WhatsApp

Richina Capital Partners Ltd Case Study Help Checklist

Richina Capital Partners Ltd Case Study Help Checklist

Richina Capital Partners Ltd Case Study Solution
Richina Capital Partners Ltd Case Study Help
Richina Capital Partners Ltd Case Study Analysis



Analyses for Evaluating Richina Capital Partners Ltd decision to launch Case Study Solution


The following section focuses on the of marketing for Richina Capital Partners Ltd where the business's consumers, competitors and core competencies have assessed in order to justify whether the choice to launch Case Study Help under Richina Capital Partners Ltd brand would be a possible alternative or not. We have firstly looked at the kind of clients that Richina Capital Partners Ltd handle while an assessment of the competitive environment and the company's strengths and weaknesses follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the validation for not introducing Case Study Help under Richina Capital Partners Ltd name.
Richina Capital Partners Ltd Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Richina Capital Partners Ltd consumers can be segmented into two groups, last customers and commercial clients. Both the groups use Richina Capital Partners Ltd high performance adhesives while the business is not only associated with the production of these adhesives however also markets them to these customer groups. There are two types of products that are being sold to these prospective markets; instantaneous adhesives and anaerobic adhesives. We would be focusing on the customers of instantaneous adhesives for this analysis since the marketplace for the latter has a lower capacity for Richina Capital Partners Ltd compared to that of immediate adhesives.

The total market for instant adhesives is roughly 890,000 in the US in 1978 which covers both client groups which have actually been recognized earlier.If we look at a breakdown of Richina Capital Partners Ltd prospective market or client groups, we can see that the business sells to OEMs (Original Devices Producers), Do-it-Yourself customers, repair work and upgrading business (MRO) and manufacturers handling items made of leather, wood, metal and plastic. This variety in consumers suggests that Richina Capital Partners Ltd can target has numerous options in terms of segmenting the marketplace for its new product especially as each of these groups would be requiring the very same type of item with particular modifications in quantity, product packaging or need. The customer is not rate delicate or brand conscious so introducing a low priced dispenser under Richina Capital Partners Ltd name is not a suggested choice.

Company Analysis

Richina Capital Partners Ltd is not just a producer of adhesives but delights in market leadership in the instantaneous adhesive industry. The company has its own competent and qualified sales force which adds value to sales by training the company's network of 250 suppliers for assisting in the sale of adhesives.

Core proficiencies are not limited to adhesive production just as Richina Capital Partners Ltd likewise concentrates on making adhesive giving devices to help with the use of its products. This double production technique gives Richina Capital Partners Ltd an edge over rivals considering that none of the rivals of giving equipment makes instant adhesives. In addition, none of these rivals sells straight to the consumer either and makes use of suppliers for connecting to clients. While we are looking at the strengths of Richina Capital Partners Ltd, it is essential to highlight the company's weaknesses as well.

The company's sales staff is skilled in training suppliers, the truth stays that the sales team is not trained in offering equipment so there is a possibility of relying heavily on suppliers when promoting adhesive devices. It ought to also be noted that the distributors are revealing unwillingness when it comes to selling equipment that requires servicing which increases the obstacles of offering devices under a particular brand name.

If we take a look at Richina Capital Partners Ltd line of product in adhesive equipment especially, the company has items aimed at the luxury of the marketplace. The possibility of sales cannibalization exists if Richina Capital Partners Ltd offers Case Study Help under the exact same portfolio. Provided the truth that Case Study Help is priced lower than Richina Capital Partners Ltd high-end line of product, sales cannibalization would absolutely be impacting Richina Capital Partners Ltd sales income if the adhesive equipment is offered under the company's brand name.

We can see sales cannibalization impacting Richina Capital Partners Ltd 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. There is another possible danger which might reduce Richina Capital Partners Ltd earnings if Case Study Help is released under the business's brand name. The truth that $175000 has actually been spent in promoting SuperBonder recommends that it is not a good time for launching a dispenser which can highlight the fact that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the instant adhesive.

Furthermore, if we take a look at the marketplace in general, the adhesives market does not show brand name orientation or price awareness which offers us 2 additional reasons for not releasing a low priced product under the company's brand name.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Richina Capital Partners Ltd would be studied via Porter's five forces analysis which would highlight the degree of rivalry in the market.


Degree of Rivalry:

Currently we can see that the adhesive market has a high development capacity due to the existence of fragmented segments with Richina Capital Partners Ltd enjoying leadership and a combined market share of 75% with 2 other market players, Eastman and Permabond. While industry rivalry between these players could be called 'intense' as the consumer is not brand name conscious and each of these players has prominence in regards to market share, the fact still remains that the industry is not saturated and still has a number of market sectors which can be targeted as prospective specific niche markets even when releasing an adhesive. However, we can even mention the truth that sales cannibalization might be leading to market rivalry in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for instant adhesives offers growth capacity.


Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the buyer in this market is low particularly as the purchaser has low understanding about the product. While companies like Richina Capital Partners Ltd have actually managed to train suppliers relating to adhesives, the final customer depends on suppliers. Roughly 72% of sales are made straight by producers and distributors for instantaneous adhesives so the buyer has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Offered the reality that the adhesive market is controlled by three players, it could be stated that the provider takes pleasure in a higher bargaining power compared to the buyer. Nevertheless, the fact remains that the provider does not have much impact over the purchaser at this moment particularly as the buyer does disappoint brand acknowledgment or cost level of sensitivity. This suggests that the distributor has the greater power when it concerns the adhesive market while the manufacturer and the purchaser do not have a significant control over the real sales.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand name commitment and the ease of entry revealed by foreign Japanese competitors in the instant adhesive market suggests that the marketplace allows ease of entry. If we look at Richina Capital Partners Ltd in particular, the business has dual abilities in terms of being a manufacturer of instantaneous adhesives and adhesive dispensers. Possible hazards in equipment dispensing market are low which shows the possibility of developing brand awareness in not just immediate adhesives but likewise in giving adhesives as none of the industry players has managed to position itself in dual abilities.

Threat of Substitutes: The danger of substitutes in the immediate adhesive industry is low while the dispenser market in particular has alternatives like Glumetic idea applicators, built-in applicators, pencil applicators and advanced consoles. The truth remains that if Richina Capital Partners Ltd presented Case Study Help, it would be enjoying sales cannibalization for its own items. (see appendix 1 for structure).


4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Richina Capital Partners Ltd Case Study Help


Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has given different reasons for not introducing Case Study Help under Richina Capital Partners Ltd name, we have actually a suggested marketing mix for Case Study Help given listed below if Richina Capital Partners Ltd chooses to go on with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target market selected for Case Study Help is 'Motor lorry services' for a number of factors. This market has an additional development potential of 10.1% which may be a good sufficient niche market segment for Case Study Help. Not only would a portable dispenser deal benefit to this specific market, the reality that the Do-it-Yourself market can also be targeted if a drinkable low priced adhesive is being offered for use with SuperBonder.

Price: The suggested price of Case Study Help has actually been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is offered through distributors or through direct selling. This cost would not consist of the cost of the 'vari suggestion' or the 'glumetic suggestion'. A price below $250 would not need approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor vehicle upkeep store needs to buy the item on his own. This would increase the possibility of influencing mechanics to buy the product for usage in their day-to-day upkeep tasks.

Richina Capital Partners Ltd would only be getting $157 per unit as shown in appendix 2 which gives a breakdown of gross success and net success for Richina Capital Partners Ltd for launching Case Study Help.

Place: A circulation design where Richina Capital Partners Ltd straight sends out the item to the regional distributor and keeps a 10% drop delivery allowance for the supplier would be used by Richina Capital Partners Ltd. Considering that the sales team is already participated in offering immediate adhesives and they do not have know-how in offering dispensers, including them in the selling procedure would be costly specifically as each sales call costs around $120. The distributors are currently offering dispensers so offering Case Study Help through them would be a favorable choice.

Promotion: A low advertising budget plan needs to have been assigned to Case Study Help but the reality that the dispenser is an innovation and it needs to be marketed well in order to cover the capital expenses incurred for production, the suggested marketing plan costing $51816 is recommended for initially introducing the item in the market. The prepared advertisements in publications would be targeted at mechanics in lorry upkeep shops. (Recommended text for the advertisement is displayed in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summed up in appendix 4).


Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Richina Capital Partners Ltd Case Study Analysis

A recommended strategy of action in the kind of a marketing mix has been talked about for Case Study Help, the fact still stays that the item would not complement Richina Capital Partners Ltd item line. We have a look at appendix 2, we can see how the overall gross success for the two designs is expected to be roughly $49377 if 250 units of each model are produced per year as per the strategy. The preliminary planned marketing is approximately $52000 per year which would be putting a strain on the company's resources leaving Richina Capital Partners Ltd with an unfavorable net earnings if the expenses are allocated to Case Study Help just.

The truth that Richina Capital Partners Ltd has already incurred a preliminary investment of $48000 in the form of capital expense and model development indicates that the income from Case Study Help is not enough to undertake the threat of sales cannibalization. Aside from that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market revealing low elasticity of need is not a preferable alternative particularly of it is affecting the sale of the business's revenue generating models.


 

PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE