WhatsApp

Thompson Asset Management Case Study Help Checklist

Thompson Asset Management Case Study Help Checklist

Thompson Asset Management Case Study Solution
Thompson Asset Management Case Study Help
Thompson Asset Management Case Study Analysis



Analyses for Evaluating Thompson Asset Management decision to launch Case Study Solution


The following section concentrates on the of marketing for Thompson Asset Management where the company's clients, competitors and core proficiencies have evaluated in order to validate whether the decision to release Case Study Help under Thompson Asset Management trademark name would be a practical option or not. We have first of all taken a look at the kind of clients that Thompson Asset Management handle while an evaluation of the competitive environment and the business's strengths and weaknesses follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the validation for not introducing Case Study Help under Thompson Asset Management name.
Thompson Asset Management Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Both the groups utilize Thompson Asset Management high efficiency adhesives while the company is not just involved in the production of these adhesives but also markets them to these client groups. We would be focusing on the consumers of immediate adhesives for this analysis considering that the market for the latter has a lower capacity for Thompson Asset Management compared to that of immediate adhesives.

The overall market for immediate adhesives is roughly 890,000 in the United States in 1978 which covers both consumer groups which have actually been identified earlier.If we look at a breakdown of Thompson Asset Management prospective market or customer groups, we can see that the company sells to OEMs (Original Equipment Makers), Do-it-Yourself clients, repair and overhauling business (MRO) and producers handling products made of leather, plastic, metal and wood. This variety in customers suggests that Thompson Asset Management can target has various alternatives in regards to segmenting the marketplace for its brand-new product specifically as each of these groups would be requiring the exact same kind of item with respective changes in need, packaging or amount. The customer is not cost sensitive or brand name mindful so launching a low priced dispenser under Thompson Asset Management name is not a recommended alternative.

Company Analysis

Thompson Asset Management is not just a manufacturer of adhesives but takes pleasure in market management in the immediate adhesive industry. The company has its own knowledgeable and qualified sales force which includes worth to sales by training the company's network of 250 suppliers for helping with the sale of adhesives.

Core proficiencies are not limited to adhesive production only as Thompson Asset Management also specializes in making adhesive dispensing devices to facilitate making use of its products. This dual production technique offers Thompson Asset Management an edge over competitors given that none of the rivals of dispensing devices makes instant adhesives. In addition, none of these rivals sells directly to the customer either and uses suppliers for reaching out to consumers. While we are looking at the strengths of Thompson Asset Management, it is important to highlight the company's weak points as well.

Although the business's sales staff is competent in training distributors, the truth remains that the sales group is not trained in offering equipment so there is a possibility of relying heavily on suppliers when promoting adhesive devices. It should also be noted that the distributors are revealing unwillingness when it comes to offering devices that requires maintenance which increases the obstacles of selling equipment under a specific brand name.

If we look at Thompson Asset Management line of product in adhesive equipment especially, the business has items aimed at the luxury of the market. If Thompson Asset Management offers Case Study Help under the very same portfolio, the possibility of sales cannibalization exists. Offered the fact that Case Study Help is priced lower than Thompson Asset Management high-end line of product, sales cannibalization would certainly be impacting Thompson Asset Management sales revenue if the adhesive devices is offered under the company's brand name.

We can see sales cannibalization impacting Thompson Asset Management 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. There is another possible hazard which might lower Thompson Asset Management income if Case Study Help is released under the company's trademark name. The reality that $175000 has actually been spent in promoting SuperBonder recommends that it is not a great time for launching a dispenser which can highlight the reality that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the instantaneous adhesive.

Additionally, if we look at the marketplace in general, the adhesives market does disappoint brand orientation or cost awareness which offers us 2 extra reasons for not introducing a low priced product under the business's brand.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Thompson Asset Management would be studied by means of Porter's five forces analysis which would highlight the degree of rivalry in the market.


Degree of Rivalry:

Presently we can see that the adhesive market has a high growth potential due to the existence of fragmented sections with Thompson Asset Management taking pleasure in leadership and a combined market share of 75% with 2 other market gamers, Eastman and Permabond. While market rivalry in between these players could be called 'extreme' as the consumer is not brand mindful and each of these players has prominence in terms of market share, the fact still remains that the market is not filled and still has a number of market segments which can be targeted as prospective specific niche markets even when launching an adhesive. However, we can even point out the reality that sales cannibalization might be causing market competition in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for instant adhesives offers growth capacity.


Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the purchaser in this market is low particularly as the buyer has low understanding about the item. While business like Thompson Asset Management have handled to train distributors concerning adhesives, the final customer depends on distributors. Around 72% of sales are made directly by producers and distributors for instantaneous adhesives so the purchaser has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Offered the fact that the adhesive market is controlled by three gamers, it could be said that the provider delights in a higher bargaining power compared to the purchaser. Nevertheless, the fact stays that the supplier does not have much influence over the purchaser at this moment specifically as the buyer does disappoint brand name acknowledgment or rate level of sensitivity. This suggests that the distributor has the greater power when it comes to the adhesive market while the producer and the buyer do not have a major control over the real sales.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand name commitment and the ease of entry shown by foreign Japanese rivals in the instant adhesive market shows that the market permits ease of entry. However, if we take a look at Thompson Asset Management in particular, the business has double capabilities in terms of being a producer of instant adhesives and adhesive dispensers. Prospective threats in equipment giving industry are low which reveals the possibility of producing brand name awareness in not just instant adhesives but likewise in giving adhesives as none of the industry players has managed to place itself in dual capabilities.

Threat of Substitutes: The danger of substitutes in the immediate adhesive industry is low while the dispenser market in particular has replacements like Glumetic suggestion applicators, in-built applicators, pencil applicators and sophisticated consoles. The fact stays that if Thompson Asset Management presented Case Study Help, it would be enjoying sales cannibalization for its own products. (see appendix 1 for framework).


4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Thompson Asset Management Case Study Help


Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has actually provided various reasons for not launching Case Study Help under Thompson Asset Management name, we have actually a suggested marketing mix for Case Study Help given listed below if Thompson Asset Management chooses to go on with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target market chosen for Case Study Help is 'Motor vehicle services' for a number of reasons. There are presently 89257 establishments in this sector and a high use of roughly 58900 lbs. is being utilized by 36.1 % of the marketplace. This market has an additional development potential of 10.1% which may be a sufficient niche market sector for Case Study Help. Not just would a portable dispenser offer convenience to this particular market, the reality that the Do-it-Yourself market can likewise be targeted if a drinkable low priced adhesive is being cost usage with SuperBonder. The item would be offered without the 'glumetic tip' and 'vari-drop' so that the customer can choose whether he wishes to go with either of the two accessories or not.

Price: The suggested rate of Case Study Help has been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is sold through distributors or via direct selling. A price below $250 would not need approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor vehicle maintenance shop needs to acquire the product on his own.

Thompson Asset Management would only be getting $157 per unit as displayed in appendix 2 which provides a breakdown of gross success and net profitability for Thompson Asset Management for launching Case Study Help.

Place: A distribution design where Thompson Asset Management directly sends out the item to the regional distributor and keeps a 10% drop delivery allowance for the distributor would be used by Thompson Asset Management. Considering that the sales group is already engaged in selling instant adhesives and they do not have expertise in offering dispensers, involving them in the selling procedure would be pricey particularly as each sales call expenses approximately $120. The suppliers are currently offering dispensers so offering Case Study Help through them would be a beneficial alternative.

Promotion: A low marketing spending plan should have been appointed to Case Study Help however the truth that the dispenser is an innovation and it requires to be marketed well in order to cover the capital expenses incurred for production, the suggested advertising strategy costing $51816 is suggested for initially introducing the item in the market. The planned ads in publications would be targeted at mechanics in car upkeep stores. (Recommended text for the ad is displayed in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summarized in appendix 4).


Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Thompson Asset Management Case Study Analysis

A recommended strategy of action in the form of a marketing mix has actually been discussed for Case Study Help, the fact still stays that the item would not complement Thompson Asset Management product line. We have a look at appendix 2, we can see how the total gross profitability for the two models is anticipated to be around $49377 if 250 units of each model are manufactured per year according to the strategy. The initial planned advertising is approximately $52000 per year which would be putting a stress on the company's resources leaving Thompson Asset Management with an unfavorable net income if the costs are allocated to Case Study Help just.

The truth that Thompson Asset Management has actually currently sustained a preliminary investment of $48000 in the form of capital cost and model development suggests that the earnings from Case Study Help is inadequate to carry out the danger of sales cannibalization. Aside from that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market showing low elasticity of demand is not a more effective alternative specifically of it is affecting the sale of the company's income creating models.



PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE