WhatsApp

Southern State University Health System Case Study Help Checklist

Southern State University Health System Case Study Help Checklist

Southern State University Health System Case Study Solution
Southern State University Health System Case Study Help
Southern State University Health System Case Study Analysis



Analyses for Evaluating Southern State University Health System decision to launch Case Study Solution


The following area concentrates on the of marketing for Southern State University Health System where the business's clients, rivals and core proficiencies have actually examined in order to validate whether the decision to introduce Case Study Help under Southern State University Health System trademark name would be a feasible option or not. We have firstly looked at the kind of consumers that Southern State University Health System deals in while an evaluation of the competitive environment and the company's weaknesses and strengths follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the justification for not launching Case Study Help under Southern State University Health System name.
Southern State University Health System Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Southern State University Health System consumers can be segmented into 2 groups, last consumers and industrial consumers. Both the groups utilize Southern State University Health System high performance adhesives while the company is not only involved in the production of these adhesives but also markets them to these client groups. There are two kinds of products that are being offered to these possible markets; instant adhesives and anaerobic adhesives. We would be concentrating on the consumers of instantaneous adhesives for this analysis considering that the market for the latter has a lower capacity for Southern State University Health System compared to that of instant adhesives.

The overall market for instant adhesives is around 890,000 in the United States in 1978 which covers both customer groups which have been identified earlier.If we take a look at a breakdown of Southern State University Health System possible market or customer groups, we can see that the company offers to OEMs (Original Devices Makers), Do-it-Yourself consumers, repair work and overhauling business (MRO) and makers dealing in items made from leather, plastic, metal and wood. This variety in consumers suggests that Southern State University Health System can target has numerous choices in terms of segmenting the market for its brand-new product especially as each of these groups would be needing the very same type of product with respective changes in packaging, amount or demand. The customer is not price delicate or brand name mindful so releasing a low priced dispenser under Southern State University Health System name is not a suggested choice.

Company Analysis

Southern State University Health System is not simply a maker of adhesives but takes pleasure in market management in the instant adhesive market. The business has its own skilled and certified sales force which includes value to sales by training the business's network of 250 suppliers for assisting in the sale of adhesives.

Core competences are not limited to adhesive production just as Southern State University Health System also specializes in making adhesive giving equipment to help with making use of its items. This double production method offers Southern State University Health System an edge over rivals given that none of the competitors of giving devices makes immediate adhesives. Additionally, none of these competitors sells directly to the consumer either and uses distributors for connecting to clients. While we are looking at the strengths of Southern State University Health System, it is essential to highlight the business's weaknesses also.

Although the company's sales personnel is experienced in training distributors, the fact remains that the sales group is not trained in selling devices so there is a possibility of relying greatly on distributors when promoting adhesive equipment. It needs to also be noted that the distributors are showing reluctance when it comes to offering equipment that requires maintenance which increases the challenges of selling devices under a particular brand name.

The business has actually products intended at the high end of the market if we look at Southern State University Health System product line in adhesive equipment particularly. If Southern State University Health System sells Case Study Help under the very same portfolio, the possibility of sales cannibalization exists. Given the truth that Case Study Help is priced lower than Southern State University Health System high-end line of product, sales cannibalization would absolutely be impacting Southern State University Health System sales profits if the adhesive equipment is offered under the business's trademark name.

We can see sales cannibalization impacting Southern State University Health System 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. There is another possible hazard which might decrease Southern State University Health System profits if Case Study Help is introduced under the business's trademark name. The reality that $175000 has been invested in promoting SuperBonder suggests that it is not a good time for launching a dispenser which can highlight the reality that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the instant adhesive.

Additionally, if we look at the marketplace in general, the adhesives market does not show brand name orientation or price awareness which provides us two extra factors for not introducing a low priced product under the business's trademark name.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Southern State University Health System would be studied by means of Porter's five forces analysis which would highlight the degree of competition in the market.


Degree of Rivalry:

Presently we can see that the adhesive market has a high growth potential due to the existence of fragmented sections with Southern State University Health System enjoying management and a combined market share of 75% with 2 other market gamers, Eastman and Permabond. While industry competition between these players could be called 'extreme' as the customer is not brand mindful and each of these gamers has prominence in terms of market share, the truth still stays that the industry is not saturated and still has numerous market segments which can be targeted as prospective niche markets even when launching an adhesive. Nevertheless, we can even explain the truth that sales cannibalization might be leading to market competition in the adhesive dispenser market while the marketplace for immediate adhesives provides growth potential.


Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the buyer in this market is low especially as the buyer has low understanding about the product. While companies like Southern State University Health System have actually managed to train distributors regarding adhesives, the last customer is dependent on suppliers. Around 72% of sales are made straight by makers and distributors for instant adhesives so the purchaser has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Given the truth that the adhesive market is dominated by three players, it could be said that the provider takes pleasure in a greater bargaining power compared to the buyer. However, the fact stays that the provider does not have much impact over the purchaser at this point especially as the purchaser does not show brand acknowledgment or cost level of sensitivity. This suggests that the distributor has the greater power when it concerns the adhesive market while the maker and the buyer do not have a significant control over the actual sales.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand commitment and the ease of entry shown by foreign Japanese competitors in the instantaneous adhesive market indicates that the market enables ease of entry. If we look at Southern State University Health System in particular, the business has double capabilities in terms of being a producer of instantaneous adhesives and adhesive dispensers. Prospective dangers in equipment giving market are low which reveals the possibility of creating brand name awareness in not only immediate adhesives however also in giving adhesives as none of the industry gamers has managed to position itself in dual capabilities.

Danger of Substitutes: The risk of replacements in the immediate adhesive industry is low while the dispenser market in particular has replacements like Glumetic pointer applicators, inbuilt applicators, pencil applicators and sophisticated consoles. The fact stays that if Southern State University Health System introduced Case Study Help, it would be indulging in sales cannibalization for its own items. (see appendix 1 for framework).


4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Southern State University Health System Case Study Help


Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has given different reasons for not releasing Case Study Help under Southern State University Health System name, we have actually a recommended marketing mix for Case Study Help given listed below if Southern State University Health System chooses to proceed with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target audience picked for Case Study Help is 'Automobile services' for a variety of factors. There are currently 89257 establishments in this sector and a high usage of around 58900 pounds. is being used by 36.1 % of the market. This market has an extra development capacity of 10.1% which might be a sufficient niche market section for Case Study Help. Not only would a portable dispenser deal benefit to this particular market, the fact that the Do-it-Yourself market can likewise be targeted if a potable low priced adhesive is being cost use with SuperBonder. The product would be sold without the 'glumetic idea' and 'vari-drop' so that the consumer can decide whether he wants to select either of the two devices or not.

Price: The suggested price of Case Study Help has actually been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is offered through suppliers or through direct selling. This price would not consist of the expense of the 'vari pointer' or the 'glumetic tip'. A rate listed below $250 would not require approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor vehicle maintenance store requires to acquire the product on his own. This would increase the possibility of affecting mechanics to acquire the product for use in their daily upkeep tasks.

Southern State University Health System would only be getting $157 per unit as shown in appendix 2 which gives a breakdown of gross success and net profitability for Southern State University Health System for releasing Case Study Help.

Place: A circulation model where Southern State University Health System straight sends the item to the regional supplier and keeps a 10% drop delivery allowance for the distributor would be used by Southern State University Health System. Because the sales team is already taken part in selling instantaneous adhesives and they do not have expertise in selling dispensers, including them in the selling process would be pricey specifically as each sales call expenses approximately $120. The distributors are currently selling dispensers so selling Case Study Help through them would be a beneficial choice.

Promotion: A low marketing budget plan must have been appointed to Case Study Help however the fact that the dispenser is an innovation and it needs to be marketed well in order to cover the capital expenses incurred for production, the recommended advertising strategy costing $51816 is suggested for at first introducing the product in the market. The prepared ads in magazines would be targeted at mechanics in car upkeep stores. (Suggested text for the ad is displayed in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summarized in appendix 4).


Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Southern State University Health System Case Study Analysis

Although a recommended strategy in the form of a marketing mix has been discussed for Case Study Help, the truth still stays that the product would not complement Southern State University Health System line of product. We have a look at appendix 2, we can see how the total gross profitability for the two models is anticipated to be approximately $49377 if 250 systems of each model are produced per year based on the strategy. The initial prepared marketing is roughly $52000 per year which would be putting a strain on the company's resources leaving Southern State University Health System with an unfavorable net earnings if the expenses are designated to Case Study Help just.

The fact that Southern State University Health System has already sustained a preliminary investment of $48000 in the form of capital cost and prototype development suggests that the earnings from Case Study Help is not enough to carry out the danger of sales cannibalization. Aside from that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market revealing low elasticity of need is not a preferable alternative particularly of it is impacting the sale of the business's earnings creating designs.


 

PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE