WhatsApp

Tire City Inc Case Study Help Checklist

Tire City Inc Case Study Help Checklist

Tire City Inc Case Study Solution
Tire City Inc Case Study Help
Tire City Inc Case Study Analysis



Analyses for Evaluating Tire City Inc decision to launch Case Study Solution


The following section concentrates on the of marketing for Tire City Inc where the company's customers, rivals and core proficiencies have assessed in order to validate whether the choice to launch Case Study Help under Tire City Inc brand would be a possible alternative or not. We have to start with taken a look at the type of consumers that Tire City Inc handle while an evaluation of the competitive environment and the business's strengths and weak points follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the justification for not introducing Case Study Help under Tire City Inc name.
Tire City Inc Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Both the groups utilize Tire City Inc high performance adhesives while the business is not just involved in the production of these adhesives but also markets them to these consumer groups. We would be focusing on the consumers of instantaneous adhesives for this analysis considering that the market for the latter has a lower potential for Tire City Inc compared to that of instantaneous adhesives.

The overall market for instant adhesives is approximately 890,000 in the US in 1978 which covers both customer groups which have been identified earlier.If we take a look at a breakdown of Tire City Inc potential market or customer groups, we can see that the business sells to OEMs (Initial Equipment Manufacturers), Do-it-Yourself consumers, repair work and revamping business (MRO) and manufacturers handling products made of leather, plastic, wood and metal. This variety in consumers suggests that Tire City Inc can target has different options in terms of segmenting the marketplace for its brand-new item specifically as each of these groups would be requiring the very same kind of product with respective changes in quantity, product packaging or need. However, the consumer is not cost sensitive or brand name mindful so releasing a low priced dispenser under Tire City Inc name is not a suggested option.

Company Analysis

Tire City Inc is not just a manufacturer of adhesives but takes pleasure in market leadership in the instantaneous adhesive industry. The business has its own skilled and qualified sales force which adds value to sales by training the business's network of 250 distributors for helping with the sale of adhesives. Tire City Inc believes in special distribution as indicated by the reality that it has chosen to offer through 250 distributors whereas there is t a network of 10000 distributors that can be checked out for expanding reach by means of distributors. The business's reach is not restricted to The United States and Canada just as it likewise takes pleasure in international sales. With 1400 outlets spread out all throughout North America, Tire City Inc has its internal production plants instead of utilizing out-sourcing as the preferred method.

Core competences are not restricted to adhesive manufacturing just as Tire City Inc likewise specializes in making adhesive dispensing equipment to assist in using its items. This dual production method gives Tire City Inc an edge over competitors considering that none of the rivals of dispensing equipment makes instantaneous adhesives. Furthermore, none of these rivals sells straight to the customer either and uses suppliers for reaching out to customers. While we are looking at the strengths of Tire City Inc, it is crucial to highlight the business's weak points.

Although the business's sales staff is skilled in training distributors, the reality stays that the sales group is not trained in selling devices so there is a possibility of relying heavily on suppliers when promoting adhesive devices. Nevertheless, it needs to likewise be noted that the suppliers are showing reluctance when it comes to selling equipment that requires maintenance which increases the difficulties of offering devices under a particular brand name.

If we look at Tire City Inc line of product in adhesive equipment particularly, the company has products focused on the luxury of the marketplace. The possibility of sales cannibalization exists if Tire City Inc offers Case Study Help under the exact same portfolio. Given the truth that Case Study Help is priced lower than Tire City Inc high-end line of product, sales cannibalization would certainly be affecting Tire City Inc sales profits if the adhesive equipment is sold under the business's brand.

We can see sales cannibalization affecting Tire City Inc 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. If Case Study Help is launched under the company's brand name, there is another possible risk which could reduce Tire City Inc profits. The fact that $175000 has been spent in promoting SuperBonder suggests that it is not a great time for launching a dispenser which can highlight the truth that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the immediate adhesive.

In addition, if we look at the marketplace in general, the adhesives market does disappoint brand name orientation or rate consciousness which offers us two additional reasons for not releasing a low priced product under the business's brand.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Tire City Inc would be studied by means of Porter's five forces analysis which would highlight the degree of rivalry in the market.


Degree of Rivalry:

Presently we can see that the adhesive market has a high development potential due to the existence of fragmented sections with Tire City Inc taking pleasure in leadership and a combined market share of 75% with 2 other market gamers, Eastman and Permabond. While industry rivalry between these gamers could be called 'intense' as the consumer is not brand name conscious and each of these gamers has prominence in regards to market share, the truth still stays that the industry is not saturated and still has numerous market segments which can be targeted as potential niche markets even when launching an adhesive. However, we can even mention the reality that sales cannibalization might be leading to industry competition in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for instantaneous adhesives offers development potential.


Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the buyer in this industry is low especially as the buyer has low knowledge about the product. While companies like Tire City Inc have actually handled to train suppliers concerning adhesives, the last consumer is dependent on distributors. Approximately 72% of sales are made straight by makers and distributors for instantaneous adhesives so the purchaser has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Offered the reality that the adhesive market is dominated by 3 gamers, it could be said that the supplier enjoys a higher bargaining power compared to the purchaser. The reality remains that the provider does not have much influence over the purchaser at this point especially as the buyer does not reveal brand name recognition or rate level of sensitivity. This suggests that the distributor has the greater power when it comes to the adhesive market while the purchaser and the maker do not have a significant control over the real sales.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand name loyalty and the ease of entry revealed by foreign Japanese rivals in the instantaneous adhesive market suggests that the marketplace allows ease of entry. However, if we take a look at Tire City Inc in particular, the business has dual capabilities in regards to being a maker of adhesive dispensers and instant adhesives. Prospective risks in devices giving market are low which reveals the possibility of creating brand awareness in not only immediate adhesives however also in giving adhesives as none of the industry players has handled to place itself in double capabilities.

Risk of Substitutes: The hazard of substitutes in the instant adhesive market is low while the dispenser market in particular has substitutes like Glumetic pointer applicators, built-in applicators, pencil applicators and advanced consoles. The fact stays that if Tire City Inc presented Case Study Help, it would be delighting in sales cannibalization for its own items. (see appendix 1 for structure).


4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Tire City Inc Case Study Help


Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has actually offered different reasons for not introducing Case Study Help under Tire City Inc name, we have a suggested marketing mix for Case Study Help provided listed below if Tire City Inc decides to go ahead with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target market selected for Case Study Help is 'Motor vehicle services' for a number of factors. There are presently 89257 facilities in this sector and a high use of around 58900 pounds. is being used by 36.1 % of the marketplace. This market has an additional development potential of 10.1% which may be a good enough niche market segment for Case Study Help. Not only would a portable dispenser offer convenience to this specific market, the reality that the Do-it-Yourself market can likewise be targeted if a potable low priced adhesive is being cost usage with SuperBonder. The product would be sold without the 'glumetic pointer' and 'vari-drop' so that the consumer can choose whether he wants to opt for either of the two accessories or not.

Price: The suggested price of Case Study Help has been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is sold through suppliers or through direct selling. This rate would not consist of the cost of the 'vari idea' or the 'glumetic tip'. A price listed below $250 would not require approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at an automobile upkeep shop requires to acquire the product on his own. This would increase the possibility of influencing mechanics to purchase the product for usage in their daily upkeep tasks.

Tire City Inc would just be getting $157 per unit as displayed in appendix 2 which offers a breakdown of gross success and net success for Tire City Inc for launching Case Study Help.

Place: A circulation design where Tire City Inc straight sends out the product to the regional supplier and keeps a 10% drop delivery allowance for the distributor would be used by Tire City Inc. Given that the sales group is already engaged in offering instantaneous adhesives and they do not have expertise in offering dispensers, including them in the selling procedure would be pricey particularly as each sales call costs around $120. The suppliers are already offering dispensers so selling Case Study Help through them would be a favorable alternative.

Promotion: A low promotional budget ought to have been assigned to Case Study Help but the reality that the dispenser is a development and it requires to be marketed well in order to cover the capital costs incurred for production, the recommended marketing plan costing $51816 is recommended for initially introducing the product in the market. The prepared ads in publications would be targeted at mechanics in vehicle upkeep stores. (Suggested text for the advertisement is displayed in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summarized in appendix 4).


Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Tire City Inc Case Study Analysis

Although a suggested plan of action in the form of a marketing mix has been gone over for Case Study Help, the reality still remains that the product would not match Tire City Inc product line. We take a look at appendix 2, we can see how the overall gross profitability for the two models is expected to be approximately $49377 if 250 units of each model are produced annually as per the strategy. The initial planned marketing is around $52000 per year which would be putting a strain on the company's resources leaving Tire City Inc with a negative net income if the expenditures are assigned to Case Study Help just.

The reality that Tire City Inc has actually already incurred an initial financial investment of $48000 in the form of capital cost and model development suggests that the revenue from Case Study Help is insufficient to carry out the risk of sales cannibalization. Besides that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market showing low flexibility of need is not a more suitable option particularly of it is impacting the sale of the business's profits creating models.



PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE