WhatsApp

Quaker Oats Co Case Study Help Checklist

Quaker Oats Co Case Study Help Checklist

Quaker Oats Co Case Study Solution
Quaker Oats Co Case Study Help
Quaker Oats Co Case Study Analysis



Analyses for Evaluating Quaker Oats Co decision to launch Case Study Solution


The following section concentrates on the of marketing for Quaker Oats Co where the company's consumers, rivals and core proficiencies have actually assessed in order to justify whether the choice to release Case Study Help under Quaker Oats Co brand name would be a feasible choice or not. We have actually firstly looked at the kind of customers that Quaker Oats Co deals in while an examination of the competitive environment and the company's strengths and weak points follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the justification for not releasing Case Study Help under Quaker Oats Co name.
Quaker Oats Co Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Quaker Oats Co customers can be segmented into two groups, industrial customers and final consumers. Both the groups use Quaker Oats Co high performance adhesives while the business is not only associated with the production of these adhesives but also markets them to these consumer groups. There are two kinds of products that are being sold to these prospective markets; anaerobic adhesives and instant adhesives. We would be concentrating on the consumers of instant adhesives for this analysis given that the market for the latter has a lower capacity for Quaker Oats Co compared to that of instant adhesives.

The total market for instant adhesives is around 890,000 in the US in 1978 which covers both consumer groups which have been determined earlier.If we take a look at a breakdown of Quaker Oats Co prospective market or client groups, we can see that the business offers to OEMs (Initial Devices Makers), Do-it-Yourself customers, repair work and revamping companies (MRO) and manufacturers dealing in products made from leather, metal, plastic and wood. This diversity in clients suggests that Quaker Oats Co can target has numerous choices in regards to segmenting the market for its brand-new product particularly as each of these groups would be needing the very same kind of item with particular modifications in quantity, packaging or need. The client is not rate sensitive or brand name mindful so releasing a low priced dispenser under Quaker Oats Co name is not an advised choice.

Company Analysis

Quaker Oats Co is not just a maker of adhesives but takes pleasure in market management in the instantaneous adhesive industry. The company has its own knowledgeable and certified sales force which adds worth to sales by training the business's network of 250 suppliers for assisting in the sale of adhesives.

Core skills are not restricted to adhesive manufacturing just as Quaker Oats Co also concentrates on making adhesive giving equipment to facilitate making use of its items. This dual production strategy offers Quaker Oats Co an edge over rivals given that none of the competitors of dispensing equipment makes instantaneous adhesives. Additionally, none of these rivals sells directly to the consumer either and uses suppliers for connecting to consumers. While we are taking a look at the strengths of Quaker Oats Co, it is necessary to highlight the company's weak points as well.

Although the company's sales personnel is knowledgeable in training suppliers, the reality stays that the sales team is not trained in selling equipment so there is a possibility of relying heavily on suppliers when promoting adhesive equipment. However, it needs to also be noted that the distributors are revealing reluctance when it concerns offering devices that needs maintenance which increases the difficulties of offering equipment under a particular trademark name.

If we take a look at Quaker Oats Co product line in adhesive equipment particularly, the business has items aimed at the luxury of the market. If Quaker Oats Co offers Case Study Help under the exact same portfolio, the possibility of sales cannibalization exists. Offered the reality that Case Study Help is priced lower than Quaker Oats Co high-end product line, sales cannibalization would definitely be affecting Quaker Oats Co sales revenue if the adhesive equipment is offered under the company's brand.

We can see sales cannibalization affecting Quaker Oats Co 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. There is another possible risk which could decrease Quaker Oats Co revenue if Case Study Help is released under the company's trademark name. The fact that $175000 has been invested in promoting SuperBonder recommends that it is not a great time for introducing a dispenser which can highlight the reality that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the instant adhesive.

In addition, if we look at the market in general, the adhesives market does disappoint brand name orientation or price awareness which provides us two extra factors for not launching a low priced product under the business's brand name.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Quaker Oats Co would be studied via Porter's 5 forces analysis which would highlight the degree of rivalry in the market.


Degree of Rivalry:

Currently we can see that the adhesive market has a high growth potential due to the presence of fragmented sections with Quaker Oats Co delighting in leadership and a combined market share of 75% with 2 other market gamers, Eastman and Permabond. While market rivalry between these players could be called 'extreme' as the customer is not brand mindful and each of these players has prominence in terms of market share, the reality still remains that the market is not saturated and still has several market segments which can be targeted as prospective niche markets even when introducing an adhesive. Nevertheless, we can even explain the truth that sales cannibalization might be resulting in market rivalry in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for instant adhesives provides development capacity.


Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the purchaser in this market is low particularly as the buyer has low knowledge about the product. While companies like Quaker Oats Co have actually handled to train suppliers regarding adhesives, the final consumer depends on distributors. Around 72% of sales are made directly by makers and suppliers for instantaneous adhesives so the buyer has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Offered the truth that the adhesive market is controlled by 3 players, it could be stated that the provider takes pleasure in a greater bargaining power compared to the buyer. The truth remains that the provider does not have much influence over the purchaser at this point particularly as the buyer does not show brand recognition or cost level of sensitivity. This suggests that the supplier has the greater power when it pertains to the adhesive market while the purchaser and the maker do not have a major control over the actual sales.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand commitment and the ease of entry revealed by foreign Japanese rivals in the instantaneous adhesive market shows that the market enables ease of entry. However, if we take a look at Quaker Oats Co in particular, the company has double capabilities in terms of being a manufacturer of instantaneous adhesives and adhesive dispensers. Possible risks in devices dispensing market are low which reveals the possibility of developing brand name awareness in not only instantaneous adhesives however also in dispensing adhesives as none of the market gamers has actually managed to place itself in dual abilities.

Danger of Substitutes: The hazard of alternatives in the instantaneous adhesive industry is low while the dispenser market in particular has replacements like Glumetic idea applicators, in-built applicators, pencil applicators and advanced consoles. The truth stays that if Quaker Oats Co presented Case Study Help, it would be enjoying sales cannibalization for its own items. (see appendix 1 for structure).


4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Quaker Oats Co Case Study Help


Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has given different factors for not releasing Case Study Help under Quaker Oats Co name, we have a suggested marketing mix for Case Study Help given listed below if Quaker Oats Co decides to proceed with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target market chosen for Case Study Help is 'Motor vehicle services' for a number of factors. This market has an extra development capacity of 10.1% which might be a good adequate niche market segment for Case Study Help. Not just would a portable dispenser deal benefit to this specific market, the truth that the Diy market can likewise be targeted if a safe and clean low priced adhesive is being offered for use with SuperBonder.

Price: The recommended cost of Case Study Help has actually been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is offered through distributors or through direct selling. A cost below $250 would not need approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor lorry maintenance store requires to acquire the product on his own.

Quaker Oats Co would only be getting $157 per unit as shown in appendix 2 which provides a breakdown of gross success and net profitability for Quaker Oats Co for launching Case Study Help.

Place: A circulation model where Quaker Oats Co directly sends out the item to the local distributor and keeps a 10% drop delivery allowance for the supplier would be used by Quaker Oats Co. Given that the sales team is currently engaged in selling instantaneous adhesives and they do not have competence in offering dispensers, including them in the selling process would be costly specifically as each sales call expenses roughly $120. The distributors are currently offering dispensers so offering Case Study Help through them would be a favorable choice.

Promotion: Although a low marketing spending plan ought to have been designated to Case Study Help but the truth that the dispenser is an innovation and it requires to be marketed well in order to cover the capital costs sustained for production, the recommended marketing strategy costing $51816 is recommended for initially presenting the product in the market. The prepared advertisements in publications would be targeted at mechanics in automobile upkeep shops. (Suggested text for the ad is displayed in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summarized in appendix 4).


Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Quaker Oats Co Case Study Analysis

Although a recommended strategy in the form of a marketing mix has been talked about for Case Study Help, the reality still remains that the product would not complement Quaker Oats Co line of product. We take a look at appendix 2, we can see how the overall gross profitability for the two designs is anticipated to be approximately $49377 if 250 units of each model are manufactured per year based on the strategy. The preliminary planned marketing is approximately $52000 per year which would be putting a pressure on the company's resources leaving Quaker Oats Co with a negative net income if the expenses are designated to Case Study Help only.

The reality that Quaker Oats Co has already sustained an initial financial investment of $48000 in the form of capital expense and model development shows that the income from Case Study Help is insufficient to carry out the risk of sales cannibalization. Besides that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market showing low elasticity of need is not a more effective alternative particularly of it is impacting the sale of the company's profits producing models.


 

PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE