WhatsApp

Technology Plus Inc Moving Onward Case Study Help Checklist

Technology Plus Inc Moving Onward Case Study Help Checklist

Technology Plus Inc Moving Onward Case Study Solution
Technology Plus Inc Moving Onward Case Study Help
Technology Plus Inc Moving Onward Case Study Analysis



Analyses for Evaluating Technology Plus Inc Moving Onward decision to launch Case Study Solution


The following section focuses on the of marketing for Technology Plus Inc Moving Onward where the company's consumers, competitors and core competencies have assessed in order to validate whether the choice to introduce Case Study Help under Technology Plus Inc Moving Onward brand name would be a feasible alternative or not. We have actually firstly taken a look at the type of clients that Technology Plus Inc Moving Onward handle while an examination of the competitive environment and the business's weak points and strengths follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the justification for not introducing Case Study Help under Technology Plus Inc Moving Onward name.
Technology Plus Inc Moving Onward Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Both the groups use Technology Plus Inc Moving Onward high efficiency adhesives while the company is not only included in the production of these adhesives but also markets them to these consumer groups. We would be focusing on the consumers of instant adhesives for this analysis because the market for the latter has a lower capacity for Technology Plus Inc Moving Onward compared to that of instantaneous adhesives.

The overall market for immediate adhesives is around 890,000 in the US in 1978 which covers both customer groups which have actually been recognized earlier.If we take a look at a breakdown of Technology Plus Inc Moving Onward possible market or client groups, we can see that the company offers to OEMs (Initial Devices Makers), Do-it-Yourself clients, repair and overhauling business (MRO) and producers dealing in products made from leather, metal, plastic and wood. This variety in customers recommends that Technology Plus Inc Moving Onward can target has different options in regards to segmenting the market for its new product specifically as each of these groups would be needing the exact same type of item with particular modifications in need, amount or packaging. The client is not cost delicate or brand name mindful so releasing a low priced dispenser under Technology Plus Inc Moving Onward name is not a recommended option.

Company Analysis

Technology Plus Inc Moving Onward is not just a manufacturer of adhesives however enjoys market management in the instant adhesive industry. The business has its own competent and competent sales force which adds value to sales by training the company's network of 250 suppliers for helping with the sale of adhesives. Technology Plus Inc Moving Onward believes in unique distribution as suggested by the reality that it has selected to offer through 250 distributors whereas there is t a network of 10000 suppliers that can be explored for broadening reach via suppliers. The company's reach is not restricted to North America only as it also delights in worldwide sales. With 1400 outlets spread all throughout North America, Technology Plus Inc Moving Onward has its in-house production plants rather than utilizing out-sourcing as the favored technique.

Core skills are not limited to adhesive production only as Technology Plus Inc Moving Onward also concentrates on making adhesive dispensing equipment to assist in the use of its items. This dual production technique provides Technology Plus Inc Moving Onward an edge over competitors given that none of the rivals of dispensing devices makes instant adhesives. Additionally, none of these rivals offers directly to the customer either and uses suppliers for reaching out to clients. While we are looking at the strengths of Technology Plus Inc Moving Onward, it is essential to highlight the business's weaknesses also.

The company's sales staff is competent in training distributors, the truth remains that the sales group is not trained in selling equipment so there is a possibility of relying greatly on suppliers when promoting adhesive devices. It ought to likewise be noted that the suppliers are revealing reluctance when it comes to offering devices that needs servicing which increases the obstacles of offering equipment under a particular brand name.

If we look at Technology Plus Inc Moving Onward product line in adhesive equipment especially, the business has products focused on the high-end of the market. If Technology Plus Inc Moving Onward sells Case Study Help under the same portfolio, the possibility of sales cannibalization exists. Offered the fact that Case Study Help is priced lower than Technology Plus Inc Moving Onward high-end product line, sales cannibalization would absolutely be affecting Technology Plus Inc Moving Onward sales earnings if the adhesive devices is offered under the business's trademark name.

We can see sales cannibalization impacting Technology Plus Inc Moving Onward 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. There is another possible hazard which might lower Technology Plus Inc Moving Onward earnings if Case Study Help is introduced under the business's brand. The truth that $175000 has been invested in promoting SuperBonder suggests that it is not a great time for introducing a dispenser which can highlight the reality that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the immediate adhesive.

Additionally, if we take a look at the marketplace in general, the adhesives market does not show brand name orientation or cost consciousness which offers us two additional reasons for not introducing a low priced product under the business's brand.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Technology Plus Inc Moving Onward would be studied by means of Porter's five forces analysis which would highlight the degree of competition in the market.


Degree of Rivalry:

Currently we can see that the adhesive market has a high growth potential due to the presence of fragmented segments with Technology Plus Inc Moving Onward taking pleasure in leadership and a combined market share of 75% with 2 other industry gamers, Eastman and Permabond. While industry competition in between these players could be called 'extreme' as the customer is not brand name mindful and each of these players has prominence in regards to market share, the truth still remains that the industry is not filled and still has a number of market sections which can be targeted as potential niche markets even when launching an adhesive. We can even point out the reality that sales cannibalization might be leading to market competition in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for immediate adhesives uses growth potential.


Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the purchaser in this industry is low specifically as the buyer has low knowledge about the item. While companies like Technology Plus Inc Moving Onward have actually managed to train distributors concerning adhesives, the last consumer is dependent on distributors. Approximately 72% of sales are made directly by manufacturers and distributors for instantaneous adhesives so the purchaser has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Provided the fact that the adhesive market is controlled by 3 gamers, it could be said that the provider delights in a greater bargaining power compared to the buyer. The truth remains that the provider does not have much impact over the purchaser at this point specifically as the buyer does not reveal brand name recognition or cost level of sensitivity. This indicates that the distributor has the higher power when it pertains to the adhesive market while the purchaser and the manufacturer do not have a significant control over the real sales.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand name loyalty and the ease of entry revealed by foreign Japanese rivals in the instant adhesive market indicates that the marketplace permits ease of entry. Nevertheless, if we look at Technology Plus Inc Moving Onward in particular, the business has double abilities in regards to being a maker of immediate adhesives and adhesive dispensers. Prospective hazards in equipment dispensing industry are low which reveals the possibility of creating brand awareness in not only instant adhesives but also in dispensing adhesives as none of the industry players has actually managed to position itself in double abilities.

Threat of Substitutes: The hazard of replacements in the immediate adhesive industry is low while the dispenser market in particular has substitutes like Glumetic pointer applicators, inbuilt applicators, pencil applicators and sophisticated consoles. The reality remains that if Technology Plus Inc Moving Onward presented Case Study Help, it would be delighting in sales cannibalization for its own items. (see appendix 1 for structure).


4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Technology Plus Inc Moving Onward Case Study Help


Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has provided various reasons for not introducing Case Study Help under Technology Plus Inc Moving Onward name, we have actually a recommended marketing mix for Case Study Help offered below if Technology Plus Inc Moving Onward decides to go on with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target audience picked for Case Study Help is 'Automobile services' for a variety of reasons. There are presently 89257 establishments in this segment and a high usage of around 58900 lbs. is being utilized by 36.1 % of the market. This market has an additional development capacity of 10.1% which may be a sufficient specific niche market segment for Case Study Help. Not only would a portable dispenser offer benefit to this particular market, the fact that the Do-it-Yourself market can likewise be targeted if a potable low priced adhesive is being sold for usage with SuperBonder. The item would be offered without the 'glumetic tip' and 'vari-drop' so that the consumer can decide whether he wants to select either of the two devices or not.

Price: The recommended price of Case Study Help has actually been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is sold through distributors or through direct selling. This rate would not include the expense of the 'vari tip' or the 'glumetic suggestion'. A cost below $250 would not need approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor vehicle upkeep store needs to purchase the item on his own. This would increase the possibility of influencing mechanics to acquire the item for use in their day-to-day upkeep jobs.

Technology Plus Inc Moving Onward would just be getting $157 per unit as shown in appendix 2 which gives a breakdown of gross profitability and net success for Technology Plus Inc Moving Onward for introducing Case Study Help.

Place: A circulation design where Technology Plus Inc Moving Onward straight sends out the product to the local supplier and keeps a 10% drop shipment allowance for the supplier would be utilized by Technology Plus Inc Moving Onward. Given that the sales group is currently taken part in offering instant adhesives and they do not have knowledge in selling dispensers, involving them in the selling process would be costly particularly as each sales call expenses approximately $120. The distributors are already selling dispensers so selling Case Study Help through them would be a beneficial alternative.

Promotion: A low advertising spending plan needs to have been designated to Case Study Help however the reality that the dispenser is a development and it needs to be marketed well in order to cover the capital costs sustained for production, the recommended advertising plan costing $51816 is advised for at first presenting the item in the market. The prepared advertisements in magazines would be targeted at mechanics in car maintenance shops. (Suggested text for the ad is shown in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summed up in appendix 4).


Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Technology Plus Inc Moving Onward Case Study Analysis

A recommended strategy of action in the type of a marketing mix has actually been discussed for Case Study Help, the reality still stays that the product would not match Technology Plus Inc Moving Onward product line. We take a look at appendix 2, we can see how the overall gross profitability for the two models is expected to be roughly $49377 if 250 systems of each model are manufactured each year based on the strategy. Nevertheless, the preliminary planned advertising is approximately $52000 per year which would be putting a stress on the business's resources leaving Technology Plus Inc Moving Onward with an unfavorable earnings if the costs are allocated to Case Study Help only.

The reality that Technology Plus Inc Moving Onward has already sustained a preliminary investment of $48000 in the form of capital expense and model development shows that the revenue from Case Study Help is not enough to carry out the risk of sales cannibalization. Aside from that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market showing low flexibility of need is not a more suitable option specifically of it is affecting the sale of the business's earnings producing models.


 

PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE