WhatsApp

Southland Corp A Case Study Help Checklist

Southland Corp A Case Study Help Checklist

Southland Corp A Case Study Solution
Southland Corp A Case Study Help
Southland Corp A Case Study Analysis



Analyses for Evaluating Southland Corp A decision to launch Case Study Solution


The following area focuses on the of marketing for Southland Corp A where the business's clients, rivals and core proficiencies have examined in order to validate whether the decision to introduce Case Study Help under Southland Corp A brand name would be a practical alternative or not. We have to start with looked at the kind of consumers that Southland Corp A deals in while an evaluation of the competitive environment and the company's strengths and weak points follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the validation for not releasing Case Study Help under Southland Corp A name.
Southland Corp A Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Southland Corp A clients can be segmented into two groups, industrial consumers and last consumers. Both the groups utilize Southland Corp A high performance adhesives while the company is not only associated with the production of these adhesives however also markets them to these consumer groups. There are 2 kinds of items that are being offered to these possible markets; instant adhesives and anaerobic adhesives. We would be focusing on the consumers of instant adhesives for this analysis given that the marketplace for the latter has a lower potential for Southland Corp A compared to that of immediate adhesives.

The total market for instantaneous adhesives is roughly 890,000 in the US in 1978 which covers both client groups which have been identified earlier.If we take a look at a breakdown of Southland Corp A prospective market or client groups, we can see that the business sells to OEMs (Initial Devices Manufacturers), Do-it-Yourself customers, repair work and overhauling companies (MRO) and producers dealing in items made from leather, wood, metal and plastic. This variety in customers suggests that Southland Corp A can target has various options in terms of segmenting the marketplace for its new item especially as each of these groups would be requiring the exact same kind of product with respective changes in product packaging, amount or demand. Nevertheless, the customer is not rate delicate or brand name conscious so launching a low priced dispenser under Southland Corp A name is not a recommended choice.

Company Analysis

Southland Corp A is not simply a producer of adhesives but takes pleasure in market leadership in the instant adhesive industry. The company has its own competent and competent sales force which includes value to sales by training the company's network of 250 distributors for assisting in the sale of adhesives. Southland Corp A believes in special distribution as suggested by the fact that it has actually picked to offer through 250 distributors whereas there is t a network of 10000 distributors that can be explored for broadening reach through suppliers. The company's reach is not restricted to North America only as it likewise delights in international sales. With 1400 outlets spread all across North America, Southland Corp A has its internal production plants rather than utilizing out-sourcing as the preferred technique.

Core skills are not limited to adhesive manufacturing only as Southland Corp A also concentrates on making adhesive giving devices to facilitate the use of its items. This double production strategy gives Southland Corp A an edge over competitors because none of the competitors of dispensing equipment makes immediate adhesives. Additionally, none of these rivals sells straight to the customer either and utilizes distributors for reaching out to consumers. While we are taking a look at the strengths of Southland Corp A, it is essential to highlight the business's weak points also.

The business's sales staff is experienced in training suppliers, the fact remains that the sales group is not trained in selling equipment so there is a possibility of relying heavily on suppliers when promoting adhesive devices. However, it ought to likewise be kept in mind that the suppliers are showing reluctance when it concerns offering devices that requires servicing which increases the difficulties of offering equipment under a specific trademark name.

If we look at Southland Corp A line of product in adhesive devices especially, the business has actually products focused on the high end of the market. The possibility of sales cannibalization exists if Southland Corp A offers Case Study Help under the same portfolio. Given the fact that Case Study Help is priced lower than Southland Corp A high-end line of product, sales cannibalization would definitely be impacting Southland Corp A sales revenue if the adhesive equipment is offered under the company's brand name.

We can see sales cannibalization affecting Southland Corp A 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. If Case Study Help is launched under the business's brand name, there is another possible threat which could reduce Southland Corp A profits. The truth that $175000 has actually been invested in promoting SuperBonder recommends that it is not a good time for releasing a dispenser which can highlight the truth that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the immediate adhesive.

In addition, if we take a look at the market in general, the adhesives market does disappoint brand name orientation or price consciousness which offers us 2 additional factors for not releasing a low priced item under the business's brand name.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Southland Corp A would be studied via Porter's 5 forces analysis which would highlight the degree of competition in the market.


Degree of Rivalry:

Currently we can see that the adhesive market has a high development potential due to the existence of fragmented sectors with Southland Corp A delighting in management and a combined market share of 75% with two other industry players, Eastman and Permabond. While industry rivalry between these players could be called 'extreme' as the customer is not brand mindful and each of these players has prominence in terms of market share, the truth still remains that the market is not saturated and still has several market sections which can be targeted as potential specific niche markets even when launching an adhesive. We can even point out the reality that sales cannibalization may be leading to market competition in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for immediate adhesives provides growth capacity.


Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the purchaser in this market is low particularly as the buyer has low knowledge about the product. While companies like Southland Corp A have managed to train distributors relating to adhesives, the last consumer is dependent on distributors. Roughly 72% of sales are made directly by producers and suppliers for immediate adhesives so the buyer has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Offered the fact that the adhesive market is dominated by three gamers, it could be stated that the supplier takes pleasure in a greater bargaining power compared to the buyer. The reality stays that the provider does not have much impact over the buyer at this point especially as the buyer does not show brand recognition or rate sensitivity. When it comes to the adhesive market while the buyer and the producer do not have a significant control over the actual sales, this indicates that the distributor has the higher power.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand loyalty and the ease of entry shown by foreign Japanese competitors in the immediate adhesive market suggests that the market allows ease of entry. However, if we take a look at Southland Corp A in particular, the company has dual abilities in terms of being a manufacturer of instant adhesives and adhesive dispensers. Prospective hazards in devices giving market are low which reveals the possibility of producing brand awareness in not only instantaneous adhesives however also in giving adhesives as none of the market players has managed to position itself in dual capabilities.

Danger of Substitutes: The threat of alternatives in the instant adhesive market is low while the dispenser market in particular has substitutes like Glumetic pointer applicators, inbuilt applicators, pencil applicators and sophisticated consoles. The truth stays that if Southland Corp A presented Case Study Help, it would be delighting in sales cannibalization for its own products. (see appendix 1 for framework).


4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Southland Corp A Case Study Help


Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has actually given different reasons for not releasing Case Study Help under Southland Corp A name, we have a recommended marketing mix for Case Study Help offered below if Southland Corp A chooses to go ahead with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target market selected for Case Study Help is 'Automobile services' for a variety of reasons. There are presently 89257 establishments in this sector and a high use of roughly 58900 lbs. is being used by 36.1 % of the market. This market has an extra growth capacity of 10.1% which might be a sufficient specific niche market sector for Case Study Help. Not just would a portable dispenser offer benefit to this specific market, the truth that the Do-it-Yourself market can also be targeted if a safe and clean low priced adhesive is being sold for use with SuperBonder. The product would be sold without the 'glumetic pointer' and 'vari-drop' so that the customer can choose whether he wishes to choose either of the two accessories or not.

Price: The suggested rate of Case Study Help has actually been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is offered through suppliers or via direct selling. This cost would not consist of the expense of the 'vari idea' or the 'glumetic tip'. A rate below $250 would not require approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at an automobile maintenance store needs to acquire the product on his own. This would increase the possibility of influencing mechanics to buy the item for use in their daily maintenance jobs.

Southland Corp A would only be getting $157 per unit as displayed in appendix 2 which provides a breakdown of gross profitability and net success for Southland Corp A for releasing Case Study Help.

Place: A circulation design where Southland Corp A directly sends the product to the regional supplier and keeps a 10% drop shipment allowance for the distributor would be used by Southland Corp A. Because the sales team is already participated in offering instant adhesives and they do not have proficiency in offering dispensers, including them in the selling procedure would be expensive particularly as each sales call expenses roughly $120. The suppliers are currently selling dispensers so selling Case Study Help through them would be a favorable choice.

Promotion: A low promotional spending plan needs to have been assigned to Case Study Help but the fact that the dispenser is a development and it requires to be marketed well in order to cover the capital expenses sustained for production, the suggested marketing plan costing $51816 is recommended for at first introducing the item in the market. The prepared advertisements in publications would be targeted at mechanics in car maintenance stores. (Recommended text for the ad is displayed in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summed up in appendix 4).


Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Southland Corp A Case Study Analysis

Although a suggested strategy in the form of a marketing mix has been gone over for Case Study Help, the reality still remains that the product would not match Southland Corp A line of product. We take a look at appendix 2, we can see how the total gross profitability for the two models is expected to be approximately $49377 if 250 systems of each model are manufactured each year based on the strategy. The initial prepared advertising is roughly $52000 per year which would be putting a stress on the business's resources leaving Southland Corp A with a negative net earnings if the costs are designated to Case Study Help only.

The truth that Southland Corp A has currently incurred a preliminary financial investment of $48000 in the form of capital expense and model development shows that the earnings from Case Study Help is insufficient to carry out the risk of sales cannibalization. Other than that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market showing low elasticity of need is not a more suitable alternative especially of it is affecting the sale of the business's earnings creating models.


 

PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE