Tonka Corporation Case Study Help Checklist

Tonka Corporation Case Study Help Checklist

Tonka Corporation Case Study Solution
Tonka Corporation Case Study Help
Tonka Corporation Case Study Analysis

Analyses for Evaluating Tonka Corporation decision to launch Case Study Solution

The following section focuses on the of marketing for Tonka Corporation where the company's consumers, rivals and core proficiencies have evaluated in order to validate whether the decision to introduce Case Study Help under Tonka Corporation brand would be a practical choice or not. We have actually first of all looked at the kind of consumers that Tonka Corporation deals in while an examination of the competitive environment and the company's strengths and weak points follows. Embedded in the 3C analysis is the validation for not introducing Case Study Help under Tonka Corporation name.
Tonka Corporation Case Study Solution

Customer Analysis

Both the groups use Tonka Corporation high efficiency adhesives while the company is not just included in the production of these adhesives however likewise markets them to these customer groups. We would be focusing on the consumers of instant adhesives for this analysis considering that the market for the latter has a lower capacity for Tonka Corporation compared to that of instantaneous adhesives.

The total market for instant adhesives is roughly 890,000 in the United States in 1978 which covers both consumer groups which have actually been identified earlier.If we take a look at a breakdown of Tonka Corporation prospective market or client groups, we can see that the business offers to OEMs (Initial Devices Makers), Do-it-Yourself clients, repair and revamping companies (MRO) and producers dealing in products made of leather, plastic, metal and wood. This diversity in customers recommends that Tonka Corporation can target has different choices in terms of segmenting the marketplace for its new item specifically as each of these groups would be requiring the exact same type of item with particular modifications in demand, product packaging or quantity. However, the customer is not price sensitive or brand name mindful so launching a low priced dispenser under Tonka Corporation name is not an advised choice.

Company Analysis

Tonka Corporation is not just a producer of adhesives but delights in market leadership in the instant adhesive industry. The business has its own skilled and qualified sales force which includes worth to sales by training the company's network of 250 distributors for helping with the sale of adhesives. Tonka Corporation believes in special distribution as shown by the truth that it has selected to sell through 250 suppliers whereas there is t a network of 10000 suppliers that can be checked out for broadening reach by means of distributors. The business's reach is not restricted to North America only as it also enjoys worldwide sales. With 1400 outlets spread all throughout The United States and Canada, Tonka Corporation has its internal production plants rather than using out-sourcing as the preferred technique.

Core competences are not limited to adhesive manufacturing just as Tonka Corporation also focuses on making adhesive dispensing equipment to facilitate the use of its products. This dual production strategy offers Tonka Corporation an edge over rivals since none of the rivals of giving devices makes instant adhesives. Furthermore, none of these rivals sells straight to the customer either and utilizes suppliers for reaching out to clients. While we are looking at the strengths of Tonka Corporation, it is essential to highlight the company's weaknesses also.

The business's sales staff is experienced in training suppliers, the truth remains that the sales group is not trained in selling devices so there is a possibility of relying greatly on suppliers when promoting adhesive devices. It must also be noted that the distributors are showing hesitation when it comes to selling devices that requires servicing which increases the challenges of selling devices under a particular brand name.

If we look at Tonka Corporation line of product in adhesive devices especially, the business has products aimed at the luxury of the marketplace. If Tonka Corporation offers Case Study Help under the exact same portfolio, the possibility of sales cannibalization exists. Offered the reality that Case Study Help is priced lower than Tonka Corporation high-end product line, sales cannibalization would certainly be impacting Tonka Corporation sales earnings if the adhesive equipment is offered under the business's trademark name.

We can see sales cannibalization affecting Tonka Corporation 27A Pencil Applicator which is priced at $275. There is another possible hazard which might decrease Tonka Corporation income if Case Study Help is launched under the company's brand. The fact that $175000 has actually been spent in promoting SuperBonder recommends that it is not a great time for introducing a dispenser which can highlight the truth that SuperBonder can get logged and Case Study Help is the anti-clogging solution for the instantaneous adhesive.

Furthermore, if we take a look at the market in general, the adhesives market does disappoint brand orientation or price consciousness which gives us two additional reasons for not releasing a low priced product under the company's brand.

Competitor Analysis

The competitive environment of Tonka Corporation would be studied by means of Porter's 5 forces analysis which would highlight the degree of competition in the market.

Degree of Rivalry:

Presently we can see that the adhesive market has a high growth capacity due to the existence of fragmented sectors with Tonka Corporation delighting in management and a combined market share of 75% with two other industry gamers, Eastman and Permabond. While market rivalry between these gamers could be called 'extreme' as the consumer is not brand conscious and each of these gamers has prominence in regards to market share, the reality still stays that the industry is not saturated and still has several market sectors which can be targeted as prospective specific niche markets even when releasing an adhesive. We can even point out the reality that sales cannibalization might be leading to market competition in the adhesive dispenser market while the market for instant adhesives uses growth capacity.

Bargaining Power of Buyer: The Bargaining power of the purchaser in this industry is low particularly as the purchaser has low understanding about the product. While companies like Tonka Corporation have actually handled to train distributors regarding adhesives, the final customer is dependent on distributors. Around 72% of sales are made straight by makers and distributors for instantaneous adhesives so the purchaser has a low bargaining power.

Bargaining Power of Supplier: Offered the reality that the adhesive market is controlled by 3 players, it could be stated that the provider delights in a higher bargaining power compared to the buyer. The reality stays that the supplier does not have much influence over the purchaser at this point specifically as the buyer does not show brand name acknowledgment or rate sensitivity. When it comes to the adhesive market while the buyer and the manufacturer do not have a major control over the real sales, this shows that the distributor has the higher power.

Threat of new entrants: The competitive environment with its low brand commitment and the ease of entry revealed by foreign Japanese rivals in the instant adhesive market indicates that the marketplace permits ease of entry. Nevertheless, if we look at Tonka Corporation in particular, the company has double abilities in regards to being a manufacturer of immediate adhesives and adhesive dispensers. Potential hazards in equipment dispensing industry are low which reveals the possibility of developing brand awareness in not only instant adhesives but likewise in dispensing adhesives as none of the market gamers has actually handled to place itself in dual abilities.

Hazard of Substitutes: The danger of replacements in the immediate adhesive industry is low while the dispenser market in particular has replacements like Glumetic suggestion applicators, in-built applicators, pencil applicators and advanced consoles. The reality remains that if Tonka Corporation introduced Case Study Help, it would be indulging in sales cannibalization for its own products. (see appendix 1 for structure).

4 P Analysis: A suggested Marketing Mix for Case Study Help

Tonka Corporation Case Study Help

Despite the fact that our 3C analysis has given various factors for not introducing Case Study Help under Tonka Corporation name, we have a recommended marketing mix for Case Study Help given below if Tonka Corporation chooses to proceed with the launch.

Product & Target Market: The target market picked for Case Study Help is 'Automobile services' for a number of factors. There are presently 89257 establishments in this segment and a high usage of approximately 58900 lbs. is being utilized by 36.1 % of the market. This market has an additional growth potential of 10.1% which might be a good enough specific niche market segment for Case Study Help. Not just would a portable dispenser offer benefit to this specific market, the fact that the Diy market can likewise be targeted if a drinkable low priced adhesive is being sold for use with SuperBonder. The item would be offered without the 'glumetic pointer' and 'vari-drop' so that the customer can decide whether he wants to opt for either of the two accessories or not.

Price: The recommended cost of Case Study Help has actually been kept at $175 to the end user whether it is sold through suppliers or via direct selling. This price would not consist of the cost of the 'vari idea' or the 'glumetic idea'. A rate below $250 would not need approvals from the senior management in case a mechanic at a motor vehicle maintenance shop requires to purchase the product on his own. This would increase the possibility of affecting mechanics to buy the product for usage in their everyday maintenance jobs.

Tonka Corporation would just be getting $157 per unit as displayed in appendix 2 which provides a breakdown of gross profitability and net profitability for Tonka Corporation for introducing Case Study Help.

Place: A distribution design where Tonka Corporation straight sends the item to the local distributor and keeps a 10% drop delivery allowance for the distributor would be utilized by Tonka Corporation. Because the sales team is currently engaged in selling instant adhesives and they do not have knowledge in selling dispensers, including them in the selling procedure would be expensive especially as each sales call costs roughly $120. The suppliers are already offering dispensers so offering Case Study Help through them would be a beneficial alternative.

Promotion: Although a low promotional spending plan needs to have been designated to Case Study Help but the reality that the dispenser is a development and it needs to be marketed well in order to cover the capital costs sustained for production, the recommended advertising strategy costing $51816 is recommended for initially introducing the product in the market. The planned ads in magazines would be targeted at mechanics in vehicle maintenance stores. (Suggested text for the advertisement is shown in appendix 3 while the 4Ps are summarized in appendix 4).

Limitations: Arguments for forgoing the launch Case Study Analysis
Tonka Corporation Case Study Analysis

Although a recommended strategy in the form of a marketing mix has been talked about for Case Study Help, the truth still stays that the product would not complement Tonka Corporation line of product. We take a look at appendix 2, we can see how the overall gross success for the two models is expected to be around $49377 if 250 units of each design are produced each year based on the strategy. The initial planned advertising is roughly $52000 per year which would be putting a pressure on the company's resources leaving Tonka Corporation with a negative net income if the costs are allocated to Case Study Help only.

The reality that Tonka Corporation has already incurred a preliminary financial investment of $48000 in the form of capital cost and prototype development shows that the earnings from Case Study Help is insufficient to carry out the danger of sales cannibalization. Other than that, we can see that a low priced dispenser for a market showing low flexibility of demand is not a preferable choice especially of it is impacting the sale of the business's earnings producing designs.