expense and prototype development shows that the profits from Case Study Help is not enough to undertake the danger of sales cannibalization. Other than that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market revealing low flexibility of demand is not a more suitable option specifically of it is impacting the sale of the company's revenue creating designs.



PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE