WhatsApp

Tokyo Afm Case Study Help Checklist

Tokyo Afm Case Study Help Checklist

Tokyo Afm Case Study Solution
Tokyo Afm Case Study Help
Tokyo Afm Case Study Analysis



Analyses for Evaluating Tokyo Afm decision to launch Case Study Solution


The following area focuses on the of marketing for Tokyo Afm where the business's clients, rivals and core competencies have examined in order to justify whether the choice to introduce Case Study Help under Tokyo Afm trademark name would be a feasible choice or not. We have actually first of all looked at the kind of consumers that Tokyo Afm handle while an examination of the competitive environment and the company's strengths and weak points follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the validation for not introducing Case Study Help under Tokyo Afm name.
Tokyo Afm Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Both the groups use Tokyo Afm high performance adhesives while the business is not just involved in the production of these adhesives but also markets them to these consumer groups. We would be focusing on the customers of instantaneous adhesives for this analysis since the market for the latter has a lower potential for Tokyo Afm compared to that of instant adhesives.

The total market for instant adhesives is roughly 890,000 in the US in 1978 which covers both consumer groups which have been recognized earlier.If we look at a breakdown of Tokyo Afm prospective market or client groups, we can see that the company sells to OEMs (Initial Equipment Manufacturers), Do-it-Yourself customers, repair and overhauling companies (MRO) and makers dealing in products made from leather, metal, plastic and wood. This diversity in customers recommends that Tokyo Afm can target has different choices in terms of segmenting the marketplace for its brand-new product specifically as each of these groups would be needing the very same kind of product with particular changes in product packaging, need or amount. However, the consumer is not cost delicate or brand mindful so introducing a low priced dispenser under Tokyo Afm name is not an advised alternative.

Company Analysis

Tokyo Afm is not just a manufacturer of adhesives however delights in market leadership in the instantaneous adhesive market. The company has its own knowledgeable and qualified sales force which adds worth to sales by training the business's network of 250 suppliers for assisting in the sale of adhesives. Tokyo Afm believes in special distribution as indicated by the truth that it has actually picked to offer through 250 distributors whereas there is t a network of 10000 distributors that can be checked out for expanding reach by means of distributors. The company's reach is not restricted to The United States and Canada just as it also takes pleasure in international sales. With 1400 outlets spread out all across North America, Tokyo Afm has its internal production plants rather than using out-sourcing as the favored method.

Core competences are not limited to adhesive manufacturing only as Tokyo Afm also focuses on making adhesive dispensing equipment to assist in making use of its items. This dual production technique offers Tokyo Afm an edge over rivals given that none of the rivals of dispensing devices makes immediate adhesives. In addition, none of these rivals sells straight to the consumer either and makes use of distributors for reaching out to customers. While we are taking a look at the strengths of Tokyo Afm, it is very important to highlight the company's weaknesses also.

The company's sales staff is experienced in training distributors, the truth remains that the sales team is not trained in offering equipment so there is a possibility of relying heavily on suppliers when promoting adhesive devices. However, it should likewise be kept in mind that the suppliers are revealing unwillingness when it pertains to offering equipment that needs servicing which increases the challenges of offering devices under a specific brand name.

If we look at Tokyo Afm product line in adhesive devices particularly, the company has actually products focused on the high-end of the market. If Tokyo Afm offers Case Study Help under the same portfolio, the possibility of sales cannibalization exists. Provided the reality that Case Study Help is priced lower than Tokyo Afm high-end line of product, sales cannibalization would definitely be impacting Tokyo Afm sales income if the adhesive equipment is sold under the business's trademark name.

We can see sales cannibalization impacting Tokyo Afm 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. There is another possible danger which might lower Tokyo Afm income if Case Study Help is launched under the company's brand name. The reality that $175000 has been spent in promoting SuperBonder suggests that it is not a great time for launching a dispenser which can highlight the reality that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the instantaneous adhesive.

Furthermore, if we look at the marketplace in general, the adhesives market does disappoint brand name orientation or cost awareness which provides us two additional factors for not introducing a low priced item under the business's brand name.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Tokyo Afm would be studied by means of Porter's five forces analysis which would highlight the degree of competition in the market.


Degree of Rivalry:

Presently we can see that the adhesive market has a high development capacity due to the existence of fragmented segments with Tokyo Afm taking pleasure in leadership and a combined market share of 75% with 2 other industry players, Eastman and Permabond. While market competition in between these gamers could be called 'intense' as the consumer is not brand name conscious and each of these gamers has prominence in terms of market share, the fact still stays that the industry is not saturated and still has numerous market sectors which can be targeted as possible niche markets even when releasing an adhesive. We can even point out the fact that sales cannibalization may be leading to market competition in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for immediate adhesives provides growth capacity.


Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the buyer in this industry is low particularly as the purchaser has low knowledge about the item. While business like Tokyo Afm have managed to train suppliers concerning adhesives, the final customer depends on distributors. Approximately 72% of sales are made directly by producers and suppliers for instantaneous adhesives so the buyer has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Offered the truth that the adhesive market is controlled by 3 gamers, it could be said that the provider delights in a higher bargaining power compared to the purchaser. The truth remains that the provider does not have much influence over the buyer at this point particularly as the purchaser does not show brand recognition or rate level of sensitivity. This indicates that the distributor has the higher power when it comes to the adhesive market while the buyer and the manufacturer do not have a major control over the actual sales.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand name commitment and the ease of entry revealed by foreign Japanese competitors in the instant adhesive market shows that the market allows ease of entry. If we look at Tokyo Afm in specific, the company has dual capabilities in terms of being a producer of adhesive dispensers and instantaneous adhesives. Potential hazards in devices dispensing market are low which shows the possibility of producing brand name awareness in not just immediate adhesives however also in giving adhesives as none of the industry gamers has actually handled to position itself in double capabilities.

Risk of Substitutes: The hazard of replacements in the instant adhesive industry is low while the dispenser market in particular has replacements like Glumetic pointer applicators, built-in applicators, pencil applicators and advanced consoles. The fact stays that if Tokyo Afm introduced Case Study Help, it would be indulging in sales cannibalization for its own products. (see appendix 1 for structure).


4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Tokyo Afm Case Study Help


Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has actually offered various reasons for not launching Case Study Help under Tokyo Afm name, we have actually a recommended marketing mix for Case Study Help offered listed below if Tokyo Afm chooses to go ahead with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target market picked for Case Study Help is 'Motor automobile services' for a number of reasons. This market has an extra development capacity of 10.1% which may be an excellent sufficient niche market segment for Case Study Help. Not just would a portable dispenser offer convenience to this particular market, the reality that the Do-it-Yourself market can also be targeted if a safe and clean low priced adhesive is being sold for usage with SuperBonder.

Price: The recommended cost of Case Study Help has been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is offered through distributors or via direct selling. A rate below $250 would not need approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor car maintenance shop requires to acquire the product on his own.

Tokyo Afm would just be getting $157 per unit as displayed in appendix 2 which offers a breakdown of gross success and net success for Tokyo Afm for releasing Case Study Help.

Place: A distribution model where Tokyo Afm directly sends out the product to the regional supplier and keeps a 10% drop delivery allowance for the distributor would be used by Tokyo Afm. Because the sales team is currently engaged in offering instant adhesives and they do not have expertise in offering dispensers, including them in the selling process would be pricey particularly as each sales call expenses approximately $120. The suppliers are currently selling dispensers so selling Case Study Help through them would be a favorable choice.

Promotion: A low advertising budget plan should have been assigned to Case Study Help but the reality that the dispenser is an innovation and it requires to be marketed well in order to cover the capital expenses sustained for production, the recommended marketing strategy costing $51816 is suggested for at first presenting the product in the market. The prepared ads in magazines would be targeted at mechanics in car upkeep stores. (Suggested text for the ad is displayed in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summed up in appendix 4).


Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Tokyo Afm Case Study Analysis

Although a suggested strategy in the form of a marketing mix has been discussed for Case Study Help, the truth still remains that the item would not match Tokyo Afm line of product. We take a look at appendix 2, we can see how the overall gross success for the two models is anticipated to be around $49377 if 250 systems of each design are produced each year as per the plan. However, the initial prepared marketing is approximately $52000 each year which would be putting a strain on the business's resources leaving Tokyo Afm with a negative net income if the expenses are allocated to Case Study Help just.

The truth that Tokyo Afm has already incurred an initial financial investment of $48000 in the form of capital expense and prototype development indicates that the profits from Case Study Help is not enough to carry out the danger of sales cannibalization. Other than that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market revealing low elasticity of need is not a more suitable option especially of it is affecting the sale of the business's income generating designs.


 

PREVIOUS PAGE
NEXT PAGE