Software Associates Case Study Help Checklist

Software Associates Case Study Help Checklist

Software Associates Case Study Solution
Software Associates Case Study Help
Software Associates Case Study Analysis

Analyses for Evaluating Software Associates decision to launch Case Study Solution

The following section focuses on the of marketing for Software Associates where the business's clients, rivals and core competencies have assessed in order to justify whether the decision to launch Case Study Help under Software Associates brand name would be a practical option or not. We have firstly taken a look at the type of consumers that Software Associates handle while an evaluation of the competitive environment and the business's weak points and strengths follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the justification for not introducing Case Study Help under Software Associates name.
Software Associates Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Both the groups utilize Software Associates high efficiency adhesives while the business is not only included in the production of these adhesives however likewise markets them to these consumer groups. We would be focusing on the consumers of instantaneous adhesives for this analysis considering that the market for the latter has a lower capacity for Software Associates compared to that of instantaneous adhesives.

The overall market for instantaneous adhesives is approximately 890,000 in the United States in 1978 which covers both consumer groups which have actually been identified earlier.If we look at a breakdown of Software Associates potential market or customer groups, we can see that the company sells to OEMs (Original Equipment Makers), Do-it-Yourself customers, repair work and upgrading companies (MRO) and producers handling items made from leather, metal, plastic and wood. This variety in clients recommends that Software Associates can target has numerous alternatives in regards to segmenting the market for its new product specifically as each of these groups would be needing the same kind of item with particular changes in amount, product packaging or need. The customer is not price sensitive or brand conscious so releasing a low priced dispenser under Software Associates name is not a recommended choice.

Company Analysis

Software Associates is not just a manufacturer of adhesives but takes pleasure in market management in the instantaneous adhesive industry. The company has its own proficient and competent sales force which adds worth to sales by training the company's network of 250 distributors for assisting in the sale of adhesives. Software Associates believes in unique distribution as shown by the truth that it has selected to offer through 250 distributors whereas there is t a network of 10000 distributors that can be explored for expanding reach via distributors. The business's reach is not restricted to North America only as it also delights in worldwide sales. With 1400 outlets spread out all throughout The United States and Canada, Software Associates has its internal production plants rather than utilizing out-sourcing as the preferred technique.

Core competences are not limited to adhesive manufacturing only as Software Associates likewise focuses on making adhesive dispensing equipment to assist in making use of its items. This double production technique provides Software Associates an edge over rivals since none of the competitors of dispensing devices makes immediate adhesives. In addition, none of these competitors sells straight to the customer either and utilizes distributors for connecting to consumers. While we are looking at the strengths of Software Associates, it is essential to highlight the business's weaknesses.

Although the business's sales personnel is experienced in training suppliers, the fact remains that the sales team is not trained in selling devices so there is a possibility of relying greatly on distributors when promoting adhesive devices. It needs to also be noted that the distributors are revealing hesitation when it comes to selling equipment that requires servicing which increases the difficulties of selling equipment under a particular brand name.

The business has actually items aimed at the high end of the market if we look at Software Associates item line in adhesive devices especially. If Software Associates sells Case Study Help under the same portfolio, the possibility of sales cannibalization exists. Offered the fact that Case Study Help is priced lower than Software Associates high-end line of product, sales cannibalization would certainly be affecting Software Associates sales profits if the adhesive equipment is offered under the company's trademark name.

We can see sales cannibalization affecting Software Associates 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. There is another possible danger which might lower Software Associates earnings if Case Study Help is launched under the business's brand. The truth that $175000 has actually been spent in promoting SuperBonder suggests that it is not a good time for introducing a dispenser which can highlight the truth that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the immediate adhesive.

Furthermore, if we take a look at the marketplace in general, the adhesives market does not show brand name orientation or price awareness which offers us 2 additional reasons for not introducing a low priced product under the company's trademark name.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Software Associates would be studied via Porter's 5 forces analysis which would highlight the degree of competition in the market.

Degree of Rivalry:

Currently we can see that the adhesive market has a high growth potential due to the existence of fragmented segments with Software Associates enjoying leadership and a combined market share of 75% with 2 other industry gamers, Eastman and Permabond. While market rivalry in between these gamers could be called 'extreme' as the customer is not brand name mindful and each of these players has prominence in terms of market share, the reality still stays that the market is not filled and still has several market sectors which can be targeted as potential specific niche markets even when introducing an adhesive. We can even point out the fact that sales cannibalization might be leading to industry rivalry in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for instantaneous adhesives provides growth capacity.

Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the buyer in this industry is low specifically as the purchaser has low knowledge about the product. While companies like Software Associates have actually handled to train suppliers concerning adhesives, the final consumer depends on distributors. Roughly 72% of sales are made directly by producers and distributors for instantaneous adhesives so the buyer has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Given the fact that the adhesive market is controlled by three players, it could be said that the supplier enjoys a higher bargaining power compared to the purchaser. Nevertheless, the fact remains that the provider does not have much impact over the purchaser at this moment particularly as the buyer does not show brand name acknowledgment or price level of sensitivity. This indicates that the distributor has the higher power when it concerns the adhesive market while the buyer and the maker do not have a major control over the actual sales.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand commitment and the ease of entry shown by foreign Japanese competitors in the instantaneous adhesive market shows that the market permits ease of entry. However, if we take a look at Software Associates in particular, the business has double capabilities in terms of being a producer of immediate adhesives and adhesive dispensers. Prospective hazards in equipment dispensing industry are low which shows the possibility of developing brand name awareness in not just instantaneous adhesives but likewise in giving adhesives as none of the industry gamers has actually handled to place itself in dual abilities.

Hazard of Substitutes: The risk of replacements in the instantaneous adhesive industry is low while the dispenser market in particular has alternatives like Glumetic tip applicators, built-in applicators, pencil applicators and sophisticated consoles. The fact stays that if Software Associates introduced Case Study Help, it would be indulging in sales cannibalization for its own products. (see appendix 1 for structure).

4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Software Associates Case Study Help

Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has actually provided numerous factors for not releasing Case Study Help under Software Associates name, we have a suggested marketing mix for Case Study Help given listed below if Software Associates decides to go on with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target market picked for Case Study Help is 'Motor vehicle services' for a number of factors. There are currently 89257 establishments in this section and a high use of around 58900 lbs. is being utilized by 36.1 % of the market. This market has an additional development potential of 10.1% which might be a good enough niche market section for Case Study Help. Not only would a portable dispenser offer benefit to this particular market, the reality that the Do-it-Yourself market can also be targeted if a potable low priced adhesive is being sold for usage with SuperBonder. The item would be sold without the 'glumetic pointer' and 'vari-drop' so that the consumer can choose whether he wishes to select either of the two accessories or not.

Price: The recommended price of Case Study Help has actually been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is offered through suppliers or through direct selling. A rate below $250 would not require approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor car maintenance shop needs to purchase the item on his own.

Software Associates would only be getting $157 per unit as shown in appendix 2 which gives a breakdown of gross profitability and net profitability for Software Associates for launching Case Study Help.

Place: A circulation design where Software Associates directly sends the product to the local distributor and keeps a 10% drop shipment allowance for the distributor would be used by Software Associates. Given that the sales group is currently participated in selling immediate adhesives and they do not have knowledge in selling dispensers, involving them in the selling procedure would be costly especially as each sales call costs roughly $120. The distributors are already selling dispensers so selling Case Study Help through them would be a beneficial choice.

Promotion: Although a low promotional budget ought to have been assigned to Case Study Help but the fact that the dispenser is a development and it needs to be marketed well in order to cover the capital expenses incurred for production, the recommended marketing strategy costing $51816 is recommended for at first presenting the item in the market. The planned ads in magazines would be targeted at mechanics in automobile maintenance stores. (Recommended text for the advertisement is displayed in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summarized in appendix 4).

Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Software Associates Case Study Analysis

Although a suggested plan of action in the form of a marketing mix has been talked about for Case Study Help, the truth still stays that the product would not match Software Associates line of product. We take a look at appendix 2, we can see how the overall gross profitability for the two models is expected to be around $49377 if 250 systems of each design are made annually as per the strategy. The initial prepared marketing is around $52000 per year which would be putting a pressure on the company's resources leaving Software Associates with a negative net earnings if the expenses are assigned to Case Study Help just.

The truth that Software Associates has actually currently incurred a preliminary investment of $48000 in the form of capital expense and model development indicates that the earnings from Case Study Help is insufficient to undertake the danger of sales cannibalization. Besides that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market revealing low elasticity of need is not a more suitable choice specifically of it is affecting the sale of the business's profits producing designs.