WhatsApp

Sengupta Fibres Ltd Case Study Help Checklist

Sengupta Fibres Ltd Case Study Help Checklist

Sengupta Fibres Ltd Case Study Solution
Sengupta Fibres Ltd Case Study Help
Sengupta Fibres Ltd Case Study Analysis



Analyses for Evaluating Sengupta Fibres Ltd decision to launch Case Study Solution


The following area concentrates on the of marketing for Sengupta Fibres Ltd where the company's consumers, competitors and core proficiencies have actually evaluated in order to justify whether the decision to introduce Case Study Help under Sengupta Fibres Ltd trademark name would be a feasible option or not. We have firstly looked at the kind of customers that Sengupta Fibres Ltd handle while an assessment of the competitive environment and the company's strengths and weak points follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the justification for not introducing Case Study Help under Sengupta Fibres Ltd name.
Sengupta Fibres Ltd Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Both the groups utilize Sengupta Fibres Ltd high efficiency adhesives while the company is not just involved in the production of these adhesives however likewise markets them to these client groups. We would be focusing on the customers of instant adhesives for this analysis given that the market for the latter has a lower potential for Sengupta Fibres Ltd compared to that of instant adhesives.

The overall market for immediate adhesives is around 890,000 in the United States in 1978 which covers both consumer groups which have been recognized earlier.If we take a look at a breakdown of Sengupta Fibres Ltd possible market or client groups, we can see that the business offers to OEMs (Original Equipment Makers), Do-it-Yourself clients, repair and upgrading business (MRO) and producers handling products made of leather, plastic, wood and metal. This diversity in customers suggests that Sengupta Fibres Ltd can target has different alternatives in terms of segmenting the market for its brand-new product particularly as each of these groups would be requiring the exact same type of item with particular changes in quantity, need or packaging. The consumer is not price sensitive or brand conscious so introducing a low priced dispenser under Sengupta Fibres Ltd name is not a recommended option.

Company Analysis

Sengupta Fibres Ltd is not simply a manufacturer of adhesives but delights in market leadership in the instant adhesive industry. The company has its own proficient and qualified sales force which includes worth to sales by training the company's network of 250 suppliers for helping with the sale of adhesives. Sengupta Fibres Ltd believes in special distribution as indicated by the reality that it has actually picked to offer through 250 suppliers whereas there is t a network of 10000 distributors that can be explored for broadening reach by means of suppliers. The business's reach is not restricted to North America just as it also delights in worldwide sales. With 1400 outlets spread all across North America, Sengupta Fibres Ltd has its in-house production plants rather than using out-sourcing as the preferred method.

Core skills are not restricted to adhesive manufacturing only as Sengupta Fibres Ltd also focuses on making adhesive dispensing equipment to facilitate the use of its items. This dual production method offers Sengupta Fibres Ltd an edge over competitors considering that none of the competitors of giving devices makes instant adhesives. In addition, none of these competitors offers directly to the consumer either and makes use of distributors for connecting to clients. While we are looking at the strengths of Sengupta Fibres Ltd, it is important to highlight the business's weak points.

The business's sales personnel is proficient in training suppliers, the reality remains that the sales team is not trained in offering devices so there is a possibility of relying greatly on suppliers when promoting adhesive devices. Nevertheless, it needs to likewise be kept in mind that the distributors are revealing hesitation when it comes to selling devices that requires maintenance which increases the difficulties of selling equipment under a specific brand name.

The company has actually products aimed at the high end of the market if we look at Sengupta Fibres Ltd item line in adhesive equipment especially. The possibility of sales cannibalization exists if Sengupta Fibres Ltd offers Case Study Help under the very same portfolio. Provided the truth that Case Study Help is priced lower than Sengupta Fibres Ltd high-end product line, sales cannibalization would absolutely be impacting Sengupta Fibres Ltd sales profits if the adhesive devices is sold under the company's brand.

We can see sales cannibalization impacting Sengupta Fibres Ltd 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. If Case Study Help is released under the business's brand name, there is another possible threat which could decrease Sengupta Fibres Ltd income. The fact that $175000 has actually been spent in promoting SuperBonder suggests that it is not a great time for launching a dispenser which can highlight the reality that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the instantaneous adhesive.

Furthermore, if we look at the marketplace in general, the adhesives market does disappoint brand name orientation or cost consciousness which gives us 2 additional reasons for not releasing a low priced product under the company's brand name.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Sengupta Fibres Ltd would be studied by means of Porter's 5 forces analysis which would highlight the degree of rivalry in the market.


Degree of Rivalry:

Currently we can see that the adhesive market has a high development capacity due to the existence of fragmented sections with Sengupta Fibres Ltd enjoying leadership and a combined market share of 75% with two other industry players, Eastman and Permabond. While industry competition in between these players could be called 'extreme' as the consumer is not brand name mindful and each of these players has prominence in regards to market share, the truth still stays that the industry is not filled and still has several market segments which can be targeted as possible niche markets even when releasing an adhesive. We can even point out the reality that sales cannibalization might be leading to industry rivalry in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for immediate adhesives provides development capacity.


Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the buyer in this market is low especially as the buyer has low understanding about the product. While business like Sengupta Fibres Ltd have managed to train suppliers regarding adhesives, the last consumer depends on distributors. Around 72% of sales are made straight by manufacturers and suppliers for instant adhesives so the buyer has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Provided the truth that the adhesive market is controlled by three gamers, it could be said that the supplier enjoys a higher bargaining power compared to the purchaser. However, the truth stays that the provider does not have much influence over the buyer at this moment particularly as the buyer does disappoint brand name acknowledgment or rate sensitivity. When it comes to the adhesive market while the maker and the buyer do not have a significant control over the actual sales, this shows that the supplier has the greater power.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand loyalty and the ease of entry revealed by foreign Japanese competitors in the immediate adhesive market indicates that the market enables ease of entry. Nevertheless, if we take a look at Sengupta Fibres Ltd in particular, the company has double capabilities in terms of being a maker of instantaneous adhesives and adhesive dispensers. Possible threats in equipment dispensing industry are low which shows the possibility of producing brand awareness in not just immediate adhesives however also in dispensing adhesives as none of the market players has actually handled to place itself in double abilities.

Hazard of Substitutes: The risk of alternatives in the instantaneous adhesive market is low while the dispenser market in particular has replacements like Glumetic tip applicators, built-in applicators, pencil applicators and sophisticated consoles. The truth remains that if Sengupta Fibres Ltd introduced Case Study Help, it would be indulging in sales cannibalization for its own items. (see appendix 1 for structure).


4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Sengupta Fibres Ltd Case Study Help


Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has provided different reasons for not launching Case Study Help under Sengupta Fibres Ltd name, we have actually a recommended marketing mix for Case Study Help given listed below if Sengupta Fibres Ltd decides to proceed with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target audience chosen for Case Study Help is 'Motor vehicle services' for a variety of reasons. There are presently 89257 facilities in this segment and a high use of around 58900 lbs. is being utilized by 36.1 % of the market. This market has an additional development capacity of 10.1% which might be a sufficient specific niche market section for Case Study Help. Not just would a portable dispenser deal benefit to this specific market, the fact that the Do-it-Yourself market can also be targeted if a drinkable low priced adhesive is being cost use with SuperBonder. The item would be offered without the 'glumetic idea' and 'vari-drop' so that the customer can decide whether he wishes to choose either of the two devices or not.

Price: The suggested cost of Case Study Help has actually been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is sold through distributors or through direct selling. A price below $250 would not require approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor vehicle upkeep store needs to buy the item on his own.

Sengupta Fibres Ltd would only be getting $157 per unit as displayed in appendix 2 which provides a breakdown of gross success and net profitability for Sengupta Fibres Ltd for releasing Case Study Help.

Place: A circulation model where Sengupta Fibres Ltd directly sends out the product to the local distributor and keeps a 10% drop shipment allowance for the distributor would be utilized by Sengupta Fibres Ltd. Since the sales group is currently engaged in offering immediate adhesives and they do not have knowledge in selling dispensers, involving them in the selling procedure would be expensive particularly as each sales call costs approximately $120. The suppliers are currently offering dispensers so selling Case Study Help through them would be a favorable alternative.

Promotion: Although a low marketing spending plan must have been designated to Case Study Help but the truth that the dispenser is an innovation and it requires to be marketed well in order to cover the capital costs incurred for production, the suggested marketing strategy costing $51816 is suggested for at first presenting the item in the market. The planned advertisements in publications would be targeted at mechanics in car maintenance shops. (Suggested text for the advertisement is shown in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summarized in appendix 4).


Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Sengupta Fibres Ltd Case Study Analysis

A suggested strategy of action in the type of a marketing mix has actually been discussed for Case Study Help, the fact still remains that the item would not complement Sengupta Fibres Ltd product line. We take a look at appendix 2, we can see how the total gross profitability for the two models is expected to be approximately $49377 if 250 systems of each design are manufactured annually based on the strategy. However, the preliminary prepared marketing is roughly $52000 each year which would be putting a pressure on the business's resources leaving Sengupta Fibres Ltd with a negative net income if the expenditures are allocated to Case Study Help just.

The fact that Sengupta Fibres Ltd has already sustained an initial financial investment of $48000 in the form of capital expense and prototype development suggests that the income from Case Study Help is not enough to undertake the danger of sales cannibalization. Aside from that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market showing low flexibility of demand is not a more effective choice specifically of it is impacting the sale of the business's income generating designs.


 

PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE