WhatsApp

Stone Container Corporation A Case Study Help Checklist

Stone Container Corporation A Case Study Help Checklist

Stone Container Corporation A Case Study Solution
Stone Container Corporation A Case Study Help
Stone Container Corporation A Case Study Analysis



Analyses for Evaluating Stone Container Corporation A decision to launch Case Study Solution


The following section concentrates on the of marketing for Stone Container Corporation A where the business's clients, competitors and core competencies have actually evaluated in order to justify whether the decision to launch Case Study Help under Stone Container Corporation A trademark name would be a feasible option or not. We have actually to start with taken a look at the type of customers that Stone Container Corporation A deals in while an examination of the competitive environment and the business's weaknesses and strengths follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the validation for not introducing Case Study Help under Stone Container Corporation A name.
Stone Container Corporation A Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Both the groups utilize Stone Container Corporation A high performance adhesives while the business is not just included in the production of these adhesives but also markets them to these consumer groups. We would be focusing on the customers of instantaneous adhesives for this analysis given that the market for the latter has a lower capacity for Stone Container Corporation A compared to that of immediate adhesives.

The total market for immediate adhesives is roughly 890,000 in the United States in 1978 which covers both consumer groups which have been recognized earlier.If we look at a breakdown of Stone Container Corporation A potential market or client groups, we can see that the company sells to OEMs (Initial Equipment Producers), Do-it-Yourself consumers, repair work and upgrading companies (MRO) and makers dealing in items made of leather, plastic, metal and wood. This variety in clients recommends that Stone Container Corporation A can target has different choices in regards to segmenting the market for its new item particularly as each of these groups would be requiring the exact same kind of product with particular changes in demand, quantity or product packaging. The consumer is not rate delicate or brand conscious so releasing a low priced dispenser under Stone Container Corporation A name is not a recommended alternative.

Company Analysis

Stone Container Corporation A is not just a manufacturer of adhesives however enjoys market leadership in the instant adhesive market. The business has its own experienced and certified sales force which adds worth to sales by training the company's network of 250 distributors for helping with the sale of adhesives. Stone Container Corporation A believes in exclusive distribution as shown by the fact that it has selected to sell through 250 distributors whereas there is t a network of 10000 suppliers that can be checked out for broadening reach through distributors. The business's reach is not restricted to The United States and Canada only as it also delights in global sales. With 1400 outlets spread all across North America, Stone Container Corporation A has its internal production plants instead of using out-sourcing as the preferred strategy.

Core skills are not restricted to adhesive production only as Stone Container Corporation A also specializes in making adhesive giving devices to facilitate the use of its items. This dual production method provides Stone Container Corporation A an edge over rivals because none of the rivals of dispensing devices makes instant adhesives. Additionally, none of these competitors sells straight to the consumer either and uses suppliers for connecting to clients. While we are looking at the strengths of Stone Container Corporation A, it is important to highlight the company's weak points.

Although the business's sales personnel is skilled in training suppliers, the truth remains that the sales group is not trained in selling devices so there is a possibility of relying greatly on suppliers when promoting adhesive equipment. It should also be kept in mind that the distributors are revealing hesitation when it comes to selling devices that needs servicing which increases the challenges of selling devices under a particular brand name.

If we look at Stone Container Corporation A line of product in adhesive equipment especially, the business has products focused on the luxury of the marketplace. The possibility of sales cannibalization exists if Stone Container Corporation A sells Case Study Help under the exact same portfolio. Given the truth that Case Study Help is priced lower than Stone Container Corporation A high-end line of product, sales cannibalization would certainly be affecting Stone Container Corporation A sales income if the adhesive equipment is offered under the business's brand name.

We can see sales cannibalization affecting Stone Container Corporation A 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. If Case Study Help is released under the business's brand name, there is another possible risk which might reduce Stone Container Corporation A income. The reality that $175000 has been invested in promoting SuperBonder recommends that it is not a great time for releasing a dispenser which can highlight the reality that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the instant adhesive.

In addition, if we take a look at the market in general, the adhesives market does disappoint brand orientation or cost awareness which provides us 2 additional factors for not releasing a low priced product under the company's trademark name.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Stone Container Corporation A would be studied by means of Porter's five forces analysis which would highlight the degree of competition in the market.


Degree of Rivalry:

Currently we can see that the adhesive market has a high growth potential due to the presence of fragmented sectors with Stone Container Corporation A taking pleasure in leadership and a combined market share of 75% with two other market players, Eastman and Permabond. While market rivalry in between these players could be called 'extreme' as the consumer is not brand name conscious and each of these gamers has prominence in terms of market share, the reality still stays that the market is not filled and still has a number of market sectors which can be targeted as prospective specific niche markets even when launching an adhesive. We can even point out the fact that sales cannibalization might be leading to industry rivalry in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for instantaneous adhesives offers development capacity.


Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the purchaser in this industry is low especially as the buyer has low knowledge about the item. While companies like Stone Container Corporation A have handled to train suppliers regarding adhesives, the final customer is dependent on distributors. Around 72% of sales are made straight by producers and suppliers for instantaneous adhesives so the buyer has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Offered the fact that the adhesive market is dominated by three players, it could be said that the supplier delights in a greater bargaining power compared to the purchaser. However, the reality remains that the provider does not have much impact over the purchaser at this moment especially as the buyer does not show brand acknowledgment or cost sensitivity. When it comes to the adhesive market while the manufacturer and the buyer do not have a major control over the real sales, this shows that the supplier has the greater power.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand commitment and the ease of entry revealed by foreign Japanese competitors in the instantaneous adhesive market shows that the marketplace permits ease of entry. If we look at Stone Container Corporation A in specific, the business has double abilities in terms of being a manufacturer of immediate adhesives and adhesive dispensers. Prospective risks in devices giving industry are low which reveals the possibility of developing brand name awareness in not just immediate adhesives however also in giving adhesives as none of the market players has handled to place itself in dual abilities.

Hazard of Substitutes: The threat of substitutes in the immediate adhesive market is low while the dispenser market in particular has replacements like Glumetic idea applicators, in-built applicators, pencil applicators and advanced consoles. The fact remains that if Stone Container Corporation A introduced Case Study Help, it would be enjoying sales cannibalization for its own items. (see appendix 1 for structure).


4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Stone Container Corporation A Case Study Help


Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has provided various reasons for not introducing Case Study Help under Stone Container Corporation A name, we have a suggested marketing mix for Case Study Help provided below if Stone Container Corporation A decides to go ahead with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target audience chosen for Case Study Help is 'Automobile services' for a variety of reasons. There are presently 89257 facilities in this section and a high usage of roughly 58900 lbs. is being used by 36.1 % of the market. This market has an additional development capacity of 10.1% which may be a sufficient specific niche market segment for Case Study Help. Not just would a portable dispenser offer benefit to this particular market, the fact that the Diy market can also be targeted if a drinkable low priced adhesive is being cost usage with SuperBonder. The item would be offered without the 'glumetic tip' and 'vari-drop' so that the customer can choose whether he wishes to opt for either of the two devices or not.

Price: The recommended price of Case Study Help has actually been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is sold through suppliers or via direct selling. This price would not include the expense of the 'vari idea' or the 'glumetic suggestion'. A rate listed below $250 would not need approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at an automobile upkeep shop needs to acquire the product on his own. This would increase the possibility of affecting mechanics to purchase the item for use in their day-to-day maintenance jobs.

Stone Container Corporation A would just be getting $157 per unit as shown in appendix 2 which gives a breakdown of gross success and net success for Stone Container Corporation A for introducing Case Study Help.

Place: A circulation design where Stone Container Corporation A straight sends the item to the regional distributor and keeps a 10% drop shipment allowance for the distributor would be utilized by Stone Container Corporation A. Since the sales team is already participated in offering instant adhesives and they do not have knowledge in offering dispensers, including them in the selling process would be expensive especially as each sales call costs roughly $120. The distributors are currently selling dispensers so offering Case Study Help through them would be a favorable choice.

Promotion: A low marketing budget must have been appointed to Case Study Help but the reality that the dispenser is a development and it requires to be marketed well in order to cover the capital expenses incurred for production, the recommended marketing strategy costing $51816 is advised for at first introducing the product in the market. The prepared advertisements in magazines would be targeted at mechanics in car upkeep stores. (Suggested text for the advertisement is displayed in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summarized in appendix 4).


Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Stone Container Corporation A Case Study Analysis

Although a recommended plan of action in the form of a marketing mix has been gone over for Case Study Help, the truth still remains that the item would not complement Stone Container Corporation A line of product. We have a look at appendix 2, we can see how the overall gross profitability for the two designs is anticipated to be around $49377 if 250 systems of each model are made each year based on the plan. The initial planned advertising is roughly $52000 per year which would be putting a stress on the company's resources leaving Stone Container Corporation A with a negative net earnings if the expenditures are assigned to Case Study Help only.

The fact that Stone Container Corporation A has already sustained an initial financial investment of $48000 in the form of capital cost and prototype development suggests that the revenue from Case Study Help is insufficient to carry out the risk of sales cannibalization. Aside from that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market revealing low elasticity of demand is not a preferable choice specifically of it is impacting the sale of the company's revenue producing models.


 

PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE