Richina Capital Partners Ltd Case Study Help Checklist

Richina Capital Partners Ltd Case Study Help Checklist

Richina Capital Partners Ltd Case Study Solution
Richina Capital Partners Ltd Case Study Help
Richina Capital Partners Ltd Case Study Analysis

Analyses for Evaluating Richina Capital Partners Ltd decision to launch Case Study Solution

The following section concentrates on the of marketing for Richina Capital Partners Ltd where the company's consumers, rivals and core proficiencies have actually assessed in order to justify whether the choice to introduce Case Study Help under Richina Capital Partners Ltd brand would be a practical choice or not. We have firstly taken a look at the type of clients that Richina Capital Partners Ltd deals in while an examination of the competitive environment and the business's strengths and weaknesses follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the reason for not launching Case Study Help under Richina Capital Partners Ltd name.
Richina Capital Partners Ltd Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Richina Capital Partners Ltd consumers can be segmented into 2 groups, last customers and industrial customers. Both the groups use Richina Capital Partners Ltd high performance adhesives while the business is not only involved in the production of these adhesives however also markets them to these consumer groups. There are 2 types of products that are being sold to these prospective markets; instantaneous adhesives and anaerobic adhesives. We would be concentrating on the customers of immediate adhesives for this analysis because the market for the latter has a lower capacity for Richina Capital Partners Ltd compared to that of immediate adhesives.

The total market for instantaneous adhesives is roughly 890,000 in the United States in 1978 which covers both customer groups which have been determined earlier.If we take a look at a breakdown of Richina Capital Partners Ltd potential market or customer groups, we can see that the business sells to OEMs (Initial Equipment Producers), Do-it-Yourself clients, repair work and overhauling business (MRO) and manufacturers handling products made of leather, wood, metal and plastic. This variety in consumers suggests that Richina Capital Partners Ltd can target has numerous alternatives in regards to segmenting the marketplace for its new product especially as each of these groups would be requiring the very same kind of product with particular modifications in product packaging, demand or amount. However, the customer is not price delicate or brand name mindful so launching a low priced dispenser under Richina Capital Partners Ltd name is not a recommended alternative.

Company Analysis

Richina Capital Partners Ltd is not simply a producer of adhesives however delights in market management in the instant adhesive industry. The company has its own proficient and competent sales force which adds value to sales by training the company's network of 250 distributors for assisting in the sale of adhesives.

Core proficiencies are not limited to adhesive production just as Richina Capital Partners Ltd likewise focuses on making adhesive giving equipment to help with making use of its products. This double production method gives Richina Capital Partners Ltd an edge over rivals given that none of the rivals of giving equipment makes instantaneous adhesives. In addition, none of these competitors offers straight to the customer either and uses suppliers for reaching out to clients. While we are looking at the strengths of Richina Capital Partners Ltd, it is crucial to highlight the company's weak points.

The business's sales staff is proficient in training distributors, the reality stays that the sales team is not trained in offering devices so there is a possibility of relying heavily on suppliers when promoting adhesive devices. Nevertheless, it must likewise be noted that the suppliers are showing unwillingness when it comes to selling equipment that requires maintenance which increases the challenges of offering devices under a specific brand name.

The business has actually items aimed at the high end of the market if we look at Richina Capital Partners Ltd item line in adhesive equipment particularly. If Richina Capital Partners Ltd sells Case Study Help under the very same portfolio, the possibility of sales cannibalization exists. Offered the reality that Case Study Help is priced lower than Richina Capital Partners Ltd high-end line of product, sales cannibalization would absolutely be affecting Richina Capital Partners Ltd sales income if the adhesive equipment is offered under the business's brand name.

We can see sales cannibalization impacting Richina Capital Partners Ltd 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. There is another possible risk which could decrease Richina Capital Partners Ltd earnings if Case Study Help is released under the business's trademark name. The truth that $175000 has been spent in promoting SuperBonder suggests that it is not a good time for releasing a dispenser which can highlight the truth that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the instantaneous adhesive.

Furthermore, if we take a look at the marketplace in general, the adhesives market does disappoint brand name orientation or cost consciousness which gives us 2 extra reasons for not launching a low priced item under the company's brand name.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Richina Capital Partners Ltd would be studied through Porter's 5 forces analysis which would highlight the degree of competition in the market.

Degree of Rivalry:

Currently we can see that the adhesive market has a high growth capacity due to the presence of fragmented sections with Richina Capital Partners Ltd taking pleasure in management and a combined market share of 75% with two other industry gamers, Eastman and Permabond. While industry rivalry in between these players could be called 'extreme' as the consumer is not brand mindful and each of these players has prominence in terms of market share, the truth still stays that the market is not saturated and still has a number of market sectors which can be targeted as prospective niche markets even when launching an adhesive. We can even point out the fact that sales cannibalization might be leading to industry competition in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for instantaneous adhesives offers development capacity.

Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the buyer in this industry is low specifically as the buyer has low understanding about the product. While business like Richina Capital Partners Ltd have actually managed to train distributors concerning adhesives, the final customer depends on suppliers. Approximately 72% of sales are made directly by producers and suppliers for immediate adhesives so the purchaser has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Provided the fact that the adhesive market is dominated by 3 players, it could be said that the provider delights in a greater bargaining power compared to the purchaser. Nevertheless, the truth remains that the supplier does not have much influence over the purchaser at this point specifically as the purchaser does disappoint brand name acknowledgment or price level of sensitivity. When it comes to the adhesive market while the maker and the buyer do not have a major control over the real sales, this indicates that the distributor has the greater power.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand loyalty and the ease of entry shown by foreign Japanese rivals in the immediate adhesive market indicates that the market enables ease of entry. Nevertheless, if we look at Richina Capital Partners Ltd in particular, the business has dual capabilities in regards to being a maker of immediate adhesives and adhesive dispensers. Possible risks in equipment dispensing industry are low which reveals the possibility of producing brand name awareness in not just immediate adhesives but likewise in dispensing adhesives as none of the industry players has actually managed to place itself in double abilities.

Threat of Substitutes: The danger of alternatives in the instantaneous adhesive market is low while the dispenser market in particular has alternatives like Glumetic suggestion applicators, in-built applicators, pencil applicators and advanced consoles. The fact stays that if Richina Capital Partners Ltd presented Case Study Help, it would be indulging in sales cannibalization for its own products. (see appendix 1 for framework).

4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Richina Capital Partners Ltd Case Study Help

Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has given numerous reasons for not launching Case Study Help under Richina Capital Partners Ltd name, we have a recommended marketing mix for Case Study Help given listed below if Richina Capital Partners Ltd chooses to go ahead with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target market picked for Case Study Help is 'Motor vehicle services' for a number of factors. This market has an extra growth potential of 10.1% which might be a great sufficient niche market section for Case Study Help. Not only would a portable dispenser offer benefit to this particular market, the reality that the Diy market can also be targeted if a drinkable low priced adhesive is being sold for use with SuperBonder.

Price: The recommended price of Case Study Help has been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is offered through distributors or via direct selling. A rate listed below $250 would not require approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor lorry upkeep shop needs to acquire the product on his own.

Richina Capital Partners Ltd would only be getting $157 per unit as shown in appendix 2 which offers a breakdown of gross profitability and net profitability for Richina Capital Partners Ltd for introducing Case Study Help.

Place: A circulation model where Richina Capital Partners Ltd directly sends the item to the regional supplier and keeps a 10% drop delivery allowance for the supplier would be used by Richina Capital Partners Ltd. Since the sales group is currently taken part in selling immediate adhesives and they do not have knowledge in selling dispensers, including them in the selling procedure would be costly especially as each sales call expenses approximately $120. The distributors are already selling dispensers so offering Case Study Help through them would be a favorable choice.

Promotion: A low marketing budget ought to have been appointed to Case Study Help but the reality that the dispenser is an innovation and it needs to be marketed well in order to cover the capital expenses incurred for production, the suggested advertising strategy costing $51816 is suggested for at first presenting the product in the market. The prepared ads in publications would be targeted at mechanics in automobile upkeep stores. (Recommended text for the advertisement is displayed in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summarized in appendix 4).

Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Richina Capital Partners Ltd Case Study Analysis

A recommended plan of action in the kind of a marketing mix has been talked about for Case Study Help, the reality still remains that the item would not complement Richina Capital Partners Ltd product line. We take a look at appendix 2, we can see how the overall gross success for the two models is expected to be roughly $49377 if 250 units of each model are manufactured per year according to the strategy. The preliminary prepared marketing is roughly $52000 per year which would be putting a stress on the company's resources leaving Richina Capital Partners Ltd with an unfavorable net income if the costs are allocated to Case Study Help only.

The truth that Richina Capital Partners Ltd has actually already sustained a preliminary investment of $48000 in the form of capital cost and model development indicates that the earnings from Case Study Help is inadequate to undertake the threat of sales cannibalization. Other than that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market showing low flexibility of demand is not a more suitable alternative specifically of it is affecting the sale of the business's earnings creating models.