WhatsApp

Sengupta Fibres Ltd Case Study Help Checklist

Sengupta Fibres Ltd Case Study Help Checklist

Sengupta Fibres Ltd Case Study Solution
Sengupta Fibres Ltd Case Study Help
Sengupta Fibres Ltd Case Study Analysis



Analyses for Evaluating Sengupta Fibres Ltd decision to launch Case Study Solution


The following section concentrates on the of marketing for Sengupta Fibres Ltd where the business's clients, rivals and core proficiencies have actually evaluated in order to justify whether the choice to introduce Case Study Help under Sengupta Fibres Ltd brand name would be a practical choice or not. We have actually to start with taken a look at the type of clients that Sengupta Fibres Ltd handle while an evaluation of the competitive environment and the business's weak points and strengths follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the justification for not releasing Case Study Help under Sengupta Fibres Ltd name.
Sengupta Fibres Ltd Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Sengupta Fibres Ltd customers can be segmented into 2 groups, last customers and commercial customers. Both the groups use Sengupta Fibres Ltd high performance adhesives while the company is not just associated with the production of these adhesives however also markets them to these customer groups. There are 2 types of items that are being offered to these prospective markets; instantaneous adhesives and anaerobic adhesives. We would be concentrating on the consumers of instant adhesives for this analysis because the marketplace for the latter has a lower capacity for Sengupta Fibres Ltd compared to that of immediate adhesives.

The total market for immediate adhesives is around 890,000 in the US in 1978 which covers both customer groups which have been identified earlier.If we look at a breakdown of Sengupta Fibres Ltd potential market or customer groups, we can see that the business offers to OEMs (Initial Devices Producers), Do-it-Yourself consumers, repair and revamping business (MRO) and manufacturers handling products made of leather, plastic, metal and wood. This variety in consumers suggests that Sengupta Fibres Ltd can target has various alternatives in regards to segmenting the market for its new item especially as each of these groups would be needing the exact same kind of product with particular modifications in amount, packaging or need. The customer is not cost sensitive or brand name mindful so introducing a low priced dispenser under Sengupta Fibres Ltd name is not a suggested alternative.

Company Analysis

Sengupta Fibres Ltd is not simply a manufacturer of adhesives but takes pleasure in market management in the instant adhesive market. The business has its own competent and qualified sales force which includes worth to sales by training the company's network of 250 suppliers for facilitating the sale of adhesives. Sengupta Fibres Ltd believes in exclusive distribution as indicated by the truth that it has chosen to sell through 250 suppliers whereas there is t a network of 10000 distributors that can be explored for broadening reach through suppliers. The company's reach is not restricted to The United States and Canada only as it also enjoys international sales. With 1400 outlets spread out all across North America, Sengupta Fibres Ltd has its internal production plants rather than using out-sourcing as the favored method.

Core skills are not limited to adhesive manufacturing just as Sengupta Fibres Ltd also specializes in making adhesive giving equipment to facilitate the use of its items. This dual production technique offers Sengupta Fibres Ltd an edge over rivals since none of the competitors of dispensing devices makes instantaneous adhesives. Furthermore, none of these competitors sells directly to the consumer either and makes use of suppliers for reaching out to consumers. While we are looking at the strengths of Sengupta Fibres Ltd, it is important to highlight the company's weak points.

Although the business's sales staff is competent in training distributors, the reality stays that the sales group is not trained in offering equipment so there is a possibility of relying greatly on distributors when promoting adhesive devices. Nevertheless, it must likewise be kept in mind that the suppliers are revealing unwillingness when it comes to selling equipment that requires maintenance which increases the difficulties of selling equipment under a specific trademark name.

If we look at Sengupta Fibres Ltd product line in adhesive equipment particularly, the company has actually items focused on the high end of the market. The possibility of sales cannibalization exists if Sengupta Fibres Ltd sells Case Study Help under the same portfolio. Given the truth that Case Study Help is priced lower than Sengupta Fibres Ltd high-end line of product, sales cannibalization would absolutely be impacting Sengupta Fibres Ltd sales earnings if the adhesive equipment is offered under the business's trademark name.

We can see sales cannibalization affecting Sengupta Fibres Ltd 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. There is another possible risk which might lower Sengupta Fibres Ltd earnings if Case Study Help is released under the company's brand. The reality that $175000 has actually been spent in promoting SuperBonder suggests that it is not a good time for launching a dispenser which can highlight the fact that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the instantaneous adhesive.

Additionally, if we look at the marketplace in general, the adhesives market does disappoint brand name orientation or cost awareness which offers us two additional reasons for not introducing a low priced product under the business's trademark name.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Sengupta Fibres Ltd would be studied through Porter's five forces analysis which would highlight the degree of rivalry in the market.


Degree of Rivalry:

Presently we can see that the adhesive market has a high development potential due to the existence of fragmented sections with Sengupta Fibres Ltd delighting in leadership and a combined market share of 75% with 2 other market players, Eastman and Permabond. While industry competition between these players could be called 'extreme' as the customer is not brand mindful and each of these players has prominence in regards to market share, the truth still stays that the industry is not saturated and still has numerous market segments which can be targeted as possible specific niche markets even when releasing an adhesive. Nevertheless, we can even explain the fact that sales cannibalization may be resulting in market competition in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for instant adhesives provides development potential.


Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the buyer in this industry is low particularly as the buyer has low knowledge about the item. While business like Sengupta Fibres Ltd have handled to train suppliers relating to adhesives, the last customer depends on distributors. Around 72% of sales are made directly by makers and distributors for immediate adhesives so the purchaser has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Given the fact that the adhesive market is controlled by three gamers, it could be said that the provider enjoys a higher bargaining power compared to the purchaser. However, the truth stays that the provider does not have much impact over the purchaser at this moment particularly as the purchaser does disappoint brand name acknowledgment or price sensitivity. This indicates that the supplier has the higher power when it concerns the adhesive market while the producer and the buyer do not have a major control over the actual sales.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand loyalty and the ease of entry shown by foreign Japanese rivals in the instantaneous adhesive market suggests that the market enables ease of entry. If we look at Sengupta Fibres Ltd in specific, the business has dual capabilities in terms of being a maker of instantaneous adhesives and adhesive dispensers. Possible hazards in devices giving industry are low which shows the possibility of producing brand awareness in not just instantaneous adhesives however likewise in giving adhesives as none of the market gamers has actually handled to position itself in double capabilities.

Danger of Substitutes: The danger of replacements in the instantaneous adhesive market is low while the dispenser market in particular has alternatives like Glumetic idea applicators, inbuilt applicators, pencil applicators and advanced consoles. The reality remains that if Sengupta Fibres Ltd presented Case Study Help, it would be indulging in sales cannibalization for its own items. (see appendix 1 for structure).


4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Sengupta Fibres Ltd Case Study Help


Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has actually given numerous factors for not launching Case Study Help under Sengupta Fibres Ltd name, we have a suggested marketing mix for Case Study Help given below if Sengupta Fibres Ltd chooses to proceed with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target market selected for Case Study Help is 'Motor lorry services' for a number of reasons. This market has an additional growth capacity of 10.1% which may be a great enough specific niche market section for Case Study Help. Not only would a portable dispenser offer benefit to this particular market, the reality that the Diy market can likewise be targeted if a drinkable low priced adhesive is being sold for usage with SuperBonder.

Price: The recommended cost of Case Study Help has actually been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is sold through suppliers or by means of direct selling. This cost would not consist of the expense of the 'vari suggestion' or the 'glumetic tip'. A rate below $250 would not need approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at an automobile maintenance store requires to purchase the item on his own. This would increase the possibility of affecting mechanics to buy the item for use in their everyday upkeep jobs.

Sengupta Fibres Ltd would just be getting $157 per unit as displayed in appendix 2 which gives a breakdown of gross success and net profitability for Sengupta Fibres Ltd for introducing Case Study Help.

Place: A circulation model where Sengupta Fibres Ltd straight sends out the product to the local distributor and keeps a 10% drop delivery allowance for the distributor would be utilized by Sengupta Fibres Ltd. Since the sales team is currently participated in selling instant adhesives and they do not have competence in offering dispensers, involving them in the selling procedure would be pricey particularly as each sales call expenses around $120. The suppliers are already selling dispensers so selling Case Study Help through them would be a favorable option.

Promotion: A low advertising budget must have been appointed to Case Study Help but the fact that the dispenser is an innovation and it needs to be marketed well in order to cover the capital costs incurred for production, the recommended advertising strategy costing $51816 is advised for at first presenting the item in the market. The planned ads in magazines would be targeted at mechanics in vehicle upkeep stores. (Suggested text for the ad is shown in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summarized in appendix 4).


Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Sengupta Fibres Ltd Case Study Analysis

Although a recommended strategy in the form of a marketing mix has actually been discussed for Case Study Help, the reality still stays that the item would not match Sengupta Fibres Ltd line of product. We take a look at appendix 2, we can see how the total gross profitability for the two designs is expected to be around $49377 if 250 units of each design are produced per year based on the strategy. The initial planned advertising is approximately $52000 per year which would be putting a strain on the business's resources leaving Sengupta Fibres Ltd with an unfavorable net income if the expenditures are allocated to Case Study Help just.

The fact that Sengupta Fibres Ltd has already sustained an initial investment of $48000 in the form of capital expense and prototype development shows that the earnings from Case Study Help is insufficient to undertake the danger of sales cannibalization. Besides that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market revealing low flexibility of need is not a more suitable option specifically of it is impacting the sale of the business's income generating designs.



PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE