WhatsApp

Scudder Stevens And Clark Case Study Help Checklist

Scudder Stevens And Clark Case Study Help Checklist

Scudder Stevens And Clark Case Study Solution
Scudder Stevens And Clark Case Study Help
Scudder Stevens And Clark Case Study Analysis



Analyses for Evaluating Scudder Stevens And Clark decision to launch Case Study Solution


The following section focuses on the of marketing for Scudder Stevens And Clark where the business's clients, competitors and core competencies have evaluated in order to validate whether the decision to release Case Study Help under Scudder Stevens And Clark brand would be a feasible choice or not. We have actually to start with looked at the kind of clients that Scudder Stevens And Clark deals in while an assessment of the competitive environment and the company's weak points and strengths follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the reason for not launching Case Study Help under Scudder Stevens And Clark name.
Scudder Stevens And Clark Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Both the groups use Scudder Stevens And Clark high performance adhesives while the business is not just involved in the production of these adhesives however also markets them to these customer groups. We would be focusing on the customers of instantaneous adhesives for this analysis given that the market for the latter has a lower potential for Scudder Stevens And Clark compared to that of immediate adhesives.

The total market for immediate adhesives is approximately 890,000 in the US in 1978 which covers both customer groups which have actually been recognized earlier.If we take a look at a breakdown of Scudder Stevens And Clark prospective market or customer groups, we can see that the company sells to OEMs (Original Equipment Makers), Do-it-Yourself customers, repair and overhauling business (MRO) and producers handling items made of leather, plastic, wood and metal. This variety in clients recommends that Scudder Stevens And Clark can target has numerous options in regards to segmenting the marketplace for its brand-new product especially as each of these groups would be requiring the very same type of item with respective modifications in quantity, packaging or demand. However, the client is not price delicate or brand mindful so releasing a low priced dispenser under Scudder Stevens And Clark name is not a recommended option.

Company Analysis

Scudder Stevens And Clark is not simply a producer of adhesives but takes pleasure in market leadership in the instant adhesive market. The company has its own competent and qualified sales force which adds worth to sales by training the business's network of 250 distributors for helping with the sale of adhesives. Scudder Stevens And Clark believes in exclusive distribution as shown by the truth that it has actually picked to sell through 250 distributors whereas there is t a network of 10000 distributors that can be explored for expanding reach through suppliers. The business's reach is not restricted to The United States and Canada only as it also delights in worldwide sales. With 1400 outlets spread out all throughout The United States and Canada, Scudder Stevens And Clark has its in-house production plants rather than utilizing out-sourcing as the preferred method.

Core proficiencies are not restricted to adhesive manufacturing just as Scudder Stevens And Clark likewise concentrates on making adhesive dispensing devices to help with making use of its items. This double production method gives Scudder Stevens And Clark an edge over rivals given that none of the competitors of dispensing equipment makes instant adhesives. Furthermore, none of these competitors sells straight to the customer either and uses suppliers for connecting to consumers. While we are taking a look at the strengths of Scudder Stevens And Clark, it is very important to highlight the business's weaknesses also.

Although the business's sales personnel is proficient in training distributors, the truth stays that the sales group is not trained in offering equipment so there is a possibility of relying heavily on distributors when promoting adhesive devices. However, it ought to likewise be kept in mind that the suppliers are revealing unwillingness when it comes to selling equipment that needs maintenance which increases the challenges of offering devices under a particular brand.

If we take a look at Scudder Stevens And Clark line of product in adhesive equipment especially, the company has actually items focused on the luxury of the marketplace. The possibility of sales cannibalization exists if Scudder Stevens And Clark offers Case Study Help under the very same portfolio. Offered the reality that Case Study Help is priced lower than Scudder Stevens And Clark high-end line of product, sales cannibalization would definitely be impacting Scudder Stevens And Clark sales income if the adhesive equipment is sold under the business's trademark name.

We can see sales cannibalization impacting Scudder Stevens And Clark 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. There is another possible threat which might decrease Scudder Stevens And Clark revenue if Case Study Help is released under the business's trademark name. The reality that $175000 has been spent in promoting SuperBonder suggests that it is not a good time for releasing a dispenser which can highlight the truth that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the immediate adhesive.

Furthermore, if we look at the marketplace in general, the adhesives market does not show brand orientation or cost awareness which provides us 2 additional factors for not releasing a low priced item under the company's brand name.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Scudder Stevens And Clark would be studied by means of Porter's five forces analysis which would highlight the degree of competition in the market.


Degree of Rivalry:

Presently we can see that the adhesive market has a high development potential due to the existence of fragmented segments with Scudder Stevens And Clark delighting in management and a combined market share of 75% with 2 other industry gamers, Eastman and Permabond. While industry competition in between these gamers could be called 'intense' as the consumer is not brand mindful and each of these gamers has prominence in regards to market share, the reality still stays that the market is not saturated and still has a number of market sections which can be targeted as possible niche markets even when introducing an adhesive. Nevertheless, we can even explain the fact that sales cannibalization might be leading to market rivalry in the adhesive dispenser market while the marketplace for instant adhesives provides development potential.


Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the buyer in this industry is low particularly as the purchaser has low knowledge about the item. While business like Scudder Stevens And Clark have managed to train distributors relating to adhesives, the final consumer depends on suppliers. Approximately 72% of sales are made directly by manufacturers and suppliers for instant adhesives so the purchaser has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Provided the fact that the adhesive market is dominated by three gamers, it could be stated that the provider delights in a greater bargaining power compared to the purchaser. Nevertheless, the reality remains that the supplier does not have much impact over the buyer at this point particularly as the buyer does not show brand recognition or rate sensitivity. When it comes to the adhesive market while the manufacturer and the purchaser do not have a significant control over the actual sales, this indicates that the distributor has the greater power.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand name loyalty and the ease of entry shown by foreign Japanese rivals in the instant adhesive market indicates that the marketplace allows ease of entry. However, if we look at Scudder Stevens And Clark in particular, the business has dual capabilities in regards to being a maker of immediate adhesives and adhesive dispensers. Potential hazards in devices giving market are low which shows the possibility of developing brand name awareness in not just immediate adhesives but also in giving adhesives as none of the market gamers has managed to position itself in dual capabilities.

Danger of Substitutes: The risk of alternatives in the instant adhesive market is low while the dispenser market in particular has substitutes like Glumetic tip applicators, inbuilt applicators, pencil applicators and advanced consoles. The fact stays that if Scudder Stevens And Clark introduced Case Study Help, it would be enjoying sales cannibalization for its own products. (see appendix 1 for structure).


4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Scudder Stevens And Clark Case Study Help


Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has actually provided different reasons for not launching Case Study Help under Scudder Stevens And Clark name, we have actually a recommended marketing mix for Case Study Help provided below if Scudder Stevens And Clark chooses to go ahead with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target audience chosen for Case Study Help is 'Automobile services' for a variety of reasons. There are presently 89257 facilities in this section and a high use of approximately 58900 pounds. is being used by 36.1 % of the marketplace. This market has an extra development capacity of 10.1% which might be a good enough specific niche market section for Case Study Help. Not just would a portable dispenser deal convenience to this particular market, the truth that the Diy market can also be targeted if a potable low priced adhesive is being cost use with SuperBonder. The product would be sold without the 'glumetic pointer' and 'vari-drop' so that the customer can decide whether he wishes to choose either of the two devices or not.

Price: The recommended cost of Case Study Help has actually been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is offered through distributors or via direct selling. A price listed below $250 would not need approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor vehicle maintenance store needs to buy the item on his own.

Scudder Stevens And Clark would just be getting $157 per unit as displayed in appendix 2 which gives a breakdown of gross profitability and net profitability for Scudder Stevens And Clark for launching Case Study Help.

Place: A distribution model where Scudder Stevens And Clark straight sends out the item to the regional distributor and keeps a 10% drop shipment allowance for the supplier would be utilized by Scudder Stevens And Clark. Given that the sales group is currently participated in selling instant adhesives and they do not have knowledge in offering dispensers, involving them in the selling procedure would be costly particularly as each sales call costs roughly $120. The suppliers are currently offering dispensers so selling Case Study Help through them would be a beneficial option.

Promotion: A low marketing budget plan needs to have been designated to Case Study Help however the reality that the dispenser is an innovation and it needs to be marketed well in order to cover the capital expenses sustained for production, the suggested marketing plan costing $51816 is advised for initially introducing the product in the market. The prepared advertisements in magazines would be targeted at mechanics in lorry upkeep stores. (Suggested text for the advertisement is displayed in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summed up in appendix 4).


Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Scudder Stevens And Clark Case Study Analysis

Although a recommended plan of action in the form of a marketing mix has been gone over for Case Study Help, the reality still remains that the item would not complement Scudder Stevens And Clark product line. We take a look at appendix 2, we can see how the overall gross profitability for the two designs is expected to be roughly $49377 if 250 units of each model are produced each year as per the plan. The initial prepared marketing is approximately $52000 per year which would be putting a stress on the business's resources leaving Scudder Stevens And Clark with a negative net income if the costs are designated to Case Study Help only.

The truth that Scudder Stevens And Clark has already sustained an initial investment of $48000 in the form of capital cost and prototype development shows that the profits from Case Study Help is not enough to carry out the danger of sales cannibalization. Besides that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market showing low flexibility of demand is not a more effective option specifically of it is affecting the sale of the business's profits producing models.


 

PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE