Southland Corp B Case Study Help Checklist

Southland Corp B Case Study Help Checklist

Southland Corp B Case Study Solution
Southland Corp B Case Study Help
Southland Corp B Case Study Analysis

Analyses for Evaluating Southland Corp B decision to launch Case Study Solution

The following section concentrates on the of marketing for Southland Corp B where the business's customers, rivals and core proficiencies have actually examined in order to validate whether the decision to introduce Case Study Help under Southland Corp B brand name would be a feasible choice or not. We have firstly taken a look at the type of customers that Southland Corp B handle while an assessment of the competitive environment and the business's strengths and weaknesses follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the reason for not introducing Case Study Help under Southland Corp B name.
Southland Corp B Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Southland Corp B customers can be segmented into two groups, last consumers and industrial clients. Both the groups use Southland Corp B high performance adhesives while the business is not just involved in the production of these adhesives however also markets them to these consumer groups. There are two types of products that are being sold to these potential markets; instantaneous adhesives and anaerobic adhesives. We would be focusing on the customers of instantaneous adhesives for this analysis because the market for the latter has a lower capacity for Southland Corp B compared to that of immediate adhesives.

The overall market for instant adhesives is around 890,000 in the US in 1978 which covers both customer groups which have been determined earlier.If we take a look at a breakdown of Southland Corp B prospective market or client groups, we can see that the business sells to OEMs (Original Devices Makers), Do-it-Yourself clients, repair and revamping business (MRO) and producers dealing in items made from leather, metal, wood and plastic. This variety in customers suggests that Southland Corp B can target has different alternatives in regards to segmenting the marketplace for its new item particularly as each of these groups would be needing the exact same kind of item with particular modifications in amount, need or packaging. Nevertheless, the client is not rate delicate or brand name mindful so introducing a low priced dispenser under Southland Corp B name is not a suggested option.

Company Analysis

Southland Corp B is not just a manufacturer of adhesives however takes pleasure in market leadership in the immediate adhesive market. The business has its own proficient and qualified sales force which includes worth to sales by training the company's network of 250 suppliers for helping with the sale of adhesives. Southland Corp B believes in unique distribution as indicated by the reality that it has chosen to offer through 250 distributors whereas there is t a network of 10000 distributors that can be explored for expanding reach by means of suppliers. The company's reach is not limited to North America just as it also takes pleasure in international sales. With 1400 outlets spread all throughout The United States and Canada, Southland Corp B has its internal production plants rather than using out-sourcing as the favored strategy.

Core skills are not limited to adhesive manufacturing only as Southland Corp B likewise concentrates on making adhesive dispensing devices to facilitate the use of its items. This double production technique offers Southland Corp B an edge over competitors since none of the rivals of dispensing devices makes immediate adhesives. In addition, none of these rivals sells straight to the consumer either and makes use of distributors for connecting to customers. While we are taking a look at the strengths of Southland Corp B, it is very important to highlight the business's weaknesses too.

Although the company's sales staff is proficient in training suppliers, the truth stays that the sales group is not trained in selling devices so there is a possibility of relying heavily on suppliers when promoting adhesive equipment. It ought to also be noted that the distributors are revealing unwillingness when it comes to offering equipment that needs maintenance which increases the challenges of offering devices under a specific brand name.

The company has actually products aimed at the high end of the market if we look at Southland Corp B item line in adhesive equipment especially. The possibility of sales cannibalization exists if Southland Corp B offers Case Study Help under the very same portfolio. Offered the truth that Case Study Help is priced lower than Southland Corp B high-end product line, sales cannibalization would definitely be affecting Southland Corp B sales revenue if the adhesive equipment is sold under the business's brand name.

We can see sales cannibalization affecting Southland Corp B 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. There is another possible risk which might lower Southland Corp B revenue if Case Study Help is released under the business's trademark name. The fact that $175000 has been invested in promoting SuperBonder suggests that it is not a great time for introducing a dispenser which can highlight the fact that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the instantaneous adhesive.

Furthermore, if we look at the marketplace in general, the adhesives market does disappoint brand name orientation or price awareness which offers us two additional reasons for not launching a low priced product under the company's brand.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Southland Corp B would be studied through Porter's five forces analysis which would highlight the degree of competition in the market.

Degree of Rivalry:

Presently we can see that the adhesive market has a high growth capacity due to the existence of fragmented segments with Southland Corp B taking pleasure in management and a combined market share of 75% with 2 other industry players, Eastman and Permabond. While market competition in between these gamers could be called 'extreme' as the consumer is not brand name conscious and each of these players has prominence in terms of market share, the fact still remains that the industry is not saturated and still has a number of market sections which can be targeted as prospective specific niche markets even when releasing an adhesive. Nevertheless, we can even mention the truth that sales cannibalization may be leading to market competition in the adhesive dispenser market while the marketplace for instantaneous adhesives provides growth capacity.

Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the purchaser in this industry is low specifically as the buyer has low knowledge about the item. While business like Southland Corp B have handled to train suppliers regarding adhesives, the final customer depends on distributors. Around 72% of sales are made directly by manufacturers and suppliers for instantaneous adhesives so the purchaser has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Offered the reality that the adhesive market is dominated by 3 gamers, it could be said that the provider delights in a greater bargaining power compared to the buyer. However, the fact stays that the provider does not have much influence over the buyer at this point particularly as the buyer does disappoint brand name recognition or rate level of sensitivity. When it comes to the adhesive market while the manufacturer and the buyer do not have a significant control over the actual sales, this suggests that the supplier has the greater power.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand name commitment and the ease of entry revealed by foreign Japanese competitors in the instant adhesive market shows that the market enables ease of entry. Nevertheless, if we look at Southland Corp B in particular, the company has double abilities in terms of being a maker of instant adhesives and adhesive dispensers. Possible hazards in equipment giving market are low which reveals the possibility of developing brand awareness in not only immediate adhesives but likewise in dispensing adhesives as none of the industry gamers has managed to position itself in dual capabilities.

Danger of Substitutes: The threat of substitutes in the immediate adhesive industry is low while the dispenser market in particular has replacements like Glumetic suggestion applicators, inbuilt applicators, pencil applicators and advanced consoles. The truth stays that if Southland Corp B introduced Case Study Help, it would be delighting in sales cannibalization for its own items. (see appendix 1 for structure).

4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Southland Corp B Case Study Help

Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has actually given different reasons for not launching Case Study Help under Southland Corp B name, we have actually a recommended marketing mix for Case Study Help offered below if Southland Corp B decides to go on with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target market picked for Case Study Help is 'Motor car services' for a number of factors. This market has an extra growth potential of 10.1% which might be a great enough niche market sector for Case Study Help. Not just would a portable dispenser offer benefit to this specific market, the reality that the Do-it-Yourself market can likewise be targeted if a safe and clean low priced adhesive is being sold for usage with SuperBonder.

Price: The recommended cost of Case Study Help has actually been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is offered through distributors or by means of direct selling. This cost would not consist of the expense of the 'vari pointer' or the 'glumetic suggestion'. A price listed below $250 would not require approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at an automobile maintenance shop requires to purchase the item on his own. This would increase the possibility of influencing mechanics to buy the product for use in their everyday upkeep tasks.

Southland Corp B would only be getting $157 per unit as displayed in appendix 2 which offers a breakdown of gross success and net success for Southland Corp B for launching Case Study Help.

Place: A circulation model where Southland Corp B directly sends the product to the regional distributor and keeps a 10% drop shipment allowance for the distributor would be used by Southland Corp B. Because the sales team is currently participated in selling instant adhesives and they do not have know-how in offering dispensers, including them in the selling procedure would be costly especially as each sales call expenses approximately $120. The suppliers are already offering dispensers so offering Case Study Help through them would be a beneficial alternative.

Promotion: A low advertising spending plan must have been appointed to Case Study Help however the fact that the dispenser is a development and it needs to be marketed well in order to cover the capital expenses incurred for production, the recommended advertising plan costing $51816 is advised for initially presenting the item in the market. The prepared ads in magazines would be targeted at mechanics in car maintenance stores. (Suggested text for the advertisement is shown in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summarized in appendix 4).

Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Southland Corp B Case Study Analysis

Although a suggested plan of action in the form of a marketing mix has actually been discussed for Case Study Help, the fact still remains that the item would not complement Southland Corp B product line. We take a look at appendix 2, we can see how the total gross profitability for the two designs is expected to be roughly $49377 if 250 systems of each model are made per year based on the strategy. The initial planned advertising is approximately $52000 per year which would be putting a strain on the company's resources leaving Southland Corp B with an unfavorable net income if the expenses are assigned to Case Study Help just.

The reality that Southland Corp B has actually currently incurred an initial investment of $48000 in the form of capital cost and model development suggests that the income from Case Study Help is insufficient to carry out the threat of sales cannibalization. Besides that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market revealing low elasticity of need is not a more suitable choice specifically of it is affecting the sale of the company's earnings generating models.